A Transitional Fossil Mite (Astigmata: Levantoglyphidae fam. n.) from the Early Cretaceous Suggests Gradual Evolution of Phoresy-Related Metamorphosis

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-409696/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

A Transitional Fossil Mite (Astigmata: Levantoglyphidae fam. n.) from the Early Cretaceous Suggests Gradual Evolution of Phoresy-Related Metamorphosis

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-409696/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 23 Jul, 2021

Read the published version in Scientific Reports →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Metamorphosis is a key innovation allowing the same species to inhabit different environments and accomplish different functions, leading to evolutionary success in many animal groups. Astigmata is a megadiverse lineage of mites that expanded into a great number of habitats via associations with invertebrate and vertebrate hosts (human associates include stored food mites, house dust mites, and scabies). The evolutionary success of Astigmata is linked to phoresy-related metamorphosis, namely the origin of the heteromorphic deutonymph, which is highly specialized for phoresy (dispersal on hosts). However, the origin of this instar is enigmatic since it is morphologically divergent and no intermediate forms are known. Here we describe the heteromorphic deutonymph of Levantoglyphus sidorchukae n. gen. and sp. (Levantoglyphidae fam. n.) from early Cretaceous amber of Lebanon (129 Ma), which displays a transitional morphology ("missing link"). It is similar to extant phoretic deutonymphs in its modifications for phoresy but has the masticatory system and other parts of the gnathosoma well-developed. These aspects point to a gradual evolution of the astigmatid heteromorphic morphology and metamorphosis. The presence of well-developed presumably host-seeking sensory elements on the gnathosoma suggests that the deutonymph was not feeding either during phoretic or pre- or postphoretic periods.

Evolutionary Biology

Transitional Fossil Mite

Cretaceous

Phoresy-Related Metamorphosis

The evolution of metamorphosis is thought to have generated an incredible diversity of organisms, allowing them to exploit different habitats and perform different functions at different life stages ^1–5. For example, the larval stage has a dispersal function in many marine organisms or it is specialized to exploit different food sources in holometabolous insects, while the adults’ main function is to find a mate and carry out sexual reproduction ^4,6,7. Metamorphosis permitted a number of subsequent evolutionary innovations, such as endoparasitism in insects, where the larva is typically parasitic, and adults reproduce and search for appropriate hosts ¹. The presence of disparate phenotypes in the life cycle of a single organism and, therefore, drastic metamorphosis occurring between them, presents an evolutionary enigma. The general consensus seems to be that complex metamorphosis is the outcome of natural selection acting on the phenotypes of both early and late life-history stages ^8–11. 'Catastrophic' or 'drastic' metamorphosis is generally assumed to be an outcome of gradual evolution acting differently on early and later developmental stages (so both acquire different evolutionary novelties) and reducing the duration of the intermediate phase ^12–14. Rapid punctuated evolution generating drastic metamorphosis may also occur through alternation of developmental pathways, as exemplified by non-feeding dispersal larvae of sea urchins ^15,16.

We use paleontological evidence to evaluate whether gradual or punctuated evolution was the main process that produced the complex life-cycle in astigmatid mites. These mites have two disparate phenotypes accomplishing different functions: (i) dispersing heteromorph (deutonymph that lost oral feeding and disperses via phoresy on hosts) and (ii) feeding/reproductive homeomorphs (larva, protonymph, tritonymph, adults).

The Astigmata is a megadiverse lineage of microscopic arthropods comprising 77 families, 1,128 genera, and 6,150 species ¹⁷, which represents only 3.5–6.8% of their estimated diversity at the species level ¹⁸. This lineage originated within oribatid mites ^19–21, but unlike their ancestors, which are mostly restricted to soil, Astigmata shifted to a wide array of patchy and/or ephemeral habitats, particularly through associations with invertebrate and vertebrate hosts ^22–25. In human associations, the best known astigmatid mites are the economically important stored product mites (e.g., Acaridae, Glycyphagidae) and the medically important house dust mites (Pyroglyphidae) and scabies (Sarcoptes) ²⁶. Most habitats occupied by free-living astigmatid mites are patchy and ephemeral, which require specific adaptations to exploit these habitats: the ability to disperse (to quickly leave a depleted food source and arrive at a new one) and short life cycles, i.e., 1–4 weeks, to be able to complete development in short-lasting habitats. Typical ephemeral habitats harboring astigmatid mites are sporocarps of fungi, tree sap flows, dung, carrion, vertebrate and invertebrate nests, phytotelmata, decaying wood, and other organic matter ²⁷. In contrast, most oribatid mites live in a stable and continuous habitat (soil), which eliminates the need for long range dispersal; their life cycles usually last from several months to well over a year (reviewed ²⁸).

One key innovation that enabled astigmatid mites to explore new habitats is the phoresy-related metamorphosis. In ancestral Astigmata, one developmental stage (the deutonymph), appearing in the middle of the life cycle (Fig. 1a), became highly specialized for dispersal through phoresy ^24,28. Phoresy is broadly defined as using a host as transport ²⁹, thus contrasting with parasitism where the dependent organism primarily derives nutrients from the host rather than dispersing. Oral feeding usually does not occur during phoresy in acariform mites, although obligate non-oral "retro-feeding" (i.e., via the anus or genital papillae) has been reported for a few astigmatid heteromorphic deutonymphs associated with insects and vertebrates ^30,31. These deutonymphs, therefore, are both phoretic and parasitic.

