A schematic illustration for synthesizing anisotropic Au NPs is shown in Fig. 1. A detailed synthetic protocol is described in the method section. In brief, spherical seeds were prepared by a rapid injection of 20 mM sodium borohydride to aqueous solution of CTAC and HAuCl4 under vigorous stirring. The seed solution left undisturbed for 1 hr. Later, CTAC capped spherical seeds (25 µL) were transferred to growth solution A (Fig. 1). When the colour of growth solution (A) turned to light pink, 25 µL of seed solution from the growth solution (A) was immediately transferred to the growth solution (B). The resultant solution was left undisturbed for 20 min at 30°C. The solution was centrifuged twice (2500 rpm) and dispersed the solid residue in deionized water. In the seed-mediated approach, the growth of anisotropic Au NP depends on a number of reaction parameters including, the concentration/amount of reducing agent and halide ions and the concentration of metal precursor and temperature. However, the most direct way to control the seed growth is the concentration of reducing agent (AA).
To investigate how the concentration of AA effects the shape evolution of Au NPs, we varied the volume of 40 mM AA added to the growth solution. When a low amount of 40 mM AA (60 µL) was added to the growth solution, we observed polydispersity in the shape of Au NPs (Fig. 2(a) and Fig. S1 in the ESM). This is due to an incomplete or low reduction rate of Au3+ ions (1.9 mmol) by AA (2.4 mmol). For the complete reduction of Au3+ ions, the concentration of AA should be twice as the concentration of Au3+ ions. To quantitatively determine the shape yield, we analyzed more than 200 NPs from different scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. We noticed the emergence of cuboctahedra Au NPs with 20% yield as a major reaction product under this condition (Fig. 3(a)). The yield of cuboctahedra Au NPs significantly enhanced to ~ 89% when the amount of 40 mM AA in the growth solution was increased to 75 µL (Figs. 2(b) and 3(a), and Fig. S2 in the ESM). We observed a change in the shape of Au NP from cuboctahedra to truncated cube as the volume of 40 mM AA increased from 75 µL to 80 µL in the growth solution (Fig. 2(c) and Fig. S3 in the ESM). Here, the quantitative yield of cuboctahedra NP was decreased to ~ 21% compared to the yield of the truncated cube (~ 53%) (Fig. 3(a)). The degree of truncation also decreased with the increase in the amount of 40 mM AA (from 80 µL to 90 µL) in the growth solution, and cubic Au NPs with rounded corner were obtained as a primary reaction product (yield ~ 76%) along with notably low yield (~ 4%) of truncated cube (Figs. 2(d) and 3(a)).
The overgrowth of cubic (growth at the corners) commenced when 95 µL of 40 mM AA was added to the growth solution (Fig. 2(e)). SEM image revealed the presence of overgrown cubic (~ 53%) and cubic Au NP (~ 23%) in the reaction mixture (Fig. 3(a)). This suggested that all cubic NP do not overgrow at the same rate. The stellated Au NPs, i.e., octapod (yield ~ 80%) and stellated octahedron (yield ~ 89%) were obtained when 100 µL and 110 µL of 40mM AA was added to the growth solution (Figs. 2(f), (g), Fig. 3(a), and Figs S4 and S5 in the ESM). The formation of stellated Au NPs resulted from the continued growth at the corners of the cubic NP. It should be noted that we found a difference in the morphology of octapod and stellated octahedron. An octapod NP is formed from the protrusion of eight arms from the core of NP. A stellated octahedron is the stellation of the octahedron, which is built by placing eight tetrahedra on each face of octahedron (Fig. 2(i)). SEM images taken at different view displayed in Fig. 2(j) further confirmed the formation of stellated octahedron Au NP. When the reduction rate was significantly increased by adding 150 µL of 40 mM AA, rhombic dodecahedral Au NP bound by the {110} facets in high yield (~ 88%) were formed (Fig. 2(h) and Fig. 3(a)). In highly supersaturated solution (high reduction rate), an accelerated growth along the < 100 > and < 111 > directions (because of the low packing density of CTAC molecules on the {100} and {111} facets) guided the formation of rhombic dodecahedra Au NP enclosed by 12 {110} high energy facets. Our results suggested that a progressive increase in the amount of AA in the growth solution leads to morphological evolution from cuboctahedra to cube, octapod, stellated octahedra, and finally, rhombic dodecahedra.
