Transcriptional level of BCL7s in glioma
To acquire more comprehensive information on the expression of the BCL7s family, we employed the cBioportal, Oncomine, Gliovis, and GEO datasets to assess for genetic alterations. We found low BCL7A expression in 12 of 16 studies and high BCL7C expression in 11 of 12 studies in brain and CNS cancer (Fig. 1A). To further illustrate the expression of BCL7 genes in glioma, we used multiple datasets from GEO. BCL7A mRNA expression was significantly low in glioma tissues compared to normal brain tissues (NBTs) in 7 out of the 8 datasets, except for the Gravendeel dataset (Fig. 1B). In GSE44791, whilst BCL7B was highly expressed in glioma compared to NBT, we found no significant differences for the other seven datasets (Fig.1B). Remarkably, there was evidence that BCL7C expression was highly elevated in glioma in 6 out of 8 public datasets. However, BCL7C expression in glioma did not differ from that of NBTs in GSE42456 and GSE44971 datasets (Fig. 1B). To verify these findings, IHC was performed to detect BCL7 gene expression in 108 glioma tissues. Notably, the expression of BCL7A and BCL7C was significantly lower and higher in glioma tissues, respectively, compared to non-tumor brain tissues (NBT). Besides, the expression of BCL7B presented no difference between NBT and glioma (Fig. 1C).
BCL7s mRNA expression is associated with glioma WHO grade
Using two public datasets, (CGGA and TCGA), we evaluated the expression of BCL7s in glioma patients with different tumor grades. Results demonstrated that GBM expressed significantly lower levels of BCL7A mRNA compared to lower-grade glioma (WHO I-Ⅲ). However, BCL7A expression decreased progressively with higher glioma grade in two public datasets (Fig. 2A & 2D). Contrarily, BCL7B expression was mainly enriched in GBM and was elevated with an increase in glioma grade (Fig. 2B & 2E). Also, BCL7C expression was higher in GBM compared to grade II–III glioma tissues in CGGA and TCGA (Fig. 2C & 2F).
Moreover, we evaluated the expression of BCL7 genes in 108 glioma tissues. Consistent with previous results, BCL7A expression was extremely lower in GBM compared to LGG (Fig. 2G). However, higher levels of BCL7B and BCL7C were reported in GBM than LGG (Fig. 2G). BCL7 genes were differentially expressed among distinct gliomas grades (Fig. 2H-2J).
BCL7A, BCL7B, and BCL7C predict prognosis in glioma
Having strongly demonstrated that BCL7s expression is significantly associated with tumor malignancy, we proceeded to assess their independent prognostic value. Results of survival analysis demonstrated that glioma patients with high BCL7A expression presented a higher percentage of OS than patients with low BCL7A expression in CGGA and TCGA (HR=0.475 and 0.185, respectively, all p<0.05, Fig. 3). Besides, the overall survival of glioma patients expressing high BCL7B was significantly worse than their counterparts expressing low BCL7B in CGGA and TCGA (HR=2.706 and 3.560, respectively, all p<0.05, Fig. 3). Also, there were consistent trends in the Kaplan-Meier analysis of BCL7C. The OS rate of patients in the high BCL7C expression group was significantly lower than that in the low expression group according to CGGA and TCGA (HR=2.559 and 2.459, respectively, all p<0.05, Fig. 3).
The Kaplan‒Meier survival plots depicted the survival of glioma patients with lower-grade glioma (LGG, WHO I-III) and GBM (WHO IV). BCL7A and BCL7B expression could significantly categorize patients with LGG into survival groups on two public datasets (Fig. 3). Low BCL7A expression in GBM patients also predicted poor prognosis in CGGA and TCGA datasets (HR=0.678, 0.755, respectively, all p<0.05, Fig.3). Of note, the effect of BCL7B expression on OS of GBM patients demonstrated no difference in CGGA and TCGA datasets (p>0.05, Fig. 3). Furthermore, we reported significantly higher overall survival in LGG patients expressing low BCL7C levels than those expressing high BCL7C levels in CGGA and TCGA (HR=2.427, 1.519, respectively, all p<0.05, Fig. 6). However, in CGGA and TCGA datasets, BCL7C expression could not classify GBM patients into survival groups (Fig. 3).
BCL7A acted as an independent risk factor of poor prognosis in glioma patients
Through Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses, we examined whether BCL7 genes were independently associated with clinical outcome risks. Results showed that high WHO grade (IV), IDH 1/2 wildtype, and low BCL7A expression could be used independently to predict the prognosis of all-gliomas patients based on TCGA and CGGA datasets (Table 1 & Table 2, respectively). BCL7B and BCL7C were not independent risk factors for poor prognosis in all-gliomas patients in TCGA and CGGA datasets (Table 1 & Table 2, respectively). To further explore the prognostic role of BCL7 genes in GBM patients, we did a multivariable Cox regression analysis. Consistent with previous findings, BCL7A expression in the BCL7 family was solely an independent prognostic indicator of the survival of GBM patients both in TCGA and CGGA datasets (Table 3 & Table 4, respectively). Taken together, these findings implicated BCL7A as the only gene in the BCL7 family, significantly associated with the prognosis of all-gliomas and GBM patients. Further, it was argued that BCL7A potentially plays a crucial role in the malignancy process of glioma. However, subsequent studies should mainly focus to elucidate the role of BCL7A in glioma.