In all extant Astigmata, the dispersal stage (heteromorphic deutonymph, formerly known as hypopus) is drastically different from the remaining developmental stages. The heteromorphic deutonymph is well sclerotized (so it is more resistant to desiccation), the mouthparts are extremely reduced or absent, chelicerae are always lacking (Fig. 1b), the foregut is solid and non-functional (so no oral feeding is possible), the posteroventral body typically bears an attachment organ – a cluster of regularly arranged conoids and suckers that use adhesive forces and negative pressure for attachment, respectively. The origin of the heteromorphic deutonymph is a mystery. Extant taxa lack any intermediates that would give a clue about their early morphological evolution, so it may appear that the unique morphology of the heteromorphic deutonymph originated via a single punctuated change, leading to dramatic evolutionary modifications associated with phoresy and the loss of oral feeding. As R. Norton ²⁸ has put it in relation to a broader question on the origin of the astigmatid mite life history: "If gradual physiological improvements were the key to the original success of the Astigmata, we might expect intermediate forms of life history in early-derivative groups, but there is no evidence of this".

Here we describe exceptionally well preserved heteromorphic deutonymphs of astigmatid mites, Levantoglyphus sidorchukae n. gen. and sp., from early Cretaceous amber of Lebanon (ca. 129 Ma), displaying transitional morphology to extant taxa, i.e., a "missing link". Taking into account this fossil, we discuss the origin of the life-cycle of Astigmata, evidence for gradual evolution of the astigmatid heteromorphic deutonymph, and whether it could feed using its well-developed mouthparts.

Systematic paleontology

Superorder Acariformes Zachvatkin, 1952

Order Sarcoptiformes Reuter, 1909

Suborder Oribatida van der Hammen, 1968

Hyporder Astigmata Canestrini, 1891

Family Levantoglyphidae n. fam. (Figs. 3–4, Supplementary information)

Diagnostic description (heteromorphic deutonymph). Unique apomorphies: Palpal solenidion ω and palpal setae cm and sup elongated and barbed; genual setae III-IV relatively elongate. Plesiomorphies indicating that Levantoglyphidae is a stem group of Astigmata: palps 4-segmented, with tarsus, fused genu + tibia, femur, and small trochanter; gnathosoma, cheliceral bodies, labrum, and rutella well developed; podocephalic canal and supracoxal opening developed; anal opening large, nearly as long as attachment organ, solenidion ω₂ on tarsus I long, filiform; tarsus II with seta aa present; tarsi III-IV with 9 setae (setae ba III-IV present). Other diagnostic characters (polarities unclear): External vertical setae ve present; dorsal idiosoma longitudinally striated; genu I with two well-developed dorsal solenidia (σ' and σ''); tarsal setae aa and ba I present on tarsus I; tarsal setae e I-II without terminal "saucer"; tarsus I with solenidion ω₃ apical, widely separated from basal solenidia ω₁ and ω₂; legs IV shorter than legs III; tarsal apical setae d III and IV elongated; tarsal apical setae ba and f IV elongated. A detailed description is available in Supplementary information.

Genus Levantoglyphus n. gen. (Figs. 3–4, Supplementary information)

Type species: Levantoglyphus sidorchukae n. sp.

Etymology. Levantoglyphus a compound noun, gender masculine, formed from Levant (Lat., a geographical area referring to the countries bordering the eastern Mediterranean Sea, including Lebanon) and glyphus (from Greek γλῠ́φω, to carve, cut out with a knife, engrave), which is used to form compound genus-group names in Astigmata.

Diagnosis. Because Levantoglyphus is a single genus in the family Levantoglyphidae, we give select diagnostic, genus-level characters of other families of Astigmata in Supplementary information. Most important character states are internal vertical setae (vi) more than twice as long as external vertical setae (ve); their bases separated (not contiguous). Tarsus IV with 2 apical setae (d and ba) longer than the length of leg IV, 1 apical seta (f) as long as the length of genu-tarsus IV, and 1 seta (r) nearly as long as the length of genu-tarsus IV.

Levantoglyphus sidorchukae n. sp. (Figs. 3–4, Supplementary information)

Etymology. The new species is named after the late Ekaterina (Katya) Sidorchuk who made major contribution in palaeoacarology. She initiated this project and accomplished critical tasks during its early stages (polishing the amber piece and partial imaging).

Material. Holotype: Heteromorphic deutonymph, specimen number 1213A (Azar collection), dorsoventral orientation, LEBANON: Mouhafazet Jabal Loubnan [Governorate of Mount Lebanon], Caza Baabda [Baabda District], Hammana - Mdeyrij outcrop, date and collector unknown (Natural History Museum of the Lebanese University, Faculty of Sciences II, Fanar, Lebanon). The piece is mounted in epoxy resin between two coverslips.Geological map of this locality is given in Azar, et al. ³³. The age of the outcrop is Lower Barremian, ca. 129 My ^34,35.

Paratype: Heteromorphic deutonymph, specimen number 1213B (Azar collection), lateral orientation, same amber piece as holotype.

Description (heteromorphic deutonymph). This species belongs to a monotypic genus having remote similarities with modern astigmatid mites. Because there is no other species to compare to (or even make an informed guess based on other astigmatid mites), we consider that the family and generic descriptions above are equivalent to the species description. Basic measurements are as follows: length of idiosoma 232(160), width 116 µm; propodosoma 96(65) µm long; hysterosoma 136(98) µm long (measurements are given for the holotype, and, in parentheses, for the paratype). Other measurements and species-level diagnostic character states can be derived from photographs (Figs. 3–4, Supplementary information).

