A pan-cancer agent for screening, resection and wound monitoring via NIR and SWIR imaging

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3879635/v1

Download PDF

Article

A pan-cancer agent for screening, resection and wound monitoring via NIR and SWIR imaging

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3879635/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 09 Sep, 2024

Read the published version in Nature Biomedical Engineering →

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Fluorescence guided surgery (FGS) facilitates real time tumor delineation and is being rapidly established clinically. FGS efficacy is tied to the utilized dye and provided tumor contrast over healthy tissue. Apoptosis, a cancer hallmark, is a desirable target for tumor delineation. Here, we preclinically in vitro and in vivo, validate an apoptosis sensitive commercial carbocyanine dye (CJ215), with absorption and emission spectra suitable for near infrared (NIR, 650-900nm) and shortwave infrared (SWIR, 900-1700nm) fluorescence imaging (NIRFI, SWIRFI). High contrast SWIRFI for solid tumor delineation is demonstrated in multiple murine and human models including breast, prostate, colon, fibrosarcoma and intraperitoneal colorectal metastasis. Organ necropsy and imaging highlighted renal clearance of CJ215. SWIRFI and CJ215 delineated all tumors under ambient lighting with a tumor-to-muscle ratio up to 100 and tumor-to-liver ratio up to 18, from 24 to 168 h post intravenous injection with minimal uptake in healthy organs. Additionally, SWIRFI and CJ215 achieved non-contact quantifiable wound monitoring through commercial bandages. CJ215 provides tumor screening, guided resection, and wound healing assessment compatible with existing and emerging clinical solutions.

Health sciences/Health care

Physical sciences/Engineering/Biomedical engineering

Biological sciences/Cancer/Cancer imaging

Health sciences/Oncology/Surgical oncology

Physical sciences/Optics and photonics

Surgery is often the first and sometimes (ideally) the only treatment a cancer patient will undergo. Tumor surgery is evolving but relies on a surgeon’s ability to innately determine tumor from healthy tissue under visible light inspection. Fluorescence guided surgery (FGS) improves tumor identification and delineation by visualizing fluorescent dyes selectively accumulating in tumors. Fluorescence imaging and FGS are heavily used preclinically but not yet widely adopted clinically, with multiple barriers to be overcome by compounds and devices.¹ These limitations include the lack of required expertise in clinical domains and ultimately the need to prove utility to patient outcomes, despite the clinical dominance of optical techniques.² Targeted and passive fluorophore accumulation imaged via FGS can dramatically improve a surgeon’s capability to resect a tumor, aid in finding smaller lesions, identify lesions not detected by conventional methods, and locate lesions which move between pre-op scans and surgery (e.g. bowel-associated).^3,4 With the advent of various FGS-based systems, especially those within robotic guided surgery, dyes which can readily be adapted to current clinical workflows are of the utmost importance.¹ A tumor selective antibody conjugated to a fluorophore of choice (e.g., indocyanine green (ICG)) is the predominant approach for FGS, providing robust results, but is often only specific for a single-tumor type.^5-9 Therefore, a novel compound must be developed for each tumor type to be targeted, preclinically tested and then subject to clinical approval, in a time (over a decade) and financial (~$100-200 million) very costly process.^10,11 The “by the minute” charges for surgical room use (avg. USD$46.04/min in 2022) where FGS requires additional time further hinders translation, preventing preclinically validated fluorophores from having the highest possible impact.^3,12,13 FGS patients normally receive a single dose of the compound, and this (combined with the high costs of bringing such a compound to market) provides yet another barrier to translation.^10,14 To overcome this pan-tumor agents are the of some of the highest value in biomedical cancer research, not only for FGS, utilizing e.g., the known lower pH environment of most tumors.¹⁵

Another long-established hallmark of cancer is apoptosis where unregulated cell reproduction and growth results in cellular damage and death.^16-18 Cellular damage and apoptosis are highest within the core of a tumor, where hypoxia and reduced blood flow form a non-sustainable environment.^19,20 Efforts to clinically leverage this feature for FGS are overdue, with few promising preclinical results so far.^21-24 Current solutions have neither been clinically translated nor are they produced in larger quantities. There is a clear demand for a scalable solution which should be easy to use, handle, and administer. Additionally, a dye sensitive to apoptosis could potentially have minimal uptake and therefore background in healthy tissue, improving tumor delineation via clearance from non-cancerous (non-damaged) areas. This would inherently provide a pan-cancer targeting approach for numerous clinical applications, and potentially scenarios outside of tumor resection where apoptosis plays a role. Having multiple dye applications could offset current market barriers and improve patient outcomes.²⁵

In this work, we have investigated the potential for delineation of multiple solid tumors and monitoring of wound healing in vivo via a single NIR/SWIR-emitting small molecule dye, CJ215. CJ215 is a commercial, carbocyanine dye, with a molecular weight of ~1330g/mol and is inherently tumor targeting without antibody, peptide or ligand conjugation.²⁶ CJ215 has a strong NIR fluorescence band (absorbance from 795-820 and peak emission from 810-840 depending on solution), and like ICG, extends to the SWIR region, potentially useful for SWIRFI in clinical settings. We show cellular localization of CJ215 and its general in vivo tumor specificity. CJ215 was taken up and delineated multiple preclinical solid tumor lines including breast (4T1, murine derived), prostate (PC3-PSMA, human derived), colon (CT26, murine derived), fibrosarcoma (HT1080, human derived) and finally, intraperitoneal colorectal cancer (SW1222, human derived).^27-30 These models represent some of the most prevalent and fatal tumors, where surgery will be a primary a treatment option (with or without adjuvant chemo/radiation therapy).^31-35 CJ215 tumor uptake could be detected with both SWIRFI and NIRFI. SNR and CNR assessment with SWIRFI were performed during screening and resection at >900 nm (sensor response) for all tumor lines and additionally at >1100 and >1300 nm long pass cut offs (via long pass filters) for two tumor lines. Finally, apoptosis is also a known component of wound healing. We therefore evaluated CJ215 for quantitative non-contact and ambient light resistant longitudinal wound assessment through commercial bandages without removing them. CJ215 wound uptake and clearance was in agreement with reported healing timelines, with a repeat injection post healing not delineating the then healed wound.^36-38 This work establishes CJ215 not only as a pan cancer agent, which can delineate multiple solid tumors with a single systemic intravenous injection but also an agent with applications beyond tumor surgery. We further take advantage of the transparency of plastic compounds in the SWIR region to enable SWIRFI for wound assessment through bandages.³⁹ This work aids the establishment and translation of fluorescence for clinical domains, extending beyond FGS and into post-operative care.

