5.1. Water-rock interaction
Hydrolysis is the process where the breakdown of minerals from the silicate group (pyroxenes, feldspars, micas, hornblendes) occurs, which are the most vulnerable to chemical alteration (Earle, 2015). These reactions can develop in the hydrothermal environment or as exogenous processes (under atmospheric conditions) in the study area; the intense agricultural activity contributes to humid conditions for altering minerals.
The hydrolysis reaction of silicate minerals in an aqueous solution, where H+ and OH- ions are selectively consumed, and K+, Na+, Ca2+ ions, and other cations are transferred from minerals to groundwater (Rose & Burt, 1979). In the mineral alteration process, the ions are released into the soil and groundwater to leave their hydrogeochemical signature so that Na-HCO3-type waters predominate in the Jofre River aquifer.
The factors that directly influence the alteration are humidity and temperature; for example, in conditions of humidity and high temperature, the hydrolysis of clay, such as kaolinite, will form a gibbsite. Whereas in arid climates, the predominant clay will be of the illite-smectite type (Appelo & Postma, 1993).
KAlSi3O8 + H2O == hydrolysis ==> HAlSi3O8 + K+ + OH- 2HAlSi3O8 + 11H2O == hydrolysis ==> Al2O3 + 6H4SiO4
Table 1. Set of hydrogeochemical phases that were considered in water-rock interaction and bibliographic references.
Phase
|
Reaction
|
Ref
|
Albite
|
NaAlSi3O8 + 8H2O = Na+ + Al(OH)-4 + 3H4SiO4
|
1
|
Ortosa
|
2 KAlSi3O8 + 9H2O + 2H+ → Al2Si2O5(OH)4 + 4Si(OH)4 + 2K+
|
2
|
SiO2(a) Quartz
|
SiO2 + 2H2O = H4SiO4
|
1
|
Kaolinite
|
Al2Si2O5(OH)4 + 6H+ = H2O + 2H4SiO4 + 2Al3+
|
1
|
Feldespar
|
2KAlSi3O8 + 2H+ + 9H2O = Al2Si2O5(OH)4 + 2K+ + 4H4SiO
|
1
|
Plagioclase
|
Na0.62Ca0.38Al1.38Si2.62O8 + 5.52 H+ + 2.48H2O =
0.62Na+ + 0.38Ca+2 + 1.38Al+3 + 2.62H4SiO4
|
1
|
Sanidine
|
(K,Na)(Si,Al)4O8 (Na0:56K0:40Ca0:01 )∑=0:97 (Al 0:97Fe 3+ 0:03 )∑=1:00 Si 3:01O8
|
1
|
Microcline
|
0.013K(AlSi3O8) + 0.013CO2 + 0.0195H2O = 0.065Al2 Si2O5(OH)4 +0.013K+ + 0.013HCO-3 +0.026SiO2
|
1
|
Enstatite
|
MgSiO3 - FeSiO3 (Mg1:77Fe 2+ 0:11Al0:04Ca0:02Na0:02Fe 3+ 0:02 )∑=1:98Si2:00O6.
|
1
|
- Parkhurst & Appelo (1999)
- Heath (2007).
These minerals were identified in petrographic and XRD analysis, where their hydrolysis reactions are as follows (Table 1). In the albite hydrolysis reaction, Na+ is incorporated into groundwater, and clays such as kaolinite, montmorillonite, gibbsite are formed (Parkhurst &Appelo 1999). In the biotite hydrolysis, K+ and Mg2+ are released. While in the hydrolysis of the magnetite, the Fe+2 passes to Fe3+ by oxidation-reduction reactions when interacting with the groundwater; as evidence of this process in the study area, the red porphyry is presented (pigeon blood) that is used as an ornamental material in houses.
Figure 8a shows evolutionary pathways for SiO2 and HCO3/Na behavior. In route I, there are samples 22, 21, 20, 18, 7, and 6; the behavior of SiO2 concerning HCO3/Na has an inversely proportional behavior; that is, as silica decreases, the HCO3/Na ratio increases at a ratio of -0.17, these samples are related to the underground flow that goes from the dam to the groundwater discharge zone. Route II is formed by samples 19, 17, 13, 12, 5, 4, and 3; in this group, it also shows behavior inversely proportional to a ratio of -0.8; it also goes in the direction of the flow. Route III is formed by samples 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 1, 11, 14, 15, and 16. This group is directly proportional; that is, as the silica increases, the HCO3/Na ratio rises at a ratio of 1. In this group, the flow converges towards sample 15, located in the discharge zone.
Figure 8b shows the albite hydrolysis reaction, which is the SiO2 ratio concerning Na/(Ca+Na), the evolutionary path I, with samples 22, 21, 20, 18, 13, 12, 10, 9, 7, 5, 4, and 3, has a relationship that is directly proportional to a ratio of 2.28; that is, the silica increases much faster than the Na/(Ca+Na) ratio. Route II, with 16, 15, 14, 11, 9, 8, 2, and 1, shows behavior inversely proportional to a percentage of -0.62; that is, as silica decreases, the Na/(Ca+Na) ratio increases. Route III, 6, and 19 have a relationship directly proportional to a ratio of 1.2; that is, the silica increases much faster than the Na/(Ca+Na) ratio.
