In this study, we show that although there is an abundance of SARS2-specific ASC in the BM short-lived plasma cell compartment, these cells are largely excluded from the LLPC compartment. This phenomenon is in stark contrast to influenza- and tetanus-specificities which are inherent to the BM LLPC. Hence, the lack of SARS2-specific ASC in the LLPC provides a mechanistic explanation of the short-lived serology of mRNA vaccines and how these mRNA platforms are unable to induce the LLPC formation. Early-minted ASC typically journey to the BM microniches and require time to fully mature into LLPC. Fundamental changes of the new ASC arrivals are required for maturation into LLPC. These BM maturation programs where an early-minted ASC undergoes dramatic morphological, transcriptional, and epigenetic modifications together with metabolic alterations provide the final maturation steps to become a LLPC10. Increased Ig transcripts11, increased unfolded protein response (UPR)34, and anti-apoptotic10 and autophagy35 programs are just a few of the pathways involved in ASC maturation36. Because this progression is arduous, not all the new arrivals can ultimately complete this entire LLPC process. Moreover, the exact kinetics of this maturation also remain unknown. In all, our study offers major insights into how the mRNA vaccines fail to induce the necessary ASC precursors with programs that are required to fully mature into LLPC.
The exact mechanisms of how LLPC are formed are still under investigation. At one time, it was thought that all human ASC had the potential to become LLPC by simply migrating to environments rich in survival factors; but recent evidence shows how imprinting of an early-minted ASC at the time of priming in addition to terminal maturation in survival niches endow particular properties for durability. LLPC are thought to come from memory B cells (mBC)37. Thus, a longer interval between prime-boost vaccine strategies for mBC formation may play a role in the generation of LLPC. Also, the phenotype of mBC such as FcRL5+ and the cytokine milieu i.e. IFNγ may also play key roles in the generation of LLPC38. It is likely that imprinting at the time of B cell induction also determines the LLPC fate but with SARS2 mRNA vaccines, they fail to imprint these LLPC programs. Finally, even after 33 months after the vaccine, we show that SARS2-specfic ASC are still excluded from the BM LLPC compartment. Thus, a longer tincture of time is unlikely to fill the LLPC subset.
In the patient with sequential BM aspirates nearly two years after the initial vaccine, there are two explanations for the abundant S2P specificity in PopA at 94 weeks and PopB at 62 and 94 weeks. Conventionally, PopA and PopB are considered the result of more recent immune responses. Thus, the very high frequency in PopA and PopB suggests another exposure to SARS2 antigens such as breakthrough asymptomatic infections temporally close to the corresponding BM sampling. Asymptomatic infections have been well described with the emergence of the highly transmissible Omicron variants23. Thus, assuming an asymptomatic infection, even 94 weeks after vaccination and infection(s), S2P-specific ASC cannot fill the LLPC compartment. Alternatively, it could be argued that lymph node S2P-specific IgG ASC take time to migrate to the BM microenvironment and reflect the product of ongoing germinal center (GC) reactions, which have been documented to last for up to 6 months after vaccination which is well after the peak of early-minted ASC responses in the blood (day 7)7. This argument still emphasizes the fact that even two years after the vaccines, PopB cannot differentiate into LLPC even with ongoing persistent GC.
Our results are consistent with recent BM studies by Tehrani et al. demonstrating that most spike-specific ASC are detectable in the CD19+ compartments post-SARS2 infection alone39. However, in this study, BM sampling was collected only 5-8 months post-illness and not up to 3 years as in our study39. Most importantly, this study used frozen BM ASC which are less reliable due to the fragility of BM ASC populations upon thawing. Also, the authors did not include longitudinal samples, IgA isotypes, Flu specificity, or PopA. Nonetheless, 5-8 months after infection alone, SARS2-specific ASC were also excluded in LLPC, similar to the finding in our study after vaccination.
