INTRODUCTION
Systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) is the result of complex interactions between environmental, genetic and social factors that initiate and perpetuate blood pressure elevations and is one of the most prevalent cardiovascular diseases worldwide (1, 2). SAH is characterized by important changes in systemic microvascular reactivity and density, as demonstrated by studies reporting altered microvascular endothelial responses to a variety of stimuli in hypertensive patients, identified mostly via laser microvascular perfusion monitoring technology (3–6). Given that microvascular dysfunction and rarefaction are unquestionably involved in the pathophysiology of SAH and that hypertension can lead to microvascular alterations, a bidirectional causality most likely exists between the two conditions (7).
In some cases, SAH can progress to a phenotype called resistant arterial hypertension (RH) (8). RH is defined as either the inability to achieve blood pressure control despite the administration of at least three antihypertensive medications at maximal or maximally tolerated dosages, including a diuretic, or controlled blood pressure requiring at least four medications (9). Typical three-drug regimens include a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, a calcium channel blocker, and a thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic (9).
Microalbuminuria (MAU) is defined as an abnormally increased excretion rate of albumin in the urine in the range of 30–299 mg/g creatinine and is associated with increased mortality independent of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (10, 11). MAU is associated with different cardiometabolic conditions, including salt sensitivity and hypertension, obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes, as well as other components of metabolic syndrome, such as dyslipidemia (12). Moreover, MAU indicates microvascular injury and is independently associated with a greater risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in hypertensive patients, especially in those with RH (13–15).
As a marker of microvessel injury, MAU may be associated with other microvascular damage indicators, such as endothelial dysfunction, as demonstrated by different methods. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) provides an innovative approach for noninvasively evaluating systemic microvascular endothelial function, with physiological (postocclusive reactive hyperemia) or pharmacological (acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside) stimulation to evaluate systemic endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent microvascular reactivity (16). A major advantage of this technique is that LSCI is more reproducible than earlier procedures, such as laser Doppler flowmetry and laser Doppler imaging (17). LSCI has also previously been shown to be an effective noninvasive technique for evaluating systemic microvascular reactivity in patients who present with cardiovascular and metabolic diseases (16, 18).
Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate systemic microvascular function in patients with RH, with or without MAU, to identify possible associations between MAU and endothelial dysfunction in the context of RH. The combination of the two alterations (MAU and endothelial dysfunction) might indicate a greater risk profile, which could merit more intensive therapeutic interventions to improve patient prognosis.
DISCUSSION
The main findings of this study are that endothelial-dependent microvascular vasodilation induced by postocclusive reactive hyperemia, but not by iontophoresis of ACh, is decreased in hypertensive patients with MAU compared with age-matched hypertensive patients without MAU. Endothelial-independent microvascular vasodilation induced by iontophoresis of SNP was also reduced in hypertensive patients with MAU.
MAU is currently accepted as a biomarker of renal, cardiac and vascular damage that is predictive of the further development of cardiovascular events, renal failure and diabetes (26) and is also closely associated with the prevalence of arterial hypertension (27). Moreover, MAU has been associated with subclinical hypertensive organ damage, characterized by a higher prevalence of concentric left ventricular hypertrophy and subclinical impairment of left ventricular performance, as well as the presence of carotid atherosclerosis (28, 29).
Notably, nondiabetic MAU is a biomarker of endothelial dysfunction that contributes to both atherosclerotic macrovascular disease and renal microvascular disease (30). Moreover, systemic endothelial dysfunction might explain the prognostic value of MAU for cardiovascular events and end-organ damage (31, 32). Endothelial dysfunction of the renal microcirculation causes MAU by increasing glomerular capillary wall permeability and increasing intraglomerular pressure (33), which leads to glomerular capillary rarefaction—mainly in patients with arterial hypertension (34)—and further increases in intraglomerular pressure (35). In fact, the presence of MAU in patients with arterial hypertension is a strong indicator of microvascular damage (36).
In the present study, hypertensive patients with MAU showed reduced endothelial-dependent systemic microvascular reactivity compared to their counterparts without MAU, as demonstrated by an attenuation of microvascular vasodilation induced by PORH. On the other hand, ACh-induced vasodilation did not differ between groups. Using strain-gauge plethysmography to study forearm vasodilation in response to intrabrachial infusion of acetylcholine, Taddei et al. reported that vascular responses were similar in hypertensive patients with or without MAU (37).