The synthesis mechanism of anisotropic Au NPs involved three steps in the seed-mediated process. In the first step, CTAC capped Au seed particles (size: 2 ± 1 nm) formed (Fig. S6 (a) in the ESM). A detailed structural HRTEM analysis performed by Walsh et al revealed the single crystalline nature of Au seed particles synthesized using a similar procedure.[42] Furthermore, the visual appearance of CTAC capped Au seed solution (brown colour) is similar to synthesized CTAB capped Au seed solution, suggesting no significance difference in seed particles capped by CTAC and CTAB (Fig. S7 in ESM). In the second step, CTAC capped Au seed particles introduced to the first growth solution. The colour of the solution turned to light pink colour and red colour after 5s and 15 min of the reaction, respectively (insets in Fig. S6 (b) and (c) in the ESM). This suggested the enlargement of Au seed particles along with time. To study the reaction products from the first growth solution after 5s and 15 min of the reaction, we stopped the reaction by adding PEG-thiol (Poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether thiol) to the growth solution followed by centrifugating at 10000 rpm. TEM image showed the formation of 11 ± 2 nm Au NPs after 5s (pink colour solution, Fig. S6 (b)) and SEM image revealed Au NPs of size 30 ± 2 nm after 15 min (red colour solution, Fig. S6 (c)). In the third step, the seed particles of size ~ 11 nm from the first solution (light pink colour solution) were added to the second growth solution, thus, facilitating the growth of anisotropic Au NPs. The morphology of Au NPs in the second growth solution is governed by the amount of AA added to the second growth solution. It should be noted that the addition of large size Au seed particles (~ 30 nm) to the growth solution resulted to a low yield of stellated and non-stellated Au NPs. Therefore, we choose optimal size (~ 11 nm) of Au seed particles to fabricate Au NPs in different morphologies.
The reduction rate of reaction plays an important role in achieving thermodynamic and kinetic favourable reaction products because it influences the growth reaction pathways of NPs (i.e. diffusion-controlled vs. surface processes). Therefore, it is imperative to establish a relationship between the reduction rate and the morphology of NP (thermodynamic vs. kinetic product). We determined the rate constant (k) of growth reaction by varying amount of 40 mM AA and fitting the absorbance (A)-time (t) profile curves obtained from dynamic ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) measurements with the equation (Fig. S10 in the ESM)
$$A={A}_{max} (1-{e}^{-k{t}^{n}})$$
1 where Amax is the maximum absorbance of the growth reaction and n is a critical growth exponent.[43] The results displayed in the table 1 showed the increase in the rate constant (k) of the reaction with the increased amount of 40 mM AA in the growth solution (implying the control of the reduction rate of precursor via the amount of AA added to the solution). When a low amount of AA is present in the growth solution, the sluggish reduction rate of the metallic precursor leads to low supersaturation. This results in a high concentration gradient between the bulk and monomer concentration in the vicinity of growing NP (a low diffusion rate of monomers from bulk to NP surface, i.e., diffusion controlled growth). These conditions favor the evolution of Au NP into different morphologies of low surface energy (thermodynamic Wulff construction).[44] In FCC metal, the surface energy (γ) of different crystallographic facets follows the trend; γ{110}>γ{100}>γ{111}.[45] In our experiments, we obtained cuboctahedron Au NPs enclosed by both {100} and {111} facets with an area ratio of 1: 0.58 at a low reduction rate (Figs. 2(a) and (b)). As the reduction rate was slightly increased by adding 80 µL of 40 mM AA, the surface area of {100} facets increase, and the surface area of {111} decreases. As a result, truncated cube Au NP formed (Fig. 2(c)). Therefore, the diffusion controlled growth reaction under low supersaturation regime facilitate the fabrication of thermodynamically favourable reaction products (cuboctahedra and truncated cube Au NP).