Spectral characterization of CJ215: CJ215 is a small molecule carbocyanine dye with a molecular weight of approx. 1330g, Supp. 1. First, we profiled the spectral absorption of CJ125 and determined whether it had any SWIR emissive tail, as has been demonstrated for ICG and ICG conjugated cancer targeting probes, Fig. 1 A.^6,40,41 We found that CJ215 underwent a spectral red shifting similar to that seen with ICG when dissolved in fetal bovine serum (FBS), Fig. 1 A.⁴² This red shift in FBS was noted at a pH of 4, 6, 7.4, 8 and 10 with CJ215 being highly stable in FBS over 150 mins at all tested pHs, but degrading rapidly in dextrose at a pH of 4, Supp. 2. CJ215 underwent further red shifting when dissolved in human serum albumin (HSA), and FBS at a pH of 7.4, followed by a slow blue shift of ~5 nm in HSA and FBS over the course of 96h, Supp. 3. Little to no degradation (loss of absorption) of CJ215 was seen in both HSA and FBS. Although the NIR emission of the dye has been shown by the manufacturer, the SWIR emission and SWIRFI capability of the dye was yet unknown. To assess this, we dissolved CJ215 in dextrose, as well as pure or diluted (in PBS) defibrinated sheep’s blood to simulate human blood, Supp. 4. The peak absorption and emission of CJ215 red shifted by ~25nm in the presence of blood versus dextrose (794 to 818 and 813 to 838 nm, respectively) with SWIR emission extending to ~1550 nm, Fig. 1 B and Supp. 4. Additionally, the dye underwent an increase in fluorescence intensity when present in serum or blood across this spectrum, further enhancing its suitability for in vivo imaging.⁴³ We assessed the ability of SWIRFI to potentially improve tumor delineation through scattering media, by imaging CJ215 through 5 mm of chicken breast, Supp. 5. CJ215 was readily detected at 900 (InGaAs sensor response cutoff), 1000, 1100, 1200 and 1300 nm long pass cut offs (achieved via long pass optical filters) with delineation improving with extended (longer) wavelengths. This improvement is attributed to lower autofluorescence, insensitivity to excitation wavelength (808nm) and reduced stray photon scatter via increased water absorption in this realm of the spectrum, Supp. 5.^44,45

In vitro assessment: Following characterization of the spectrum of CJ215 we assessed the level of CJ215 uptake in vitro in both 4T1 (murine breast cancer) and HT1080 (human fibrosarcoma) cell lines. We first assessed the subcellular localization of the dye via NIR point scanning confocal microscopy. After 3hrs of incubation in 4T1 single cells and 3D spheroid structures, CJ215 was found to be localized to mobile vesicles inside both cells and spheroids, likely taken up via endocytosis Fig. 1 C, D. To further assess the uptake of CJ215, 4T1 cells were incubated with the dye for 3 hrs at either 4°C or 37°C. At 4°C endocytosis, as an energy-consuming process is impaired.⁴⁶ Indeed, CJ215 uptake was reduced by 39.1% in cells at 4°C, indicating that CJ215 is actively transported into cells, Fig. 1 E. We also assessed the effect of inducing apoptosis via staurosporine (Sta) on CJ215 uptake in HT-1080 (fibrosarcoma) cells. The addition of staurosporine (Sta), an apoptosis inducer, increased CJ215 cellular uptake by 99.3% compared with untreated control cells, while addition of z-VAD FMK, an inhibitor of Sta induced apoptosis, reduced that uptake by 48.8% (to 51.1%) compared to Sta alone, Fig. 1 F.⁴⁷ ICG incubation under comparative conditions did not yield any significant change in cellular uptake, Supp. 6. Finally, we found that serum-starved 4T1 cells had a 54.3% higher uptake of CJ215 than cells incubated in the presence of serum, as has been shown for other dyes, Supp. 7.^43,48 Following fixation with PFA, cells retained CJ215 fluorescence levels up to 9 days post fixation, Supp. 8.

In vivo screening: Having determined that induction of apoptosis increased cellular uptake of CJ215 and that the dye was predominantly taken up by cells via active transport, we next assessed CJ215’s capability for preclinical tumor screening across four tumor lines in vivo, in mice implanted with a single lesion site. With lower apoptosis levels found in healthy/normal tissues, we hypothesized that tumors would be the main site of CJ125 retention. We utilized a SWIRFI system equipped with an 808 nm laser (300 mW/cm²) to assess CJ215 uptake in male and female mice, across FoxN1^nu, SCID and BALB/c mouse lines under ambient lighting conditions.⁴¹ The tested tumor lines comprised xenografted mice bearing breast (4T1, murine, orthotopic), prostate (PC3-PSMA, human, heterotopic), HT1080 (fibrosarcoma, human, orthotopic) and CT26 (colon, murine, heterotopic) tumors, Fig. 1 G. All mice were imaged every 24 hr from 1 to 96 hrs and finally at 144 or 168 hrs post injection, Fig. 1 H. The SWIRFI system (>900nm, sensor response) enabled video rate (30 Hz) acquisitions under ambient lighting conditions and readily achieved sufficient SNR (>5dB) at all tested timepoints with exposure times as low as 1 ms, Fig. 1 H. In all cases the dye showed highly selective tumor uptake, with sufficient SNR achieved within 1 hr post injection. Contrast (CNR), the ability to delineate the tumor from healthy tissue achieved sufficient levels (>3dB, Rose criterion) from 24 to 168 hrs, with CNR increasing in all cases with elongated clearance time, Fig. 1 I.^49,50 Images from all mice at all timepoints are also presented, Supp. 9-12. All SWIRFI presented throughout this manuscript was performed with the ambient lighting LED on, at no detriment to image fidelity.⁴¹

Tumor resection: post-euthanasia tumor resection was confirmed in all mice using SWIRFI again under ambient lighting conditions. The assumed primary tumor was resected, and both the excised tumor and remaining tissue (i.e., the entire body) were placed side by side within the SWIRFI system, Fig 2 A. In all cases, the primary site contained enough fluorescence to delineate the tumor, while also confirming that the tumor bed was free of residual fluorescence. If suspected remnant tumor was left behind, as noted by highly fluorescent areas this was then resected. For all tested tumors the primary and potential secondary sites had sufficient SNR, Fig 2 B, for detection along with sufficient CNR, Fig. 2 C, to be delineated from the tumor bed site. Resection images for all mice and all tumors are also shown, Supp. 13-16.

Extended spectral emission of CJ215 assessment: The extended spectral emission of carbocyanine dyes into the SWIR spectrum, which only SWIRFI systems can detect, provides improvements in delineation and resolution, especially through scattering media.^44,51 We compared the extended spectral emission of CJ215 in HT1080 and CT26 tumor uptake at >900 (sensor response), >1100, and >1300 nm (via long pass optical filters). This was performed to assess increased resolution and penetration via water absorption, which begins to increase >1100 and further increases >1300 nm, Supp. 5.⁴⁵ In all cases CJ215 could be detected but as expected, required increasingly longer exposure times at longer wavelength cutoffs (1-2 ms for >900 nm, 100-200 ms for >1100nm and 500-1500ms for >1300nm cutoffs). Tumor SNR was sufficient at all timepoints, with CNR permitting tumor delineation for HT1080 tumors at 1 hr but not for the CT26 line, Supp. 17. Data combined from both lines, permitted a clearer SNR and CNR assessment and comparison between timepoints. The effect of these cutoffs for resection efficacy was also assessed in both primary sites and potential secondary locations, Fig. 3 A. In all cases, the >1300 nm cutoff provided the lowest SNR and CNR, with >1100 and >900 performing comparably Fig. 3 B,C. a similar trend was identified for screening, Supp. 17. However, the >1300 nm cutoff did improve delineation of the tumor core for both tested tumor lines, Fig. 3 A, E, F. We found dye localization and core delineation improved both qualitatively and quantitatively at extended wavelengths, most obviously at 1300nm, Fig 3 E, F. Using immunohistochemistry (IHC) for cleaved caspase 3 (CC3, a known apoptosis marker) we confirmed that the core of the tumors had the highest levels of apoptosis, with increased apoptosis observed throughout the tumor, Fig 3 G.⁵²

