3.1. Characterization
In the XRD patterns of the prepared catalysts (Fig. 1), the peaks matched well with those of cubic spinel ZnFe2O4 (JCPDS file No. 22-1012), confirming the presence of the ZnFe2O4 crystals. In Fig. 1, six distinct diffraction peaks were observed at 2θ = 18.19°, 29.92°, 35.26°, 42.84°, 45.45°, and 62.21°, which were attributed to the (111), (220), (311), (400), (511), and (440) planes of ZnFe2O4, suggesting that the ZnFe2O4 crystals exhibit excellent crystallinity and very high surface purity (Zhao et al., 2023).
Figure 2 shows the SEM image of the ZnFe2O4 catalyst at various magnifications. The results reveal that ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles were uniformly dispersed in hexagonal and spherical structures. The homogeneous characteristics and uniform distribution of the ZnFe2O4 particles might facilitate contact between the oxidant and catalyst, promoting PMS activation (Guo et al., 2021). Moreover, the presence of numerous pores on the ZnFe2O4 surface is beneficial for the adsorption of ATZ on the catalyst.
Figure 3 shows the peaks at 284.8, 530.8, 711.5, and 1021.6 eV that correspond to C1s, O1s, Fe2p, and Zn2p, respectively. These results indicate the high stability of the ZnFe2O4 catalyst. The relative elemental composition of the catalyst is summarized in Table 1. The C1s orbital is characterized by peaks at 286.3, 284.8, 288.9, and 287.2 eV, which can be attributed to C-O, C-C, O = C-O, and C = O, respectively (Table 2). As shown in Fig. 3b, the energy difference between the orbital spin-splitting peaks (2p1/2 and2p3/2) is ∼23 eV, the ratio of the spectral peak areas (2p1/2:2p3/2) is ∼1:2. The Zn2p spectral peaks at 1021.9 eV, as indicated by the database, correspond to ZnO. The Fe2p spectrum in Fig. 3c shows a low-intensity peak at 708.9 eV, verifying the presence of Fe3+ species in the catalyst. Meanwhile, those peaks at 710.0, 711.0, 712.0, and 713.0 eV represent the four typical multiple cleavages of Fe3+ with their relative contents, as shown in Table 3.
According to the above results, there were no significant changes in the valence states of Fe and Zn in the catalyst. but the carbon content increased after the reaction, while the Fe and Zn concentrations simultaneously decreased. Although Fe in the catalyst is predominantly in the form of Fe3+, which increases at low binding energies after the reaction.
3.2. Catalytic activity and reaction parameters
The ATZ removal rates of different systems were studied to evaluate the catalytic efficiency of ATZ degradation by ZnFe2O4-activated PMS. The effects of catalyst dosage, PMS addition, starting pH and anions on ATZ degradation were studied to confirm the oxidation efficiency of ZnFe2O4 catalyst.
The effect of the ZnFe2O4 catalyst amount on ATZ degradation efficiency was studied by adding different amounts of the ZnFe2O4 catalyst (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 g/L) at room temperature (25°C), an initial pH of 7, an ATZ concentration of 20 µmol/L, and a PMS concentration of 100 mg/L. As shown in Fig. 4, the ATZ degradation rate reached only 10% within 1 min when only PMS was added without the ZnFe2O4 catalyst. However, as the catalyst concentration increased, the ATZ degradation efficiency also increased. Specifically, at catalyst concentrations of 0.1 and 0.2 g/L, the ATZ degradation efficiency was 15% and 22%, respectively. When the catalyst concentration was 0.5 g/L, the degradation efficiency was 30%. This trend could be attributed to the increase in the catalyst amount, which generates more PMS-activated active sites and more ROS (She et al., 2021). Meanwhile, the increased catalyst content might enhance the ATZ adsorption, promoting ATZ oxidation. However, the ATZ degradation efficiency is not very high, either without the catalyst or with 0.5 g/L Catalyst. This limitation could be primarily attributed to the PMS content. The optimization of reaction conditions necessitates the change in the PMS amount; thus, the subsequent experiments were carried out using 0.5 g/L of the catalyst.