When the concentration of AA in the growth solution was sufficiently increased, the faster reduction rate led to higher supersaturation (excess concentration of monomers in the growth solution) and the rapid diffusion of monomer units to the growing NP surface. In this case, the surface controlled process dominates, and the shape of Au NPs is governed by kinetic factors, such as the rate of deposition (Vdeposition) and diffusion (Vdiffusion). A balance of deposition rate and diffusion rate (Vdeposition=Vdiffusion) favoured the formation of Au nanocubes bound by the high surface energy {100} facets (Fig. 2(d)). When Vdeposition > Vdiffusion, the surface diffusion is very sluggish, and thereby, the growth facilitates at the corner of cubic NP (in the < 111 > direction). As a result, concave Au nanocubes were obtained (Fig. 2(e)). Further increase in the reduction rate significantly enhances the rate of deposition (Vdeposition > > Vdiffusion) and suppresses the surface diffusion (Vdiffusion). The growth under such conditions led to the formation of kinetically favourable products (octapods and stellated octahedra), as shown in Figs. 2(f) and (g).
The surface diffusion is a thermally activated process that can be controlled by the reaction temperature. To elucidate the role of surface diffusion in the formation of stellated Au NPs (octapod and stellated octahedron), we synthesized Au NPs at different temperatures at the fixed volumes of 40 mM AA (95 µL and 110 µL). When the reaction temperature was set to 10°C, Au NPs of cubic morphology formed instead of concave Au NPs (AA = 95µL) and stellated octahedron (AA = 100 µL) formation at 30°C, indicating the balance deposition rate and surface diffusion at the surface of NP (Figs. S9(a) and (d) in the ESM). Raising the temperature of the growth solution to 70°C and 90°C, we obtained concave cubic and stellated octahedron Au NPs as a major reaction product (Figs. S9 (b), (c), (e) and (f) in the ESM). These morphologies of Au NPs are identical to morphologies of Au NPs obtained at 30°C. From these results, it is clear that the increase in the growth temperature from 30°C to 90°C does not have a significant influence on the surface processes (i.e. Vdeposition > > Vdiffusion). Furthermore, our results also suggest that the increase in the temperature of growth solution has no significant influence on the packing density of CTAC on the high energy surfaces of Au NPs or the solubility of CTAC surfactant molecules. Therefore, Au NPs of concave cubic, octapod and stellated octahedron morphologies can be synthesized as long as the surface diffusion of atomic species are suppressed, for example, the temperature range from 30°C to 90°C. At a low temperature (below 30°C), the balance between the surface diffusion and deposition lead to the formation cubic Au NPs.
To investigate the stability of the pre-formed Au NPs of octapod morphology, we employed molecular dynamics simulations under varying thermal conditions. We did not observe the change in the morphology of thermally equilibrated Au octapods at room temperature (Fig. 3(b)). The octapod Au seed at 300 K was heated until the temperature reached 500 K, and the system left in a thermal bath for about 100 ns or more. A very few minor changes can be noticed at the atomic level (not at the macro level) in the Au octapod (Fig. 3(c)). This suggested no significant surface diffusion of atoms on the surface of NPs at both room temperature and 500 K. We then considered to heat up the system until it reached 700 K and left the system to find its final morphology in the thermal bath for 200 ns. In this case, the disappearance of branches in the stellated Au NP indicated the activation of the surface diffusion process, i.e., the migration of Au atoms from branches/arms to fill the gap between the arms. As a result, the morphology of Au NP changed from octapod to rounded cubic as show in Fig. 3(d), indicating a significant increase in the rate of surface diffusion (Vdiffusion > > Vdeposition). We noticed a further change in the shape of Au NPs to spherical when the system was left at 1350K in the thermal bath for another 450 ns (Fig. 3(e)). These simulation results suggest the stability of octapod morphology of Au NPs at high temperature upto 500K, and the significant increase in the surface diffusion of atomic species above 500 K can cause the change in the morphology of Au NPs, i.e., cubic (700 K) and spherical (1350 K).
To examine how the packing density of molecules/ions around NPs influences the surface processes and, thus, the formation of stellated or non-stellated Au NPs, a surface-sensitive XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) technique was used to collect survey and high-resolution XPS spectra from various anisotropic Au NPs shown in Figs. 2(b)-(d) and Figs. 2(f)-(h). The survey spectra showed C, N, O, Cl and Au in all samples (Table S1 in the ESM). However, we did not notice any trace amount of Br ions on the surface of anisotropic Au NPs. The absence of Br- ions on the surface of Au NPs suggested no interaction of Br- ions to the growing NPs (i.e. no chemisorption of Br- ions on the Au surface). The presence of Br- ions in the growth solution play a role in regulating the reduction potential of the metal precursor by forming [AuBr2]-, which is lower than to [AuCl2]-.[31] Therefore, the role of Br- ions appeared to control the reduction rate of the metal precursor via increasing or decreasing its concentration in the growth solution. The seed-mediated growth in the absence of NaBr under similar conditions yielded polyhedral or ill-defined shape Au NPs (Fig. S10 in the ESM) because the rapid reduction rate in the absence of NaBr suppressed the migration of atomic species on the surface of growing NP.
