1. Pomerantz, R. T. & O'Donnell, M. The replisome uses mRNA as a primer after colliding with RNA polymerase. Nature 456, 762–766, doi:10.1038/nature07527 (2008).
2. Pomerantz, R. T. & O'Donnell, M. Direct restart of a replication fork stalled by a head-on RNA polymerase. Science 327, 590–592, doi:10.1126/science.1179595 (2010).
3. Gupta, M. K. et al. Protein-DNA complexes are the primary sources of replication fork pausing in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110, 7252–7257, doi:10.1073/pnas.1303890110 (2013).
4. Rocha, E. P. C. The replication-related organization of bacterial genomes. Microbiology 150, 1609–1627, doi:10.1099/mic.0.26974-0 (2004).
5. Adelman, K. & Lis, J. T. Promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II: emerging roles in metazoans. Nat Rev Genet 13, 720–731, doi:10.1038/nrg3293 2012.
6. Epshtein, V.et al. UvrD facilitates DNA repair by pulling RNA polymerase backwards. Nature 505, 372–377, doi:10.1038/nature12928 2014.
7. Ghodke, H., Ho, H. N. & van Oijen, A. M. Single-molecule live-cell imaging visualizes parallel pathways of prokaryotic nucleotide excision repair. Nat Commun 11, 1477, doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15179-y (2020).
8. Ho, H. N., van Oijen, A. M. & Ghodke, H. The transcription-repair coupling factor Mfd associates with RNA polymerase in the absence of exogenous damage. Nat Commun 9, 1570, doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03790-z (2018).
9. Sanders, K.et al. The structure and function of an RNA polymerase interaction domain in the PcrA/UvrD helicase. Nucleic Acids Res 45, 3875–3887, doi:10.1093/nar/gkx074 (2017).
10. Sikova, M.et al. The torpedo effect in Bacillus subtilis: RNase J1 resolves stalled transcription complexes. EMBO J 39, e102500, doi:10.15252/embj.2019102500 (2020).
11. Saba, J.et al. The elemental mechanism of transcriptional pausing. Elife 8, doi:10.7554/eLife.40981 (2019).
12. Wiedermannova, J.et al. Characterization of HelD, an interacting partner of RNA polymerase from Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res 42, 5151–5163, doi:10.1093/nar/gku113 (2014).
13. Koval, T.et al. Domain structure of HelD, an interaction partner of Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase.FEBS Lett 593, 996–1005, doi:10.1002/1873-3468.13385 (2019).
14. Hawkins, M.et al. Direct removal of RNA polymerase barriers to replication by accessory replicative helicases. Nucleic Acids Res 47, 5100–5113, doi:10.1093/nar/gkz170 (2019).
15. Liu, B., Zuo, Y. & Steitz, T. A. Structural basis for transcription reactivation by RapA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112, 2006–2010, doi:10.1073/pnas.1417152112 (2015).
16. Xu, J.et al. Structural basis for the initiation of eukaryotic transcription-coupled DNA repair.Nature 551, 653–657, doi:10.1038/nature24658 (2017).
17. Lane, W. J. & Darst, S. A. Molecular evolution of multisubunit RNA polymerases:sequence analysis. J Mol Biol 395, 671–685, doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.10.062
2010.
18. Lane, W. J. & Darst, S. A. Molecular evolution of multisubunit RNA polymerases:structural analysis. J Mol Biol 395, 686–704, doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.10.063 (2010).
19. Keller, A. N.et al. epsilon, a new subunit of RNA polymerase found in gram-positive bacteria. J Bacteriol 196, 3622–3632, doi:10.1128/jb.02020-14 (2014).
20. Yang, X. & Lewis, P. J. Overproduction and purification of recombinant Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase. Protein Expr Purif 59, 86–93, doi:10.1016/j.pep.2008.01.006 (2008).
21. Helmann, J. D. Purification of Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase and associated factors. Methods Enzymol 370, 10–24, doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(03)70002-0
2003.
22. Kang, J. Y.et al. Structural basis of transcription arrest by coliphage HK022 Nun in an Escherichia coli RNA polymerase elongation complex. Elife 6, doi:10.7554/eLife.25478 (2017).