CJ215 biodistribution: Whilst SWIRFI is an emerging technique with advantages over established methods, due to the unavailability of imaging systems it remains a restricted resource to many researchers with even fewer clinical options. Additionally, the SWIRFI system employed here had a relatively small FOV, limiting simultaneous imaging of multiple organs. To highlight the suitability of CJ215 for conventional NIRFI, the IVIS Spectrum system (silicon based sensor) was utilized for biodistribution assessment.⁵³ Resected organs were imaged simultaneously with fluorescence levels then quantified to highlight the various tumor to organ ratios. In all cases, the tumor was always the brightest tissue, achieving tumor:muscle ratios up to 99.63, Fig. 4. For nearly all models, minimal to no remnant uptake was seen in healthy tissues, resulting in e.g., tumor:spleen ratios of up to 47.7 or tumor:liver of 17.86, Fig. 4. Residual fluorescence seen in the kidneys highlights the renal clearance of CJ215. Biodistribution from all tumors and all mice are shown along with corresponding H&E staining of select organs, Supp. 18-25. During the resection of CT26 tumors, additional fluorescence was determined deeper and in proximity to the resected tumor, Fig. 5 A. In two mice (M3, M4) additional areas of increased CJ215 fluorescence were identified below the resected tumor. These areas were also isolated (Fig. 5 B (ROI-2)) and sent with the primary tumor and select organs sent for histological analysis, Fig. 5 C, D, E. When compared with tumor tissue, these tissues had lower CJ215 uptake (but still elevated over other organs) and were found to be tumor free. These areas were identified as small intestine, lymph node, uterine and ovarian tissue with the additional focus in M3 containing a small tumor fragment. Further, IHC staining for cleaved caspase 3 (CC3) Fig. 5 D, an established marker for apoptosis, found increased levels of apoptosis in these tissues. As expected, CT26 primary tumor sites had highly elevated levels of CC3 positive cells, especially within the core of the tumor, Supp. 26. The additionally resected tissues which had increased CJ215 fluorescence also displayed increased levels of CC3 positive cells, Fig 5 E.⁵²

Contrast-based SWIRFI for binary tumor delineation: Having determined that simply letting CJ215 clear from healthy tissues improved tumor delineation, we utilized further image processing to improve tumor delineation. This was done with the goal of presenting a surgeon with an efficient method of image display when using CJ215, based upon their selection of a non-tumor background reference point. The entire process was completed using ImageJ with the chosen region recorded, the mean and SD of the ROI calculated, followed by respective framewise and pixelwise correction according to widely established CNR calculations, Eq.1. The resulting image is then displayed as a contrast-based image expressed in CNR (dB), dubbed “contrast mode”, Fig 6 A. SWIRFI and CJ215 CNR images can readily provide a surgeon with binary tumor delineation with a 3dB threshold (Rose criterion) found to be effective for all tested tumor lines as seen in Fig 6 B.

Assessment of CJ215 in a metastatic tumor model: The four previously four tumor models are readily and widely used for the assessment of tumor targeting of both fluorescent, radioactive, and treatment agents. However, these models represent a single tumor location near the skin surface, where CJ215 could be readily visualized. One significantly more challenging location and urgent clinical problem is the surgical removal of peritoneal carcinomatosis.^54,55 SW1222 tumors are a human derived colorectal carcinoma tumor line which is highly aggressive and spreads throughout the peritoneal space. This heavily invasive and often palliative surgery requires organ removal during surgery whilst the body cavity is inspected via white light investigation for remnant tumor and would benefit significantly from a suitable targeted dye for FGS. This model of metastatic peritoneal spread consisted of SW1222 luciferase expressing patient-derived colorectal cancer cells injected intraperitoneally.⁵⁵ Once sufficient tumor burden was confirmed using luciferase imaging, animals were administered CJ215 as before. SWIRFI was performed at >900, >1100 and >1300 nm cut offs to assess tumor screening. Tumor visualization of the SW1222 model without prior knowledge of lesion location was initially difficult to distinguish over endogenous colon signal, Fig. 7 A, B, C Supp. 27. As before, necropsy biodistribution was performed with NIRFI at 168 hrs post injection, Fig. 7 D, Supp. 28. We found that tumors were widely dispersed throughout the peritoneum were highly necrotic (essentially dead tissue), with patchy fluorescence seen across identified tumors, Fig. 7 B, C. In all mice, highly fluorescent lesions were seen adjacent to the spleen often engulfing the pancreas (Splenic Tum.), Fig. 7 D and were confirmed to be tumorous via H&E staining, Fig. 7 E, Supp. 29. Highly necrotic tumors still achieved a tumor:muscle ratio of 7.89, Fig. 7 D. Splenic tumors had an improved tumor:muscle ratio of 10.38 and 8.80 over the spleen itself Fig. 7 D, appearing less necrotic (H&E staining, Fig. 7 E), highlighting the ability of CJ215 to delineate organ bound tumor masses and uptake in viable tumors.

Wound monitoring: During hair depilation in the CT26 model slight skin surface damage was inadvertently caused which then proceeded to form scabs and heal over time. We incidentally noticed high levels of CJ215 uptake in these areas, along with tumor uptake, Supp. 30. Over the 168hr imaging period, the wound fluorescence decreased with progressing wound healing but remained unchanged in the tumor. Spurred on by this finding, we assessed the ability of SWIRFI to image CJ215 through a variety of commercially available bandages, Supp. 31. SWIRFI readily detected CJ215 through all tested bandages, the majority of which were opaque in visible light. Encouraged by this observation, we next implemented a controlled wound monitoring experiment where mice underwent a skin incision with a scalpel, followed by absorbable stitch closing, and were intravenously administered CJ215. Hydrogel burn bandages were placed over the wound during imaging as they provided a non-stick barrier at the wound site, are highly scattering, hindering visible light wound inspection, and provided suitable intensity losses and SNR changes in phantom testing, Supp. 31. Mice were imaged at >900, >1100 and >1300 nm with and without a bandage from 2 to 240 hrs (10 days) post-surgery and CJ215 injection, Fig. 8 A, B and Supp. 32-35. The bandage was only placed on mice during imaging and was removed before they awoke to prevent discomfort to mice, inadvertent bandage consumption, or bandage degradation. We found that after a single injection of CJ215 the intensity of dye uptake corresponded with wound healing progression, using CNR as a metric for wound assessment, with >1300 nm providing the best wound CNR, along with the wound being readily delineated through the bandage during the main healing phase, Fig. 8 C. The reduction in signal by the bandage prevented reliable wound delineation at 168 hrs and onwards. Wound CNR was detectible from 1-2 hours post injection, highlighting the quick uptake and targeting to wounds of CJ215. CNR peaked 48 hrs post injection then dropped over time until the wound was no longer detectible i.e., completely healed, with longer exposure times utilized between 72 & 240 hrs post injection to ensure sufficient signal collection. CNR was found to provide a quantitative metric for wound healing assessment in line with visible light inspection of wound healing but, importantly, also useable when removal of wound dressing is detrimental to the patient. To confirm lack of wound uptake once healed, mice then received a second injection of CJ215 and were imaged every 24 hrs from 1 to 48 hrs post injection. As opposed to right after the initial surgery, sufficient contrast could not be detected within the now healed wound region in all mice, with necropsy based biodistribution showing no significant difference in fluorescence intensity in the wound area versus normal skin, Supp. 36. H&E further confirmed the normal physiology of the wound area, Supp. 37.

In this work, we have validated the use of the commercial carbocyanine dye, CJ215, for tumor delineation in preclinical cancer models as well as monitoring of naïve and dressed wounds. CJ215 fulfills many requirements for clinical translation and importantly, is optically like ICG and therefore compatible with the wide array of already existing clinical FGS systems, Fig 1 A. CJ215 can take advantage of the reduced optical tissue scatter and absorption in the NIR, which aside from FDA approval, attributes the dominance of ICG. Furthermore, CJ215 has a strong SWIR emission tail, Fig 1 B, which provides advantages over NIR and visible emission ranges.⁴⁴ We set out to elucidate the potential tumor targeting capability of CJ215 by assessing its uptake in vitro. CJ215 appeared to be endocytosed and spread across multiple mobile vesicles within 4T1 single cells and spheroids, Fig 1 C, D, Supp. Videos 1, 2. CJ215 uptake is increased in cells which are actively metabolic, as shown by the incubation at 4° vs 37°C , Fig 1 E. We show that induction of apoptosis (cell death) with staurosporine doubled cellular uptake of CJ215 in HT1080 cells, while apoptosis inhibition tempered this uptake, indicating that the dye is more readily taken up by apoptotic cells Fig 1 F.⁴⁷ Notably, in the presence of FBS (serum) cellular uptake of CJ215 was reduced by over 50%, Supp. 7, with CJ215 found to be stable (still fluorescent) in formaldehyde over the course of days, Supp. 8.