Remarks. Similarly to heteromorphic deutonymphs of crown group Astigmata, the fossil mite is well sclerotized, has the attachment organ and many foliate tarsal setae, and long apical setae on tarsi III-IV. Based on comparison with living mites, these character states collectively suggest that Levantoglyphus was phoretic on arthropods. But unlike all extant Astigmata, the gnathosoma, including the rutella and chelicerae (main structures participating in shredding food particles during feeding), are well developed in the fossil mite. These and some other character states, such as presence of setae ba on tarsi III-IV and setae aa on tarsi II, suggest that these mites have no close modern relatives, and therefore belong to the stem group Astigmata. We also note that the astigmatid genus Schizoglyphus (Schizoglyphidae) also has a number of plesiomorphic character states (3-segmented palps, 3 pairs of genital papillae) ²⁴ suggesting its basal position, but in comparison with Levantoglyphus its gnathosoma is reduced (similarly to other Astigmata) and tarsal setae aa II and ba III-IV are absent. Levantoglyphus sidorchukae differs from an undescribed astigmatid deutonymph from the Cretaceous termite Lebanotermes veltzae ³⁶ by the elongated propdosoma (much shorter in the termite mite). There are only five published records of fossil astigmatid heteromorphic deutonymphs: (i) An undetermined astigmatid mite phoretic on Lebanotermes veltzae Engel, Azar and Nel, 2011 from Lebanese amber, 129 Mya ^36,37; (ii) Acaridae or Histiostomatidae, from the spider Dasumiana emicans, Baltic amber, Eocene, 44–49 Ma ³⁸; (iii) Histiostoma ovalis-species group (Histiostomatidae) from a bark beetle of the genus Phloeosinus, Baltic amber, Eocene, 44–49 Ma ³⁹; (iv) Winterschmidtia or Parawinterschmidtia (original genus Amphicalvolia), family Winterschmidtiidae, Mexican Chiapas amber, Miocene, 23.03–15.97 Ma ⁴⁰; (v) An undetermined astigmatid mite from an ambrosia beetle, subfamily Platypodinae, Dominican amber, Miocene, 20.4–13.7 Ma ⁴¹. The oldest known fossil records of non-phoretic stages of Astigmata are also from the Eocene Baltic amber ^42,43. Levantoglyphus sidorchukae represents the second record of Astigmata and its phoretic behavior with the minimum age of 129 Ma.

Metamorphosis is a key innovation allowing the same species to inhabit different environments and accomplish different functions, leading to evolutionary success in many animals ^1–5. Although much progress has been made to understand the origin of metamorphosis, producing complex life-cycles with phenotypically disparate phases, this question still remains enigmatic and oftentimes controversial ^{8–11, 15,16}. Paleontological evidence is especially important here because it can distinguish whether evolution of metamorphosis was a continuous accumulation of changes over a long period of time (gradual evolution) ^12–14 or it occurred rapidly without intermediate steps (punctuated evolution), for example, as a result of alternation of developmental pathways^15,16. Here we present a detailed comparative morphological analysis of an exceptionally well-preserved Cretaceous fossil mite, Levantoglyphus sidorchukae. This is a heteromorphic deutonymph capable of phoresy on arthropod hosts and displaying a transitional morphology, particularly in having its mouthparts well-developed (unlike extant deutonymphal Astigmata having vestigial mouthparts). Here we integrate this critical fossil with our knowledge about phoretic morphology and biology of extant mites, and try to distinguish between the two scenarios in the evolution of the complex life-cycle of Astigmata.

In acariform mites, only a single instar is specialized for phoretic dispersal, deutonymph or adult (female only or both sexes). The degree of specialization of the phoretic stage can be classified into unspecialized homeomorphs, specialized homeomorphs, and heteromorphs having, respectively, no, minor, or drastic differences as compared to non-phoretics ²⁵. Phoretic individuals typically do not feed using mouthparts; phoretic adults do not mate or deposit eggs while on host.

Unspecialized homeomorphs disperse by attaching to the host using preexisting structures normally adapted for other purposes, such us the claws and/or membranous pretarsal ambulacra. The examples are: males and females of Aeroglyphus peregrinans (Astigmata) phoretic on carpenter bees ⁴⁴; numerous genera of adult oribatids (males and females), Licnocepheus, Scheloribates, Euscheloribates, Oppia, Paraleius, phoretic on various insects ^45,46; and numerous Heterostigmata where inseminated females are usually phoretic, while males are short-lived and non-feeding (e.g., Trochometridium, Pediculaster, Petalomium, Scutacarus, Heterotarsonemus, Iponemus, Pseudotarsonemoides, Nasutitarsonemus, Tarsanonychus, Tarsonemella, Pseudacarapis, Suctarsonemus, Pseudotarsonemus, and some species-groups of Tarsonemus) ^47–51. Similarly to Heterostigmata, phoresy is common for females of Cheyletidae ⁵². The oribatid mite genus Mesoplophora presents a unique case where its phoretic adaptations are based on a complex morphology evolved as defense against small predators (i.e., ptychoidy). The propodosoma of these mites can fold over and cover the soft cuticle and appendages of the mite, which are most vulnerable to attacks. At the same time, the folded propodosoma can serve as part of a clasping mechanism that is used by the mite to cling to the setae of insect hosts during phoresy ⁴⁵.

