COVID-19 is an ongoing infectious disease caused by a novel coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2 1-5. The outbreak was officially declared a pandemic by WHO on March 11th, 2020. Today, it has inflicted more than 7 million people and caused more than 400,000 deaths worldwide. Studies have shown that various public health measures, including handwashing, face masking, social distancing, and restricting the movement, have contributed significantly to control the spread 6-9. However, with no effective treatments available and vaccines still months away, scientists around the world are racing to develop models that can predict if and when the second wave will come. Given the evidence that there are mitigating effects of warmer temperatures, humidity and sunlight on other infectious diseases such as pneumonia and flu, there have been speculations that weather factors may play a similar role on COVID-19 1,10. Here we analyzed the early outbreak data in China and its correlation with meteorological factors. Our results provide evidence that atmospheric humidity facilitates rather than hinders the infection, contrary to a common belief that warm and humid weather can slow down the spread of the virus 1, 2.
Previous studies on the relationship between atmospheric humidity and COVID-19 pandemic have shown that the higher the humidity is, the more favorable it is to control the pandamic2,11. However, these conclusions are contrary to the previous findings of the relationship between atmospheric humidity, pneumonia, and influenza12-14. We believe that there are many methodological problems in previous studies on the relationship between atmospheric humidity and COVID-19 pandemic, which may lead to unreliable conclusions. First, some studies only observed data for three days2, which is not enough to reflect the relationship between atmospheric humidity and the long-term development of the pandemic (overall incidence rate). Second, most of the studies used meteorological data at the provincial or even national level11,15 , which is not reasonable, because the regional meteorological differences within a province or country are often large, while the average meteorological characteristics of two neighboring provinces or countries may be very close. This method may cover up the real relationship between atmospheric humidity and COVID-19 pandemic. Third, previous studies used the number of new cases per day in a period of time that was arbitrarily chosen 2,11, without taking into account the number of initial cases and the highest number of cases in a region, and therefore could not objectively reflect the largest incidence rate in the region. Fourth, some studies included data after outbreaks began to declin 16, which may confuse atmospheric factors with human management measures and therapeutic effects. The methods adopted in this study overcome the above problems.
We collected data from 132 Chinese cities to test the impact of natural climate factors on the pandemic's growth rate (see Method for details). We selected the pandemic data (the number of increased cases per day) of each city in the fastest-growing regions of the pandemic since January 23rd (the day of closure of Wuhan) to March (when the confirmed COVID-19 cases of all cities first reached the peak). Besides, we collected the average daily atmospheric temperature, average relative humidity, and average air pressure of the 132 cities during the period. We also collected the GDP data (2019), population density data (2018) and the distance to Wuhan of each city.
We used general linear regression for the analysis. First, we took GDP, population density, distance, temperature, temperature range and air pressure as independent variables, and the pandemic growth rate as the dependent variable for analysis (see Formula 1). The results showed that the distance negatively related to the growth rate of the pandemic (B=-0.34, p=0.001). Temperature had a marginally significant correlation with the growth rate of the pandemic (B=-0.21, p=0.07). Second, we took GDP, population density, distance, temperature, temperature range, atmospheric pressure, and atmospheric relative humidity as independent variables and the pandemic growth rate as the dependent variable for analysis (see Formula 2). The results showed that atmospheric relative humidity significantly predicted the growth rate of the pandemic (B=0.40, p=0.001) (see Table 1), and the higher the relative humidity in cities, the higher the local incidence(see Figure 1). Temperature was negatively associated with the growth rate of the pandemic (B=-0.26, p=0.02). The distance was negatively correlated to the pandemic growth rate (B=-0.32, p=0.001).
Rgrowth =β1GDP + β2PD + β3Tem + β4RTem + β5Air + β6Dis + α1 (1)
Rgrowth =β7GDP + β8PD + β9Tem + β10RTem + β11Air + β12Dis + β13ReHum + α2 (2)
Note: G=Growth Rate, PD=Population density, Tem=Temperature, RTem=Temperature Range, Air= Air Pressure, Dis=Distance, ReHum=Relative humidity. β=Regression coefficient, α=Residual.
Table 1 The Regression Model of Growth Rate on Atmospheric Environment
Variables
|
DV= Growth Rate
|
|
DV= Growth Rate
|
B
|
P
|
B
|
P
|
GDP
|
-0.04
|
0.77
|
|
-0.03
|
0.81
|
Population density
|
0.10
|
0.45
|
|
0.10
|
0.39
|
Distance
|
-0.34**
|
0.001
|
|
-0.32**
|
0.001
|
Temperature
|
-0.21
|
0.07
|
|
-0.26*
|
0.02
|
Temperature Range
|
-0.07
|
0.50
|
|
0.08
|
0.47
|
Air Pressure
|
0.15
|
0.10
|
|
-0.01
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relative humidity
|
|
|
|
0.40***
|
0.000
|
R²
|
0.15
|
|
0.23
|
△R²
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: N=132. *p<0.05,***p<0.001.
The transmission rate of the pandemic will be influenced by natural climatic factors as well as humanistic and social factors17. The current study found a significant positive correlation between atmospheric relative humidity and the increase of pandemic situation, indicating that the virus may survive longer in the environment with high relative humidity. The findings put forward a warning to the pandemic prevention and control in special cities and regions: cities with high relative humidity are more likely to spread the COVID-19 pandemic, and special precautions should be taken.
It should be noted that this study found that relative humidity positively predicted the transmission of COVID-19, which is inconsistent with previous studies 2,11. The reason may be that the previous study only selected three days of data, making its conclusion very limited. The period of relative humidity data selected in this study is much more extended, so our conclusion should be universal.
Our findings provide new insights into the relationship between climate and the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, with the coming of summer in the northern hemisphere, the atmospheric relative humidity in many cities will further increase, which may aggravate the spread of COVID-19. All urban administrative departments and medical institutions shall take corresponding prevention and control measures in advance.