3.1. Composition and molecular weight
The co-polycarbonates contain BNEF and BHEBN were synthesized by a two-step (transesterification and polycondensation) one-pot method (Fig. 1). The feeding ratios of BHEBN and BNEF are different, which correspond to PC-X (X is the molar percentage of BNEF), and are listed in Table 1.
Table 1
Composition and molecular weight of polycarbonates (PC-X).
Co-polycarbonates | Composition ([BHEBN]/ [BNEF]) | GPC |
Feed | Co-polycarbonates[a] | Mn/g·mol− 1 | Mw/g·mol− 1 | PDI |
PC-0 | 100/0 | - | 35000 | 53000 | 1.51 |
PC-20 | 80/20 | 86.3/13.7 | 24600 | 40500 | 1.65 |
PC-40 | 60/40 | 63.6/36.4 | 23000 | 40700 | 1.77 |
PC-60 | 40/60 | 48.0/52.0 | 22000 | 46300 | 2.10 |
PC-80 | 20/80 | 27.5/72.5 | 21600 | 49800 | 2.31 |
PC-100 | 0/100 | - | 18600 | 48900 | 2.63 |
[a] Values obtained from 1H NMR.
With the increase of BNEF content, the molecular weight of copolymer decreases gradually, and the molecular weight distribution (PDI) increases gradually. This may be due to the greater steric hindrance of the chain segment containing BNEF than that of the chain segment containing BHEBN, and the weaker movement of the chain segment, resulting in the more uneven distribution of polymerization products.
The structure of monomer BHEBN and BNEF contains only aromatic ring and methylene. In the 1H NMR spectrum (Fig. 3) of copolymers, proton peaks overlap and interfere with each other. The monomer composition of co-polycarbonates cannot be obtained directly from nuclear magnetic hydrogen spectrum integration. However, since the amount of aromatic hydrogen of monomer BNEF and BHEBN is different and the amount of methylene hydrogen is the same, the composition ratio of the copolymer can be calculated by the sum of the number of hydrogen protons.
According to the integral value of 1H NMR spectrum, the molar ratio of BHEBN/BNEF in the final synthesized co-polycarbonates can be calculated by equations (1), (2) and (3). f BHEBN and f BNEF represent the molar percentage of BHEBN and BNEF, respectively. Ia is an integral of 3.84ppm to 4.51ppm, and Ib is an integral of 6.83ppm to 7.77ppm. The calculated molar ratios of co-polycarbonates composition are shown in Table 1.
$${\text{f}}_{\text{BHEBN}}\text{=}\frac{5{\text{I}}_{a}-2{\text{I}}_{b}}{2{\text{I}}_{a}}\times 100\% \text{(1)}$$
$${\text{f}}_{\text{BNEF}}\text{=}\frac{2{\text{I}}_{b}-3{\text{I}}_{a}}{2{\text{I}}_{a}}\times 100\% \left(2\right)$$
$$\frac{\text{BHEBN}}{\text{BNEF}}\text{=}\frac{{\text{f}}_{\text{BHEBN}}}{{\text{f}}_{\text{BNEF}}} \text{(}\text{3}\text{)}$$
From Table 1, it is found that the actual content of BNEF in the polycarbonate is lower than the theoretical amount. This may be due to the fact that BNEF monomer has a Cardo structure in addition to the binaphthalene group, and its steric hindrance is larger than that of BHEBN, so the reactivity is relatively low. Monomer BNEF did not fully participate in the polymerization and has a small loss. The change trend of molecular weight also has confirmed that the BNEF reaction activity is relatively low.
3.2. The chemical structure
The infrared spectrum of the prepared polycarbonate is shown in Fig. 2. Although the copolymerization ratio of polymers is different, they have high similarity in the infrared spectrum, as shown in Fig. 2a. This may be due to the fact that monomers BHEBN and BNEF are polyaromatic cyclic compounds, and the content of other groups except aromatic ring groups is very low. The absorption peak at 3050cm-1 is the result of the C-H stretching vibration of the benzene ring[29]. At the wave number of 2930 cm-1, the absorption peak is the methylene C-H asymmetric tensile vibration[30], and the absorption peak at 1750cm-1 is a typical carbonyl (C = O) stretching vibration[31, 32]. In addition to these remarkable characteristic absorption peaks, other absorption peaks are highly similar. The spectrogram of 600 ~ 1800cm-1 is enlarged (Fig. 2b). It is found that the absorption peak at 1250cm-1 is enhanced with the increase of BNEF content, but there is no absorption peak when BNEF is not contained. This may be the vibration absorption peak of C-C skeleton of quaternary carbon atoms in Cardo structure. At 1595cm-1, the absorption peak is enhanced gradually with the increase of BNEF content. This may be because the number of aromatic rings of BNEF is more than that of BHEBN. With the increase of BNEF content, the vibration absorption peak of aromatic ring C = C skeleton is enhanced. The changes of these absorption peaks confirm the successful synthesis of copolymers.
