Figure 1 schematically illustrates the synthesis of H2V3O8 nanowires through a facile high-temperature hydrothermal method. The concentrations of the H2O2 have a great influence on the final morphology of the H2V3O8 as shown in Fig. 2a-d. With the concentrations below 10%, the HVO-10, and HVO-15 nanowires exhibit substantial agglomeration clustered together (Fig. 2a, b). The distinct levels of agglomeration for the HVO-10 and HVO-15 nanowires result from the splitting and growth of the vanadium oxide layer during the reaction process[40]. Increasing the concentration of H2O2 to 20%, the as-prepared sample (HVO-20) exhibits a more uniformly dispersed and elongated nanowire structure with lengths spanning from a few micrometers to several hundred nanometers. Further increasing the H2O2 concentration to 25%, a short nanorod structure can be found for the HVO-25 due to the violent oxidation reaction by the ultrahigh concentration of H2O2[41]. Therefore, changing the concentration of H2O2 can modulate the morphology of H2V3O8 nanowires and the optimal concentration of H2O2 is 20% based on the morphology investigation. The morphology of the HVO-20 sample was additionally scrutinized by TEM. In Fig. 2e, the HVO-20 nanowires present smooth surfaces with a diameter of 197 nm and a length of 1.95 µm. The high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of HVO-20 (Fig. 2f) exhibits well-defined lattice fringes with a lattice spacing of 0.47 nm, corresponding to the (020) crystal plane spacing[42]. The inset in Fig. 1f reveals a well-defined dot structure in the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern with distinct (020) and (011) crystalline planes, indicating a single crystal structure of the HVO-20 nanowires.
Figure 3a presents the XRD patterns of the HVO-10, HVO-15, HVO-20 and HVO-25, in which the HVO-10, HVO-15, and HVO-20 show the orthorhombic crystal system (PDF#85-2401) of the H2V3O8 without impurity[40]. Specifically, the diffraction peaks at 10.4°, 18.3°, 18.9°, 24.6°, 26.2°, 32.6°, and 50.0° in the three samples align with the (200), (310), (020), (320), (011), (520), and (002) crystal planes of the H2V3O8 crystals. Increasing the concentration of H2O2 to 25% results in impurity as appeared the diffraction peaks at 25.2° and 30.0°, corresponding to the characterization peaks of VO2 (PDF#81-2392). Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) is an advanced technique for detecting unpaired electronic information in materials, employed to identify the presence of oxygen vacancies in metal oxides[43]. As shown in Fig. 3b, the HVO-15, HVO-20, and HVO-25 demonstrate g value of 2.0038 indicating the existence of oxygen vacancies in the three samples. Moreover, the largest intensity of g of HVO-20 manifests the highest concentration of oxygen vacancies in HVO-20. Also, XPS analysis was conducted to investigate oxygen vacancies in the sample. In the O 1s peaks of the three samples (Fig. 3c), the peaks at 530.0 eV, 531.2 eV, 532.3 eV, and 533.3 eV correspond to the O-V bond (perfect lattice oxygen), oxygen-deficient bond, -OH bond, and O-C bond, respectively[44]. According to the integral area, the atomic percentage of the oxygen vacancy in HVO-15, HVO-20, and HVO-25 were 15.4%, 18.5%, and 16.1%, respectively, aligning consistently with the findings of the EPR. The initial upward trajectory followed by a subsequent decline in the oxygen vacancy signifies the controllable modulation of oxygen vacancy concentration in the H2V3O8 through the amount of the H2O2. In the high-resolution XPS spectrum of V 2p (Fig. 3d), two notable peaks at 516.0 eV and 523.5 eV align with V 2p3/2 and V 2p1/2 of V4+, while another pair of significant peaks at 517.5 eV and 525.0 eV correspond to V 2p3/2 and V 2p1/2 of V5+, respectively[44]. The ratios of V5+ to V4+ in HVO-15, HVO-20, and HVO-25 were determined as 1.88, 1.71, and 1.76, respectively, and the variation in peak intensities is linked to the formation of oxygen vacancies and also demonstrates that oxygen vacancies can modulate the electronic structure of materials[44, 45]. As indicated by pertinent reports, supercritical water can serve as a reducing agent at elevated temperatures, which facilitates the reduction of V5+ to V4+ along with the genesis of oxygen vacancies[46]. Different concentration of H2O2 causes different amounts of the liberation of oxygen liberated from the lattice with different diffusion rates, thus leading to different concentrations of oxygen vacancy in the three samples[47].
