The silique of ecotype Jm-1 accumulated more Cd than ecotype Kyo-0
The CdCl2 treatment was applied after 20 days of normal culture and the Cd concentrations in the roots of the two ecotypes showed no differences, while the Cd concentrations in the leaves, stems, and siliques of Jm-1 were significantly higher, as they were 0.19, 0.20, and 0.72 times higher than those of Kyo-0, respectively (Figure 1A). After 25 days of normal culture, the two Arabidopsis ecotypes were treated with the same concentration of CdCl2, and similarly, the Cd concentrations in the leaves, stems, and siliques of Jm-1 were significantly higher than those of Kyo-0, as the levels in Jm-1 were 1.01, 0.21, and 1.56 times greater, respectively, but no difference was found in the roots (Figure 1B). Furthermore, for the 33-day-old ecotypes receiving the CdCl2 treatment, differences in the Cd concentrations were found only in the leaves, stems, and siliques of the two ecotypes, as the levels in Jm-1 were 0.24, 0.17, and 1.22 times higher, respectively.
No differences in biomass and xylem sap Cd between Jm-1 and Kyo-0
After 25 days of normal culture, there were no significant differences in the dry weights between the different organs of the two Arabidopsis ecotypes without treatment (Figure 2A), and even after the CdCl2 treatments there were no marked differences in their growth performances (Figure 2B). With the CdCl2 treatment, there was no significant difference in the Cd concentrations of the xylem sap (Figure 2C). This indicates that the Cd long-distance transport from the root to the shoot had no impact on the silique Cd accumulations between Jm-1 and Kyo-0.
Cd subcellular distribution between Jm-1 and Kyo-0
To further investigate the differences in Cd concentration between the two ecotypes, the subcellular components were then extracted from the different organs, and their Cd concentrations were determined. We found that the Cd concentrations in the CW of the leaves of Jm-1 were significantly lower than those of Kyo-0, and were higher in the stems and siliques of Jm-1, but there was no difference in the Cd concentrations between the roots of the two ecotypes (Figure 3A). In the cell organs that were gradient centrifuged and extracted, the Cd concentrations of the leaves, stems, and siliques did not differ between the two ecotypes, while the Cd concentration in the roots of Jm-1 was higher than in those of Kyo-0 (Figure 3B). In Jm-1, the concentration of Cd in the soluble fractions of the siliques was significantly higher than that in Kyo-0, while differences in Cd concentration were not found in the leaves, stems, or roots between Jm-1 and Kyo-0 (Figure 3C).
Cd content in CW fractions and PME activity of Jm-1 and Kyo-0
Due to the difference of Cd concentration in the CWs of the two ecotypes, the CWs were then gradient centrifuged and their Cd concentrations measured. For EDTA-pectin, it was found that the Cd concentrations in the leaves of Kyo-0 were significantly higher than that of Jm-1, but these differences were reversed in the stem and silique, and there was no significant difference in the Cd concentrations of the roots of the two ecotypes (Figure 4A). We did not find differences in the Na2CO3 pectin and cellulose of the two ecotypes for the different organs (leaves, stems, or roots), while the concentrations of Cd in the siliques of Jm-1 were significantly higher than those in Kyo-0 (Figure 4B, D). Except for the roots, the Cd concentrations in the hemicellulose of the other organs (leaves, stems, or roots) were higher than in those of Jm-1 (Figure 4C). The PME activity was higher in Kyo-0 than in Jm-1 with the Cd treatments (Figure 4E).
Metal concentrations in different organs and phloem sap
In Cd-free/control conditions (Figure 5A), the Ca concentrations in the leaves and stems were strikingly higher in Jm-1 than in Kyo-0, while this difference was not found in the siliques or roots of the two ecotypes. The concentrations of Fe, Cu, and Zn were higher in the leaves, stems, and roots of Jm-1, but no difference was found in the siliques. The Mg and Mn concentrations in the Jm-1 leaves, stems, and siliques were significantly higher than in Kyo-0, but this difference was not found in the roots.