1H NMR characterization is necessary to further confirm the chemical structure of the synthetic polycarbonates. The 1H NMR spectrum is shown in Fig. 3. Although there is a peak at 5.1 ~ 5.3ppm, the integral result shows that the integral value of this range is too small to be ignored and it is presumed to be an impurity peak. According to the structure of the material, it is speculated that the copolymer has two main proton absorption peaks, one is the methylene proton peak (3.84 ~ 4.51ppm) connected with oxygen[21], the other is the aromatic ring proton peak (6.83 ~ 7.77ppm). The copolymers BHEBN and BNEF both have methylene and aromatic rings attached to oxygen, and have no other characteristic groups. This makes it impossible to obtain the monomer copolymerization ratio directly from the integral of the characteristic proton peaks. But the different total number of hydrogen atoms in the copolymer can confirm the different proportion of the monomer copolymerization, because the number of hydrogen atoms in the monomer is different.
13C NMR characterization has been performed to further confirm the structure of the co-polycarbonates. According to the different structural units connected on both sides of the carbonyl carbon, the carbonyl carbon of co-polycarbonate appears in four forms: C1, C2, C3 and C4, as shown in Fig. 4a. In co-polycarbonate, C2 and C3 can be regarded as the same, the chemical environment of co-polycarbonate is relatively complex, so the chemical shift of C1 and C4 is slightly offset, C3 and C4 appear between the signal peaks of C1 and C4[21]. However, it is worth noting that the signal peak at 155.04ppm is not the signal peak of carbonyl carbon, but the carbon signal peak on the naphthalene ring in the BNEF unit.
In Fig. 4b, it is found that the carbon peak (141.1ppm, 140.2ppm, 133.2ppm, 118.9ppm, 106ppm) attributed to BNEF homogeneous polycarbonate also appears in the co-polycarbonates, but disappears in the BHEBN homogeneous polycarbonate without BNEF[32]. The carbon peak (134.1ppm, 124ppm, 116ppm) in the BHEBN homogenous polycarbonate appear simultaneously in the co-polycarbonate[33], but disappear when there is no BHEBN. More importantly, the peak at the chemical shift of 58.5ppm is the sp3 hybridized quaternary carbon atom in the Cardo structure, which occurs in the polycarbonates containing BNEF[34].
The integral data obtained by 13C NMR can be combined with equations (4), (5), and (6) to calculate the numerical mean sequence length (Ln) of BHEBN carbonate unit and BNEF carbonate unit in the co-polycarbonate, and the random degree (R) of the co-polycarbonate. The results are listed in Table 2.
$${\text{L}}_{\text{n,BHC}}\text{=}\text{1+}\frac{2{\text{I}}_{BHC}}{{\text{I}}_{BHC\&BNC}} \text{(}\text{4}\text{)}$$
$${\text{L}}_{\text{n,BNC}}\text{=}\text{1+}\frac{2{\text{I}}_{BNC}}{{\text{I}}_{BHC\&BNC}} \left(5\right)$$
$$\text{R}\text{=}\frac{\text{1}}{{\text{L}}_{\text{n,BHC}}}+\frac{\text{1}}{{\text{L}}_{\text{n,BNC}}} \text{(}\text{6}\text{)}$$
Where, IBHC, IBNC and IBHC&BNC correspond to the area integral values of C4, C1 and C2&C3 signal peaks in Fig. 4a; Ln,BHC and Ln,BNC are the numerical mean sequence lengths of BHEBN carbonate unit and BNEF carbonate unit. R is the random degree of the copolymer.
Table 2
Composition and Microstructure of polycarbonates (PC-X).
Co-polycarbonates | Composition ([BHEBN]/ [BNEF]) | Microstructure |
Feed | Co-polycarbonates[a] | Ln,BHC | Ln,BNC | R |
PC-0 | 100/0 | - | - | - | - |
PC-20 | 80/20 | 83.2/16.8 | 4.31 | 3.15 | 0.55 |
PC-40 | 60/40 | 66.1/33.9 | 2.31 | 4.13 | 0.68 |
PC-60 | 40/60 | 46.8/53.2 | 1.33 | 5.65 | 0.93 |
PC-80 | 20/80 | 23.7/76.3 | 1.12 | 12.76 | 0.97 |
PC-100 | 0/100 | - | - | - | - |
[a] Values obtained from 13C NMR.