Furthermore, the effect of the PMS concentration on ATZ degradation efficiency was studied by adding different concentrations of PMS (0, 100, 200, and 500 mg/L) at room temperature (25°C), an initial pH of 7, an ATZ concentration of 20 µmol/L, and a catalyst concentration of 0.5 g/L. The results are shown in Fig. 5. As shown in Fig. 5, in the absence of PMS, the ZnFe2O4/PMS system caused minimal ATZ degradation after 30 min of adsorption, and the ATZ degradation rate increased with the PMS concentration. Specifically, at PMS concentrations of 200 and 500 mg/L, the ATZ degradation rates were 62% and 74%, respectively. The ATZ degradation rate was notably high within the first minute, and decreased with time. When the PMS concentration was 100 and 200 mg/L, the ATZ degradation efficiency increased more than twice. However, no significant decrease in the ATZ degradation efficiency was observed, when the PMS concentration was 500 mg/L. This finding could be attributed to the presence of excess PMS that serves as a free radical scavenger and its competition with ATZ for the formation of reactive substances (Xu et al., 2022). Conversely, the small number of active sites on the catalyst surface hinders effective PMS activation, reducing ATZ degradation efficiency (Miao et al., 2018).
Initial pH of the reaction solution is a crucial parameter that affects the oxidative ATZ degradation by PMS. The effects of initial pH values of ATZ (3, 5, 7, 9, 11) on the ATZ degradation efficiency were investigated at room temperature (25°C), an ATZ concentration of 20 µmol/L, a catalyst concentration of 0.5 g/L, and a PMS concentration of 500 mg/L; the results are shown in Fig. 6. According to these findings, ATZ could undergo degradation by ZnFe2O4-activated PMS in a broad pH range. However, the ATZ removal efficiency decreased as the initial pH increased. Generally, the primary active substances are abundant under acidic conditions and are highly effective toward ATZ degradation (Hussain et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2019). However, these active species tend to react with OH− to form HO• under alkaline conditions (Xie et al., 2019). Higher concentrations of OH− may also lead to HO• and OH− interactions, resulting in radical annihilation and thus reducing the degradation efficiency of ATZ.
Two typical inorganic anions, H2PO4− and CO32−, were selected to assess the practical applicability of the ZnFe2O4 catalysts. The effects of these two anions on the ATZ degradation efficiency in the ZnFe2O4/PMS system were observed by adding 10 mM of H2PO4− and CO32− at room temperature of 25°C, an initial pH of 7, an ATZ concentration of 20 µmol/L, and a catalyst concentration of 0.5 g/L; the results are shown in Fig. 7.
As shown in Fig. 7, the addition of H2PO4− and CO32− to the ZnFe2O4/PMS system results in the partial degradation of ATZ. When 10 mM H2PO4− was added, the ATZ removal rate decreased rapidly to 67%. This decrease could be attributed to the reaction of H2PO4− with HO•, generating the less-reactive phosphate (Peng et al., 2018). In addition, H2PO4− formed a complex with the catalyst on the surface, inhibiting ATZ degradation. Similarly, in the presence of 10 mM of CO32−, the ATZ removal rate was only 50% within 30 min. The results showed that CO32− induced a scavenging effect on the ROS (Ji et al., 2015). In addition, CO32− increased the alkalinity of the solution, which negatively affected ATZ degradation efficiency.
3.3. Reusability of ZnFe2O4 in catalytic reaction
One of the most crucial factors for the practical application of a catalyst is its reusability. Four catalysis cycles were conducted under the experimental conditions to assess the reusability of ZnFe2O4. As shown in Fig. 8, the ATZ degradation efficiency decreased from 86–81% in 30 min after four cycles, indicating excellent reusability of the ZnFe2O4 catalyst. However, slight metal ion overflow was observed on the catalyst, which was believed to have caused the decrease in activity. Moreover, ATZ degradation might be hindered by the absorption of certain intermediate products by the catalyst (Liu et al., 2021).