The deconvoluted high resolution XPS spectra of C1s displayed three distinct peaks. The peaks at ~ 285 eV (C-C/C-H) and ~ 286.5 eV(C-N) revealed the presence of CTAC molecules on the surface of anisotropic Au NPs (Fig. 4(a)). The presence of CTAC molecules can also be confirmed by the presence of quaternary ammonium peak at ~ 402.3 eV in N1s spectra (Fig. S11 in the ESM). A shoulder peak toward higher binding energy at ~ 288.7 eV and the peak at ~ 286.5 (C-O) suggested the presence of carboxyl (O-C = O) functional group on the surface of Au NPs. These carboxyl functional groups can be arised from AA (ascorbic acid or ascorbate ions), indicating the existence of chemisorbed ascorbate ions along with CTAC molecules on the surface of anisotropic NPs. This peak intensity differed across all samples, and stellated Au NPs showed a clear shoulder peak (Figs. 4(d) and (e)). We determined the relative intensity ratio (%) of peak (O-C = O) to other peaks by integrating the area under the deconvoluted peaks. This ratio turned out to low, i.e., ~ 2.7%, ~ 2.6%, ~ 2.4% and ~ 2.4% for cuboctahedra (Fig. 2b)), truncated cube (Fig. 2(c)), cube (Fig. 2(d)), and rhombic dodecahedra (Fig. 2<(h)), respectively. Stellated Au NPs (Figs. 2(f) and 2(g)) showed a high ratio (~ 4.5%) compared to other shapes. The results from XPS data analysis revealed the presence of different packing density of molecules/ions across various shapes from cubic to stellated octahedron. Among different morphologies, stellated Au NPs contained relatively a higher density of AA (i.e. relatively high packing density of CTAC and AA on the {100} facets relative to the {111} facets) on their surfaces than other shapes. This high packing density of molecules and ions can significantly suppress the migration of atomic species from corner to flat surfaces (low surface diffusion rate). The rapid growth along the < 111 > direction, thus, facilitated the formation of stellated NPs (Vdiffusion < < Vdeposition). A low density of AA on the surface of cuboctahedra, truncated cube, and cube Au NPs led to the overall low surface coverage of CTAC and AA on the {100} facets. As a consequence, a relatively high surface diffusion led to the formation of non-stellated Au NPs (Vdiffusion > > Vdeposition). Therefore, the reduction rate of precursor and concentration of AA as well as the packing density of CTAC on the high energy facets play important in formation of stellated Au NPs by suppressing the surface diffusion. It is also known that reducing power of AA depends on the pH of the growth solution and increases with the increase in the pH of the growth solution. [33] The increased reduction rate of the reaction can produce excess concentration of reduced Au species which may disrupt the micellar structure of CTAC molecules on the surface on the surface of growing Au NPs. Therefore, the pH of the growth can also affect the morphology of Au NPs.
