This study aimed to investigate the individual and combined effects of naturally derived compounds, SAC and CBD, in preserving cognitive function by preventing BBB/BRB disruption, glial cell activation and oxidative DNA damage in the established db/db mouse model of T2D.
Our metabolic measures in db/db mice were consistent with moderate T2D, including hyperglycaemia, hyperinsulinemia, and hypertriglyceridemia, along with insulin resistance and obesity. These moderately diabetic db/db mice displayed impaired short-term episodic memory, as evidenced by a decrease in preference index in the NOR test. Additionally, the mice showed reduced latency time in the PA test, indicating dysfunction in long-term memory formation mediated by the hippocampus and amygdala in response to aversive stimuli [42]. Importantly, our data indicate that dietary intervention with SAC and/or CBD improved short-term memory function, with SAC also preserving long-term memory.
The exact mechanisms by which SAC/CBD prevented cognitive decline in moderately diabetic db/db mice are not fully understood. In the db/db mice, either SAC, CBD, or their combination effectively reduced hyperinsulinemia to a similar extent as the anti-diabetic drug, metformin. These findings align with recent evidence indicating that SAC and CBD enhance insulin receptor sensitivity, lipid metabolism and cellular glucose uptake [43], [44]. Notably, SAC demonstrated efficacy in improving hypertriglyceridemia in db/db mice, in line with established lipid-modulating effects of cysteine compounds [16]. Additionally, CBD treatment resulted in a reduction in body weight, supporting recent clinical findings on the potential use of phytocannabinoids in obesity treatment [45]. However, it is crucial to note that the overall benefits of SAC and CBD, whether administered alone or in combination, against metabolic dysregulation were modest, leaving measures of insulin resistance elevated in db/db mice. Similarly, metformin exhibited limited restorative effects on diabetic metabolic status in this study, failing to significantly impact hyperglycaemia and insulin resistance as demonstrated in other studies [46]. These data suggest that the therapeutic effects of SAC and CBD in the CNS may be potentiated through mechanisms independent of glucose and insulin regulation.
Instead, the benefits of SAC and CBD on cognitive performance in db/db mice may attribute to its neurovascular protective anti-inflammatory/-oxidative properties. Indeed, the cognitive-preserving actions of SAC and CBD monotherapies have been reported in multiple disease models, involving vascular protection and amelioration of chronic reactive gliosis and oxidative stress in the CNS [47], [48].
Furthermore, the db/db mice exhibited significant cerebral abnormalities such as BBB leakage, reactive gliosis, and oxidative DNA damage. Retinal changes we observed in db/db mice included reduced GCC thickness, increased BRB leakage risk, and significant glial activation, all associated with impaired memory functions. These findings align with existing evidence linking cerebral and retinal microangiopathy, neuroinflammation, and oxidative stress to cognitive dysfunction and neural degeneration in the context of T2D [6], [12]. Interestingly, Corem et al., [49] reported transient BBB disruption in normoglycemic db/db mice, which disappeared upon diabetes onset. Emerging evidence suggests that both transient and prolonged BBB disruptions involve astrocyte reactivity and microglial activation in T2D and other neurodegenerative disorders [50]. Additionally, activated glia contribute to oxidative stress, leading to DNA mutations and cellular damage that exacerbates neuroinflammation [51].
Remarkably, treatment with natural agents conferred substantial neuroprotective effects in diabetic db/db mice. SAC and CBD, either alone or in combination, demonstrated potent anti-inflammatory effects, reducing GFAP-astrogliosis and Iba1-microglial activation. The SAC + CBD combination treatment notably restored BBB integrity more effectively than monotherapies. These findings are supported by previous studies, with SAC shown to decrease oxidative DNA damage in cerebral ischemia [52] and ameliorate reactive gliosis in the streptozotocin (STZ) rat model of diabetes [23]. CBD has been reported to attenuate BBB leakage and microglial activation in a viral multiple sclerosis model [27] and modulate astrocyte activity through the endocannabinoid system, suggesting potential therapeutic benefits for various neurological disorders [53].
Due to physiological similarities, we recently reported that the microvascular dysfunction and neuroinflammatory cascades in the diabetes brain are closely mirrored in the retina, leading to thinning of GCC cell layer [6]. Immunofluorescence analysis in this study showed an increased risk of focal BRB leakage, accompanied by GFAP-astrogliosis and Iba1-microglial activation in diabetic db/db mice. Evidence from T2D models suggests that BRB leakage and glial-mediated neuroinflammation contribute to retinal ganglion cell death [13], [54]. Importantly, our study provided novel evidence that SAC and CBD, whether alone or combined, provide neuroprotection against GCC thinning comparable to metformin. This preservation of retinal thickness may be due to reduced BRB leakage risk and severity, as well as complete protection against abnormal glial activation in the retina.
Although research on SAC and CBD in ocular diseases is limited, SAC has demonstrated potential to suppress GFAP-astrocyte immunoexpression in kainate-induced toxicity [55]. Similarly, CBD has been reported to reduce the expression of inflammatory cytokines and pro-adhesion molecules, which promote vascular permeability and cell death [28]. These reports suggest that SAC and CBD promote retinal health through modulation of glial cell activation.