To assess the electrochemical performance of the H2V3O8 nanowires as cathode materials for AZIBs, CR2032 coin cells were fabricated utilizing H2V3O8 as a positive electrode, zinc flakes as a negative electrode, and 3 M Zn(CF3SO3)2 aqueous solution as an electrolyte. Figure 4a illustrates the Cyclic Voltammetry curves of the HVO-20 electrode during the initial three cycles at a sweep rate of 0.1 mV s− 1. The CV curve of the first cycles is different from the following cycles attributed to the initial activation process of the fresh electrode. However, the CV curves largely overlap in the subsequent two cycles, signifying the high reversibility of the electrochemical process. Two pairs of discernible redox peaks appeared at 0.39 V/0.82 V and 0.59 V/1.11 V, corresponding to the V5+ /V4+ and V4+ /V3+ transitions, respectively[28]. Figure 4b illustrates the cycling performance of the HVO-10, HVO-15, HVO-20, and HVO-25 electrodes at a current density of 0.3 A g− 1. The initial discharge specific capacity of the HVO-20 electrode reached 461.7 mAh g− 1, surpassing that of HVO-25 (367.3 mAh g− 1), HVO-15 (366.9 mAh g− 1), and HVO-10 (292.5 mAh g− 1). Moreover, the capacity of the HVO-20 electrode still reached 426.6 mAh g− 1 with a remarkable capacity retention of 92.4% after 100 cycles. This result suggests that the combined influence of one-dimensional nanostructures and oxygen vacancies creates ample diffusion pathways and adsorption sites for Zn2+[35, 48]. During the cycling, a gradual decline followed by an ascent in the discharge specific capacity of the HVO-20 electrode was noted, which is attributed to the gradual wetting and activation of the electrode material[29]. Figure 4c illustrates the charge/discharge curves of the HVO-20 electrode at a current density of 0.3 A g− 1. The discharge curve exhibits two plateaus at 0.39/0.82 V and 0.59/1.11 V, aligning with the CV curve. Additionally, the figure reveals that the initial charge specific capacity (443.5 mAh g− 1), is attributed to partially Zn2+ ions embedded, in the HVO-20 lattice during charging[26]. The rate performance of the four electrodes was evaluated at current densities ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 A g− 1. As illustrated in Fig. 4d, e, HVO-20 demonstrated reversible discharge specific capacities of 454.9, 421.1, 402.3, 354.3, 262.9, and 212.7 mAh g− 1 at current densities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.8, and 1.0 A g− 1 respectively, surpassing that of HVO-10, HVO-15, and HVO-25. Upon reducing the current density back to 0.1 A g− 1, HVO-20 recovered to a discharge specific capacity of 437.2 mAh g− 1, accompanied by a remarkable capacity recovery rate of 96.1%. The outstanding rate performance of HVO-20 can be ascribed to its one-dimensional nanostructures and high concentration of oxygen vacancies, which enhance ion diffusion kinetics[49]. Lastly, the long-cycle performance tests of the four electrodes were also evaluated at a current density of 1.0 A g− 1 in Fig. 4f. The HVO-10, HVO-15, and HVO-25 decline obviously with a capacity of 76.0 mAh g− 1, 29.4 mAh g− 1, and 6.67 mAh g− 1 after 1000 cycles. Notably, the HVO-20 electrode exhibited excellent stability with a substantial capacity of 198.8 mAh g− 1 after 1000 cycles, resulting in a commendable capacity retention rate of 67.2%. The remarkable cycling stability demonstrated by HVO-20 implies that the presence of oxygen vacancies significantly enhances both the zinc storage capacity and structural stability of H2V3O8[50].
To reveal the electrochemical kinetic performance of the cathodes, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests were conducted for the HVO-10, HVO-15, HVO-20, and HVO-25, as shown in Fig. 5a and Fig. 5b.The Nyquist curves for each electrode exhibit two segments: the diagonal line in the mid-to-high-frequency range signifies the charge transfer resistance (Rct) at the electrolyte-electrode material interface, while the diagonal line in the low-frequency range corresponds to the diffusion rate of Zn2+ in the electrode material[26]. At the third cycle, the Rct of the HVO-20 electrode is 51.9 Ω, lower than that of HVO-10 (67.44 Ω), HVO-15 (67.44 Ω), and HVO-25 (57.2 Ω). This implies that the presence of oxygen vacancies has the potential to enhance conductivity[51]. Notably, after 50 cycles, the Rct of the HVO-20 electrode is still lower than that of the HVO-10 (198.1 Ω), HVO-15 (187.8 Ω), and HVO-25 (160.6 Ω). Additionally, the Zn2+ diffusion coefficients were further investigated by the linear correlation between Z′ (the real component of the impedance spectrum) and the ω1/2 low frequency (angular frequency in the low-frequency range) to derive the Wahlberg coefficient (\(\sigma\), the slope of Fig. 5c)[37]. As shown in Fig. 5d, the DZn of the HVO-20 is 3.40 × 10− 12 cm2 s− 1, far higher than 1.19 × 10− 12 cm2 s− 1 of HVO-10, 1.87 × 10− 12 cm2 s− 1 of HVO-15 and 2.82 × 10− 12 cm2 s− 1 of HVO-25 because of the optimal concentration of the oxygen vacancies[52]. Lastly, the exchange current densities (io) for the four electrodes were determined by the linear polarization method in Fig. 5e. io is a crucial parameter that characterizes the reversibility of the electrode, for which a higher io indicates a more reversible electrode reaction[39]. As shown in Fig. 5f, HVO-20 exhibited the highest io (10.417 mA g− 1), surpassing HVO-25, HVO-15, and HVO-10 with io values of 8.615 mA g− 1, 7.485 mA g− 1, and 6.037 mA g− 1, respectively. The EIS, diffusion coefficient, and exchange current density indicate the superiority of the HVO-20 with both nanowire nanostructure and oxygen vacancies for reversible Zn storage[53].