Advancements in 3D imaging tools that minimize human effort have yielded images with greater sensitivity in relation to pathological changes and improved anatomical resolution which facilitate clinical research and clinical practice. Furthermore, the development of 3D medical imaging software programmes allows the analysis and quantitative interpretation of the obtained data, facilitating the identification of small previously undetectable quantitative variations which improves our precision to diagnose and evaluate the individual responses to a given treatment. It is established that when 3D anatomical structures are assessed using their 2D equivalents, it may lead to errors [14]. To overcome this disparity, it is recommended to use concepts of geometric correction and 3D Multiplanar reconstructions (MPR) [14, 15].
Once imaging data is acquired, the next step is image segmentation, which refers to the delineation of the desired anatomy, or ROI. Discrimination of the anatomy of interest from surrounding tissues often requires expertise and time, and knowledge of specialized software is needed to perform the segmentation. Time taken for segmentation may vary significantly depending upon the ROI. Some software programmes offer algorithms and protocols that are tailored for more efficiently defining certain anatomical regions. No standardized approach to image segmentation currently exists, and the segmentation process can be automated or manual, but many workflows promote a semi-automated approach similar to ours, since fully automated segmentation often fails to match human assessment leading to procedural errors, thereby reflecting on the final measurements, especially with regards to the low contrast images produced by CBCT [16].
One of the desired outcomes of REP is root maturation with reduction in pulp space volume. The change in the volume of the pulp space can be considered as an indicator to determine the success post REP [17, 18]. Moreover, the precision of the segmentation regulates the accuracy of the 3D engineered scaffolds and is envisaged to play a significant role in cell - based regenerative endodontic strategies [19].
OsiriX MD is a medical image processing application for Mac running on a 64-bit platform that fully complies with the DICOM standard for image communication and image file formats. OsiriX MD is an FDA approved 510k class II medical device, as per US Food and Drug Regulation CFR21 part 820. OsiriX MD has been previously utilized to analyze the pulp space volume post REP [20]. The advantage with this software is that there is no need to outline the pulp space boundaries in every slice, as it interpolates the ROI for the missed slices and computes the volume. On the other hand, 3D Slicer is an open-source software platform for medical image informatics, image processing, and three-dimensional visualization. The 3D Slicer works across all operating platforms (Linux, Mac OS, Windows). Though this software is not restricted in its use, FDA has still not approved it for clinical use.
Typically, proprietary DICOM imaging software programmes are expensive, and their accessibility to the general clinician is limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether an open-source software (3D Slicer) approach would be practical and efficient for the volumetric analyses of the pulp space post REP when compared to that of a proprietary software (OsiriX MD).
The results of this work demonstrated that the mean decrease in volume after REP was 7.62 mm3 with OsiriX MD and 7.685 mm3 with 3D Slicer. Statistically there was no significant difference in the mean change in volumes calculated. This can be attributed to the dedicated tools within these software packages that allows the rapid, automatic outline and measurement of the ROI: the operator is required to only detect the coronal and apical extent (reference point), thereby minimizing observers variations when analyzing 3D images in various planes [21].
Except for a case report and one case series, there are no studies in literature currently which report the volumetric analyses of the teeth after REP [10, 20]. Mostafa EzEldeen et al. (2015) conducted a similar study using the two-step livewire, semiautomatic user-guided 3D active contour segmentation technique with the MeVisLab (MeVis Research, Bremen, Germany) software. The mean change in volume after REP was reported to be 27.92 mm3 in the 5-case series [10]. This difference in the outcomes compared to our study may be attributed to the larger no of cases as well as other predisposing factors such as the etiology (trauma) and periapical pathosis in the present study population [13].
The reduction in volume of pulp space post REP was apparently due to the intra canal deposition of cementum or bone like tissues. This assumption is based on various reported histological findings in immature teeth with apical periodontitis treated with REP [20, 22–24]. However, the nature of the tissues formed or the influence of predisposing factors (i.e., trauma, periapical pathosis) has not been discussed nor was it in the scope of this study, which mainly focused on the quantitative efficiency of the two software programs. Though an attempt was made to quantify the hard tissue deposition on the canal walls post REP, we were unsuccessful in delineating its boundaries. This may be due to some of the limitations of CBCT imaging, such as a low contrast, background noise, limited correlation with Hounsfield units, along with a small area of tissue to be assessed ,all of which made it difficult to determine the precise location and quantification of the hard tissue formed post REP [25]. However, in the 3D Slicer the post REP 3D pulp space volume can be overlaid translucently over the pre-operative image and reviewed in a 3D view to assess the hard tissue deposition on the canal walls, which was not reported here as the reproducibility of this technique could not be confirmed or compared with OsiriX MD.
In terms of efficiency, the process with OsiriX MD was time consuming when compared to the grow cut technique in 3D Slicer, as in OsiriX MD multiple points outlining the diameter of the pulp space must be marked manually on the selected slices, until the entire perimeter has been defined.