CJ215 showed excellent uptake in a variety of tumor models in vivo, representing some of the most prevalent cancers including breast (4T1), prostate (PC3-PSMA), fibrosarcoma (HT1080) and colon (CT26), Fig 1 G. High uptake was seen in all models across multiple mouse lines, both in male and female mice, with human and murine derived tumors in various orthotopic and heterotopic locations, Fig 1 G. Our previously established ambient light resistant SWIRFI method and CJ215 could delineate tumors within 1 hr post injection, with highly conclusive delineation at 24 to 168 hrs, Fig. 1 H, I.⁴¹ Tumor contrast steadily increased over time, in line with previous investigations with other carbocyanine based probes, Fig 1 I.⁴¹ Tumor resection performed on euthanized mice found that SWIRFI with CJ215 enabled confirmation of tumor resection, identification of remnant tumor, and highlighted other suspect regions with the tumor site always having the brightest fluorescence, Fig 2.

SWIRFI enabled investigation of the extended spectral emission of CJ215 which current silicon based sensors cannot detect, Supp 5.^6,40,51 We assessed the reduction in photon scatter of CJ215 by increased water absorption at >1100 and >1300 nm long pass cutoffs to improve tumor CNR, Fig 3. For both screening and resection these wavelengths ultimately did not provide a major advantage in tumor delineation, due to the high tumor uptake of CJ215 and at the cost of non-video rate imaging, Fig 3 B-D. However, the >1300nm cutoff provided both qualitative and quantitative non-destructive insight to CJ215 distribution within the tumor core, highlighting tumor heterogeneity, Fig 3 E, F. This core uptake was reflected in CC3 (apoptosis) staining via IHC, confirming the observations made via SWIRFI, Fig 3 E, G.

SWIRFI has optical benefits but remains a novel and often inaccessible tool due to limited access to suitable imaging equipment. The utilized SWIRFI system has a reduced FOV (a single mouse), making multiple organ comparisons cumbersome. We performed NIRFI necropsy biodistribution post resection on an IVIS system with a larger FOV (up to 5 mice), further confirming both CJ215 tumor localization and suitability for NIRFI, Fig 4. Tumors had the brightest fluorescence in all experiments with non-tumor bearing organs having minimal residual dye uptake. This biodistribution enabled un precedented tumor:muscle ratios of up to 100 where anything above 2 or even 1.5 is considered successful, Fig 4.⁵⁶ Furthermore, CJ215 cleared from vital organs such as the liver, spleen and pancreas enabling tumor:organ ratios in the mid 40s, Fig 4. Although not present in these single site models, this highlights that CJ215 has the potential to delineate various organ metastases with high contrast for improved delineation. Importantly, these ratios were achieved by simply allowing CJ215 to clear from healthy tissue after a single systemic intravenous injection. CJ215 cleared renally as highlighted by the retained kidney fluorescence, in stark comparison to other dyes or nanoparticle-based approaches where liver clearance can be a predominant factor, Fig 4.^15,57-59 Select organs from these mice were assessed via histopathology (H&E staining), confirming tumor tissue from healthy organs, and assessing additionally resected regions. All suspected tumor regions were confirmed to be tumorous via H&E staining.

During CT26 resection and necropsy, additional areas aside from the primary tumor demonstrated elevated organ:muscle ratios, Fig 5 A, B. These regions were confirmed to be lymph node, uterine, ovarian, colon as well as a single tumor site, Fig 5 C. IHC for CC3 (apoptosis marker) was performed on these tissues, highlighting their increased apoptotic levels, Fig 5 D. This also confirmed the highly apoptotic core seen at the center of tumors, where CJ215 uptake had been brightest, Fig 3 G, Supp. Fig 26. The exact cause of cellular damage and apoptosis in these regions is unclear, however they were predominantly near the primary tumor site and may have been compressed as it proliferated, causing cell stress and apoptosis.

Confirmation of the high tumor uptake, seen during SWIRFI screening, spurred us to present images in a way that would be most useful for FGS. Image presentation during surgery is an integral component of FGS when assessing novel systems and probes, and ultimately is where impact and utility of the approach are determined.⁶⁰ Sufficient SNR was always achieved with SWIRFI, the main tumor delineation factor was concluded to be contrast (CNR), as expected, Fig 2 H, I. Here, we present video rate images in a contrast mode where the user selects a non-tumorous background reference point, Fig 6 A. A custom script in ImageJ facilitated this, across SWIRFI videos at >900 nm and achieved pixelwise image correction at a rate of ~40 ms per image, Fig 6 B, Supp. Video 3. The 3dB threshold was found to be successful in highlighting tumor areas for all lines, fulfilling the Rose criterion.^49,50 Additionally, the conversion of images from a linear to a logarithmic scale counteracted the high tumor core uptake of CJ215 easing entire tumor delineation, Fig 6 B CT26 model. This method enables binary tumor delineation, on the fly for FGS and can be readily implemented by other researchers and for other probes. Graphics processing unit (GPU) implementation (outside the scope of this work, but possible with ImageJ) could decrease image processing time to enable real-time visualization (assuming image handoff from memory to GPU is efficient) during FGS as opposed to in post processing with few ms acquisition times.⁶¹

With the success and high tumor localization of CJ215 in single site tumor models, we then assessed its potential in a more challenging way. The SW1222 cell line is a human derived, highly aggressive, and metastatic tumor model which spreads throughout the peritoneal space. Current clinical treatment includes surgical removal, where white light visual inspection is utilized in a highly invasive surgery. This procedure comprises organ repositioning with peritoneal inspection and often fails to detect and remove all lesions. CJ215 was assessed in one such model where mice received SW1222 cells injected intraperitoneally, Fig 7 A.⁵⁵ Tumor growth was confirmed with luciferase, but SWIRFI and CJ215 (even at extended wavelengths e.g., >1300nm) did not conclusively delineate tumors through the peritoneum, Fig 7 A, Supp. Fig 22. At 168 hrs post injection, SWIRFI resection was attempted with tumors being identified as solid, black necrotic tissue (likely dead), widely dispersed throughout the peritoneum, and bound to the intestines and spleen, Fig 7 B. NIRFI confirmed lower tumor uptake in the most necrotic tissues but did highlight large lesions spread around the spleen and pancreas, which could be readily delineated, Fig 7 B, Supp. Fig 23. Even though less successful than single site models, CJ215 achieved tumor:muscle ratios of up to 10 within these tumors with an uneven distribution across highly necrotic areas, Fig 7 C. Due to the rapid growth of these tumors and their widespread dispersion, they lacked viable vascular networks within necrotic tissue at the injection timepoint. The non-existent metabolic activity, and poor blood delivery in dead and pervasively necrotic tissue hinders CJ215 delivery and therefore uptake in such lesions, Fig 7 B, Supp. Fig 24.⁶² This is further highlighted by the high presence of disrupted blood vessels and necrotic tissue morphology in H&E staining of main tumors, versus the more viable and less necrotic splenic/pancreatic tumors which presented higher tumor:muscle ratios.