When R = 0, it is a simple physical blending of homopolymer. When 0 < R < 1, it is block copolymer; When R = 1, it is random copolymer; When R = 2, it is an alternate copolymer. The co-polycarbonate synthesized in this paper is a block copolymer with R values ranging from 0.55 to 0.97. With the increase of BNEF content, the copolymer tends to be random copolymer.
3.3. Thermal properties
The synthesized polycarbonates were characterized by DSC (Fig. 5) to study the thermal properties of the co-polycarbonates. It can be seen that there is no melt crystallization peak in the cooling scan and no melt crystallization peak in the second heating scan. Moreover, all polycarbonates have only one glass transition temperature, so all the synthetic polycarbonates are amorphous.
Table 3
DSC and TGA results of polycarbonates (PC-X).
Co-polycarbonate | DSC (Second heating scan) | TGA |
Tg (°C) | TD,5%(°C) | TDM(°C) |
PC-0 | 118.0 | 325.7 | 378.6 |
PC-20 | 131.9 | 330.1 | 385.1/430.1 |
PC-40 | 147.6 | 338.9 | 391.4/431.1 |
PC-60 | 163.1 | 341.6 | 392.8/445.2 |
PC-80 | 180.9 | 359.8 | 401.7/445.6 |
PC-100 | 200.0 | 373.2 | 444.9 |
TD, 5%: The decomposition temperature at 5% weight lost.
TDM: The decomposition temperature at maximum weight loss rate.
The glass transition temperature results of the synthesized polycarbonates are listed in Table 3. The glass transition temperature (Tg) of BHEBN homologous polycarbonate (PC-0) is 118℃, while the Tg of BNEF homologous polycarbonate (PC-100) is 200℃. The glass transition temperature of copolymer is between 118℃ and 200℃, and increases with the increase of BNEF content. In the copolymerization process, although there is a loss of BNEF, the actual measured glass transition temperature is in good agreement with the results obtained from the Fox equation (Fig. 6). When the content of BNEF is higher than 40%, the glass transition temperature is higher than that of BPA-PC[35], which can be applied to more high-temperature environmental fields.
The thermal stability of the synthesized polycarbonate was analyzed by TGA (Fig. 7). The initial thermal decomposition temperature (TD,5%) is positively correlated with the content of BNEF in the polycarbonates. This is because the BNEF polycarbonate chain segment with naphthalene ring and Cardo structure has higher rigidity and heat resistance.It is interesting to note that the DTG curves of the polycarbonate show double valleys, which means that there are two maximum thermal decomposition rates. However, both BHEBN homogenous polycarbonate (PC-0) and BNEF homogenous polycarbonate (PC-100) have only one maximum thermal decomposition rate. Co-polycarbonates have only one glass transition temperature. This indicates that homo-polycarbonates are degraded in one step, while co-polycarbonates are degraded in two steps[14]. In spite of this, the variation trend of decomposition temperature at maximum thermal decomposition rate (TDM) of polycarbonate is positively correlated with the content of BNEF.
3.4. Optical properties
The sample was characterized by optical properties test, and the characterization results were shown in Table 4. It can be seen from the data in Table 4 that BNEF homo-polycarbonate (PC-100) has a refractive index of up to 1.6813. By comparing the structures of BNEF and BHEBN, it can be concluded that the Cardo structure with multi-aromatic rings greatly improves the refractive index, which is consistent with the literature reports. Compared with the 1.6390 refractive index of BPEF homologous polycarbonate, the high refractive index of BNEF homologous polycarbonate is attributed to the naphthalene ring group.
Table 4
Optical properties of polycarbonates (PC-X).
Polymer | Refractive index | Abbe number | Transmittance |
PC-0 | 1.6592 | 20.8 | 88.25 |
PC-20 | 1.6710 | 18.7 | 87.54 |
PC-40 | 1.6753 | 18.5 | 87.23 |
PC-60 | 1.6780 | 18.4 | 87.07 |
PC-80 | 1.6809 | 18.3 | 87.80 |
PC-100 | 1.6813 | 18.0 | 87.91 |
The refractive index of polycarbonate increased with the increase of BNEF content, but the glass transition temperature also increased gradually. The increasing rate of the glass transition temperature is much higher than that of the initial thermal decomposition temperature, which will make it more difficult to process the material. BNEF mainly increases the refractive index, and the addition of BHEBN can adjust the glass transition temperature of the copolymer. The Abbe number is calculated from the refractive index at three specific wavelengths. There is a negative correlation between Abbe number and refractive index, but it is mainly determined by the structure of the material. Transmittance is the primary index of optical materials, which is mainly affected by material structure and sample preparation technology.