After the CdCl2 treatment (Figure 5B), the concentrations of Ca, Fe, and Mg in the different organs showed the same trend between the two ecotypes, that is, concentrations in the stems and siliques of Jm-1 were higher than those in Kyo-0, but differences in the concentrations in the leaves and roots were not found. Furthermore, the other three metal concentrations (Cu, Mn, and Zn) showed the same trend in different organs between the two ecotypes, i.e., concentrations in the stems were significantly higher in Jm-1, but we did not detect any clear differences between their leaves, siliques, or roots.
We then examined the metal concentrations in the phloem sap, and found that the Ca, Mg, and Mn concentrations were remarkable higher in Jm-1 than in Kyo-0 in the Cd-free/control conditions, and no differences were detected in the Fe, Cu, or Zn concentrations (Figure 6A). After the CdCl2 treatment, concentrations of Cd, Fe, Mg, and Mn were found to be high in Jm-1, among which the Fe and Mg concentrations were significantly high (Figure 6B). However, differences were not found in the Ca, Cu, and Zn concentrations for these two ecotypes (Figure 6B).
Associated transporter gene expression
We measured the expression levels of related genes, including those for PMEs, yellow strip-like proteins (YSLs), natural resistance-associated macrophage proteins (NRAMPs), zinc regulated transporter/iron-regulated transporter (ZRT/IRT1)-related proteins (ZIPs), and the vacuolar Cd compartment-related genes that are responsible for transferring Cd from the cytoplasm to the vacuole. The expression of PME1, PME2, PME3, PME12, PME18, PME31, and PME35 was high in Kyo-0 under normal conditions, and after the Cd treatment the expression of PME1, PME2, PME12, PME25, PME18, PME31, and PME41 was high in Kyo-0. Furthermore, the expression levels for most PMEs were increased in Kyo-0 after Cd treatment (Figure 7A). In the Cd-free/control conditions, the expression of YSL6 was obviously higher in Jm-1, while there was no significant difference in the expression of the other YSLs (Figure 7B). After the Cd treatment, only the expression of YSL3 showed differences between the two ecotypes, and its expression was much higher in Kyo-0 compared with that in Jm-1 (Figure 7B). There was no significant difference in the MTP8 expression between the two ecotypes with or without treatment (Figure 7C). Among the NRAMPs, only the expression of NRAMP3, NRAMP4, and NRAMP6 showed differences between the two ecotypes, and their expression was higher in Jm-1. However, with the Cd treatment, only the expression of NRAMP6 was higher in Jm-1, while the other NRAMPs showed no significant differences (Figure 7C). Similarly, in the ZIPs, only the expressions of ZIP4 and ZIP11 were different without the Cd treatment, as their expression levels in Jm-1 were higher. However, after the Cd treatment, there were no significant differences in the other ZIPs, and the expression of ZIP11 in Kyo-0 was significantly higher than that in Jm-1 (Figure 7D). For the relative genes responsible for transferring cadmium from cytoplasm to vacuoles, the expression levels for CAX2, CAX3, and ABCC2 were not significantly different in either the control or Cd treatment groups (Figure 7E). However, CAX1 expression was significantly upregulated after the Cd treatment, but the expression levels in Kyo-0 were not significantly higher than those in Jm-1, and there was no remarkable difference compared with those under the Cd-free/control conditions (Figure 7E).
Then, cax1 and CAX1-OE material was treated with CdCl2 after 25 days of hydroponic growth, and Colo.0 was used as the control. The Cd concentrations were also measured in the leaves, stems, siliques, and roots. In the leaves and stems, the Cd concentrations in CAX1-OE were lower than in Colo.0, while there was no difference between Colo.0 and cax1 (Supplementary Figure 1). Cd concentrations in the silique of cax1 were much higher than those in Colo.0, but there was no difference between Colo.0 and CAX1-OE (Supplementary Figure 1). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the Cd concentrations of the roots (Supplementary Figure 1).