Low BCL7A expression associated with IDH wildtype and 1p19q codeletion
IDH1/2 mutations and 1p19q co-deletion, the 2 crucial mutations in glioma, are associated with favorable prognosis in glioma patients. The 2 mutation test has become a part of the routine diagnosis and classification of gliomas [18, 19]. Herein, LGG patients were classified into three groups (Group 1: IDH1 wild-type, Group 2: IDH1 mutations with 1p19q codeletion, and Group 3: IDH1 mutations without 1p19q codeletion) according to the guideline of the 2016 WHO classification of CNS tumors. Through immunohistochemistry staining, we found significantly lower BCL7A levels in IDH1/2 wildtype GBM than in LGG (Fig. 4A). Also, LGG patients with IDH1 mutations and without 1p19q codeletion (Group 3) exhibited higher BCL7A expression than patients with IDH1 wild-type (Group 1) or those with IDH1 mutations and 1p19q codeletion (Group2) (Fig. 4A-4B).
To validate these findings, further analysis was implemented using data from CGGA and TCGA. We revealed that LGG patients in Group 3 (IDH1 mutations without 1p19q codeletion) highly expressed BCL7A than patients in Group1 and Group 2 (Fig. 4C).
BCL7A is lowly expressed in mesenchymal GBM
Previously, Verhaak et al. subclassified GBM into four subtypes (classic, mesenchymal, proneural, and neural) based on similarity to defined genomic expression signature [3]. GBM cells with a mesenchymal phenotype, in contrast to epithelial tumor cells, showed higher expression levels of cell movement-associated proteins in addition to improved migration and invasion [20, 21]. Herein, BCL7A expression in GSE16011, Rembrandt, and TCGA molecular subtypes of GBM was evaluated. We found a lower expression of BCL7A in mesenchymal subtype GBM than in other subtypes (Fig. 5A-5C). To demonstrate the predictive power of BCL7A on the mesenchymal phenotype, a Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis was undertaken. The potential of BCL7A to predict the mesenchymal subtype of GBM was more powerful than BCL7B/C. The Area Under Curve (AUC) was 0.811, 0.869, 0.824 for BCL7A in CGGA, Rembrandt, and TCGA, respectively (Fig. 5D-5F).
By estimating the expression correlation coefficient between BCL7A and mesenchymal-related genes using the Spearman Correlation method, we found a significant correlation of BCL7A with multiple epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) related markers (Snail1, Vimentin, Twist1, and ZEB1), and mesenchymal-related genes (CD44, CHI3L1, RELB, and TNFRSF1A) (Fig .4E). Collectively, these findings implied that BCL7A is enriched in the mesenchymal subtype, thus, we hypothesized that BCL7A could influence the change from an epithelial to a mesenchymal phenotype.
BCL7A is associated with immune cell infiltration in glioma
GO enrichment analysis significantly distributed DEGs into biological process, molecular function, and cellular component categories. Consequently, BLC7A was mainly enriched in neutrophil activation (GO:0042119), extracellular matrix structural constituent (GO:0005201), cell adhesion molecule binding (GO:0050839), extracellular matrix (GO:0031012), and collagen-containing extracellular matrix (GO:0062023) (Fig. 6A-6D). Following gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of BCL7A in GBM, the adaptive immune response and neutrophil migration were highly enriched in BCL7A low expression group (Fig. 6E). TIMER was applied to explore the correlation of BCL7A with immune cell infiltration and reported a significant negative-correlation between BCL7A expression in tumor cells and the infiltration of neutrophil cells in LGG and GBM (Fig. 6F). IHC analysis revealed robust infiltration of neutrophil in the glioma tissues of low BCL7A expression; however, less infiltration of neutrophil occurred in tissues of high BCL7A expression (Fig. 6G-6H).
BCL7A is an independent predictor of response to TMZ in LGG and GBM
Since BCL7A expression is highly enriched in mesenchymal GBM and strongly associated with immune response in glioma, we attempted to explore whether BCL7A functioned as a predictive biomarker for positive adjuvant chemotherapy response. Patients were categorized into BCL7A high andBCL7A low groups, based on the mean expression levels of BCL7A in all samples. Results in TCGA-LGG showed that patients receiving ion radiotherapy (IR) only in the high BCL7A group had no difference in prognosis compared to those in the low BCL7A group (P>0.05, Fig. 7A). Besides, patients who received chemotherapy (TMZ) combined with IR in the high BCL7A group survived longer than patients in the low BCL7A group (HR=0.346, 95% CI [0.175, 0.687], P<0.05, Fig. 7B). Similar results were reported in GSE107850, a dataset we adopted to explore whether TMZ confers a survival advantage over IR in LGG (Fig. 7C-7D). Importantly, there was no effect of BCL7A expression on the overall survival of GBM patients who received IR only (P>0.05, Fig. 7E). However, BCL7A separated GBM patients who received TMZ+IR into survival groups (HR=0.760, 95% CI [0.603, 0.957], P<0.05, Fig. 7F). These findings demonstrated the potential influence of BCL7A on the effect of TMZ in glioma. Considering the association of MGMT promoter methylation status with TMZ resistance, we explored the relationship between BCL7A and MGMT. Notably, BCL7A expression was negatively associated with MGMT expression in four public datasets (Fig. 7G); its expression was highly enriched in MGMT methylated glioma (Fig. 7H). In LGG and GBM patients with MGMT methylation, BCL7A expression could not segregate GBM patients into survival groups (Fig. 7I-7J). Surprisingly, patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter in the high BCL7A group presented a higher percentage of overall survival than patients in the BCL7A low group (Fig. 7-7J). LGG and GBM patients with methylated MGMT in the low BCL7A group presented a similar prognosis to patients with unmethylated MGMT in the high BCL7A group.