To illustrate the role of surfactant molecules CTAC and NaBr in the formation of stellated and non-stellated Au NPs, we replaced CTAC by CTAB (hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide) and NaBr by NaCl. Au NPs were grown under identical condition by varying the amount of 40 mM AA (75 µL, 90 µL and 110 µL) in the growth solution. We noticed Au nanorods as a major reaction product and other shapes as byproducts (Figure S12 in the ESM). The shape yield of gold nanorods appeared to be increase with the increase in the amount of 40 mM AA in the growth solution. However, we did not notice the formation of stellated and non-stellated Au NPs. These results indicate the role of CTAC and NaBr in the formation of stellated and non-stellated Au NPs. This can be explained based on the stability of elongated CTAB micellar structure than CTAC micellar structure, thus facilitating the formation of Au nanorods.[33]
To study the effect of seed aging on the size and morphology, we synthesized Au NPs using aged seed particles in the presence of the varied amount of AA. It should be noted that the colour of the seed solution changed from brown (1 hr) to light red (24 hrs) and dark red (96 hrs). The change in colour indicated the increased in the size of seed particles, which can have an influence on the size and morphology of NPs. When the seed solution was aged for 1hr, the size of Au NPs increased from 76 nm to 88 nm along with the increase in the volume of 40 mM AA (75 µL to 110 µL) in the growth solution (Fig. 5(a)). At a high volume of 40 mM AA (150 µL), the size of Au NPs was measured to be 74 nm. This decrease in size can be attributed to a high rate of Au precursor reduction and the rapid consumption of Au atoms. However, we did not notice any trend in the size of anisotropic Au NPs grown by 24 hrs and 96 hrs aged seed solution in the presence of the varied amount of AA (Fig. 5(a) and Figs. S13 and S14 in the ESM). At a fixed amount of AA, an overall increase in the size of anisotropic Au NP can be seen as the aging time of seed particles increased. The seed particles aged for 96 hrs yield stellated octahedron Au NPs in the range of AA amounts (90 µL to 110 µL) in the growth solution (Fig. S14 in the ESM).
Au NPs display a localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR). The position of LSPR depends on the shape and size of Au NPs, including the number of vertices and faces. To investigate the shape-dependent LSPR property of Au NPs produced in this work, ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy was used. Cuboctahedra Au NP showed a LSPR peak at around 562 nm, which can be attributed to a dipolar mode (Fig.
5(b)). As the shape of NP changed from cuboctahedra to truncated cubic, and cubic (i.e. the degree of truncation or the number of faces decreases), the LSPR peak was red-shifted from 562 nm to 583 nm (Fig.
5(b)). Our results are in agreement with the theoretical model that explains a red-shift in the peak with the change in the shape of Au NPs from cuboctahedra to cubes.[46] The LSPR peak was red-shifted for concave Au NP (or partially overgrown nanocube) compare to Au nanocube. As the shape of NP further evolved into octapod (612 nm) and stellated octahedra (623 nm) morphology, an additional red-shift in the LSPR peak can be seen than to cubic and concave Au NPs (Fig. 5(c)). Here, a broadening in LSPR peaks of stellated Au NPs can be attributed to the variation in the size, arm length and tip size of Au NPs. A more intense depolarizing field caused this red-shift at high charge density regions (the presence of sharp corners and edges on the concave, octapod, and stellated octahedra). The rhombic dodecahedral Au NPs showed the LSPR peak at the wavelength of 562 nm, which is blue-shifted compared to stellar Au NPs due to the absence of sharp edges and corners (Fig. 5(c)). The results from UV-vis measurements confirmed the formation of Au NPs in different morphologies. The growth kinetics of the seed-mediated reaction depends on the type and concentration of halides. To illustrate this, we grown Au NPs in the presence of NaCl and NaBr. The growth in the presence of the varied amount of 10 mM NaCl resulted to ill-defined polyhedral morphology of Au NPs (Fig. S15 in the ESM). This uncontrolled growth of Au NPs is due to the rapid reduction rate of reaction in the presence of Cl- ions (due to higher reduction potential of [AuCl2]-). However, the controlled addition of NaBr to the growth solution reduces the ability of Au3+ to Au because Br- ions strongly interact with Au precursor and thus, lower down the reduction potential of the precursor by forming [AuBr2]- complex. Au NPs were grown by varying the volume of 10 mM NaBr added to the growth solution at a fixed volume of 40 mM AA (100 µL). The results displayed in Figs. 6(a)-(d) displayed a gradual change in the morphology of Au NP from octapod to nanocube with an increase in the amount of 10 mM NaBr in the growth solution. It can be seen that the arm length of octapod NP decreased from 54 ± 4 nm to 20 ± 3 nm with the increase in NaBr (Fig. 6(f)). Moreover, the angle between adjacent arms of octapod NP increased with the increase in the concentration of NaBr (Fig. S16 in the ESM). The quantitative yields of octapod and nanocube were determined based on a visual inspection of more than 200 NPs from different SEM images. The analysis showed the progressive decrease in the yield of octapod from 78–9% and an increase in the yield of Au nanocubes from 22–72% as the volume of 10 mM NaBr increased from 20 µL to 70µL in the growth solution (Fig. 6(e)). From these results, it can be learned that the addition of increased amount of 10 mM NaBr slowed down the reduction rate of reaction. This shifted the NP growth from surface controlled reaction (high reduction rate) to diffusion-controlled (low reduction rate).
