Ex-vivo studies
Fish sampling and preparing of the intestine homogenate
Ten seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and 10 seabream (Sparus aurata) fish were collected from the Gulf of Suez, Egypt. The fish were transported in an icebox to the Biotechnology and Biodiversity Conservation Laboratory, Centre of Excellence for Advanced Sciences, National Research Center. Upon arrival at the laboratory, the fish were dissected under aseptic conditions and skins were sterilized with 70% ethanol. Fish intestines were excised using sterile scissors and forceps. 10 grams of the excised intestine was homogenized in a 90 ml saline solution (0.85% NaCl). Serial dilutions 101 to 103 were prepared to isolate probiotic bacteria from the prepared suspension.
Isolation of Lactobacillus sp./probiotic candidates
Probiotic/Lactobacillus sp. were isolated using the pour-plate technique and the modified De Man Rogose Sharpe (MRS) agar. The MRS agar was modified by reducing the pH to 2.5 (oxgal, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo, USA) and the prepared plates were incubated at 37°C for 24–48 h according to Vinderola and Reinheimer [14]. For purification, the typical lactic acid bacterial colonies were picked up and subcultured on MRS agar plates for 48h. The suspected isolates were morphologically and biochemically invisitgated by applying Gram staining and catalase test, respectively. The γ hemolysis test of gram-positive and catalase-negative isolates were assessed using blood agar plates according to Gerhardt et al. [15]. We gave the intention only to the Gram-positive, catalase–negative and γ-hemolytic (non-hemolytic) isolates where they were preserved in tryptic soy broth supplemented with 30% glycerol (glycerol stock) at -80oC as a master cell bank for the further evaluation.
Antimicrobial activity of presumptive probiotic isolates
The antimicrobial activity was evaluated using the well diffusion test, as described by Bauer et al. [16]. The targeted pathogenic bacterial were standard Aeromonas hydrophila ss. hydrophila and Pseudomonas fluorescens obtained from American Type Culture Collection, USA (ATCC 13037 and ATCC13525, respectively). The probiotic isolates were grown in MRS broth at 37°C for 24 h, followed by harvesting the cells by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. The melted Mueller-Hinton agar (Himedia, India) was inoculated with 10% freshly prepared broth culture of each pathogenic strain and then poured into petri plates for the well diffusion assay.
Once solidified, three wells with a diameter of 6 mm were punctured, and 50 µl of each prepared cell-free supernatant was placed in the wells. After incubation at 37 oC for 24h, the resulted inhibition zones around the wells were measured.
Acid and bile salt tolerance assays
Acid tolerance of the bacterial isolates was evaluated by inoculating the prepared cell pellets in MRS broth with pH ranginges of 2.0 to 4.0 as descrioed by Verdenelli et al. [17]. The bacterial cell count was adjusted for each cell suspension to have 108 CFU/mL using the 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard. The viable residual cells were calculated using the plate count method on MRS agar after incubation at 37°C for 2 and 5h. The survival rate was calculated according to the following formula: Survival rate (%) = (log cfu Nt / log cfu N0) × 100 where Nt and N0 represent surviving bacterial count after incubation time and the initial count at zero time, respectively.
Bile salt tolerance was evaluated according to Gilliland et al. [18]. The extracted pellet was cultured in MRS broth supplemented with 0.3% of oxgall bile (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo, USA) at 37°C for 2 and 5h. Residual viable cells and survival rates were determined as described above.
Phenol tolerance
The ability of probiotic isolates to tolerate phenol was determined according to Xanthopoulos et al. [19]. Two milliliters of standardized probiotic isolates (108 cfu/mL) were cultured at 37°C in 8 ml of MRS broth supplemented with phenol at 0.4% concentration for 24 h. The bacterial enumeration was conducted using the plate count method on MRS agar at 0 h and 24 h incubation and the residual viable cells and survival rate were estimated as aforementioned.