Hair depilation during CT26 tumor imaging inflicted minor wounds. These wounds showed high CJ215 uptake, with CJ215 clearing from them over time as they healed but remaining in the adjacent tumor, Supp. Fig 30. This feature of CJ215 uptake is reminiscent of previous descriptions of tumors being wounds which do not heal.⁶³ SWIR imaging is commonly used in industrial settings to detect e.g., liquids through substances which are opaque in the visible spectrum and therefore also opaque to the human eye.³⁹ We combined this aspect of SWIR sensors with SWIRFI to detect CJ215 through a variety of commercial bandages in phantoms, Supp. Fig 31. Hydrogel bandages, used in burn wound healing, were chosen to track wound healing in mice post a controlled incision, Fig 8 A, B, Supp. Video 4.^64,65 Similar to tumor delineation, CNR could be inversely used to elucidate wound healing progression completely non-invasively after a single systemic injection of CJ215, Fig 8 C. CNR increased up to 48hrs post injection and then decreased as wounds healed in line with visible inspection (without bandages) with the >1300nm cutoff providing the highest CNR, albeit not video rate, Fig 8 C, Supp. Fig 32-35. Having completely healed and following a second injection of CJ215, the wound area showed only minimal uptake, found to be in line with non-injured skin, Supp. Fig 36. These mice also provided further biodistribution data of CJ215 in non-tumor bearing conditions, confirming the renal clearance as seen at later timepoints and again the lack of uptake in other organs, Supp. Fig 37. This aspect of CJ215 and SWIRFI provide an objective, rapid (seconds), and quantitative solution in chronic wound monitoring with potential clinical applications in e.g., diabetic and burn wound victims.⁶⁶ This will be especially useful where bandage removal may cause pain to victims or pose a risk of infection.⁶⁴ Based on these experiments a patient (even those not undergoing tumor resection) could receive a single injection of CJ215 upon surgery completion with wound healing tracked for days during post-operative care. SWIRFI and CJ215 can readily visualize bandage covered wounds under ambient lighting conditions providing an additional application of clinical fluorescence imaging, not limited to only tumor resection.

Throughout this work we have shown that CJ215 is highly tumor selective with excellent clearance from healthy organs. This clearance further aids tumor delineation and even enabled the detection of tumors on or close to non-affected organs. CJ215 displayed notable spectral changes when dissolved in FBS, HSA or blood compared to dextrose eluding to that in vivo, CJ215 is binding to serum and other components of blood. This is evidenced by the shift in absorption peak of CJ215 in dextrose, HSA, FBS and blood (795, 805, 810 and 818nm, respectively Supp. Fig 2-4), with each solution presenting an increasingly convoluted environment and more components for CJ215 to bind to, more akin to in vivo settings. Importantly following an initial red spectral shift, CJ215 underwent a blue shift over the course of days (~5-10nm) potentially forming a covalent adduct with albumin and blood components, as shown for other carbocyanine dyes.^43,48 In comparison to previous work, CJ215 contains a methoxy group on the cyclohexenyl ring at the center of the heptamethine bridge as opposed to a chloride group along with some other subtle chemical differences.⁴³ This methoxy group and likely CJ215 as a whole is less reactive than a carbocyanine dye with a chloride group at the same location, explaining the slow blue shift (days) in the presence of blood components. Based on the biodistribution with renal clearance and in vitro experimentation, CJ215 is likely binding to blood components in vivo which are then preferentially taken up by apoptotic and stressed cells including tumors and wound healing areas.⁴⁸ This is further confirmed by the serum free in vitro experiments and biodistribution similarity to radiolabeled albumin, with protein catabolism by tumors and wound healing being a predominant driver of uptake.^43,67

One limitation of CJ125 is that based on our experimentation, CJ215 will likely not be of use in highly advanced and necrotic (dead) tumor tissue with poor vasculature as shown in the SW1222 model. However, surgery would not be performed at this level of tumor burden. This is unlike the tested single site tumor models, where CJ215 is readily delivered via the blood stream and vasculature, dispersed throughout the tumor itself and then trapped within highly apoptotic cores. Nevertheless, the SW1222 model did validate the ability of CJ215 to delineate peritoneal metastasis in multiple dispersed lesions. Due to the ability of CJ215 to highlight and be retained in apoptotic tissue, CJ215 may not be suitable for FGS in patients which have already received e.g., adjuvant chemotherapeutics which are known to cause off target cell death.⁶⁸ This would likely increase non-tumorous background uptake, potentially reducing tumor CNR or leading to false positives as seen in the CT26 model, however, uptake in the tumor could be increased as well. Conversely, due to the low uptake in healthy tissue and established biodistribution seen here, CJ215 could be used to study these affects and the organ protection provided by co-administered compounds. Fortunately, surgery is often the first treatment for most solid tumors, highlighting the suitability of CJ215 for tumor FGS within current surgical guidelines. Whilst toxicology has not yet been confirmed, no adverse events were reported in any of the mice used herein with all mice surviving the injections and main organs appearing histologically normal. Repeated injections also caused no issue and as CJ215 is renally cleared, it may reduce potential liver toxicity.

In summary, CJ215 provides a unique dye for tumor and wound monitoring through binding to mostly apoptotic cells, enabling delineation of various tumors in murine models (all tested models have been included and we have yet to find a solid model which CJ215 does not delineate) and quantitative wound monitoring. These aspects position CJ215 as a pan cancer agent, with high tumor selectivity for multiple applications reducing the often-limiting factor of FDA approval pipeline costs and bridging the “valley” between preclinical and clinical translation. Finally, CJ215 is a commercial product facilitating rapid replication of these results and further investigation by any researcher with a suitable device e.g., IVIS. This is in stark comparison to the burden shouldered by academic labs where mass production of custom compounds is often unachievable and not a focus.

Acknowledgments: We would particularly like to thank Stanislas Urbain and François Scherninski from Proimaging, Paris, France, for helpful advice and discussions and for providing CJ215 for this investigation. We also thank the small animal imaging core at MSKCC for their assistance as well as RARC at MSKCC for advice on animal experiments and excellent animal assistance, especially Amanda Ritter and Eric Soto-Lemus. Sincere thanks go to Ning Fan of the Molecular Cytology Core Facility at MSKCC and Ileana Miranda of the Laboratory of Comparative Pathology at MSKCC. We would like to thank Eric Chan, Eric Rosiek & Yevgeniy Romin for of the Molecular Cytology core at MSKCC for microscopy assistance.

Disclosures: D.A.H. is a co-founder and officer with equity interest in Lime Therapeutics, Inc., and co-founder with equity interest in Selectin Therapeutics Inc., and Resident Diagnostics, Inc., and a member of the scientific advisory board of Concarlo Therapeutics, Inc., Nanorobotics Inc., and Mediphage Bioceuticals, Inc. The remaining authors declare no competing interests. CJ215 was a gift from Proimaging who did not sponsor this research aside from providing CJ215.

Data Availability: All data and code required used throughout this manuscript is available from the corresponding authors upon request. Note, all code to process images was peformed in ImageJ via already available plug-ins.

Funding: Support for this work was possible thanks to:

The NIH (R56 EB030512, J.G.), the National Science Foundation CAREER Award (1752506, D.A.H.), the NCI (R01-CA215719, D.A.H. and Cancer Center Support Grant P30-CA008748, Selwyn Vickers/MSKCC), the NIBIB (R01-EB033651, D.A.H., R00-EB033580 to M.K.), the American Cancer Society Research Scholar Grant (GC230452, D.A.H.), the Louis and Rachel Rudin Foundation (D.A.H.), the Experimental Therapeutics Center of MSKCC (D.A.H.), Mr. William H. Goodwin and Mrs. Alice Goodwin and the Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research (D.A.H.) This work has been partially funded by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center’s Technology Development Funding Program, flexTDF (D.V.).

