Summary of the sequencing data
To investigate the dynamics of epimicrobiota of S. japonica at nursery stage, a total of 24 epimicrobial samples were collected at 4 time points (Fig. 1). After quality control and removal of chloroplast (254,271 reads), mitochondria (937 reads) and archaea origin (121 reads) sequences, a total of 2,236,531 clean reads with an average of 93,189 (SD = 16,453; min = 59,843; max = 119,370) reads per sample were obtained from 24 samples. A total of 2,862 OTUs were classified into 32 phyla, 78 classes, 172 orders, 275 families and 527 genera with the entire dataset. Rarefaction curves indicated that the sequencing reached saturation in all bacterial communities (Fig. S2), and this was further supported by Good’s coverage higher than 99.5%.
Composition and diversity of epimicrobiota
The dominant bacteria of epimicrobiota shifted with the development of S. japonica (Fig. 2a, Fig. S3). Planctomycetes (mean relative abundance: 87.1%) was the most dominant phylum for MS. Proteobacteria was the most dominant for both S-1 (64.5%) and S-2 (57.9%). As for S-3, the most dominant phylum was Verrucomicrobia (69.9%) (Fig. S3). Blastopirellula (86.0%) and Pseudoalteromonas (44.3%) were the most abundant genera for both MS and S-1, respectively. While, Rubritalea was the most dominant genus for S-2 (30.6%) and S-3 (67.1%). Specifically, the relative abundance of Rubritalea in the epimicrobial communities gradually increased (ranging from 0.008% to 67.1%) over the sampling time (Fig. 2a).
Regarding the alpha diversity, Chao1 index of MS was significantly different from other samples (Tukey-HSD test: p < 0.001, Fig. S4). While for Shannon index, significant difference was only found between MS and S-2 (Tukey-HSD test: p = 0.016, Fig. S4). As for the Beta diversity, the epimicrobial communities of S. japonica were significantly clustered by sampling time (Epimicrobiota by time: PERMANOVA F = 9.5809, R2 = 0.5897, p = 0.001, Table 1) according to PCoA ordination (Fig. 2b) and PERMANOVA analysis. The community structure of MS and S-1 was significantly different from other samples based on pairwise comparison (PERMANOVA: F = 11.1103, R2 = 0.5263, p = 0.005, Table 1). While no significant difference was observed in the community structure between S-2 and S-3 samples (PERMANOVA: F = 2.4851, R2 = 0.199, p = 0.124, Table 1).
Table 1 Results of permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) with adonis based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity of epimicrobiota.
Groups
|
df
|
F
|
R2
|
P
|
Epimicrobiota by time
|
3
|
9.5809
|
0.5897
|
0.001
|
MS vs. S-1
|
1
|
11.1103
|
0.5263
|
0.005
|
MS vs. S-2
|
1
|
21.8481
|
0.686
|
0.001
|
MS vs. S-3
|
1
|
14.7187
|
0.5954
|
0.004
|
S-1 vs. S-2
|
1
|
7.2898
|
0.4216
|
0.003
|
S-1 vs. S-3
|
1
|
6.3122
|
0.387
|
0.001
|
S-2 vs. S-3
|
1
|
2.4851
|
0.199
|
0.124
|
MS, mature sporophytes (n = 6); S-1, 6-week-old sporelings (n = 6); S-2, 7-week-old sporelings (n = 6); S-3, 8-week-old sporelings (n = 6).
There were 13 indicator species at four sampling points (Fig. 2c). Blastopirellula, Phycisphaera and Granulosicoccus were the indicator species for MS. Pseudoalteromonas, Psychrobacter, Cobetia, Halomonas, Idiomarina and Alcanivorax were the indicator species for S-1. Loktanella, Thalassobius and Parasphingopyxis were the indicator species for S-2. Planctomicrobium was the only indicator species for S-3.
Core OTUs of the epimicrobial communities
OTUs presented in 100% of samples were defined as core OTUs. Among these core OTUs, the top core OTUs were defined as those with relative abundance more than 1.0%. A total of 130 core OTUs, belonging to 7 phyla, 35 order, 68 genera, were found within the epimicrobial communities (Fig. S5 and Table S1) with 8 top core OTUs (Table 2). These top core OTUs included Pseudoalteromonas OTU1, Rubritalea OTU2, Blastopirellula OTU3, Loktanella OTU9, Sulfitobacter OTU12, Litoreibacter OTU13, Psychrobacter OTU23 and Unclassified Rhodobacterales OTU24 (Table 2). The relative abundance of these top core OTUs fluctuated with the development of S. japonica (Table 2).