3.4. Catalytic mechanism
An EPR spectroscopy study of the ROS involved in the ZnFe2O4/PMS system was carried out to understand the catalytic mechanism. In this study, DMPO was utilized to capture SO4•−, HO•, and O2•−, and TEMP was used to detect 1O2 using spin trapping. The DMPO-HO• adduct exhibits characteristic peaks as the reaction time increases from 0 to 10 min, as shown in Fig. 9a. The DMPO-O2•− adduct signals indicate that O2•− may also participate in ATZ degradation, as shown in Fig. 9b. Moreover, TEMP-1O2 adduct signals were observed after 10 min, indicating the participation of 1O2 in the reaction. These results demonstrate that the PMS might be activated by the ZnFe2O4 catalyst to produce active substances that remove ATZ. And SO4•− was not detected in the EPR spectra, possibly because SO4•− was consumed rapidly within 5 min of the reaction.
3.4. ATZ degradation pathways
To elucidate the pathway of ATZ degradation over the ZnFe2O4/PMS system, the degradation intermediates were determined through the LC-MS/MS. Electrospray quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI Q-TOF) was conducted to qualitatively analyze the model compound (ATZ) and its degradation products in a positive ion mode. After analyzing the structure and type of the resulting product, the possible degradation pathway was inferred, primarily involving the reaction channels shown in Fig. 10. The first possible reaction channel of the initial substrate (the proton ion peak [m+H]+ obtained through ionization in ESI-MS is at m/z 216; the subsequent ion peaks correspond to proton adducts [m+H]+ formed through the ionization of the corresponding product in mass spectrometry appear at m/z 188) involves the cleavage of the CSp3-N bond in ATZ to deisopropyl, and 6-chloro-2 is obtained through further cleavage of the CSp3-N bond to form deethyl 4-diamino-1,3,5-triazine at m/z 146. The second possible reaction channel involves the cleavage of the CSp3-N bond in ATZ to form the deethylated product at m/z 174 and the further cleavage of the CSp3-N bond to form the depropyl product [6-chloro-2,4-diamino-1,3] at m/z 188 and 174. This product further reacted with chlorine to yield amino chlorides at m/z 222 and 208. The chlorination of the product at m/z 222 resulted in the further chlorination of the amino group to yield the amino dichlorination product at m/z 256.The subsequent degradation of products m/z 222 and 208 involves the cleavage of C-Sp3-N bonds, leading to the formation of m/z 180 products through the elimination of deprropyl or ethyl groups. The third possible reaction channel involves the oxidation of the methyl group on the N-ethyl group of ATZ to yield a product at m/z 232. The hydrolysis of the chlorine atom leads to the C–Cl bond cleavage at m/z 214, yielding the product at m/z 170. 4,6-Diamino-2-hydroxytriazine (m/z 128) is obtained upon further deethylation. The product at m/z 232 is also formed via the oxidative dehydrogenation of the alcohol hydroxyl group, which yields another product at m/z 230. The fourth possible reaction channel involves the hydrolysis of the chlorine atom of ATZ, yielding the product at m/z 198. Additionally, products at m/z 156 or 170 were obtained through the cleavage of the CSp3-N bond to form the propyl or ethyl group, respectively. The reoccurring CSp3-N bond was broken to form the deethyl or propyl group, and the 4,6-diamino-2-hydroxytriazine product was obtained at m/z 128. ATZ degradation was also characterized by the monochlorination and dichlorination of ethyl to yield products at m/z 174 and 284. 4,6-Diamino-2-hydroxy-triazine or N2,6-dichloro-2,4-diamino-triazine was further characterized by the cracking and oxidation of the triazine ring to obtain small molecules, such as acids and amines, and finally to obtain H2O, CO2, Cl−, NO3−, and NH4+.