Spectral Analysis:

CJ215 (Proimaging, Paris, France) absorption spectra were determined after dissolving in either dextrose (5% Dextrose Inj. USP, 100/150 mL PAB®, NDC 0264-1510-32, Braun Medical, USA), fetal bovine serum (FBS) at varying dye concentrations between 0.2 and 20 µM was assessed using an ultraviolet-visible/NIR spectrometer (Jasco V-780, Jasco Inc., USA) 100 µL cuvettes using a dye free vehicle sample for correction, with readings displayed in optical density (OD). Extended SWIR tail emission was recorded using the same solutions on a 96 well optical plate (UV Half Area Plate, 3679, Corning, USA) with a custom SWIR fluorescence spectrometer, as previously described.⁴¹ Briefly an 808nm laser excitation source, inverted microscope (IX-71 microscope, Olympus, USA) and 20x SWIR lens (Olympus, USA) were used to collect spectra, with intensity artefacts corrected appropriately. Dextrose, FBS, HSA (human serum albumin, H6914-20ML, MilliporeSigma, USA) or defibrinated sheep’s blood (R54004, ThermoFisher Scientific, USA) were used to assess the spectral absorption and emission shift of CJ215 in solution over time, measured on a microplate (Corning® UV-Transparent Microplates, CLS3679, MilliporeSigma, USA) on an automated plate reader (SpectraMax ID5, Molecular Devices, USA). Solutions were incubated in either 1.5 ml Eppendorfs or 15 ml tubes at 37°C at 300 RPM (Thermomixer R, Eppendorf, USA).

In vitro assessment:

4T1 (ATCC® CRL-2539) cells were cultured in RPMI media (supplemented with Pen-Strep and FBS) until confluent in 6 well plastic poly-d-lysine coated plates with an embedded glass cover slip (P06G-1.5-10-F, MatTek, USA). In these conditions 4T1 cells formed a mix of single cells and spheroid aggregations. Cells were washed once with fresh medium, then incubated (incubator, 37°C, 5% CO₂) with CJ215 (suspended in cell culture medium) for 3 hrs at a concentration of 0.645 mM. 1 µl of stock DAPI solution (62248, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was added to each well at 2hrs 40 mins into CJ215 incubation. At 3hrs well media was aspirated, cells washed once with fresh medium and then 1 ml of medium was added to each well. Point scanning confocal microscopy was then performed (STELLARIS 8, Leica, USA) within an hour, recording various images (stacks, videos) with appropriate DAPI, CJ215 and polarized white light settings. Images were imported into ImageJ, split by color with gaussian blur (sigma = 1) applied to DAPI and CJ215 channels followed by contrast adjustment for easier visualization prior to remerging the channels.

Active transport was assessed also using 4T1 cells incubated in pre-coated plastic 6 well plates (no glass coverslip). Cells were washed once and then placed into either a fridge or incubator for 10 mins prior to incubation with CJ215 as performed for confocal imaging. CJ215 uptake was assessed using the 700 and 800 channels on an Odyssey CLx, with image analysis performed on .tiff images consisting of determining the mean fluorescence within each well (Fiji/ImageJ).⁶⁹ HT1080 (ATCC® CCL-121™) cells (75,000 cells/well) were seeded on a 24 well plate with 500 µL of cell medium (DMEM, with Pen-Strep and 10% FBS). After 24 hours, the cells had attached to the plate surface and Staurosporine was added to the wells with a final concentration of 2 µM Staurosporine. The cells were incubated with Staurosporine for 18 hours. 5 µL CJ215 stock solution (0.5 mg/mL) was mixed with 1.2 mL media and 50 µL dye-media mix was added to each well. Dye was incubated with the cells for an additional 6 hours, then cells were washed with PBS once. The plate was imaged and quantified as before (Odyssey CLx and Fiji/ImageJ). Serum free and serum uptake of CJ215 was assessed with 4T1 cells plated on 6 well plates, as before. Cells were starved in serum free conditions (cell medium without FBS) for 3 hours prior to addition of and incubation with CJ215, also as before. Cells were washed once with respective media and then fixed and imaged in 1 ml of formaldehyde solution (formaldehyde solution 4%, microscopy grade, 1.00496.5000, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and imaged as before (Odyssey CLx). Formaldehyde stability of CJ215 was assessed with the same cells stored at 4°C for up to 9 days post fixation, again imaged as before.

In vivo experimentation:

Single tumor model sites were generated with multiple cells, mouse lines and sexes. In brief, 3.0x10⁵ 4T1 cells suspended in 30µL of Matrigel were injected into the mammary pad of female FoxN1^nu mice. 5x10⁶ PC3 cells expressing human prostate specific membrane antigen (PC3-PSMA) suspended in 50µL of PBS were subcutaneously injected into the flank of male NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid/J mice. 5x10⁶ HT1080 cells suspended in 100µL of 50:50 Matrigel and PBS were subcutaneously injected into the flank, at the top of the leg in female FoxN1^nu mice. 2x10⁶ CT26 cells suspended in PBS were subcutaneously injected into the flank of female BALB/cAnN mice. Mice were utilized at various ages, with tumors allowed to proliferate until tumors at various sizes could be visually determined, approx. >50 mm³. 5.0x10⁶SW1222 cells expressing luciferase suspended in 100 µl of cell medium were intraperitoneally injected into female FoxN1^nu mice, sporadically forming tumor lesions, and assessed using luciferin. Female FoxN1^numice (bearing no tumors) were also used for wound healing experiments.

In all cases mice received a 2mg/kg intravenous injection of CJ215 suspended in clinical grade dextrose. Upon receipt of CJ215 it was suspended in dextrose, aliquoted into glass dram vials and lyophilized for storage at -20°C. Injection solutions were prepared within 1 hr prior to administration, with solutions appearing dark green. The dye did not form any noticeable clumps, could be readily resuspended in dextrose simply using a pipette and animal injections went smoothly. CJ215 was not handled in any overly restrictive or particular manner and no adverse event was noticed post dye injection. All mouse handling, experimentation, imaging, and housing was performed according to NIH guidelines and via approved IACUC protocols at MSKCC. Mice received food and water ad libitum, under a 12 hr on/off light cycle, 5 mice per cage with food. FoxN1^nu mice used in tumor experiments were fed either a solid amoxicillin or Sulfatrim based diet to counteract skin infections. SW1222 and wound healing mice were placed on a low autofluorescence diet to counteract observed intestinal signals, with wound healing mice receiving Sulfatrim water to counteract skin infections. Surgery was performed on mice in line with preapproved protocols with mice having anesthesia induced at 3% v/v followed by maintenance at 1-2% v/v in oxygen and placement on a heating pad. Prior to surgery the mice received subcutaneously received buprenorphine (0.5 mg/kg) and meloxicam (2mg/kg) with bupivacaine (0.1cc) administered at the incision site for numbing. The surgical field was cleaned for surgery using sets of alternating scrubs, (alternating either povidine-iodine (Betadine), chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol). All surgical instruments were sterilized by steam sterilization and using a glass bead sterilizer between animals. A scalpel was used to create a ~1cm incision with wound sealing performed with monofilament absorbable suture (monocryl). Mice were monitored post recovery every 24hrs and received meloxicam (2mg/kg) subcutaneously for up to 72hrs post-surgery.

Tumor resection was only performed on mice which had been euthanized via CO₂ inhalation, in line with approved protocols. Following this the tumor was resected under white light visualization with resection confirmed using SWIRFI. Necropsy biodistribution was assessed by isolating the following organs: tumor or wound site, liver, kidneys, lungs, brain, spleen, pancreas, stomach, small and large intestines, skin, bone, muscle, and heart.

