3.1. Mechanical and physical properties
To determine the mechanical, chemical, and physical properties of the friction composites developed according to the recipes (ISM-1, ISM-2 and ISM-3), hardness, density, and water-oil absorption tests were conducted. The hardness results for the composites with dimensions of 25x25x10 mm3 are provided in Table 3. Upon reviewing Table 3, it can be observed that the values obtained in 12 hardness measurements for each recipe are very close to each other. Hardness values ranged from 62 to 69 Shore D. The hardness values of all samples were very close to each other, and the chemical composition change did not affect the hardness values. These results are consistent with findings from previous studies in the literature [9–11, 19, 22].
Table 3
Hardness of tested samples (Shore D)
Test numbers
|
Samples
|
ISM-1
|
ISM-2
|
ISM-3
|
1.
|
68
|
67
|
66
|
2.
|
67
|
64
|
63
|
3.
|
68
|
64
|
68
|
4.
|
65
|
66
|
65
|
5.
|
65
|
63
|
66
|
6.
|
63
|
64
|
64
|
7.
|
65
|
65
|
66
|
8.
|
68
|
65
|
63
|
9.
|
69
|
66
|
64
|
10.
|
64
|
65
|
66
|
11.
|
63
|
65
|
64
|
12.
|
68
|
65
|
62
|
Average
|
66.08
|
64.92
|
64.75
|
Density measurements were conducted for three types of recipes: ISM-1, ISM-2, and ISM-3. The averages of the results are presented in Table 4. Upon examining Table 4, it is observed that the density of the ISM-1 recipe is the highest. This is attributed to ISM-1 having the least HCFCo in its recipe. Since glass wool has smaller dimensions and higher density compared to hemp fiber, it affects the density of the composite material. Similar to hardness values, the three different samples exhibit similar densities. The densest sample corresponds to the highest hardness value. Similar results for different materials can be found in studies in the literature [23–25].
Table 4
Composite Code
|
ISM-1
|
ISM-2
|
ISM-3
|
Average density (gr/cm3)
|
2.5680
|
2.5667
|
2.5463
|
After soaking the samples in water and oil for 48 hours, total hardness and weight changes were measured (Fig. 4). In water and oil immersion, it was determined that the ISM-3 recipe samples underwent the greatest weight changes (Table 5). The least swelling occurred in the ISM-1 sample, with 0.16 g, while the highest water absorption appeared in the ISM-3 sample, which had the lowest density and hardness. Although the rate of weight increase was not as high in oil as in water, the same trend was observed in the oil-containing samples. Depending on density and hardness, the ISM-1 sample showed a weight increase of 6.25% in both water and oil, while the lightest and softest ISM-3 sample exhibited a weight increase of nearly 90%. Additionally, when looking at the difference in weight change between ISM-1 and ISM-3 samples in water, this ratio is around 33%, while in oil, it is approximately 17%. Table 5 gives the variations in hardness values of the samples. No significant changes were observed in Shore D hardness values for all three samples, and a slight increase in hardness was observed in the oil-containing samples. Overall, microstructure, density, and hardness changes directly affect many mechanical properties of the material [9]. Despite the limited number of studies in the literature, some researchers have emphasized the significant effect of water and oil absorption on reinforced composites [10, 11]. Chandradass et al. conducted similar water and oil absorption tests, and the results are close to those obtained in this study [19].
Table 5
Water and oil absorption of composites
Samples
|
Weight Gain (g)
|
Water
|
Oil
|
Change (%)
|
ISM-1
|
0.16
|
0.17
|
6.25
|
ISM-2
|
0.46
|
0.26
|
65
|
ISM-3
|
0.53
|
0.28
|
89.2
|
Change (%)
|
33.1
|
16.5
|
-
|
3.2. Tribological properties
As seen in Fig. 5, the friction coefficient value, dependent on temperature at a constant speed, has steadily decreased. The results in Table 5 were found to be close to literature values. While the ISM-1 sample had the highest friction coefficient at 160°C in the tests, at 260°C and 360°C, all three samples reached similar friction coefficients. However, looking at the wear values in Fig. 6, no difference was observed in tests at 160°C and 360°C for all three samples, while at 260°C, the ISM-3 sample exhibited the highest wear. This may be attributed to differences in hardness and density values. In some studies in the literature, an increase in temperature has been observed to partially increase the friction coefficient, which then rapidly decreases afterward [19].
