3.1 Materials
3.1.1 Chemicals and Reagents
Chemicals and reagents that were used included acetylcholine iodide, gallic acid, and Folin-Cioacalteau reagent obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). β-caryophyllene (purity C98.5%), metronidazole, tween 80, and DurcupanTM ACM Fulka embedding mixture from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Thiobarbituric acid (TBA), trichloroacetic acid (TCA), quercetin, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), and 2-deoxyribose were procured from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie (USA). Sodium carbonate, ferric chloride, aluminium chloride, potassium acetate, potassium ferricyanide, tris salt, ferric sulfate, as well as other reagents used were of analytical grade; glass-distilled water was also used.
Methodology
Determination of DPPH radical scavenging ability
The radical scavenging ability of the sample against DPPH free radical is to be evaluated as described by Gyamfil et al. (1999).
Determination of Fe (II) chelating ability
The method of Puntel et al. (2005) will be used to determine the iron chelating ability of the samples.
Determination of ferric reducing antioxidant property
The reducing property of the samples was determined by assessing the ability of the samples to reduce FeCl3 solution as described by Oyiazu (1986).
Total antioxidant capacity
The total antioxidant capacity of the sample will be determined against 2, 2’- azino-bis (ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) radical according to the method described by Re et al.(1999).
Inhibition of Fenton reaction (degradation of deoxyribose)
The method of Halliwell and Gutteridge (1981) will be used to determine the ability of the samples to prevent Fe2+/H2O2 induced decomposition of deoxyribose.
Experimental Animal handling and Feeding
Wistar male and female rats weighing 200-220g were used in this study. The animals were obtained from the Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria. The animals were handled according to the guidelines of the National Council for Animal Experiments Control (CONCEA) and in accordance with the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals. The male and female rats were given normal feed.
After two weeks of acclimatization, the rats were randomly divided into eight (8) groups of six (6) animals each and fed for fourteen (14) days with free access to feed and water. The handling of the animals was carried out in accordance with the recommended international standards.
The selected dose was 10 mg/kg/day, chosen based on previous studies (Chang et al., 2013; Horváth et al., 2012; Abbas et al., 2013).
Experimental design
Group I Normal Control rats – were administered the vehicle (1% ethanol)
Group II β-caryophyllene (10 mg/kg)
Group III β-caryophyllene (20 mg/kg)
Group IV Sildenafil citrate (20 mg/kg/day)
Group V β-caryophyllene (20 mg/kg/day) + sildenafil citrate (20 mg/kg/day)
Group VI Paroxetine Induced Erectile Dysfunction (PIED) rat
Group VII Paroxetine Induced Erectile Dysfunction + β-caryophyllene (10 mg/kg)
Group VIII Paroxetine Induced Erectile Dysfunction + (20 mg/kg) of β-caryophyllene
Group IX Paroxetine Induced Erectile Dysfunction + Sildenafil citrate (20 mg/kg/day)
At the end of the 14th day, the rats were subjected to sexual (male paired with female) behavioural assays according to Thawatchai et al. (2012).
Sexual Behaviour
The sexual behavioural assay was carried out according to a modified method of Thawatchai et al. (2012).
Determination of penile superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was determined by the method of Mistra & Fridovich (1972).
Determination of penile catalase activity
This is carried out according to the modified method of Clairborne (1985).
Determination of penile reduced glutathione (GSH) level
Reduced glutathione (GSH) level was determined by the method of Jollow et al. (1974).
Determination of penile glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity
This was carried out according to the method of Mannervik and Guthenberg (1981).
Data Analysis
The results were expressed as the means ± SEM. Statistical significance will be determined by two-way ANOVA followed by a post-hoc Tukey test for multiple comparisons using Prism software (GraphPad, version 6.0, Carlsbad, CA).