In-vivo studies
Fish
Animal ethics. Animal experiments were performed in accordance with the protocols approved by of the National Research Centre–Medical Research Ethics Committee (NRC-MREC) for the use of animal subjects (Approval no. 06410923) and in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines and regulations.
Nile Tilapia have been brought from EL-Noubarya, Egypt, and transported to the biotechnology and biodiversity conservation laboratory, Centre of Excellence for Advanced Sciences, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt, in large plastic water containers supplied with battery-operated aerators as a source of oxygen. Fish were acclimatized for 10 days in glass aquaria (80× 40×30 cm) filled with 65 L of dechlorinated tap water. Aquaria glass (n-4) was stacked with 10 Tilapia fish (40.2 ± 5.5 g) and fed a basal fish feed with no additives. During the experiment, the water parameters (temperature, dissolved oxygen, ammonia, and nitrite) were measured and maintained within the recommended range according to APHA [20]. The water temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen ranged between 26.7 ± 2.1°C, pH 7.2–8.2 and 6.9 ± 0.5 mg/l, respectively. The mean concentrations of ammonia and nitrite were recorded as 0.040 ± 0.005 and 0.06 ± 0.013 mg/l, respectively.
Fish feed preparation
The selected SB8 Lactobacillus candidate was grown for 24 h at 30°C in MRS broth in a shaking incubator. After incubation, the cells were harvested by centrifugation (4000 g), washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2), and resuspended in the same buffer. The absorbance at 600 nm was adjusted to 0.25 ± 0.05 to standardize the number of bacteria (106 to 107 CFU mL− 1). Dilution plating was conducted to verify the relationship between absorbance at 600 nm and CFU/ milliliter. Commercial basal fish feed (Zoo Control, Egypt) was used as the main diet and the SB8 Lactobacillus candidate was used as supplement to reach to a final concentration of 106 to 107 CFU g− 1 feed. The count/bacterial conentration was determined using the standard plate count method on MRS agar [21], and the bacterial suspensions were slowly sprayed onto the feed with a contentious mixing.
Experimental design
Fish were randomly divided into four groups. Each group contained 30 fish in triplicates. Fish in the negative control group were fed a basal diet and not exposed DLM. Fish in the second group were fed a basal diet SB8-supplemented. Third group was a positive control where it fed a basal diet and was DLM-exposed (14.9 µg/L) [22]. Fish in the fourth (test ) group fed a basal diet supplemented with the SB8 and DLM-exposed (14.9 µg/l). Fish diets were provided twice daily at of 3% of fish live body weight rate for 30 days. At the end of the experiment, whole blood, serum, and liver samples were collected, immediately tested and/or stored in the proper storage condition until being analyzed.
Haematological investigation
Blood samples were collected from three anesthetized fish per aquarium. The blood has been withdrown from the caudal vein using a heparinized hypodermic syringe. The collected blood was mixed with a phosphate buffer saline solution and some hematological parameters such as total WBC, Neu, Lym, Mon, and Eos (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils) were measured according to Gabriel et al. [23]. where The WBC count was determined by diluting the blood sample 1:100 in PBS. And finally, the differential leukocytes count was determined indirectly by staining a blood smear with May-Grunwald-Giemsa.
Oxidative stress enzymatic activities
Liver samples were homogenized in an ice bath (homogenization ratio of 1g tissue/ 9mL physiologic saline. The homogenate was centrifuged at 3000g for 10 min to collect the supernatant which was stored at -80°C until being used to assess the oxidative stress enzymatic activities as described by Peña-Llopis et al. [24]. In brief the total protein level in the supernatant was measured according to the manufacturer’s instructions, by using the whole protein assay kit (BCA method, Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute) [24]. The malondialdehyde (MDA) level and superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activities were measured with the respective commercial ELISA kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) [24].
