2.1 Research on the decontamination ability of emergent plants in eutrophic water bodies
2.1.1 The impact of different emergent plants on the pH of water bodies
The pH of the microsystem water formed by six emergent plants showed a fluctuating increase in the early stage and began to decline after July 15th. Among them, the pH of group Q decreases the most significantly, with a pH value of 7.34 at the end of the experiment, showing a neutral state. The second group is the planting Y group, with a pH value of 7.48 at the end of the experiment, which is significantly lower than that of CK. The pH of CK is higher than the initial value at the end of the experiment. It is directly higher than the other experimental groups. From the overall change trend of each treatment in the figure, the fluctuation range of the microsystem water formed by emergent plants is significantly smaller than CK, and the overall performance of the water body is relatively stable (Fig. 1).
2.1.2 Effects of dissolved oxygen (DO) in microsystems created by different emergent plants
Two factor analysis of variance showed that plant material (F = 28.914, P < 0.05), treatment time (F = 105.641, P < 0.05), and their interaction (F = 1.221, P < 0.05) has a significant impact on DO. Except CK group, the DO content in the water shows a stable downward trend, and there are certain fluctuations in the DO content in all other groups of water. At the beginning of the experiment, the DO content of each plant group sharply decreases. As plants grow, the DO in water rapidly increases. At the end of the experiment, the DO concentration in the water of the plant group is higher than that of the CK. The DO concentration in the water of plant microsystems is maintained at 6.91–8.74 mg∙L− 1, while the DO concentration in the CK is only 2.74 mg∙L− 1. Among them, Y group has the highest DO concentration, reaching 8.74 mg∙L− 1 (Fig. 2).
2.1.3 Changes of NH4+-N and NO3−-N content in microsystems created by different emergent plants
Under different emergent plants, both NH4+- N and NO3−-N in eutrophic water have a certain removal effect, and the removal rate is relatively fast (Fig. 3). In the first week of the experiment, the mass concentration of NH4+- N in the water rapidly decreases, with the removal rates of Y, L, and Z treatments reaching 32.7%, 24.8% and 24.4%, respectively. The removal efficiency of different concentrations of NH4+- N by planting aquatic plant is significantly higher than that of CK (p < 0.05). Moreover, At 21 days of each plant treatment, NH4+- N shows a decrease with higher efficiency. At the end of the experiment, the final removal rates of NH4+- N in water by Y, L, and X treatments are 83.8%, 79.8%, and 75.5%, respectively, while the removal rate of the CK is only 10.1%. The removal rates of each treatment are significantly higher than those of CK. The concentration of NO3−-N in water shows increase-decrease-stabilize. Especially the peak plant growth period (July 1st), NO3−-N in the water rapidly decreases, and NO3−-N in different plant treatments decreases to 1.02–1.46 mg∙L− 1, with an average NO3−-N elimination rate of 27.0%. By the end of the experiment, the NO3−-N levels in Y, X, and L treatments decreased to 68.7%, 64.4%, and 63.2%, respectively. The average removal rate of NO3−-N reaches 60.5%, significantly higher than that of CK.
2.1.4 Changes in TN and TP content in microsystems created by different emergent plants
In the early stage of the experiment, the TN content in the emergent plant microsystem rapidly decreases due to the strong adsorption and interception effects of rapid sedimentation and plant roots in the early stage; As the experiment progresses, the sedimentation effect weakens and the root system gradually reaches adsorption saturation. Currently, the removal of TN mainly relies on the absorption of plants and the adsorption and degradation of root microorganisms. This process is relatively slow, so the removal rate of TN gradually slows down. At the end of the experiment, the removal efficiency of TN in the plant group is better than that of CK. And the TN content of Y microsystem decreases from 9.49 to 3.21 mg∙L− 1, with a removal rate of 66.2% (Fig. 4); The next group is the X and L microsystem, with TN removal rates of 62.9% and 58.3%, respectively. And there is no significant difference in removal rates between the two treatments. The Y shows a rapid decrease in TN on July 15th, mainly due to the rapid tillering and reproduction of plants during this period, which required a large amount of nitrogen absorption, resulting in a rapid decrease in TN concentration. The final average removal rate of TN in the CK is only 8.6%, significantly lower than other experimental groups (p < 0.05).