Specialized homeomorphs have relatively minor morphological adaptations for phoresy as compared to non-phoretic individuals. There is only one instance in oribatids – some species of the genus Mesoplophora have phoresy-specific morphological modifications: each genital plate of the adult mite has a tooth-like tubercle. When the mite propodosoma is closed on a host seta, these tubercles act as a locking mechanism, preventing the seta from slipping out ⁴⁵. In contrast to oribatids, specialized homeomorphs are common in Heterostigmata, where this stage is called phoretomorph. They are female-only and they are optional (facultative) in the life-cycle and can be produced alongside normal, non-phoretic females. Phoretomorphs occur in several heterostigmatid genera, e.g., Pyemotes, Pediculaster, Archidispus, Lamnacarus, Scutacarus) ^49,53−56. These females display conspicuous modifications for phoresy: the first pair of legs and their claws are greatly enlarged and are used to grasp the host setae or its soft intersegmental skin ⁵⁵. Some phoretomorphs (Archidispus) also show thickening of several ventral setae ^55,57, a condition which is reminiscent of conoidal setae of astigmatid heteromorphic deutonymphs, such as coxal setae 1a, 3a, and 4b of Chaetodactylus krombeini. Furthermore, in many Heterostigmata, especially in Tarsonemidae and Scutacaridae, legs IV are modified, they are shorter than legs III and have several very long setae (as in the fossil mite and many modern phoretic Astigmata). These legs are used for standing in an upright position as part of host-seeking behavior, with the long setae of legs IV providing further support and backing when in bipedal stance. While in the upright position, mites make questing movements with their first pair of leg (furnished with many sensory solenidia and sensilla) probing the environment for various clues emitted by the host. During normal locomotion, anterior legs are not greatly exposed and legs IV and their long setae are trailed. In a few species of the genera Imaripes and Lophodispus, the long setae of legs IV are used for jumping, either to lodge on the host or evade predators ^57,58. Jumping could be an effective adaptation for mites targeting quickly moving or flying hosts, e.g., flies.

Heteromorphs occur only in Astigmata. As detailed in the Introduction section, the heteromorphic deutonymph is a facultative, immature instar typically adapted for phoresy. In all extant Astigmata that retain this instar, heteromorphic deutonymph is drastically different from the remaining developmental instars (see Introduction). In several independent lineages, hereromorphic deutonymphs are bimorphic, with one type being phoretic and mobile and another one is immobile, having extremely regressive, nearly featureless, sac-like morphology (immobile heteromorphic deutonymph). The latter deutonymph is a quiescent instar that can withstand environmental stresses for prolonged periods of time. For example, it can wait in an abandoned nest cavity until it is re-used by a new host ⁵⁹. When deutonymphal dimorphism is present, the preceding ontogenetic stage, the protonymph, can molt into either of these two types of deutonymphs or the tritonymph. So the outcome of the protonymphal molt is trimodal. When only the phoretic deutonymph is present (most typical case), the outcome of this molt is bimodal (deutonymphs or tritonymph) (Fig. 1b). Exceptions from these rules are: Tensiostoma (Histiostomatidae) with deutonymphal dimorphism but the molt from protonymph to tritonymph does not occur (bimodal) ⁶⁰; many astigmatid mites do not form deutonymphs (e.g., Tyrophagus, Psoroptidia), the protonymph can only molt to tritonymph (unimodal) ²⁴. Similarly to Heterostigmata (see above), astigmatid heteromorphic deutonymphs can adopt a questing posture, standing in a tilted position on legs III and IV and making questing movements with legs I and II e.g., in Histiostomatidae and Acaridae ^61,62. Deutonymphs of Hormosianoetus laboratorium can jump up to 5 cm using a downward push of legs III (oriented anteriorly), while their legs IV are oriented posteriorly ⁶³. Legs IV probably have no function in jumping or walking, and are dragged along behind while the mite is walking ⁶³.

The mouthparts and foregut of extant astigmatid heteromorphic deutonymph are reduced and non-functional, making oral feeding impossible. Oral feeding can only start when the deutonymph molts to the next stage, the tritonymph. The tritonymphal stage is homeomorphic, has normally developed mouthparts and digestive system, and can feed. Unlike all modern astigmatid phoretic deutonymphs, Levantoglyphus sidorchukae has a developed gnathosoma. The presence of chelicerae (with internal cheliceral muscles) and rutella, which are the main structures used to shred food particles, may suggest that oral feeding could occur at this stage. However, it is highly unlikely based on the known biology of extant mites – the lack of oral feeding during phoresy seem to be the general rule for acariform as well as parasitiform mites. For example, phoretomorph females of Heterostigmata, phoretic adult oribatid mites, and many parasitiform mites have functional mouthparts but they do not feed during phoresy ^18,24. When these mites disembark from the host in a suitable habitat, they start feeding and continue their life cycles. There a few recorded cases, all involving homeomorphs, of mites that can feed during phoresy: the parasitform mite Poecilochirus carabi ⁶⁴ and probably astigmatid mites of the Sennertia vaga species group ⁶⁵. Because no known specialized homeomorphs or heteromorphs of extant mites can feed during phoresy, the likelihood of feeding for Levantoglyphus heteromorphic deutonymph seems extremely low. However, could Levantoglyphus deutonymphs feed in the pre- and postphoretic periods? This is known for Heterostigmata, and Levantoglyphus deutonymphs do have a feeding-ready gnathosoma, with both chelicerae and rutella well-developed. We believe that feeding in this situation is also not likely. There are several modifications suggesting that the gnathosoma of the fossil mite was primarily sensorial, therefore, replacing its principal function of processing and manipulating food. A comparison of the general astigmatid adult gnathosoma (feeding instar) and the typical gnathosoma of the phoretic deutonymph (non-feeding), suggests that, while nearly all elements of the typical "feeding" gnathosoma are present (i.e, color-coded elements of Glycyphagus and Levantoglyphus in Fig. 1b), several sensorial features are enlarged and developed in a way similar to extant phoretic deutonymphs (i.e., Levantoglyphus vs Naiadacarus). The above sensorial elements include extremely elongated palpal solenidia (ω) and setae cm and sup (Fig. 1b), with solenidia being olfactory chemoreceptors and setae being mechanoreceptors ⁶⁶. It seems, therefore, conceivable that the disproportionate development of these sensory elements occurred in response to the need of phoretic host seeking, not as part of sensing or testing food. Based on this argument, we believe that the deutonymphal gnathosoma of Levantoglyphus was sensorial, and the mite, therefore, was not feeding at the entire deutonymphal stage.

