In this study, we investigated whether DEQLF could be used to differentiate between active and inactive lesions, thereby acting as a valid tool for lesion activity assessment of early caries. On visual observation of the fluorescence images obtained with DEQLF, the fluorescent dye penetrated the caries lesions and thus, emitted brighter autofluorescence in case of the active lesions, whereas in the inactive lesions, it was confirmed that the fluorescent dye did not penetrate the caries. DEQLF was used to easily distinguish whether the early caries lesions were active or inactive by observing autofluorescence with the naked eye in caries lesions. By calculating the G value, the lesion activity of early caries could be quantitatively evaluated.
The fluorescent dye penetrated the active lesions but not the inactive lesions (Fig. 2). The emitted autofluorescence of the active caries lesions was brighter than that of the sound enamel and showed positive G values, whereas the emitted autofluorescence of the inactive caries lesions was darker than that of the sound enamel and showed negative G values (Table 1). This is similar to the results of previous studies in which active caries lesions showed brighter fluorescence than inactive lesions when DEQLF was performed on artificial root caries lesions32. These results can be explained based on the fact that the porosity of a caries lesion’s surface increases proportionally as the number and diameter of microchannels in the surface layer increase33,34. Likewise, in the histological evaluation in this study, it was confirmed that the active caries lesions have no remineralized surface layer, which also means that active caries lesions have a more porous surface than inactive lesions (Fig. 2), due to which, a larger amount of fluorescent dye could penetrate the caries lesion simultaneously.
In the DEQLF image, the inactive caries lesions of I10 emitted partially bright autofluorescence due to penetration of the fluorescent dye into the lesions, while the inactive caries lesions of I3 and I5 emitted dark autofluorescence as the fluorescent dye did not penetrate the lesions (Fig. 2). In contrast, in the histological images, the inactive caries lesions of I3 and I5 had a “completely remineralized” surface layer with mineral content similar to that of normal enamel. However, the inactive caries lesions of I10 had a mineral content similar to that of demineralized lesions and an “incompletely remineralized” surface layer. When the caries lesions were treated with a high concentration of fluoride (such as 2% sodium fluoride used in this study), the remineralization of the surface layer differed according to the lesion severity35. Therefore, it is considered that the caries lesions of I10 had an “incompletely remineralized surface layer” due to the low remineralization of a high concentration of fluoride at a relatively deep lesion depth. Based on this, DEQLF may be used to detect inactive lesions in which the lesion surface is incompletely remineralized by observing the autofluorescence of a fluorescent dye that is partially emitted within the lesion. DEQLF may also be used to evaluate the extent to which the lesion has remineralized.
DEQLF, the method of dye penetration after dehydration, can help clinicians intuitively assess lesion activity. In this study, when only dehydration was performed, both the active and inactive groups emitted darker fluorescence than the sound enamel (Table 1). In previous studies that used QLF to observe early caries lesions during dehydration, both active and inactive lesions emitted dark fluorescence resulting from the evaporation of water from the porous structure of the lesion, as the refractive index changed from water (1.33) to air (1.00)14,27,33. However, it is difficult for clinicians to facilitate evaporation of such a small amount of water as that observed in the early caries lesions, and to assess lesion activity by visually observing or quantitatively measuring the result of evaporation (change in the refractive index of the lesion). In contrast, in this study, it was possible to clearly differentiate between active and inactive lesions using DEQLF, as the dye penetration highlighted the active lesions as bright fluorescence and the inactive lesions as dark fluorescence (Fig. 2). The change in fluorescence (|ΔΔG|) by DEQLF in the active groups was 3.1−3.7 times higher than that by dehydration, and the |ΔG| by DEQLF in the inactive groups was 1.7−2.2 times lower than the |ΔΔG| by dehydration (Fig. 3). Therefore, these results show that DEQLF may be used to clearly and intuitively assess lesion activity rather than using the dehydration method to visualize and quantify the porous structure of early caries lesions.
Fluorescein sodium was used as the fluorescent dye in this study. Previous studies have reported that porphyrin derivatives are mainly used as fluorescent dyes for caries lesion assessment with laser fluorescence (LF)36,37,38,39,40. However, the porphyrin derivatives are not suitable as a fluorescent dye for DEQLF, since they already exist in natural caries lesions as bacterial metabolites20,41,42,43,44. Consequently, when performing DEQLF on natural caries lesions with porphyrin derivatives, it is impossible to distinguish the red fluorescence between the fluorescent dye and the bacterial metabolite. In contrast, fluorescein sodium is produced only outside the body and does not form an ionic bond with enamel28,45. Moreover, since fluorescein sodium emits yellow-green autofluorescence, it can be easily distinguished from the red autofluorescence of porphyrin derivatives on the caries lesions. However, since this study used artificial lesions to simulate active and inactive lesions in the laboratory, it was not possible to reflect all features (dental plaque, dental calculus, and anatomical morphology) of natural caries lesions. Therefore, it is useful as a fluorescent dye for DEQLF to evaluate the lesion activity of natural caries.
This is the first study to distinguish between active and inactive lesions in artificial caries using DEQLF. We confirmed that there was a difference in the autofluorescence emitted from the active and inactive lesions of artificial caries using DEQLF. Active lesions emitted brighter yellow-green autofluorescence than sound enamel, whereas inactive caries lesions emitted darker autofluorescence than sound enamel after performing DEQLF. It may be considered a supportive modality for clinicians in the intuitive and quantitative assessment of lesion activity in early caries, based on different fluorescence patterns and surface porosity.
The DEQLF method can intuitively and quantitatively distinguish between active and inactive lesions based on differences in autofluorescence. Therefore, DEQLF might be useful as an objective assessment of lesion activity. The method has ample scope to become a useful tool for assessing lesion activity with a single observation and for longitudinal monitoring of lesion activity in clinical practice. Additionally, DEQLF consists of a simple procedure; therefore, even dentists with little experience in evaluating lesion activity of early caries can easily use this in clinical settings and for large groups.