Participants
The study population comprises residents aged 60 years or older from Tianjin and Shanghai, China, who participated in China's National Free Physical Examination program between August 2018 and October 2022. Participants were excluded as following criteria: (1) did not complete date on the depression, nutrition assessments and cognitive function; (2) had a known diagnosis of dementia; (3) unable to communicate with the study staff or provide informed consent. After excluding 306 subjects, the final sample consisted of 4799 participants (2010 males, 2789 females). Missing data on cognitive function assessment, psychological tests, and nutritional status evaluation were noted in 186, 25, and 7 participants, respectively. Another 6 participants had missing data on basic covariates, and 82 were evaluated for dementia. The study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University and Shanghai Medical and Health University, adhering to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Covariates
Interviews were conducted using questionnaires from previous studies [18]. Socio-demographic variables included age, sex, marital status, living arrangements, and education. Behavioral characteristics such as alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity, and falls history were recorded. Chronic diseases, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary heart disease, stroke, kidney disease, peptic ulcer, biliary tract disease, pulmonary disease, osteoarthritis, Parkinson's disease, gout, cancer, and thyroid disease, were also documented [19].
Definition of MCI
MCI was defined according to Petersen's diagnostic criteria[20]. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale (IADL) were used. Cognitive impairment thresholds for MMSE were ≤17, 20, and 24 points for illiteracy, elementary, and middle school or above, respectively[21]. IADL consists of eight items on a scale of 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating better daily living ability. IADL score ≥6 indicates normal daily living ability[9, 22].
Assessment of depression
Depression was screened by the Chinese version of 30-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-30), which was standardized including 30 items ranging from 0-30 points. A cutoff value of 11 points was used to define depression. [23]. Participants were also grouped according to the severity of symptoms: “None” (GDS-30<11), “Mild” (11≤GDS-30≤20), “Moderate to severe” (20<GDS-30≤30).
Nutritional Status Evaluation
Nutritional status was evaluated using the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), a validated screening tool used in geriatric health care[24]. Compared with the MNA, the sensitivity and specificity of this version are 97.9% and 100%, respectively[25]. The MNA-SF consists of six items assessing food intake, weight loss, mobility, psychological stress, neuropsychological problems, and body mass index (BMI). The total score ranges from 0 to 14 points. Participants with scores of 12-14 were considered well-nourished, 8-11 were at risk of malnutrition, and 0-7 were malnourished.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables were expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD), while categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Group differences were analyzed using the independent t-test or chi-square test, as appropriate. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the association between depression, nutritional status, and MCI. Multivariate logistic regression models were then used to adjust for potential confounding factors.
Mediation analyses were performed to explore the mediating role of nutritional status in the association between depression and MCI. In the mediation analysis model with full adjustment, we included GDS score and depression severe grades as independent variables (X), MMSE score as dependent variable (Y), and the MNA-SF variable as a potential mediator (M). The total effect (path c) represents the sum of the direct and indirect effects of GDS score and depression severe grades on MMSE score. The direct effect (path c’) is the effect of GDS score and depression severe grades on MMSE, and the indirect effect (path ab) is the mediating effect of the association between GDS score and depression severe grades and MMSE.
The PROCESS macro for SPSS was used for mediation analysis [26]. We tested the significance of the indirect effect (mediation effect) and confirmed that the effect of independent variable on mediator, the effect of mediator on dependent variable and the total effect of independent variable on dependent variable were significant, respectively. A bootstrapping method with 5000 resamples was applied to calculate bias-corrected 95% confidence intervals for direct and indirect effects.