In Figure 8c, the SiO2 relationship concerning Ca2+ is shown; route I, with samples 22, 21, 20, 18, 7, and 4, has a relationship that is directly proportional to a ratio of 0.4; that is, Ca2+ increases much faster than silica. Route II, with samples 16, 15, 14, 11, 10, 9, 8, 2, and 1, shows behavior directly proportional to a ratio of 0.12; that is, Ca2+ increases much faster than silica. Route III, samples 3, 5, 6, 12, 13, 17, and 19 have a relationship directly proportional to a ratio of -0.4; that is, Ca2+ increases much faster than when silica decreases.
Figure 9a shows the relationship of F- vs. Na+, in which the evolutionary pathways of groundwater are observed (F1, F2, and F3). The evolution begins with sample 22 (La Muñeca Dam) with a directly proportional behavior up to 2 mg/L and 150 mg/L of Na (F1) coordinates. From this point on, water has two paths of evolution, in one, there is no increase in F-, and only Na+ increases, possibly due to the water-rock interaction (rhyolitic) with a high Na+ (F2) content. The other evolutionary route has a significant increase in F and little growth in Na, possible interaction with irrigation return water. This area is characterized by using apatite (PO4)3Ca5(F,Cl,OH) in samples 13 and 14 are an old gallery and a pond located in the lower part of probably cumulative irrigation areas (F3).
In Figure 9b, Cl versus NO2 two evolutionary routes are observed; in the first, with respect to Cl, there is a considerable increase in Cl-, which places this group of samples (6, 4, 3, 20, and 15) as a more evolved water by water-rock interaction. In the second evolutionary route, it is subdivided according to its origin with respect to NO2 that goes from samples 22, 21, 1, 19, 14, 18, 2, 5, and 17 linearly through the town of Tierra Nueva with a possible contribution of residual water urban, which explains the increase in NO2. The second group identified in this route is found with a low Cl- content, and an increase in NO2 attributed to its location in irrigation areas to the use of fertilizers and irrigation returns; samples 10, 11, and 12 have the maximum concentration of NO2, possibly due to contamination from discharges from a poultry farm.
5.2. Stable isotopes
Some researchers use the environmental isotope ratio for the interpretation of water-rock interaction (Barth, 2000; Jung et al., 2020; Sankoh et al., 2022). Figure 9c shows the relationship δ18O vs. Cl-; in this figure. Based on result, two groups of water are identified. The first group corresponds to samples 3, 6, 20, 15, and 4, originating from the water-rock interaction, being the group with the most significant evolution. The second evolutionary path begins in the sample located in La Muñeca Dam (22) with a value of δ18O -4.33 o/oo, indicating maximum evaporation, which is consistent with a surface water body exposed to temperature changes; sample 9 also has evaporation effects due to its proximity to the dam. The rest of the group tends to increase evaporation due to the possible return of irrigation and mixing with urban water.
Figure 10a is the isotopic relationship between δ18O and δ2H, for δ18O the minimum was -9.58 (Sample 3), the maximum was -4.33 (sample 22 from La Muñeca dam), and the average was -7.18, with a standard deviation of 1.37. While for δ2H, the minimum was -41.14 (sample 22 from Presa la Muñeca), the maximum was -73.94 (sample 3), and the mean was -54.34, with a standard deviation of 7.8. Two evolutionary routes are identified; the first one is related to the water-rock interaction with a low δ2H and δ18O, which is consistent with the type of exploitation (wells 3, 2, 6, and 5). The second evolutionary route shows greater evaporation from its origin shows 22, which is interpreted that the Dam influences the aquifer up to its lowest part. Group 14, 12, 17, 11, and 16 is identified as the mixing zone where their values are related to the World Meteoric Line.
In relation to the global meteoric line (GWWL) defined by Craig (1961) δ2H= 8*δ18O+10, the evaporation line of the Tierra Nueva aquifer (δ2H= 3.27* δ18O-28.9), shows a deviation of 22° concerning the line world meteorology, this deviated line represents the evaporation line of the Tierra Nueva aquifer. The evaporation line intersects the meteoric world line at -8.5 at δ18O and -63 at δ2H. Close to these coordinates are samples 17, 16, 14, 13, and 12. Some examples (3, 2, 6, and 5) do not fit this trend and have a horizontal displacement (green line) concerning the GWWL (Craig, 1961); this behavior is related to the water-rock interaction. It is worth mentioning that the red arrow direction indicates groundwater's evolution from La Muñeca Dam. This behavior can also be interpreted as a mixing effect between the water from the dam and the groundwater from the Tierra Nueva aquifer, in which the flow from below the dam mixes with the groundwater (Jung et al., 2020).
Figure 10b shows the relationship d-excess vs. δ18O, with a trend that is inversely proportional to d-excess concerning δ18O (d-excess=-4.9*18O-30.3); as d-excess decreases, δ18O increases, such that the highest value of d-excess is in sample 14, consistent with being influenced by irrigation return water, and the lowest value corresponds to sample 22 from La Muñeca Dam. On the other hand, samples 3, 2, 6, and 5 do not fit this pattern and intersect the line d-excess=-4.9*18O-30.3 at -6.5 of δ18O, which we identify as the evolutionary path of water interaction -rock, where d-excess has slight variation, and δ18O has a more significant variation (Sankoh et al., 2022).
Figure 10c shows the relationship between d-excess versus altitude. In figure 10c, the dug wells are found mainly at elevations from 1,725 to 1,750 masl. Three samples were obtained at an elevation of 1785 masl, while sample 22 (Muñeca Dam) was collected at 1845 masl. One sample of water was taken from the Muñeca Dam; however, it present elevations (1880 masl) that correspond to the heights of the catchment area of the Muñeca Dam.