SWIRFI and NIRFI:

Ambient light resistant SWIRFI was performed as previously described.⁴¹ In brief, a hyperspectral SWIR system (IR-VIVO, Photon etc., Canada) equipped with an 808 nm laser (~300 mW/cm²) for dye excitation, a 940 nm LED for SWIR white light (reflectance imaging) and an RGB LED was used for SWIRFI. The ambient lighting LED was on for all SWIRFI images presented throughout this manuscript. Extended emission imaging was achieved using suitable long pass optical filters (Thorlabs, NJ, USA) mounted in front of the lens of the system in a custom mount. Exposure times ranged from 1-1500 ms with data stored in a .h5 format. Images were converted to tiff files with corrections then performed in Fiji/ImageJ as before including dark noise subtraction, outlier removal, and cropping.⁴¹ Defined ROIs were used to assess brightness, SNR and CNR, also as previously described.⁴¹ NIRFI for biodistribution was performed using an IVIS Spectrum (PerkinElmer, USA) with ICG based filter sets (745 excitation and 840 nm emission), at exposure times of 5-20s, high lamp, f# of 1 and small binning. Organ quantification was performed in ImageJ/Fiji with ROIs drawn across each organ in the raw luminescent tiff file exported from the IVIS. This system was also used for luciferase imaging of SW1222 mice in bioluminescence mode. For all live animal imaging, mice were anaesthetized using isoflurane inhalation at an induction of 3% v/v and maintenance of 1-2% v/v in O₂ and were placed on a heating pad during imaging.

Histological Assessment:

Paraffin embedded organs (tumor or wound, liver, kidney, spleen, and muscle) were prepared as previously described to generate either on 5 µm thick unstained or H&E stained (Leica Autostainer, ST5010) slides.⁴¹ H&E slides were imaged using an automated slide scanner at 20x magnification (0.8 NA, 3DHistech, Budapest, Hungary) with representative images shown at 20x (SlideViewer, Version 2.5, 3DHistech). Immunohistochemistry for CC3 was performed on paraffin sections using a Leica Bond RX automated stainer. After heat-induced epitope retrieval in a pH 6.0 buffer, anti-CC3 antibody (Cell Signaling 9661) was applied at a concentration of 1:250, followed by a polymer detection reagent kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (DS9800, Novocastra Bond Polymer Refine Detection, Leica Biosystems). The chromogen indicating positive immunoreactivity was 3,3 diaminobenzidine tetrachloride (DAB), and sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. CC3 IHC images were acquired an Olympus VS200 slides scanner and VS200 ASW 3.4.1 software (Evident Scientific, Hamburg, Germany) using a 20X/0.80NA objective to generate whole slide images with a pixel size of 0.2738 µm. CC3 images are presented at various magnifications after visualization in QuPath (v0.4.4) and image export to Fiji/ImageJ2 (version 2.14.0/1.54g).^69,70 Select H&E and CC3 whole slide images were examined by a board-certified veterinary pathologist (SM).

Data Analysis:

Image processing and quantification was performed in ImageJ/Fiji with results saved in Excel files (Excel for Mac, ver. 16.57, Microsoft, USA). SNR and CNR values were calculated in Excel with graphing with various statistical analyses as listed performed in GraphPad Prism (Prism 10 for MacOS, GraphPad Software LLC). A custom script (macro) was developed in ImageJ/Fiji for pixelwise correction of SWIRFI images based on a user defined ROI. The script calculated the mean and SD of this ROI for all frames in a video image and uses the CNR formula commonly utilized to present images in “contrast mode”.

Wound healing assessment:

Assessed bandages in phantom imaging included hydrocolloid gel (Item no. 990443, 33x53 mm, Walgreens, USA), hydrogel (Item no. 973181, 44.5x73 mm or 25x56 mm, Walgreens, USA), transparent (60X70 mm, TEGADERM, Nexcare, 3M, Item no. 666368, Walgreens, USA) and liquid spray (on saran wrap, Item no. 202297, Walgreens, USA). Hydrogel bandages were applied to mice only during imaging, with each mouse receiving a new bandage and the bandage being removed prior to removing the mouse from the imaging setup.