In the early stage of the experiment, the decreasing trend and amount of TP content of different emergent plant microsystems remains basically consistent. At the end of the experiment, the TP removal rate of the plant microsystem water is between 59.1% and 81.3%. It is significantly higher than that of CK, with a removal rate of 37.6%. Based on the comparative analysis of different types of emergent plants, the removal effect of Y treatment on TP in water is superior to other emergent plants, and there is a significant difference compared to CK. Y treatment has a significant removal effect on TP in water, with a removal rate exceeding 80% (Fig. 5). This may be due to the fact that in the early stages of the experiment, different plants are in the early stages of growth and have relatively low demand for phosphorus in the water body; In the later stage of the experiment, plants grow rapidly, and some plants exhibited a large number of tillering phenomena, requiring a large amount of nutrient supplementation, resulting in certain differences in the total phosphorus content in the water.
2.2 Changes in Chlorophyll a Content of Algal Inhibition Indicators in Different Emergent Plant Microsystems
Chlorophyll is an important pigment in the photosynthesis of plants and algae, with chlorophyll a (chl a) being the most important. The concentration of chlorophyll-a of floating algae in the water environment system can reflect the quantity of floating algae, which is an important assessment index in the assessment of water pollution and eutrophication.
From Fig. 6, chl a content of CK increases compared to the initial concentration at the end of the experiment. In the water of the different emergent plant microsystems, chl a fluctuates significantly in the early stages of the experiment; At the end of the experiment, there is a significant decrease compared to the initial concentration. The Y treatment shows a certain rebound after a sharp decline in the initial stage of the experiment, and then the decline stabilized. Chl a content in treatment Y is the lowest at the end of the experiment (6.6 mg∙L− 1), decreased by 37.1% compared to the initial stage, decreased by 54.1% compared to CK. It reaches a significant difference compared to other experimental groups (P < 0.05). The chl a concentration of CK group shows a slow increase over time, which may be due to the experimental time being summer, strong sunlight, high temperature, and abundant nitrogen and phosphorus content in the water, meeting the conditions for rapid algae growth. Therefore, the concentration of chl a in CK shows a gradual upward trend, resulting in a significantly higher concentration measured at the end of the final experiment than the initial concentration.
2.3 Research on the pollution resistance performance of different emergent plants in eutrophic water
The proline content of Z, Y, and H group in eutrophic water shows a consistent upward trend over time, and the Pro content has increased by 26.4%, 28.6%, and 17.7% compared to the initial value, respectively; However, the Pro content in the bodies of Q and X group shows a decreasing trend, but the plant growth is good. Under sewage conditions, the MDA content of Z, Y, and H group showed a consistent upward trend over time, and the MDA content increased by 38.4%, 39.8%, and 23.9% compared to the initial value, respectively; However, the MDA content in the bodies of Q, X and L group showed a decreasing trend (Table 1).
Table 1
Analysis of pollution resistance of different plants in eutrophic water bodies
Treatment
|
Pro
|
MDA
|
0 d
|
60 d
|
0 d
|
60 d
|
Q
|
102.34
|
75.61
|
0.8125
|
0.6714
|
X
|
148.30
|
104.55
|
1.2451
|
0.9453
|
Z
|
29.97
|
37.89
|
0.3458
|
0.4785
|
Y
|
95.24
|
122.52
|
0.2678
|
0.3744
|
L
|
32.41
|
33.24
|
0.3017
|
0.1151
|
H
|
95.21
|
112.08
|
0.6528
|
0.8090
|