Heteromorphic deutonymphs of extant Astigmata lack any intermediates that could shed light about their early morphological evolution. The most conspicuous changes characterizing extant heteromorphic deutonymph are dramatic transformations of the gnathosoma and digestive system – functional mouthparts and foregut are absent (see Introduction). Based on the mostly regressive nature of these modifications and the absence of known intermediate morphologies, it seems possible that the origin of the heteromorphic deutonymph is a result of a single, rapid punctuated change ²⁸. Interestingly, punctuated evolution has been shown to occur through alternation of developmental pathways, as was exemplified by non-feeding dispersal larvae of sea urchins that can return to their ancestral state of feeding larvae ^15,16. Taking into account the transitional gnathosomal morphology of Levantoglyphus and comparative aspects related to phoresy discussed above, we suggest that the ancestral evolution of Astigmata (i) started from the trinymphal ontogenesis typical for oribatid mites (Fig. 1a); then proceeded to (ii) the deutonymph capable of occasional phoresy on arthropod hosts (unspecialized homeomorph); the outcome of the next step was (iii) the evolution of deutonymphal dimorphism, with specialized phoretic homeomorphs and non-phoretic homeomorphs; (iv) following by further evolution of the former to a heteromorphic deutonymphal stage and the suppression of the latter stage. States ii (unspecialized homeomorphs) and iii (specialized phoretic homeomorphs) are seen in many linages of modern Heterostigmata (see above). State iv occurs in modern Astigmata. Levantoglyphus sidorchukae presents an intermediate step between states iii and iv. The presence of many phoresy-related characters shared with modern Astigmata (attachment organ, foliate tarsal setae, long terminal setae on posterior legs probably assisting in questing behavior and/or jumping, modified legs IV) leaves almost no doubt that this mite was phoretic. However, it has a well-developed gnathosoma, which is strongly reduced in all modern astigmatid phoretic deutonymphs (Fig. 1b). This feature strongly suggests that the evolution of the phoretic heteromorphic deutonymph, and by extension the entire astigmatid life-history (see Introduction), was gradual rather than punctuated.

Amber source and preparation

The amber piece was cut and polished following published protocols ^67,68 and using tools as described previously ⁶⁹. Briefly, this technique is based on polishing amber until very small pieces containing the specimens are obtained. The distance from the amber surface to the mite specimen does not exceed 100 µm, which allows use of the highest resolution oil immersion optics (100x microscope objective). As a result, the finest details, such as the leg and body setation can be observed. The polished piece was mounted in Buehler Epo-Thin epoxy resin between two coverslips. In the course of the microscopic study, one of the coverslips was inadvertently damaged, which led to the immersion oil getting inside the inclusion, making it more transparent. This opportunity was used to produce additional stacks of images, revealing fine structure of the gnathosoma.

Imaging

Compound microscopes Nikon E-800 with water immersion optics (40x and 60x), Zeiss AxioImager A2 with dry (40x, 63x) and oil immersion optics (100x), Leica DM 2500 LED (40x, 100x). Brightfield, phase contrast, polarized and differential interference contrast and incident illumination were used. Stacks of images, comprising multiple focal planes, were obtained with digital cameras Nikon D-7000 on the Nikon microscope, Zeiss Axiocam 506 color, Hitachi KP-HD20A on the Zeiss microscope, and Leica DMC4500 on the Leica microscope. Stacks were corrected for colour, brightness and noise with Adobe Lightroom, then exported to JPEG or TIFF format. The resulting original stacks are available through Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4657688), along with the technical details (magnification, camera, and illumination). Finished figures were produced from 20–200 layered (multifocal) images processed with Helicon Focus 6.8.0, using algorithms A (mostly) and B with subsequent manual addition of significant details from the individual focal planes. A similar focus stacking software, Zerene Stacker v 1.04, was also used with the PMax option. Drawings were prepared with Adobe Photoshop CS6 or Illustrator CC, using image stacks as a background ⁷⁰. In case of very large stacks, a series of multifocal images were assembled first (see above) and then 1–3 composite stacked images were used as a background to trace and produce vector line art by hand.