In this context, it is essential to discuss the different mechanisms involved in the physiological and pharmacological tests used to evaluate endothelial function in the present study. Dissimilar endothelial mediators, including nitric oxide (NO), cyclooxygenase metabolites, and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF), are involved in the hyperemic response that follows arterial occlusion (PORH, physiological provocation) (22). In fact, large-conductance calcium-activated potassium (BKCa) channels appear to be involved, suggesting the participation of EDHF in this response (38). A variety of endothelium-derived vasodilator mediators, including EDHF, NO, and prostaglandins, also appear to be released following ACh skin iontophoresis (pharmacological provocation) (22, 39–41). However, it has been recently demonstrated that arteries from hypertensive patients present with late-phase acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent contraction due to arachidonic acid-derived bioactive products, which is likely related to low-grade, chronic vascular inflammation (42). Thus far, it is unclear whether this process is fundamental for the genesis of hypertension or if it exacerbates vascular tissue injury leading to malignant hypertension (42).
The presence of MAU is also associated with different vascular structural alterations (43, 44), such as increased thickness of the intima and media of the carotid artery compared with patients with normoalbuminuria (45), and predicts the development and progression of carotid atherosclerosis (46). Moreover, in addition to functional and mechanical changes, structural alterations of the microcirculation, mainly represented by microvascular remodeling, are observed in patients with essential hypertension, even at very early stages, contributing to the development of hypertension complications and impacting cardiovascular prognosis (47–49).
The results of the present study also revealed reduced endothelial-independent (SNP-induced) microvascular reactivity in hypertensive patients with MAU compared with patients without MAU, indicating impaired microvascular smooth muscle function. Considering that MAU indicates systemic vascular structural alterations and that SNP is a direct nitric oxide donor that skirts the endothelium and directly relaxes adjacent vascular smooth muscle cells, this result indicates structural alterations in microvessels (arteriolar remodeling) in patients with MAU. In this context, we have already shown that patients diagnosed with early-onset coronary artery disease have structural microvascular alterations concurrent with increased carotid intima-media thickness (18).
In our study, there was a similar percentage (approximately 30%) of diabetic patients in both groups, thus precluding the conclusion that differences in microcirculatory reactivity observed in the RH + MAU group compared to the RH without MAU group could be related to well-known systemic microvascular alteration characteristics of diabetic angiopathy, which is one of the most common complications that arises from chronic diabetes (50).
In our observational study, the RH + MAU group had a greater number of women (almost twofold); nevertheless, the UACR did not differ between males and females in either group, i.e., those who did or did not present with MAU. The fact that we observed a greater number of women with MAU when recruiting an equal number of patients of both sexes is in line with previous studies demonstrating a greater prevalence of women with micro- and macroalbuminuria among individuals over 20 years of age (51).
As expected, the prevalence of chronic kidney disease was greater in the RH + MAU group, as classified according to the creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI2009) (52). In this case, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 is considered to represent mild renal insufficiency for both men and women. In our study, the mean eGFR did not differ between the two groups.
Both diastolic and mean arterial pressure values were greater in the RH + MAU group than in the RH without MAU group. These results confirm the correlation between arterial pressure and urinary albumin excretion that has already been demonstrated concerning both casual values of arterial pressure (53, 54) and ambulatory blood pressure measurements (55).
Notably, LDL-cholesterol levels were greater in patients with RH + MAU than in those without MAU, despite the absence of any difference in the frequency of statin use between the groups. It is reasonable to assume that the group with worse microvascular function would have higher levels of LDL cholesterol since reduced endothelial function is associated with hypercholesterolemia. A possible explanation is the decreased synthesis of nitric oxide in the vascular endothelium of these individuals. In a previous study, a reduction in endothelium-dependent vasodilation was observed in individuals with hypercholesterolemia, while there was no difference in endothelium-independent vasodilation, indicating that the reduction in vasodilation was not a consequence of a lower smooth muscle response to the vasodilatory stimulus (56).