For a clear description about the evolution of stellated Au NPs and other shapes, we constructed experimentally a morphology diagram based on experiments under different conditions (Fig. 7). The diagram displayed the formation of octapod Au NPs in the molar ratio of AA/Au3+ from 1.5 to 1.7 and NaBr concentration up to 30 µmoles. The stellated octahedron Au NPs were synthesized by adjusting the molar ratio (AA/ Au3+) between 1.7 and 2.1, and NaBr concentration up to 30 µmoles. The rhombic dodecahedra Au NPs were seen over a wide range of AA/Au3+ (above 2.1) and NaBr concentration. The other shapes, cuboctahedron, and truncated cubic NPs can be obtained at a lower molar ratio of AA/Au3+ (between 0.6 to 1.4). Interestingly, cubic Au NPs were emerged as a primary reaction product in the narrow molar ratio range (AA/Au3+~1.4–1.5) at a low concentration of NaBr. As the concentration of NaBr increased (above 30 µmoles), the cubic Au NPs can be synthesized over a wide ratio (AA/Au3+) range from 1.4 to 2.1. Therefore, the morphology diagram revealed the importance of AA, Au3+, and NaBr concentrations in the formation of stellated and non-stellated Au NPs.
Self-assembly of anisotropic Au NPs into superstructures is a promising approach to fabricate next-generation functional materials with enhanced and collective physical properties. The properties of self-assembled materials depend on the shape, orientation, and spatial arrangement of the nanoscale building blocks. In this work, we also explore the self-assembly of the stellated octahedron and rhombic dodecahedron Au NP, i.e., the packing of these NPs within self-assembled superstructures. For the self-assembly, a concentrated solution of CTAC capped Au NPs was dropped on the silicon wafer (5 mm2) and left for overnight drying in a closed environment. SEM images shown in Figs. 8(a) and (b) displayed the self-assembly of stellated octahedron Au NPs. Upon close examination, different packing arrangements of the stellated Au NPs can be seen. The stellated Au NPs are packed in cubic crystal symmetry (supercrystal with {100} facets), which is the most likely the case because this configuration provides the highest structural stability as four branches per NP rest on the substrate (Fig. S17 (a) in the ESM). Another arrangement showed the packing of stellated NPs in < 111 > direction, i.e., supercrystal with {111} facets. Similarly, we observed two different packing arrangements in the self-assembled rhombic dodecahedron Au NPs superstructures (Figs. 8 (c) and (d)). Assuming the cubic symmetry of supercrystals, two different arrangements can be understood based on the packing of NPs in the < 111 > and < 100 > orientations, and thereby obtained superstructures with (111) and (100) faces. The self-assembly of stellated and rhombic dodecahedron Au NPs is guided by the surfactant (CTAC) mediated interparticle depletion forces (i.e. the surfactant is believed to facilitate the self-assembly). [20]
The individual octapod AuNPs are expected to exhibit strong coupling with their LSPRs with the incident light field. Fig. S17 (a) in the ESM displayed a self-assembled monolayer of stellated octahedron in cubic symmetry when the self-assembly was performed with a low concentration of NPs. Such a self-assembled superstructure can build up higher electric field enhancement due to the plasmonic hotspots at the corners or assemblies of the NPs. Thus, models were constructed to numerically investigate the distributions of electric field using FEM (finite element method). To simplify the calculations in the simulations, only short-range ordered 2 x 2 and 3 x 3 array were considered. The electric field intensity distribution has been calculated and shown in Fig. S17 (b) in the ESM (inset along the x-y plane for a single particle) and Fig. S18 in the ESM. It can be observed that the strongest enhancements are located at the plasmonic hotspots or the corners and edges of the octapod AuNPs, and these can be attributed to the plasmonic nanoantenna effect.[47] The simulations also indicate that the plasmonic enhancement is higher for a bi-layer (2 x 2 array) than that for monolayer or single particle arrangement. This is because there are more gaps in between the octapod Au NPs in the case of bi-layer arrangement (Fig. S18 (b) in the ESM). This property can be beneficial for surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) where the Raman intensity of an analyte in the vicinity of hotspots can be enhanced drastically.