The fossil specimens were not flattened (as is the case of for specimens mounted with the conventional technique widely used for extant mites), and their setae were oriented nearly vertically to the surface (as in live specimens), making it difficult to observe these setae. However, in amber fossils vertically oriented setae can sometimes be easily identified by tiny bubbles of air near their tips; but unfortunately, sometimes the points of origin of these setae could not be seen, even with phase contrast optics. These setae were drawn without their basal parts and, if possible, were identified based on their relative positions.

Terminology

Idiosomal chaetotaxy follows Griffiths, et al. ⁷¹; the terminology of coxisternal setae follows Norton ¹⁹; for appendages, the chaetotaxy and solenidiotaxy follow Gradjean for palps ⁷² and for legs ⁷³.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 19-14-00004 to P.B. Klimov. We thank Barry OConnor (University of Michigan) for sharing his identification of Amphicalvolia hurdi, critical reading of the manuscript, and useful comments. This paper is dedicated to the memory of our co-author, Ekaterina A. Sidorchuk, who passed while this project was in progress.

Author contributions

E.A.S, P.B.K., and D.A. designed the project; D.A. collected the fossils; P.B.K. wrote the manuscript with contributions from D.A., H.R.B. and A.V.T, and A.A.K.; D.D.V and E.A.S processed and polished the amber piece; D.D.V, P.B.K, and E.A.S took microscopic photographs; P.B.K. prepared all figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Additional Information

Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/####.

Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to P.B.K.

1 Engel, M. S. Insect evolution. Curr. Biol.25, R868-R872, doi:DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.059 (2015).

2 Ebenman, B. Evolution in organisms that change their niches during the life-cycle. American Naturalist139, 990-1021, doi:Doi 10.1086/285370 (1992).

3 Holstein, T. W. & Laudet, V. Life-history evolution: at the origins of metamorphosis. Curr. Biol.24, R159-R161, doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.003 (2014).

4 Rainford, J. L., Hofreiter, M., Nicholson, D. B. & Mayhew, P. J. Phylogenetic distribution of extant richness suggests metamorphosis is a key innovation driving diversification in insects. PLoS One9, e109085 (2014).

5 Nicholson, D. B., Ross, A. J. & Mayhew, P. J. Fossil evidence for key innovations in the evolution of insect diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences Series B281, 20141823 (2014).

6 Pechenik, J. A. On the advantages and disadvantages of larval stages in benthic marine invertebrate life cycles. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.177, 269-297 (1999).

7 Burgess, S. C., Baskett, M. L., Grosberg, R. K., Morgan, S. G. & Strathmann, R. R. When is dispersal for dispersal? Unifying marine and terrestrial perspectives. Biological Reviews91, 867-882, doi:10.1111/brv.12198 (2016).

8 Hart, M. W. & Grosberg, R. K. Caterpillars did not evolve from onychophorans by hybridogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.106, 19906-19909 (2009).

9 Giribet, G. On velvet worms and caterpillars: science, fiction, or science fiction? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.106, E131 (2009).

10 De, A., Mathur, R. K. & Bose, R. Can molecular biology and bioinformatics be used to probe an evolutionary pathway? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.106, E141 (2009).

11 Willis, J. H. & Cox-Foster, D. L. Insect metamorphosis via hybridogenesis: An evidentiary rebuttal. J. Insect Physiol.56, 333-335 (2010).

12 Haug, J. T. & Haug, C. An unusual fossil larva, the ontogeny of achelatan lobsters, and the evolution of metamorphosis. Bulletin of Geosciences88, 195-206 (2013).

13 Truman, J. W. & Riddiford, L. M. The origins of insect metamorphosis. Nature401, 447-452, doi:10.1038/46737 (1999).

14 Haug, J. T. et al. Unique occurrence of polychelidan lobster larvae in the fossil record and its evolutionary implications. Gondwana Research28, 869-874 (2015).

15 Wray, G. A. Punctuated evolution of embryos. Science (Washington D C)267, 1115-1116 (1995).

16 Raff, E. C. et al. Regulatory punctuated equilibrium and convergence in the evolution of developmental pathways in direct-developing sea urchins. Evolution & Development5, 478-493 (2003).

17 Schatz, H., Behan-Pelletier, V. M., OConnor, B. M. & Norton, R. A. Suborder Oribatida van der Hammen, 1968. Zootaxa3148, 141-148 (2011).

18 Walter, D. E. & Proctor, H. C. Mites: Ecology, Evolution & Behaviour. Life at a Microscale. 2 edn, 495 (Springer Netherlands, 2013).

19 Norton, R. A. Morphological evidence for the evolutionary origin of Astigmata (Acari: Acariformes). Exp. Appl. Acarol.22, 559–594, doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006135509248 (1998).

20 Zachvatkin, A. A. in Zachvatkin A. A.: Sbornik nauchnykh rabot. [=A. A. Zachvatkin: Collection of Scientific Works] (eds V. B. Dubinin & A. B. Lange) 19-120 (Moscow State University, 1953).

21 OConnor, B. M. in Acarology VI Vol. 1 (eds D. A. Griffiths & C. E. Bowman) 19-27 (Ellis Horwood Ltd., 1984).

22 OConnor, B. M. in Synopsis and classification of living organisms Vol. 2 (ed S. P. Parker) 146-169 (McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1982).

23 OConnor, B. M. in Acarology: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress (eds R.B. Halliday et al.) 76-82 (CSIRO Publishing, 2001).