23. Kouba, T.et al. The Core and Holoenzyme Forms of RNA Polymerase from Mycobacterium smegmatis. J Bacteriol 201, doi:10.1128/JB.00583-18 (2019).
24. Vassylyev, D. G., Vassylyeva, M. N., Perederina, A., Tahirov, T. H. & Artsimovitch,I. Structural basis for transcription elongation by bacterial RNA polymerase. Nature 448, 157–162, doi:10.1038/nature05932 (2007).
25. Johnston, E. B., Lewis, P. J. & Griffith, R. The interaction of Bacillus subtilis sigmaA with RNA polymerase. Protein Sci 18, 2287–2297, doi:10.1002/pro.239 (2009).
26. Ma, C.et al. RNA polymerase-induced remodelling of NusA produces a pause enhancement complex.Nucleic Acids Res 43, 2829–2840, doi:10.1093/nar/gkv108 (2015).
27. Ma, C.et al. Inhibitors of bacterial transcription initiation complex formation. ACS Chem Biol 8, 1972–1980, doi:10.1021/cb400231p (2013).
28. Yang, X.et al. The structure of bacterial RNA polymerase in complex with the essential transcription elongation factor NusA. EMBO Rep 10, 997–1002, doi:
10. 1038/embor.2009.155 (2009).
29. Lin, W.et al. Structural Basis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Transcription and Transcription Inhibition.Mol Cell 66, 169–179 e168, doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.03.001 (2017).
30. Holm, L. Benchmarking fold detection by DaliLite v.5. Bioinformatics 35, 5326–5327, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz536 (2019).
31. Artsimovitch, I.et al. Allosteric modulation of the RNA polymerase catalytic reaction is an essential component of transcription control by rifamycins. Cell 122, 351–363, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.014 (2005).
32. Molodtsov, V.et al. X-ray crystal structures of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase in complex with benzoxazinorifamycins.J Med Chem 56, 4758–4763, doi:10.1021/jm4004889 (2013).
33. Naryshkina, T., Kuznedelov, K. & Severinov, K. The role of the largest RNA polymerase subunit lid element in preventing the formation of extended RNA-DNA hybrid. J Mol Biol 361, 634–643, doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2006.05.034 (2006).
34. Toulokhonov, I. & Landick, R. The role of the lid element in transcription by E. coli RNA polymerase. J Mol Biol 361, 644–658, doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2006.06.071 (2006).
35. Delumeau, O.et al. The dynamic protein partnership of RNA polymerase in Bacillus subtilis. Proteomics 11, 2992–3001, doi:10.1002/pmic.201000790 (2011).
36. Singleton, M. R., Dillingham, M. S. & Wigley, D. B. Structure and mechanism of helicases and nucleic acid translocases. Annu Rev Biochem 76, 23–50, doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.052305.115300 (2007).
37. Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J Mol Biol 372, 774–797, doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022 (2007).
38. Gnatt, A. L., Cramer, P., Fu, J., Bushnell, D. A. & Kornberg, R. D. Structural basis of transcription: an RNA polymerase II elongation complex at 3.3 A resolution.Science 292, 1876–1882, doi:10.1126/science.1059495 (2001).
39. Abdelkareem, M.et al. Structural Basis of Transcription: RNA Polymerase Backtracking and Its Reactivation.Mol Cell 75, 298–309 e294, doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.04.029 (2019).
40. Molodtsov, V.et al. Allosteric Effector ppGpp Potentiates the Inhibition of Transcript Initiation by DksA. Mol Cell 69, 828–839 e825, doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.035 (2018).
41. Brueckner, F., Ortiz, J. & Cramer, P. A movie of the RNA polymerase nucleotide addition cycle. Curr Opin Struct Biol 19, 294–299, doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2009.04.005 (2009).
42. Punjani, A. & Fleet, D. J. 3D Variability Analysis: Directly resolving continuous flexibility and discrete heterogeneity from single particle cryo-EM images. bioRxiv, 2020.2004.2008.032466, doi:10.1101/2020.04.08.032466 (2020).
43. Stelter, M., Acajjaoui, S., McSweeney, S. & Timmins, J. Structural and mechanistic insight into DNA unwinding by Deinococcus radiodurans UvrD. PLoS One 8, e77364, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077364 (2013).