Liu, J. T. & Sanai, N. Trends and challenges for the clinical adoption of fluorescence-guided surgery. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 60, 756-757 (2019).
Pogue, B. W. Perspective on the optics of medical imaging. J Biomed Opt 28, 121208-121208 (2023).
Sutton, P. A. et al. Fluorescence-guided surgery: comprehensive review. BJS open 7, zrad049 (2023).
Teng, C. W. et al. Second window ICG predicts gross-total resection and progression-free survival during brain metastasis surgery. Journal of Neurosurgery 135, 1026-1035 (2021).
Li, M. et al. 800CW Dye and 89Zr Dual-labeled Antibody for the PET/NIRF/Cerenkov Multi-modality Imaging of ICAM-1 (CD54) in Pancreatic Cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 60, 331-331 (2019).
Tsuboi, S. & Jin, T. Shortwave-infrared (SWIR) fluorescence molecular imaging using indocyanine green–antibody conjugates for the optical diagnostics of cancerous tumours. RSC advances 10, 28171-28179 (2020).
Hollandsworth, H. M., Turner, M. A., Hoffman, R. M. & Bouvet, M. A review of tumor-specific fluorescence-guided surgery for colorectal cancer. Surgical oncology 36, 84-90 (2021).
Gao, R. W. et al. Safety of panitumumab-IRDye800CW and cetuximab-IRDye800CW for fluorescence-guided surgical navigation in head and neck cancers. Theranostics 8, 2488 (2018).
Gutowski, M. et al. SGM-101: An innovative near-infrared dye-antibody conjugate that targets CEA for fluorescence-guided surgery. Surgical oncology 26, 153-162 (2017).
Nunn, A. D. The cost of developing imaging agents for routine clinical use. Investigative radiology 41, 206-212 (2006).
Paul, S. M. et al. How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge. Nature reviews Drug discovery 9, 203-214 (2010).
Nagaya, T., Nakamura, Y. A., Choyke, P. L. & Kobayashi, H. Fluorescence-guided surgery. Frontiers in oncology 7, 314 (2017).
Smith, T. et al. The cost of OR time is $46.04 per minute. Journal of Orthopaedic Business 2, 10-13 (2022).
Kinch, M. S. & Woodard, P. K. Analysis of FDA-approved imaging agents. Drug discovery today 22, 1077-1083 (2017).
Crawford, T. et al. pHLIP ICG for delineation of tumors and blood flow during fluorescence-guided surgery. Scientific reports 10, 1-14 (2020).
Kaynak, A. et al. Phosphatidylserine: The unique dual-role biomarker for cancer imaging and therapy. Cancers 14, 2536 (2022).
Fouad, Y. A. & Aanei, C. Revisiting the hallmarks of cancer. American journal of cancer research 7, 1016 (2017).
Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. cell 144, 646-674 (2011).
Kobayashi, H., Watanabe, R. & Choyke, P. L. Improving conventional enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effects; what is the appropriate target? Theranostics 4, 81 (2014).
Jensen, R. L. Brain tumor hypoxia: tumorigenesis, angiogenesis, imaging, pseudoprogression, and as a therapeutic target. Journal of neuro-oncology 92, 317-335 (2009).
Pfeffer, C. M. & Singh, A. T. Apoptosis: a target for anticancer therapy. International journal of molecular sciences 19, 448 (2018).
Barth, N. D. et al. A fluorogenic cyclic peptide for imaging and quantification of drug-induced apoptosis. Nature communications 11, 4027 (2020).
Widen, J. C. et al. AND-gate contrast agents for enhanced fluorescence-guided surgery. Nature biomedical engineering 5, 264-277 (2021).
Cho, H. et al. Polymeric micelles for apoptosis-targeted optical imaging of cancer and intraoperative surgical guidance. PloS one 9, e89968 (2014).
Shi, X. et al. Near-infrared window II fluorescence image-guided surgery of high-grade gliomas prolongs the progression-free survival of patients. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 69, 1889-1900 (2021).
Tran-Guyon, J., Guyon, V. & Scherninski, F. (Google Patents, 2023).
Pulaski, B. A. & Ostrand‐Rosenberg, S. Mouse 4T1 breast tumor model. Current protocols in immunology 39, 20.22. 21-20.22. 16 (2000).
Flores, O. et al. PSMA-targeted theranostic nanocarrier for prostate cancer. Theranostics 7, 2477 (2017).
Miwa, S. et al. Inhibition of spontaneous and experimental lung metastasis of soft-tissue sarcoma by tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R. Oncotarget 5, 12849 (2014).
Richman, P. I. & Bodmer, W. F. Control of differentiation in human colorectal carcinoma cell lines: Epithelial—mesenchymal interactions. The Journal of pathology 156, 197-211 (1988).
Czajka, M. L. & Pfeifer, C. Breast cancer surgery. (2020).
Kim, E. H. & Bullock, A. D. Surgical management for prostate cancer. Missouri Medicine 115, 142 (2018).
Augsburger, D. et al. Current diagnostics and treatment of fibrosarcoma–perspectives for future therapeutic targets and strategies. Oncotarget 8, 104638 (2017).
Matsuda, T. et al. Recent updates in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. Annals of gastroenterological surgery 2, 129-136 (2018).
Glehen, O. et al. Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 22, 3284-3292 (2004).
Riwaldt, S. et al. Role of apoptosis in wound healing and apoptosis alterations in microgravity. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology 9, 679650 (2021).
Greenhalgh, D. G. The role of apoptosis in wound healing. The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology 30, 1019-1030 (1998).
Fogarty, C. E. & Bergmann, A. Killers creating new life: caspases drive apoptosis-induced proliferation in tissue repair and disease. Cell Death & Differentiation 24, 1390-1400 (2017).
Belsky, J. Short wave infrared enhances machine vision: the machine vision professional gains a new tool with SWIR. Quality 52, 16VS-16VS (2013).
Carr, J. A. et al. Shortwave infrared fluorescence imaging with the clinically approved near-infrared dye indocyanine green. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 4465-4470 (2018).
Mc Larney, B. E. et al. Ambient Light Resistant Shortwave Infrared Fluorescence Imaging for Preclinical Tumor Delineation via the pH Low-Insertion Peptide Conjugated to Indocyanine Green. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 64, 1647-1653 (2023).
Cosco, E. D., Lim, I. & Sletten, E. M. Photophysical properties of indocyanine green in the shortwave infrared region. ChemPhotoChem 5, 727-734 (2021).
Usama, S. M. et al. Role of albumin in accumulation and persistence of tumor-seeking cyanine dyes. Bioconjugate chemistry 31, 248-259 (2020).
Carr, J. A. et al. Absorption by water increases fluorescence image contrast of biological tissue in the shortwave infrared. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 9080-9085 (2018).
Jacques, S. L. Optical properties of biological tissues: a review. Physics in Medicine & Biology 58, R37 (2013).
Madani, F., Lindberg, S., Langel, Ü., Futaki, S. & Gräslund, A. Mechanisms of cellular uptake of cell-penetrating peptides. Journal of biophysics 2011 (2011).
Yuste, V. J. et al. The prevention of the staurosporine‐induced apoptosis by Bcl‐XL, but not by Bcl‐2 or caspase inhibitors, allows the extensive differentiation of human neuroblastoma cells. Journal of neurochemistry 80, 126-139 (2002).
Usama, S. M. & Burgess, K. Hows and whys of tumor-seeking dyes. Accounts of Chemical Research 54, 2121-2131 (2021).
Dickerscheid, D., Lavalaye, J., Romijn, L. & Habraken, J. Contrast-noise-ratio (CNR) analysis and optimisation of breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) acquisition protocols. EJNMMI research 3, 1-9 (2013).
Cherry, S. R., Sorenson, J. A., Phelps, M. E. & ScienceDirect. Physics in nuclear medicine. Vol. 3 (Soc Nuclear Med, 2003).
Zhu, S. et al. Repurposing cyanine NIR‐I dyes accelerates clinical translation of near‐infrared‐II (NIR‐II) bioimaging. Advanced Materials 30, 1802546 (2018).
Gown, A. M. & Willingham, M. C. Improved detection of apoptotic cells in archival paraffin sections: immunohistochemistry using antibodies to cleaved caspase 3. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry 50, 449-454 (2002).
Sabapathy, V., Mentam, J., Jacob, P. M. & Kumar, S. Noninvasive optical imaging and in vivo cell tracking of indocyanine green labeled human stem cells transplanted at superficial or in-depth tissue of SCID mice. Stem Cells International 2015 (2015).
Klaver, Y. L., Lemmens, V. E., Nienhuijs, S. W., Luyer, M. D. & de Hingh, I. H. Peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin: Incidence, prognosis and treatment options. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG 18, 5489 (2012).
Chandler, C. S. et al. Intraperitoneal pretargeted radioimmunotherapy for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Molecular cancer therapeutics 21, 125-137 (2022).
Li, H., Zhu, J., Conti, P., Lee, C. & Chen, K. (Soc Nuclear Med, 2016).
Wang, F. et al. High-precision tumor resection down to few-cell level guided by NIR-IIb molecular fluorescence imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2123111119 (2022).
Lim, I. et al. Shortwave infrared fluorofluorophores for multicolor in vivo imaging. Angewandte Chemie 135, e202215200 (2023).
Bandi, V. G. et al. Targeted multicolor in vivo imaging over 1,000 nm enabled by nonamethine cyanines. Nat Methods, 1-6 (2022).
Elliott, J. T. et al. Review of fluorescence guided surgery visualization and overlay techniques. Biomed. Opt. Express 6, 3765-3782 (2015).
Haase, R. et al. CLIJ: GPU-accelerated image processing for everyone. Nat Methods 17, 5-6 (2020).
Liu, Z.-g. & Jiao, D. Necroptosis, tumor necrosis and tumorigenesis. Cell stress 4, 1 (2020).
Dvorak, H. F. Tumors: wounds that do not heal—redux. Cancer immunology research 3, 1-11 (2015).
Brumberg, V., Astrelina, T., Malivanova, T. & Samoilov, A. Modern wound dressings: Hydrogel dressings. Biomedicines 9, 1235 (2021).
Stoica, A. E., Chircov, C. & Grumezescu, A. M. Hydrogel dressings for the treatment of burn wounds: an up-to-date overview. Materials 13, 2853 (2020).
Kenworthy, P. et al. Monitoring wound healing in minor burns—A novel approach. Burns 44, 70-76 (2018).
Stehle, G. et al. Plasma protein (albumin) catabolism by the tumor itself—implications for tumor metabolism and the genesis of cachexia. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology 26, 77-100 (1997).
Zeien, J. et al. Clinical implications of chemotherapeutic agent organ toxicity on perioperative care. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 146, 112503 (2022).
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9, 676-682 (2012).
Bankhead, P. et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Scientific reports 7, 1-7 (2017).

There is NO Competing Interest.

CJ215Video1SingleCellVideo.mp4
Supplementary Video 1
CJ215Video2SpheroidVideo.mp4
Supplementary Video 2
CJ215Video3MouseTumorContrast.mp4
Supplementary Video 3
CJ215Video4WoundImaging.mp4
Supplementary Video 4
SWIRCJ215NBMESupplemental3.docx
Supplementary Information

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 09 Sep, 2024

Read the published version in Nature Biomedical Engineering →

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

A pan-cancer agent for screening, resection and wound monitoring via NIR and SWIR imaging

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Results

Discussion

Declarations

Materials And Methods

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1