24 OConnor, B. M. in A Manual of Acarology. Third Edition. (eds G. W. Krantz & D. E. Walter) 565-657 (Texas Tech University Press, 2009).

25 Houck, M. A. & OConnor, B. M. Ecological and evolutionary significance of phoresy in the Astigmata. Annu. Rev. Entomol.36, 611-636 (1991).

26 Fain, A., Guerin, B. & Hart, B. J. Mites and allergic disease. (Varennes an Argonne, France, 1990).

27 OConnor, B. M. Evolutionary ecology of astigmatid mites. Annu. Rev. Entomol.27, 385-409 (1982).

28 Norton, R. A. in Mites: ecological and evolutionary analyses of life-history patterns. (ed Marilyn A. Houck) 99-135 (Chapman & Hall, 1994).

29 Walter, D. E. & Proctor, H. C. Mites: Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour. (Unibersity of New South Wales Ltd. and CABI Publishing, 1999).

30 Houck, M. A. & Cohen, A. C. The potential role of phoresy in the evolution of parasitism: Radiolabelling (tritium) evidence from an astigmatid mite. Exp. Appl. Acarol.19, 677-694, doi:Doi 10.1007/Bf00052079 (1995).

31 Alberti, G., Kanarek, G. & Dabert, J. Unusual way of feeding by the deutonymph of Neottialges evansi (Actinotrichida, Astigmata, Hypoderatidae), a subcutaneous parasite of cormorants, revealed by fine structural analyses. J. Morphol.277, 1368-1389 (2016).

32 Reuter, E. Zur Morphologie und Ontogenie der Acariden mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Pediculopsis graminum (E. Reut.). Acta Societatis Scientiarum Fennicae36, 1-288 (1909).

33 Azar, D., Gèze, R. & Acra, F. in Biodiversity of fossils in amber from the major world deposits. (ed David Penney) 271-298 (Siri Scientific Press, 2010).

34 Granier, B., Toland, C., Gèze, R., Azar, D. & Maksoud, S. Some steps toward a new story for the Jurassic - Cretaceous transition in Mount Lebanon. Carnets De Geologie16, 247-269 (2016).

35 Maksoud, S., Azar, D., Granier, B. & Gèze, R. New data on the age of the Lower Cretaceous amber outcrops of Lebanon. Palaeoworld26, 331-338, doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2016.03.003 (2017).

36 Engel, M. S. et al. New, primitive termites (Isoptera) from Early Cretaceous ambers of France and Lebanon. Palaeodiversity4, 39-49 (2011).

37 Azar, D. Preservation and accumulation of biological inclusions in Lebanese amber and their significance. Comptes Rendus Palevol6, 151-156, doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2006.10.004 (2007).

38 Dunlop, J. A. et al. A minute fossil phoretic mite recovered by phase-contrast X-ray computed tomography. Biol. Lett.8, 457-460 (2012).

39 Wirth, S. F. & Garonna, A. P. Histiostoma ovalis (Histiostomatidae, Acari) associated with Ips sexdentatus (Scolytinae, Curculionidae, Coleoptera): ecology and mite redescription on the basis of formerly unknown adults and nymphs. International Journal of Acarology41, 415-428 (2015).

40 Türk, E. A new tyroglyphid deutonymph in amber from Chiapas, Mexico. University of California Publications in Entomology31, 49-51 (1963).

41 Santiago-Blay, J. A., Jolivet, P. & Verma, K. K. A natural history of conspecific aggregations in terrestrial arthropods, with emphasis on cycloalexy in leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Terrestrial Arthropod Reviews5, 289–355 (2012).

42 Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. in World Spider Catalog, version 20.0 1-303 (Natural History Museum Bern. Online at http://wsc.nmbe.ch, accessed 15 January 2019. doi: 10.24436/2, 2019).

43 Sidorchuk, E. A. Mites as fossils: forever small? International Journal of Acarology44, 349-359, doi:print https://doi.org/10.1080/01647954.2018.1497085 (2018).

44 Zachvatkin, A. A. in Fauna SSSR: Paukoobraznuye Vol. 6(1) (ed S. A. Zernov) 475 (Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Moscow-Leningrad, 1941).

45 Norton, R. A. Observations on phoresy by oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatei). International Journal of Acarology6, 121-130 (1980).

46 Knee, W. A new Paraleius species (Acari, Oribatida, Scheloribatidae) associated with bark beetles (Curculionidae, Scolytinae) in Canada. ZooKeys667, 51-65 (2017).

47 Lindquist, E. E. Discovery of sporothecae in adult female Trochometridium Cross, with notes on analogous structures in Siteroptes Amerling (Acari: Heterostigmata). Exp. Appl. Acarol.1, 73-85 (1985).

48 Lindquist, E. E. The world genera of Tarsonemidae (Acari: Heterostigmata): A morphological, phylogenetic, and systematic revision, with a reclassification of family-group taxa in the Heterostigmata. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada136, 1-517 (1986).

49 Camerik, A. M., de Lillo, E. & Lalkhan, C. The neotype of Pediculaster mesembrinae (Canestrini, 1881) (Acari: Siteroptidae) and the description of all life stages. International Journal of Acarology32, 45-67 (2006).

50 Ebermann, E. & Rack, G. Zur Biologie einer neuen myrmecophilen Art der Gattung Petalomium (Acari, Pygmephoridae). Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum Hamburg7, 175-192 (1982).

