Plants are exposed to various stresses during their growth and development, both in natural and agricultural conditions (Seleiman et al., 2020). Fluctuations in temperature, whether rising or falling, influence the pace of plant development, with temperature stress disrupting cellular metabolism and functionality. (Djukic et al., 2019). This stress induces alterations across multiple levels: morphological, physiological, and biochemical, depending on the species and duration of exposure. (Desoky et al., 2020). Cold temperatures (< 20°C) and freezing conditions (< 0°C) represent one of the major abiotic stresses for plants in agriculture. The acclimatization of winter varieties begins after the temperature drops below 10°C. Yield losses induced by cold stress are characterized by a reduction in the number of productive tillers, spikes, and grains per spike, shorter stems, smaller leaf surface area, and decreased photosynthetic capacity. Winter cereals varieties, during the tillering stage, are sensitive to low temperatures, which cause a range of damages to plants such as membrane rigidification, changes in protein conformation, damage to the photosynthetic system, and excessive accumulation of various reactive oxygen molecules. (Fowler et al., 1999; Valluru et al., 2012; Crosatti et al., 2013; Li et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015; Hussain et al., 2018). During stressful conditions, one of the most damaging effects is oxidative stress, due to the generation of large amounts of reactive oxygen molecules, leading to damage to proteins, nucleic acids, lipid oxidation, cell membrane damage, and ultimately resulting in the inhibition of plant growth and development, and sometimes even plant death (Avasthi et al., 2015).
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are a type of metallic nanoparticles with unique biological, chemical, and physical characteristics. Due to their exceptional catalytic activity, chemical stability, high electrical conductivity, optical and thermal properties (Shaikh et al., 2018), silver nanoparticles have become nanomaterials of great interest to science and have found wide-ranging applications. They are used in various fields: medicine (Asgary et al., 2016; Hernández-Arteaga et al., 2017; Saratale et al., 2017; Markovic et al., 2024), dentistry (Fernandez et al., 2017), theranostics (Sakthi et al., 2022), air and water purification (Sharma et al., 2021; Zahoor et al., 2021), microbiology (Rajkumar et al., 2019; Rozhin et al., 2021), electronics industry (Bouafia et al., 2021), cosmetics (Foteva, 2024), color degradation and environmental pollution prevention (Mehta et al., 2021), food industry (Shaikh et al., 2020), and agriculture (Panda et al., 2024).
The utilization of silver nanoparticles in agriculture holds multifaceted significance, including their application as nanofertilizers (Fatima et al., 2021), nano-pesticides (Dangi et al., 2021; Mansoor et al., 2021), nanobiosensors, nanometeorological instruments (Manna et al., 2019), improvement of soil properties (Khan et al., 2023), as well as growth stimulators and fruit ripening agents (Alghuthaymi et al., 2015). Silver nanoparticles at a specific concentration can lead to desired effects in plants (Jasrotia et al., 2018). Bhati-Kushwaha et al. (2013) reported that silver nanoparticles mitigate the harmful effects of cold stress in wheat. Silver nanoparticles have increased yield, antioxidant activity, and proline content in cereals under cold stress conditions (Almutairi & Alharbi, 2015; Mohamed et al., 2017; Karimi & Sasan, 2017). Markarian et al. (2023) utilized ZnO nanoparticles and demonstrated their enhancement of wheat's resistance to cold stress. The same effect was achieved with gold nanoparticles in wheat seedlings under cold and low-temperature conditions (Venzhik et al., 2022a; Venzhik et al., 2022b).
The synthesis of AgNPs, as well as other nanomaterials, can be physical, chemical, or biological. Biological synthesis is also referred to as green synthesis (Sesuvium et al., 2010; Lee & Jun, 2019). Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles has advantages over chemical and physical methods. The methods used in green synthesis are environmentally and commercially acceptable, as well as simple. They do not require high energy inputs, such as high temperatures, pressures, forces, or the use of toxic chemicals (Banerjee et al., 2014). Green synthesis methods are reliable, fast, and minimize adverse environmental effects (Rauwel et. al., 2015). Biological synthesis essentially consists of three steps: extraction, reducing agent, and the use of non-toxic materials. With the biological method, nanoparticles of specific size and shape can be obtained, which is one of the most important requirements in synthesis. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles utilizes molecules obtained from biological systems such as plants, microorganisms, fungi, and algae (Mustapha et al., 2022). Molecules obtained through extraction from biological systems such as phenols, terpenoids, amino acids, vitamins, polysaccharides, proteins, enzymes, tannins, alkaloids, and alcohol compounds are important as reducing and stabilizing agents (Ahmed et al., 2016; Sudheer et al., 2022). The synthesis of silver nanoparticles using plant extracts occurs more rapidly compared to the use of microorganisms (Sharma et al., 2019). Plant-based synthesis of AgNPs is widely utilized compared to microorganism-based techniques because it is more efficient, less biocompromising, and does not require active cell cultures and their maintenance (Xu et al., 2020). Physical methods follow a top-down synthetic approach, while chemical and biological methods, in contrast, follow a bottom-up approach (Silva et al., 2017). Physical methods are suitable because they typically yield a large quantity of nanoparticles. However, physical methods require large amounts of energy and expensive equipment. Chemical methods carry the risk of toxic effects and environmental pollution, making them unsuitable and avoided for these reasons (Mallick et al., 2004; Tran et al., 2013; Yaqoob et al., 2020). Silver nanoparticles obtained through green synthesis, unlike chemical synthesis, exhibit long-term antibacterial effects and lower phytotoxicity, thus reducing their negative impact on the environment. Molecules obtained from biological systems represent a renewable resource in the process of green synthesis. This differs from chemical synthesis, which requires the production of chemicals, often at high costs (Zhang et al., 2021). Various strategies have been used to overcome the negative effects of stress: selecting tolerant genotypes, applying different plant growth regulators, and using organic fertilizers. Species and varieties that can tolerate stress, combined with nanotechnology in agriculture, could be an effective strategy for achieving sustainable production and increasing yields during stressful conditions (Arif, 2020; Kumari et al., 2022). Additionally, nanotechnology is environmentally friendly because its use reduces the effects of harmful chemicals on crops and the environment in general (Ahmad et al., 2022).
The aim of the research is to analyze the impact of silver nanoparticles on the antioxidant activity of winter wheat and barley varieties during winter conditions in a ten-day experiment conducted in the tillering stage at a field trial.