Ethic statement:
This study was designed as a human observational case control study. All parents or guardians of the participants provided written informed consent for this institutionally approved study. Approval for this study was obtained from the Maharishi Markandeshwar University. Approval to conduct this study was given by the Institution Ethics Committee.
A total of 20 children in the age group of 6 to 8 years were selected from the outpatient department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Maharishi Markandeshwar University, after confining the case definitions, inclusion and exclusion criteria for each respective Group. The detailed plan and purpose of the study were explained, and informed written consent was obtained from the accompanying parent/guardian of each child. The teeth to be included in the study were categorized into the following groups:
The teeth were selected into a particular group based on the following case definitions:
-
Primary tooth- healthy pulp (Group I): A retained primary tooth with no associated pain or evidence of dental caries and not more than one-third root resorption.
-
Primary tooth- inflamed pulp (Group II): A deep carious lesion in the primary tooth with history, clinical and radiographic findings indicative of irreversible pulpal changes along with a positive response to pulp sensibility tests (heat or cold) but without any calcific changes on the radiograph.
Exclusion criteria for both Group I and II
-
History of trauma with the associated tooth.
-
Presence of any systemic disease
-
Any ongoing anti-inflammatory or systemic medication.
After thorough clinical examination and radiographic evaluation, the teeth with deep carious lesions indicative of irreversible pulp changes were subjected to cold and heat tests. The teeth were air-dried and subjected to a heat test using a gutta-percha stick. Then, an ice stick was used on the middle 1/3rd of the labial surface of the tooth to be tested and the contralateral tooth for comparative evaluation. Only those teeth positively responding to heat and cold tests were finally included.
These children were assigned and coded with a sequential number as per the Group in which they were categorized, i.e., numbers 1 to 10 for Group I and 11 to 20 for Group II, respectively.
In each Group, surface anaesthesia (lignocaine jelly 2%) was applied at the injection site. This was followed by parenteral administration of local anaesthesia without Epinephrine to prevent the introduction of exogenous Epinephrine. Maxillary teeth were anaesthetized by local infiltration, and mandibular teeth were anaesthetized by mandibular nerve block.
The required procedure was performed after ensuring adequate subjective symptoms of the anaesthetic effect.
Healthy pulp: Group I
Teeth were extracted as traumatically as possible by only one operator and immediately stored in an isotonic saline solution. Pulpal tissue was then obtained with appropriately sized endodontic broaches within 5 minutes of extraction by cutting off the crown with the help of a straight diamond bur attached to a high-speed handpiece with a water spray.
Then, extirpation of pulp tissue was performed judiciously using endodontic broaches of an appropriate size to remove the pulp intact and avoid tearing.
Inflamed pulp: Group II
The access cavity was prepared, and the coronal pulp was removed using a spoon excavator. Radicular pulp tissue was extracted judiciously using endodontic broaches to remove the pulp intact and avoid tearing.
Pulp Sample Collection and Analysis
Tissue Handling:
For all four groups, pulp tissue was placed in a pre-weighed Eppendorf tube immediately after extirpation. It was again weighed using a high-precision electronic balance to determine the exact weight of pulp tissue.
Then, 0.5 ml of 0.1 M perchloric acid and 0.5 ml of 1mM sodium-metabisulfite were added to each sample. The samples were labelled with the same number that had already been assigned to the corresponding patient. Samples were then stored at -80˚C.
Extraction of catecholamines:
The technique of Opacka-Juffry et al. [13] was strictly followed to extract catecholamines from the dental pulp.
Chromatographic conditions
Chromatographic separation was performed in HPLC (Shimadzu Corporation, LC2010C HT, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with column Luna 5u C18 (2) 100A (250 x 4.6 mm), Phenomenex, USA. Detection was made at 280 nm with an Ultraviolet (UV) detector. The sample cooler temperature was maintained at five °C, and the column temperature was maintained at 25°C. The system was run at a flow rate of 1 ml/ minute.
Preparation of mobile phase
The mobile phase was phosphate buffer (pH 4.5, 50mM concentration) acetonitrile (95:5 v/v). The 50nM phosphate buffer was prepared by dissolving potassium dihydrogen phosphate (3.5 gm) in 450 ml freshly prepared de-ionized distilled water, and to this solution, 54.0 mg of 1-heptane sulphonic acid sodium salt was added, as previously explained by Yu and coworkers [14]. After it was dissolved entirely, the dilution was made to 500 ml to obtain a concentration of 50 mM and the pH was adjusted to 4.5 using orthophosphoric acid. The mobile phase was filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane filter, degassed through an ultrasonicator, and gradient delivered at a 1 ml/minute flow rate.
Preparation of standard solutions
The sequential concentrations of 1, 2 and 3µg/ml of standard pure drugs of Norepinephrine, Epinephrine and Dopamine were prepared in distilled water and then filtered with a syringe filter in separate microtubes. 20 µl volume of each sample was injected, and the effluent was monitored at 280 nm.
Each HPLC analysis of standard compounds or extracted samples was run for 15 minutes. The same mobile phase was used to run the catecholamines extracted from each pulp sample in HPLC. The chromatographic data were collected and integrated using LC Solution 2010 software with a computerized data station. The standard drugs were run to estimate the retention time and calculate the concentration of catecholamines, i.e., Norepinephrine, Epinephrine, and Dopamine.
The concentration of individual catecholamines (i.e. Norepinephrine, Epinephrine and Dopamine) was calculated based on the peak area obtained on HPLC graphs and the retention time of each catecholamine compared with the already established standard curves for pure drugs. The calculations were made by using the proportion of peaks and areas with the following formula with standard purity taken as 100%:
Concentration of catecholamines (µg/g)=
\(\frac{\text{A}\text{r}\text{e}\text{a} \text{o}\text{f} \text{s}\text{a}\text{m}\text{p}\text{l}\text{e}}{ \text{a}\text{r}\text{e}\text{a} \text{o}\text{f} \text{s}\text{t}\text{a}\text{n}\text{d}\text{a}\text{r}\text{d}}\) × \(\frac{\text{a}\text{m}\text{o}\text{u}\text{n}\text{t} \text{o}\text{f} \text{s}\text{t}\text{a}\text{n}\text{d}\text{a}\text{r}\text{d} \left(\text{m}\text{g}\right)}{ \text{a}\text{m}\text{o}\text{u}\text{n}\text{t} \text{o}\text{f} \text{s}\text{a}\text{m}\text{p}\text{l}\text{e} \left(\text{m}\text{g}\right)}\) × \(\frac{\text{d}\text{i}\text{l}\text{u}\text{t}\text{i}\text{o}\text{n} \text{f}\text{a}\text{c}\text{t}\text{o}\text{r} \text{o}\text{f} \text{s}\text{a}\text{m}\text{p}\text{l}\text{e} }{\text{d}\text{i}\text{l}\text{u}\text{t}\text{i}\text{o}\text{n} \text{f}\text{a}\text{c}\text{t}\text{o}\text{r} \text{o}\text{f} \text{s}\text{t}\text{a}\text{n}\text{d}\text{a}\text{r}\text{d}}\) × \(\begin{array}{c}\text{S}\text{t}\text{a}\text{n}\text{d}\text{a}\text{r}\text{d}\\ \text{p}\text{u}\text{r}\text{i}\text{t}\text{y}\end{array}\)