51 Schousboe, C. On the biology of Scutacarus acarorum Goeze (Acarina: Trombidiformes). Acarologia (Paris)27, 151-158 (1986).

52 Eickwort, G. C. in Mites: Ecological and Evolutionary Analyses of Life-History Patterns (ed M. A. Houck) 218-251 (Chapman & Hall, 1994).

53 Moser, J. C. & Cross, E. A. Phoretomorph: a new phoretic phase unique to the Pyemotidae (Acarina: Tarsonemoidea). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am.68, 820-822 (1975).

54 Cross, E. A., Moser, J. C. & Rack, G. Some new forms of Pyemotes (Acarina: Pyemotidae) from forest insects, with remarks on polymorphism. International Journal of Acarology7, 179-196 (1981).

55 Ebermann, E. Records of polymorphism in the mite family Scutacaridae (Acari, Tarsonemina). Acarologia (Paris)32, 119-138 (1991).

56 Norton, R. A. An example of phoretomorphs in the mite family Scutacaridae. Journal Georgia Ent Soc12, 185-186,illust. (1977).

57 Baumann, J. Tiny mites on a great journey - a review on scutacarid mites as phoronts and inquilines (Heterostigmatina, Pygmephoroidea, Scutacaridae). Acarologia (Paris)58, 192-251 (2018).

58 Ebermann, E. Indication of jumping ability in the mite family Scutacaridae (Acari, Tarsonemina). Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum Hamburg11, 205-209 (1995).

59 Baker, E. W. Natural history of Plummers Island, Maryland. XV. Descriptions of the stages of Chaetodactylus krombeini, new species, a mite associated with the bee, Osmia lignaria Say (Acarina: Chaetodactylidae). Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash.75, 227-236 (1962).

60 Wurst, E. & Kovac, D. Description and biology of the mite Tensiostoma veliaphilum n. gen. n. sp. from the water surface of bamboo phytotelmata in Southeast Asia (Arachnida, Acari, Astigmata, Histiostomatidae). Senckenb. Biol.82, 63-98 (2003).

61 Schulze, H. Zur Kenntnis der Dauerformen (Hypopi) der Mehlmilbe Tyroglyphus farinae (L.). Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie und Parasitenkunde60, 536-544 (1924).

62 Scheucher, R. in Beiträge zur Systematik und Ökologie mitteleuropäischer Acarina. Vol. 1 (ed H.-J. Stammer) 233-384 (1957).

63 Hall, C. C., Jr. A dispersal mechanism in mites (Acarina: Anoetidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society32, 45-46 (1959).

64 Brown, J. M. & Wilson, D. S. in Mites: ecological and evolutionary analyses of life-history patterns. (ed Marilyn A. Houck) 1-22 (Chapman & Hall, 1994).

65 Klimov, P. B. & OConnor, B. M. Morphology, evolution, and host associations of bee-associated mites of the family Chaetodactylidae (Acari: Astigmata), with a monographic revision of North American taxa. Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Zoology University of Michigan199, 1-243 (2008).

66 Alberti, G. & Coons, L. B. in Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates. Volume 8C: chelicerate Arthropoda. (eds Frederick W. Harrison & Rainer F. Foelix) 515-1215 (Wiley-Liss, 1999).

67 Sidorchuk, E. A. in Amber mining and processing in Sambia, 12-14 May 2010. International Symposium Materials. (ed Z. V. Kostyashova) 47-53.

68 Sidorchuk, E. A. in Insect Evolution in an Amberiferous and Stone Alphabet: Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Fossil Insects, Arthropods and Amber. (eds Dany Azar et al.) 189-201 (Koninklijke Brill NV, 2013).

69 Sidorchuk, E. A. & Vorontsov, D. D. Preparation of small-sized 3D amber samples: state of the technique. Palaeoentomology1, 80-90, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.1.1.10 (2018).

70 Coleman, C. O. Substituting time-consuming pencil drawings in arthropod taxonomy using stacks of digital photographs. Zootaxa1360, 61-68 (2006).

71 Griffiths, D. A., Atyeo, W. T., Norton, R. A. & Lynch, C. A. The idiosomal chaetotaxy of astigmatid mites. J. Zool.220, 1-32, doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1990.tb04291.x (1990).

72 Grandjean, F. Au sujet de l'organe de Claparède, des eupathidies multiples et des taenidies mandibulaires chez les Acariens actinochitineux. Archives des Sciences physiques et naturelles, 5ème période28,, 63-87 (1946).

73 Grandjean, F. La chaetotaxie des pattes chez les Acaridiae. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France64, 50-60 (1939).

No competing interests reported.

S1LevantoglyphusCretaceousAzar1213v5SciRepSupplementaryDescription.docx

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 23 Jul, 2021

Read the published version in Scientific Reports →

Editorial decision: Major revision
18 May, 2021
Reviews received at journal
07 May, 2021
Reviewers agreed at journal
01 May, 2021
Reviewers invited by journal
28 Apr, 2021
Editor assigned by journal
28 Apr, 2021
Editor invited by journal
13 Apr, 2021
Submission checks completed at journal
12 Apr, 2021
First submitted to journal
10 Apr, 2021

You are reading this latest preprint version

A Transitional Fossil Mite (Astigmata: Levantoglyphidae fam. n.) from the Early Cretaceous Suggests Gradual Evolution of Phoresy-Related Metamorphosis

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Results

Discussion

Methods

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1