Table 2 Taxonomy and mean relative abundances of the top core OTUs in epimicrobiota.
ID
|
Order
|
Genus
|
MS
|
S-1
|
S-2
|
S-3
|
OTU1
|
Alteromonadales
|
Pseudoalteromonas
|
0.3
|
42.7
|
0.7
|
0.4
|
OTU2
|
Verrucomicrobiales
|
Rubritalea
|
0.004
|
0.7
|
17.5
|
55.9
|
OTU3
|
Pirellulales
|
Blastopirellula
|
45.0
|
0.01
|
0.01
|
0.01
|
OTU9
|
Rhodobacterales
|
Loktanella
|
0.01
|
0.4
|
19.4
|
2.5
|
OTU12
|
Rhodobacterales
|
Sulfitobacter
|
0.02
|
0.9
|
2.1
|
0.8
|
OTU13
|
Rhodobacterales
|
Litoreibacter
|
0.005
|
0.2
|
4.9
|
3.5
|
OTU23
|
Moraxellales
|
Psychrobacter
|
0.003
|
5.2
|
0.04
|
0.02
|
OTU24
|
Rhodobacterales
|
Unclassified
|
0.003
|
0.003
|
4.0
|
2.1
|
MS, mature sporophytes (n = 6); S-1, 6-week-old sporelings (n = 6); S-2, 7-week-old sporelings (n = 6); S-3, 8-week-old sporelings (n = 6).
Analysis of co-occurrence networks and identification of keystone species
To illustrate the interspecies interactions between the four sampling times, co-occurrence networks of the epimicrobiota were constructed (Fig. 3). The topological properties of each network were summarized in Table 3 and Table S2. The average path distance (GD) values and average clustering coefficient (avgCC) were different from randomized networks with the same number of edges and nodes (Table S2). Simultaneously, modularity (M) values of these networks were higher than randomized networks, indicating that the networks were modular. With the exception of the S-2 network, the interactions within epimicrobiota became more closely along with the sampling time according to the rising average clustering coefficient (Fig. 3 and Table S2).
Table 3 Network characteristics of epimicrobiota at nursery stage
|
Number of nodes
|
Number of edges
|
Number of positive links
|
Number of negative links
|
MS
|
41
|
126
|
125
|
1
|
S-1
|
108
|
515
|
442
|
73
|
S-2
|
109
|
262
|
246
|
16
|
S-3
|
78
|
481
|
416
|
65
|
MS, mature sporophytes (n = 6); S-1, 6-week-old sporelings (n = 6); S-2, 7-week-old sporelings (n = 6); S-3, 8-week-old sporelings (n = 6).
Based on the values of Pi and Zi, all nodes in our networks were categorized into connectors and peripheral nodes. Among these two topological categories, connectors were defined as keystone species (Fig. S6 and Table S3). There were no keystone species at MS. Loktanella OTU9 and unclassified Rhodobacteraceae OTU192 were the keystone species for S-1. Unclassified Alphaproteobacteria OTU324 were keystone species for S-2. For S-3, the keystone species were Planctomicrobium OTU128, unclassified Rubinisphaeraceae OTU728 and Roseibacillus OTU375.
To illustrate the community dynamics in epimicrobiota over the sampling time, NetShift analysis was used to establish the most common subnetwork and to find the drivers during the development at nursery stage (Fig. 4 and Table S4). These drivers were further confirmed by high NESH-score and positive DelBet value. We failed to construct the common subnetwork between MS and S1 because the co-occurrence network of MS was fragmented (Fig. 3a). There were 5 drivers between S-1 and S-2, in which 1 belonged to Planctomycetes and others corresponded to Proteobacteria (Fig. 4A and Table S4). 14 drivers were identified between S-2 and S-3, including 3 Verrucomicrobia, 8 Proteobacteria, 2 Planctomycetes and 1 Bacteroidetes (Fig. 4b and Table S4). 8 drivers were classified into Proteobacteria between S-1 and S-3 (Fig. 4c and Table S4).