Total protein analysis
Blood samples were withdrawn from the caudal vein of the remaining anesthetized fish and then collected in untreated anticoagulant eppendorf tubes. The tubes were kept at 4°C for 10 h and then centrifuged at 3000 g for 15 min, and the supernatant serum was collected. The serum was immediately stored at -80°C for further biochemical analyses. All collected serum samples were analyzed for total protein using the Bradford method [25] and albumin content according to Doumas et al. [26]. Addtionally, the globulin content (subtracting albumin from total protein) and albumin/globulin ratio (A/G) were measured using commercial kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, China) following the instructions provided.
Analysis of micronucleus formation
Micronucleus and erythrocyte alteration test was carried out relying on caudal incision to obtain blood smears on clean grease-free microscopic slides. After drying at room temperature, the slides were fixed in absolute methanol for 10 minutes. The slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. They were then dehydrated in ascending concentrations of alcohol (30, 50, 70, and 90%). Finally, the slides were cleared in xylene and permanently mounted by DPX [27]. Slides were selected based on the staining quality, then coded, randomized, and scored blindly. In each group, 10,000 cells (a minimum of 1000 per slide) were examined using 40× objective lens and 15× eyepiece for micronucleated and morphologically altered erythrocytes identification. We followed the well established criteria for identifying MN according to Shimdt [28] to ensure authentic scoring. The morphologically altered erythrocytes were examined according to Mekkawy et al. [29].
Expression analysis of immune genens
RNA isolation and RT-PCR Reaction
TRIzol® Reagent (Invitrogen, Germany) was utilized to extract total RNA from the liver tissues of Nile tilapia following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. The resulting total RNA was then treated with one unit of RQ1 RNAse-free DNAse (Invitrogen, Germany) to digest DNA residues. Subsequently, it was suspended in DEPC-treated water, and quantified spectrophotometrically at 260 nm. The purity of the total RNA was between 1.8 and 2.1 as recognized by the 260/280 nm ratio. Aliquots of the RNA were immediately used for reverse transcription (RT) or stored at -80°C for future use. Complete Poly (A)+ RNA isolated from liver tissues was reverse transcribed into cDNA in a total volume of 20 µl using RevertAid™ First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas, Germany). The RT reaction conditions were 10 min at 25°C, followed by 1 h at 42°C, and the denaturation step was 5 min at 99°C [30]. Afterward, the reaction tubes containing RT preparations were flash-cooled in an ice chamber until being used for cDNA amplification via quantitative Real-Time- polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).
Real-Time- PCR (qrt-PCR)
StepOne Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA) was used to determine the liver cDNA copy number of IL-1 and IL-6. The PCR reaction mixrures were 25 µl containing 12.5 µl 1× SYBR® Premix Ex Taq TM (TaKaRa, Biotech. Co. Ltd.), 0.5 µL 0.2 µM sense primer, 0.5 µL 0.2 µM antisense primer, 6.5 µl distilled water, and 5 µl of cDNA template. Each experiment included a distilled water control. The sequences of the used specific primers are listed in Table 1 [31]. After each qPCR, a melting curve analysis was performed at 95.0°C to assess the effectiveness of the primers used. The relative quantification of the target to reference gene was calculated according to the 2−ΔΔCT method.
Table 1
Primers sequences used for qRT-PCR
Genes
|
Primer sequence a
|
References
(Accession no.)
|
IL-1
|
F: 5`- caa gga tga cga caa gcc ag -3`
|
JF957370.1
|
R: 5`- ggt agc gga cag aca tga ga -3`
|
IL-6
|
F: 5`- aat tcc ttc tgg ccc tga ca -3`
|
XM_019350387.2
|
R: 5`- tcc tct gtc tcc tca cct ga -3`
|
β-Action
|
F: 5`- cca gcc ttc ctt cct tgg ta -3`
|
KJ126772.1
|
R: 5`- agg tgg ggc aat gat ctt ga -3`
|
a F: forward primer; R: a reverse primer. Tm: temperature |
Statistical analysis
The statistical software Statistical Analysis System (SAS) [32] was used to analyze the data of this study. The General Linear Models (GLM) procedure was applied, followed by the Scheffé-test to identify significant differences among the fish groups. The values were presented as mean±SEM. The differences were considered significant if the P < 0.05.