Increased oxidative stress is well recognized as being an important metabolic accompaniment in CKD patients. Previous studies have indicated that CKD patients had a higher oxidative stress status than healthy subjects [8, 13–16, 20]; however, oxidative stress status (i.e., MDA, ox-LDL, GSH/GSSG ratio) of our CKD patients not only remained no fluctuation among patients at different CKD stages, but there was also no effect on renal function in the present study. It is worth noting that antioxidant capacities (i.e., TEAC, GSH, GSSG) also remained steady among different CKD stage patients. Cysteine is a major, yet limiting substrate for the synthesis of GSH within cells. Although we did not measure other substrates of GSH synthesis (i.e. glycine and glutamate), plasma cysteine concentration was not reduced following renal function loss. In our CKD patients, sufficient cysteine concentration may help maintain GSH synthesis during different CKD stages. As long as CKD patients, including those at an advanced disease stage, still possess capable antioxidant capacities to cope with increased oxidative stress, GSH and its dependent antioxidant capacities may not be the significant factor affecting their oxidative stress status during renal function loss.
Under an increased oxidative stress condition, GSH is oxidized to GSSG, and along with GSH-Px, reduces hydroperoxides. Plasma GSH-Px is synthesized primarily in the proximal renal tubular cells [17], an early consequence of active nephron mass reduction which might lead to the reduction of plasma or erythrocyte GSH-Px activity in CKD patients [19, 20, 30, 31]. Therefore, it was not surprising to us when we observed that plasma GSH-Px activity experienced a significant reduction following the progressive loss of renal function in our CKD patients. Plasma GSH-Px activity seemed to deplete when catalyzing the reduction of hydrogen peroxide and other organic hydroperoxides to water at the advanced stage of the disease. In spite of GSH being a substrate of GSH-Px, GSH-Px is a selenium-containing enzyme, so its selenium status was thus recognized to be another key factor affecting plasma GSH-Px activity in CKD patients [32], although not all studies agreed with this [20, 33]. Since selenium concentration was not analyzed in our study, the relationship between plasma GSH-Px activity and selenium cannot be discussed further. GSH-Px is the first line of cellular defense in the human body, and even though the first line of antioxidant defense system may have been exhausted, the secondary antioxidant enzymes in the antioxidant defense system, such as GSH-St, may be expected as being capable of coping with oxidative stress in CKD patients. Unfortunately, we did not measure GSH-St activity, otherwise the overall picture of GSH-dependent antioxidant capacities could be better understood during different stages of CKD patients.
Even though many factors have been mentioned in association with increased oxidative stress during renal function loss, the accumulation of uremic toxins in the circulation is an important contributing factor for increased oxidative stress in CKD patients [9–12]. However, elevated uremic toxins (i.e., homocysteine and IS) had no relationship with oxidative stress indicators, but did have a direct contribution on renal dysfunction in our CKD patients. It seemed that uremic toxins could directly ruin renal function without regulating other mechanisms to affect renal function. In a similar way with our previous study [8], a high homocysteine concentration was independent of oxidative stress when associated with the risk of CKD. Although the pathogenesis of hyperhomocysteinemia in CKD patients is not fully understood, a progressive increase in homocysteine levels was associated with decreasing eGFR in patients with CKD [34, 35]. In spite of the significant role which homocysteine plays in the risk of CKD, IS (a gut-derived uremic toxin) not only had a significant association with renal function in our CKD patients and others [6, 36], but it also played a more dominant role than homocysteine when associated with renal function. Increased IS concentration has been shown to cause nephrovascular toxicity and damage to vascular smooth muscle cells, while enhancing inflammatory gene expression, and promoting the degeneration of renal tubular epithelial cells and renal interstitial cells [4, 11, 37]. The change in plasma IS concentration should be regularly monitored for patients at any stage of CKD, in order to reduce or prevent the gradual loss of renal function.
In line with the study from Yu et al., [38], IS was not correlated with GSH, GSSG and the GSH/GSSG ratio in our CKD patients. Dou et al. [39] indicated that high IS concentrations (497.4 and 994.8 µmol/L) would decrease total GSH concentrations by 37% and 67% in human umbilical vein endothelial cells, respectively; while lower IS concentrations (99.5 and 199 µmol/L) had no effect on total GSH levels. The IS levels of CKD patients were between 6.4 ~ 72.4 µmol/L in the study of Yu et al. [38], and between 1.5 ~ 93.7 µmol/L in the present study; these IS levels were significantly less than the concentrations which were treated in endothelial cells by Dou et al. [39]. This may explain why our team and Yu et al. [38] did not observe the association between plasma IS concentration and an oxidative stress indicator (GSH/GSSG ratio) in CKD patients. Uremic toxin adsorbents (i.e., oral carbonaceous adsorbent AST-120) [4, 38], along with increasing dietary fiber intake [40, 41] have been shown to effectively reduce IS concentrations. Therefore, we might postulate that the effective treatment of lowering IS would not exhaust GSH utilization and could maintain adequate GSH dependent antioxidant capacity for any stage of CKD patients.
The strength of this study was that patients from all stages of CKD were recruited, therefore the changes in uremic toxins, along with indicators of oxidative stress and antioxidant capacity could be compared among all CKD stages. However, the cross-sectional study design was lacking a longer observation period and more repeated measurements at defined intervals, thus it could not reflect a long-term status and changes in uremic toxins, oxidative stress and antioxidant capacities in CKD patients. The other limitation within this study was that PCS, another important uremic toxin, was not measured in this study. However, IS has been shown to be highly correlated with PCS levels in Asian CKD patients, and displays a higher level than those in the Caucasian population [6]. We believed that the IS level could reflect uremic status even though we did not measure PCS levels in our CKD patients.