In another flow cytometry-based BM study, Schulz et al. also found S1-specific responses predominately in the BM CD19+ compartment after vaccination40. In this study, BM samples were collected during hip joint replacement surgery from patients of up to 17 months post-SARS2-vaccination. While no Flu- or Tet-specificities were evaluated, the authors noted some SARS2 specificity in the CD19neg ASC compartment and concluded they were in fact long-lived, but these SARS2 specific ASC were notably in the CD45+ (of CD19neg) ASC subset40. The majority of LLPC as originally defined in Halliley et al. demonstrate downregulated CD45 in our LLPC9 (Suppl. Fig. S5), which is also consistent with previous studies41,42. Interestingly, in concordance with our study, in Schulz et al, the CD19negCD45neg subset which includes the majority of our previously defined LLPC also excluded the S1-specific responses40. Hence, the bona fide LLPC which may be a subset of the CD19neg BM ASC population likely harbors Flu- and Tet-specificities as well as measles- and mumps-specificities but appears to exclude SARS2-specific responses.
We cannot rule out a subset of BM PopB cells which may be an intermediary population on the road to maturing into the LLPC. Our previous single-cell transcriptional data showed that the most mature BM clusters with aggregated LLPC also contained some PopB11. Thus, simple surface markers CD19 and CD138 may be too blunt an instrument to dissect the heterogeneity of BM PopB. PopB likely contains some new arrivals as well as some early mature BM ASC subsets since Tet-specific responses reside in PopB and LLPC years after vaccination albeit at much lower frequencies in PopB compared to LLPC. Ultimately, additional dissection into the transcriptional and epigenetic differences in Tet- versus S2P-specific PopB (CD19+CD138+) cells may reveal important mechanistic differences in forming long-lived ASC.
Although the emergence of new viral variants confounded serum protection, in this study, we focused on responses against the original virus and the wildtype vaccines, knowing that they rapidly wane within 3-6 months regardless of the vaccine platform (mRNA and viral vector-based vaccines like adenovirus (Ad) vectors)3,4. The unstable nature of mRNA and the resultant transient expression of the spike protein during induction might explain the lack of sustained antibody responses. Interestingly, the Ad vectors persist for weeks, yet specific humoral immunity is also short-lasting3,4. Furthermore, recent evidence showed that the mRNA vaccine platforms do not induce strong type I IFN responses43. In vitro and animal studies suggest that type I IFN may play a role in LLPC44,45, but whether it is important for the generation of in vivo human LLPC will need further studies. Given both the mRNA and Ad vector vaccine platforms induce strong germinal center reactions and interactions with Tfh cells, the mechanisms underlying their failure to generate LLPC are even more puzzling2 suggesting dysfunction in the maturation process in BM microniche. In all, we merely suggest that before moving the current vaccines to the mRNA platforms, more studies on the durability of humoral immunity are needed.
Could the limited durability of neutralizing antibody responses be due to the structural nature of the spike protein itself and thus limited only to coronavirus vaccines? Coronaviruses lack highly repetitive organized structures or pathogen-associated structural patterns46. Most RNA viruses that induce long-lasting antibody immunity have on their surface rigid repetitive structures spaced 5-10nm47. In coronaviruses, the long spike proteins are embedded in a fluid membrane which are often loosely floating and widely spaced at 25nm apart46. Therefore, the inherent nature of the spike protein on coronaviruses itself may be an issue in B cell activation47 since neutralizing antibody responses to seasonal human coronaviruses, as well as SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV, are also short-lived2. Perhaps the long widely spaced spike protein structure of the coronaviruses may play an important role in antibody durability.
There are limitations in our study. First, our sample size is relatively small especially of those after vaccine and infection. Second, the infections were self-reported symptoms that warranted testing, so any asymptomatic infections were not confirmed. Third, primary BM ASC are rare cell types and BM aspirates are difficult to obtain and interrogate; thus, not all samples provided sufficient cells in each BM subset. Lastly, we had limited longitudinal and sequential samples with the longest at 33 months since the first SARS2 vaccine dose. Of course, it would be important to assess the BM compartment decades after the primary vaccine and as new variant SARS2 viruses continue to circulate.
In conclusion, the holy grail of vaccinology is the generation of LLPC. Our findings demonstrate the exclusion of SARS2 specificity in the BM LLPC compartment and provide novel insights of how the mRNA vaccines fail to induce necessary precursor programs to fully mature into BM LLPC. These findings have implications for the need to improve COVID-19 vaccination. Whether optimizing vaccine regimens or immunization schedules, engineering different spike proteins, or formulating vaccine adjuvants and delivery systems will need better understanding. Finally, interrogating the LLPC require invasive BM aspirates and a greater tincture of time (likely years); thus, identifying early biomarkers of early-minted blood ASC or LLPC precursors are needed to help predict the durability of new platform vaccines.