Additionally, in some studies, similar changes have been attributed to the surface vitrification effect with an increase in the number of revolutions [26–32]. However, in tests at 850 rpm, as observed in Fig. 7, a regular decrease in the friction coefficient with increasing temperature was observed for all three samples. Under the specified test conditions, the best friction coefficient was again observed in the ISM-1 test sample. The highest friction coefficient at all temperature values was observed in the ISM-2 sample.
Figure 8 presents the wear rates for the same tests and samples. Similar to previous tests, wear increased with the rising test temperature for each sample. The highest wear was observed in the ISM-3 sample, while the least wear occurred in the ISM-1 sample, with the ISM-2 sample falling between these two values. Once again, density and hardness were major factors for this test and these samples. When compared with literature values, the test results were found to be within the desired ranges [13, 33–37]. The impact of temperature on the friction coefficient and friction rates of brake pad materials is also evident in the study by, where they studied the effects of brake pressure, initial braking velocity, and braking frequency on the average friction coefficient, stability coefficient of friction coefficient, wear rate, and average surface temperature [38]. It is highlighted that excessive heat exposure can lead to a decrease in friction coefficients within brake linings, consequently diminishing the stopping ability of brakes [39]. Furthermore, emphasized the variability of the pad friction-coefficient with humidity, the number of brake applications, and temperature changes [40]. These findings collectively underscore the significant influence of temperature on the friction characteristics of brake pad materials.
3.2. Microstructural evaluation of HCFCo composite
Figure 9 (a, b, c, d) shows typical SEM pictures of raw hemp fibers (a = 50 X, b = 100 X, c = 50, d = 125 X). Figure 10 (a, b, c, d) presents electron microscope images and an EDX analysis graph for raw hemp fibers. The main difference between both graphs is that Fig. 9 shows multiple hemp fibers, while Fig. 10 shows a 1000X magnification of a single hemp fiber.The results of the EDX analysis are shown in Table 6. Hemp, a natural cellulose fiber, contains hemicellulose, lignin, and pectin, which play a crucial role in determining the structural properties of the fiber, including water retention and strength. In untreated samples, fiber bundles displaying some splitting due to mechanical separation during carding are clearly visible. The average diameter of all fiber bundles was determined from the cross-section obtained from SEM pictures. The average diameter of raw fibers (20 µm) is significantly lower than the value reported by Sauvageon et al. [41] (41 µm). The average fiber lengths are in the range of 15–20 mm. Continuous and main fibers containing fine spiral fibers with a diameter of 2 microns can be observed in these images. Hemp fibers, composed of the basic elements C, N, and O, exhibit properties that can provide high tensile and abrasion resistance. Hemp is a bast fiber grown in temperate climates, contributing to various important products such as textiles, seeds (oil), and pulp and paper.
Table 6
EDX results of raw hemp fibers
Element
|
Weight
%
|
Atomic
%
|
Net
Int.
|
Net Int.
Error
|
C K
|
28.54
|
53.9
|
164.65
|
0.01
|
N K
|
4.04
|
6.55
|
8.76
|
0.14
|
O K
|
24.4
|
34.6
|
159.24
|
0.02
|
AuM
|
43.02
|
4.95
|
432.08
|
0.01
|
Figure 11 displays the microstructures of the HCFCo composite at four different magnifications (50X, 125X, 500X, and 1000X) and presents the corresponding EDX results. The EDX analysis for hemp fiber impregnated with colemanite is provided in Table 7. In contrast to Table 6, elements B, Na, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, and Fe are observed densely on the coating surface. Figure 12 shows the high magnification of hemp fiber and colemanite with EDX graph. From Fig. 12, it can be seen that hemp fiber and colemanite display a very good distribution in general matrix. Also from this here, good bonding has occurred between hemp fiber fiber and colemanite. In addition to this, EDX graph has associated with Table 7.
Wear surface images are shown in Fig. 13a. ISM-1, with the least wear and deformation, has been identified as the most dense and hardest material. In ISM-1, which contains only 4% hemp fibers uniformly distributed within the microstructure, ISM-3 with 12% hemp fibers has become the composite material subjected to the most abrasive wear, exhibiting the least hardness and toughness. Figure 13b shows some friction materials in sample. These materials were marked with help of their shapes and studies in litetature [3, 28, 29, 37, 41].