SAP patients with respiratory failure often require IMV, which can be associated with the development of delirium[11]. Delirium is a common complication in these patients and can significantly affect the patient's prognosis. By identifying risk factors and effective preventive measures, patient outcomes can be improved[12]. This study represents the first investigation into the preventive effect of perphenazine on delirium after extubation in SAP patients.
Recent studies have highlighted the incidence and impact of delirium in SAP patients. A retrospective study found that delirium occurred in 16.98% of SAP patients and was associated with decreased patient satisfaction and longer hospital stay[11]. A prospective observational study reported that delirium occurred in 19.2% of SAP patients and was associated with longer ICU and hospital stay[13]. Delirium was independently associated with a long-term poor prognosis[14]. This means that even if the disease is effectively treated, delirium may cause persistent cognitive impairments, such as memory loss and impaired executive function. And a limited increase in nursing interventions could not reduce the duration of delirium and coma within 28 days in critically ill patients[15].
Therefore, it is crucial to identify risk factors for delirium in SAP patients who require IMV to prevent and manage this complication effectively. In our study, there was a higher rate of delirium due to invasive mechanical ventilation with endotracheal intubation, which is already a risk factor for delirium. In univariate analysis, perphenazine showed an anti-delirium effect, whereas fentanyl caused delirium. After multi-factor adjustment, perphenazine still has protective effect. Other risk factors for delirium in SAP patients that appeared in multiple systematic reviews[16–18], including older age, higher SAP severity scores, and the use of other sedatives and opioids, did not show positive results in our study, possibly due to the small sample size. Older age is a well-known risk factor for delirium in critically ill patients, and it is associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment and dementia[19, 20]. Higher disease severity scores reflect more severe disease and organ dysfunction, which can increase the risk of delirium due to the systemic inflammatory response and multiorgan failure[21, 22]. The use of sedatives and opioids, which are commonly used in critically ill patients to manage pain, anxiety, and agitation, can also contribute to delirium by impairing cognitive function and increasing sedation depth[23, 24]. Five parameters, hypertension, serum amylase, pre-albumin, age and APACHEⅡ score, were used in the adjustment of P value. This is because the first 3 parameters have a P-value of less than 0.15 in comparison of clinical features, while the latter 2 parameters are common risk factors for delirium in other literature. Therefore, strategies to prevent and manage delirium in SAP patients receiving IMV should focus on minimizing the use of sedatives and opioids, optimizing pain control with non-pharmacological approaches and non-opioid analgesics, and promoting early mobilization and cognitive stimulation.
Delirium may be caused by neuroinflammation, hypoxia, altered energy metabolism, and imbalances in different neurotransmitter pathways[25]. These mechanisms can disrupt normal brain function and lead to confusion, altered consciousness, and other symptoms. But so far, no drugs have been shown to improve the prognosis of patients with delirium. In a multicenter, blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to investigate the effect of haloperidol on delirium in ICU patients, 1000 adult delirious patients admitted to the ICU for an acute condition were randomized to receive intravenous haloperidol or placebo[26], and the result showed that there was no significant difference between haloperidol and placebo in terms of the number of days alive and out of the hospital at 90 days in ICU patients with delirium. In a meta-analysis, melatonin was associated with a reduced incidence of delirium in ICU hospitalized patients, showing its potential to prevent delirium from occurring[27]. But in a recent randomized controlled trial, prophylactic administration of melatonin did not reduce the prevalence of delirium compared with placebo[28]. Dexmedetomidine belongs to the class of drugs known as selective alpha-2 adrenergic agonists. Several clinical trials have investigated its effects on the incidence of delirium in critically ill patients, and the results suggest that dexmedetomidine may effectively reduce the incidence of delirium in this population[29, 30]. Saran et al. reported that quetiapine prophylactic therapy does not reduce the incidence of delirium in hospitalized elderly patients[31]. However, treatment with antipsychotic drugs and antidepressants can alleviate delirium symptoms in some hospitalized patients[32]. In our study, we investigated the effects of prophylactic antidelirium therapy with perphenazine on delirium incidence. Our results showed that the use of perphenazine reduced delirium incidence, but the duration of delirium was not counted due to the small number of cases. There was a decrease in in-hospital mortality in patients treated with prophylactic perphenazine, which was not reported in other literature. We suspect that for specific groups, this reduction in mortality might be due to reduced delirium. Alternatively, it could be due to statistical bias resulting from a relatively small sample size. A prospective randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm our findings.
Limitation
We set very detailed criteria for case enrollment, which, while ensuring consistency of intervention measures in cases, reduced the total number of cases. In the Perphenazine group, only two cases of delirium occurred, making it impossible to compare the duration of delirium between the two groups.