The patient presented with the finger drop sign and acute bulbar palsy, which are both relatively rare manifestations of GBS. First, the finger drop sign is a distinctive feature observed in this case. Recent research defined the FDv as corresponding to the AMAN type in nerve conduction studies (2). Initially, our patient’s nerve conduction studies demonstrated low amplitude, suggesting a conduction block. However, early reversible conduction failure is a known phenomenon in GBS (9), with this abnormality often being observed in the early stage of AMAN type. In subsequent nerve conduction studies, the conduction velocities returned to normal, confirming the AMAN classification of our case according to the Ho criteria, Hadden criteria, and Uncini criteria (6–8). While our case fulfills the definition of FDv, including positive anti-GM1 antibodies and AMAN type, it is important to note that the presence of a combination of positive anti-GT1a antibodies in FDv has not been previously reported.
The occurrence of acute bulbar palsy in GBS is frequently associated with anti-GT1a antibodies (10). Interestingly, there are no specific studies that have conclusively identified which cranial nerves are predominantly involved in acute bulbar palsy in patients with GBS with positive anti-GT1a antibodies (10, 11). Our patient exhibited pronounced tongue weakness at the onset of GBS, which improved rapidly following IVIg treatment. The improvement in tongue pressure was associated with amelioration of the dysarthria and dysphasia, suggesting that tongue pressure may reflect the overall severity of GBS. Tongue weakness is reported to be correlated with respiratory function in GBS (12). As GT1a is reported to be expressed in the glossopharyngeal nerve, vagal nerve, human cerebrum, and hypoglossal nerve, the presence of anti-GT1a antibodies raises the possibility that the effect of these antibodies on the hypoglossal nerve could cause the unique tongue weakness (4, 13). Measuring tongue strength can be a valuable tool to not only assess the severity and progression of bulbar palsy, but to also determine the targets of intervention in rehabilitation.
In our case, anti-GD1b and anti-GQ1b antibodies were also positive. While anti-GD1b antibodies indicate sensory ataxic neuropathy and anti-GQ1b antibodies are typically indicative of MFS, the clinical presentation of our patient did not exhibit ataxia and did not align with MFS (1, 14). Despite the occurrence of anti-GD1b and GQ1b antibodies in MFS and sensory ataxic neuropathy cases, it is important to consider the possibility of cross reactivity (4, 15, 16). The absence of typical MFS symptoms and reduced deep sensation indicated that the presence of anti-GD1b and anti-GQ1b antibodies in this case may have been due to cross reactivity to anti-GM1 and anti-GT1a antibodies, respectively. In addition, while the patient had appendix cancer, there was low probability of paraneoplastic syndrome because of his monophasic disease course and marked response to IVIg treatments.
Our case exhibited a rare combination of clinical features, namely, acute bulbar palsy and the finger drop sign. The simultaneous presence of these symptoms, coupled with the detection of both anti-GT1a and anti-GM1 antibodies, highlights the intricacies and diagnostic challenges associated with overlapping subtypes of GBS, underscoring the need for clinicians to consider the possibility of such overlapping syndromes. Our case particularly suggests an association between anti-GT1a antibody and its impact on the hypoglossal nerve. This finding suggests that measuring tongue strength could be a valuable method for assessing clinical progression and determining appropriate rehabilitation strategies. To disentangle the complexities of these overlapping subtypes, further research is essential to elucidate the distinct clinical subtypes of GBS, their specific associations with anti-ganglioside antibodies, and the mechanisms underlying these associations.