Mechanistic research supports the effects of SAC and CBD on neurocognition. SAC's antioxidant actions involving nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) have been shown to preserve spatial learning and memory functions, along with immunomodulatory effects that down-regulate pro-inflammatory nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) cascades and reduce gliosis in the hippocampus [24], [56]. Similarly, CBD demonstrated benefits in improving episodic memory and social learning in models of Alzheimer’s disease, attributed to its modulation of various pathways involved neuroprotection, including the NF-κB/Nrf2 pathway [57]. CBD is also shown to activate nuclear receptors such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), which downregulates the expression of inflammatory genes in glia cells [58]. Overall, the neuroprotective effects of SAC and CBD observed in this study are supported by their anti-inflammatory and antioxidative actions, which may help mitigate memory impairment in T2D.
In contrast to SAC/CBD, metformin showed limited protection against glial-mediated neuroinflammation, despite a protective effect on the BBB. The modest improvements in memory function observed in metformin-treated db/db mice in this study may be due to its limited efficacy in neuroprotection. Contrary to our findings, De Oliveira et al., [59] reported substantial therapeutic benefits of metformin in STZ-induced T1D mice, including mitigation of spatial memory decline, astrocyte and microglial activation, and reduced levels of pro-leakage vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Likewise, Pilipenko et al., [60] documented improved cognitive function and reduced reactive gliosis in toxin-induced Alzheimer’s disease models. However, recent findings suggest minimal cognitive benefits with metformin treatment [61], and earlier studies even indicate that metformin may exacerbate neuroinflammation [62]. These discrepancies warrant further investigation and suggest that while metformin is an effective anti-diabetic medication, it may not be the optimal therapeutic choice for addressing CNS complications.
Clinical evidence highlights the impact of metabolic dysregulation on neurovascular injury and cognitive deficits [63]. Our study re-affirmed the association between CNS pathology and the metabolic profile of T2D, particularly disruptions in insulin regulation. The central hypothesis of our study proposed that SAC and CBD could preserve cognitive function, in part, by ameliorating the underlying cerebral pathophysiology. To verify this hypothesis, we investigated the relationship between BBB leakage and makers of glial activation and DNA oxidation. Additionally, we investigated the links between memory performance and cerebral pathophysiologies in experimental T2D.
Our study revealed significant correlations between BBB leakage and GFAP-astrogliosis, as well as Iba1-microglial activation, which are consistent with existing literature [64]. Under diabetic conditions, reactive astrocytes exhibit reduced functionality [65], leading to retraction of astrocytic end-feet from microvessels [66]. Similarly, pathologically active microglia promote vascular permeability by producing inflammatory cytokines and engaging in abnormal phagocytosis of neurovascular elements [67]. Our correlation findings emphasise the role of reactive gliosis in the pathogenesis of BBB leakage in T2D. Unsurprisingly, impairments in short-term and long-term hippocampal memory functions were associated with BBB leakage, as well as glial activation. Therefore, the cognitive benefits of SAC and CBD formulations may be linked to their actions on neurovascular and glial components.
While our study provides valuable insights, certain aspects warrant further investigation. For instance, we observed significant changes in the total neuroretina and nuclear sub-layers (INL and ONL) following treatment with SAC and/or CBD and metformin, despite the absence of apparent diabetes-related changes. Research on the diabetic changes in INL and ONL thicknesses is inconclusive, and these sub-layers may not be prime targets of diabetic neurodegeneration [68], [69]. Additionally, our ex vivo assessments of the retina revealed a lower incidence of BRB leakage compared to previous studies in the same model [70]. These disparities may be explained by variations in immunofluorescence markers of BRB leakage and the significant differences in experimental timelines.
It is important to acknowledge the limitations of our study. The use of a single experimental time-point precludes the temporal characterisation of CNS injury in T2D. Furthermore, the assessment of short-term memory using the NOR test was hindered by reduced locomotor activity in diabetic mice, especially in the SAC and CBD monotherapy groups, and these results should be interpreted cautiously. Future studies should consider a broader panel of cognitive tests and their suitability for the db/db obese phenotype. Regarding ex vivo measures, the assessment of neuroinflammation could have been strengthened by additional examination of proinflammatory cytokines and/or other secretary products of microglia and reactive astrocytes. Similarly, the retina could be assessed for additional measures of neurodegeneration, such as expression of TUNEL or apoptotic-positive cells.
The phenotype of experimental and clinical T2D includes hypertension, systemic inflammation, and peripheral vascular abnormalities. While these measures extend beyond the scope of our study, they require investigation to elucidate the broader effects of SAC and CBD in therapeutic management of T2D.
In conclusion, our study enhances the understanding of T2D-related complications in the CNS. The findings demonstrate that SAC and CBD are neuroprotective, with the capacity to prevent neurovascular lesions, glial activation, neurodegeneration, and oxidative injury. These effects contribute to preserving memory function and support the use of naturally derived agents in diabetes therapy.