44. Velankar, S. S., Soultanas, P., Dillingham, M. S., Subramanya, H. S. & Wigley,D. B. Crystal structures of complexes of PcrA DNA helicase with a DNA substrate indicate an inchworm mechanism. Cell 97, 75–84, doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80716-3 (1999).
45. Yang, W. Lessons learned from UvrD helicase: mechanism for directional movement.Annu Rev Biophys 39, 367–385, doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.093008.131415 (2010).
46. Nicolas, P.et al. Condition-dependent transcriptome reveals high-level regulatory architecture in Bacillus subtilis. Science 335, 1103–1106, doi:10.1126/science.1206848 (2012).
47. Rabatinova, A.et al. The delta subunit of RNA polymerase is required for rapid changes in gene expression and competitive fitness of the cell. J Bacteriol 195, 2603–2611, doi:10.1128/JB.00188-13 (2013).
48. Scharf, N. T., Molodtsov, V., Kontos, A., Murakami, K. S. & Garcia, G. A. Novel Chemical Scaffolds for Inhibition of Rifamycin-Resistant RNA Polymerase Discovered from High-Throughput Screening. SLAS Discov 22, 287–297, doi:10.1177/2472555216679994 (2017).
49. Peredultchuk, M., Vonstein, V. and Demirjian, D. C.. Thermus promoters for gene expression. USA patent (1999).
50. Pronobis, M. I., Deuitch, N. & Peifer, M. The Miraprep: A Protocol that Uses a Miniprep Kit and Provides Maxiprep Yields. PLoS One 11, e0160509, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160509 (2016).
51. Studier, F. W. Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures.Protein Expr Purif 41, 207–234 (2005).
52. Zivanov, J.et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3.Elife 7, doi:10.7554/eLife.42166 (2018).
53. Zheng, S. Q.et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat Methods 14, 331–332, doi:10.1038/nmeth.4193 (2017).
54. Zhang, K. Gctf: Real-time CTF determination and correction. J Struct Biol 193, 1–12, doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2015.11.003 (2016).
55. Wagner, T.et al. SPHIRE-crYOLO is a fast and accurate fully automated particle picker for cryo-EM.Commun Biol 2, 218, doi:10.1038/s42003-019-0437-z (2019).
56. Afonine, P. V.et al. New tools for the analysis and validation of cryo-EM maps and atomic models. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 74, 814–840, doi:10.1107/S2059798318009324 (2018).
57. Terwilliger, T. C., Ludtke, S. J., Read, R. J., Adams, P. D. & Afonine, P. V.Improvement of cryo-EM maps by density modification. bioRxiv, 845032, doi:10.1101/845032 (2020).
58. Goddard, T. D.et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci 27, 14–25, doi:10.1002/pro.3235 (2018).
59. Terwilliger, T. C., Adams, P. D., Afonine, P. V. & Sobolev, O. V. A fully automatic method yielding initial models from high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy maps.Nat Methods 15, 905–908, doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0173-1 (2018).
60. Trabuco, L. G., Villa, E., Mitra, K., Frank, J. & Schulten, K. Flexible fitting of atomic structures into electron microscopy maps using molecular dynamics. Structure 16, 673–683, doi:10.1016/j.str.2008.03.005 (2008).
61. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60, 2126–2132, doi:10.1107/S0907444904019158 (2004).
62. Croll, T. I. ISOLDE: a physically realistic environment for model building into low-resolution electron-density maps. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 74, 519–530, doi:10.1107/S2059798318002425 (2018).
63. Geer, L. Y., Domrachev, M., Lipman, D. J. & Bryant, S. H. CDART: protein homology by domain architecture. Genome Res 12, 1619–1623, doi:10.1101/gr.278202 (2002).
64. Larkin, M. A.et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23, 2947–2948, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 (2007).
65. Papadopoulos, J. S. & Agarwala, R. COBALT: constraint-based alignment tool for multiple protein sequences. Bioinformatics 23, 1073–1079, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm076 (2007).
66. Ashkenazy, H.et al. ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res 44, W344-350, doi:10.1093/nar/gkw408 (2016).