Several management case studies of phosphorus reduction in lakes showed reduced biomass 8 but whether toxin concentrations decreased proportionally is often not quantified. We explored this question for the lakes summarized by Schindler et al. by performing a strategic literature review (for methodology see SI). Of the 35 lakes, time-series data of MC concentrations are only available for 9 lakes, and they do not cover the time span from before to after the phosphorus only reduction. Therefore, there is a lack of direct field observations that show how toxin concentrations change when total phosphorus is reduced.
Alfred Redfield analyzed large oceanic datasets to quantify stoichiometric relations in phytoplankton. In a similar manner and methodology, we seek insight into the relation between total phosphorus, biomass and MC concentration in field observations. Specifically, we ask: Do decreasing phosphorus concentrations in lakes result in an increase of MC concentration?
We analyzed the NLA dataset, which includes relevant observations, including TP, total nitrogen (TN), Chla, dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN, i.e. biological available nitrogen), turbidity (NTU, i.e. parameter for available light) and MC concentration (for methodology see SI). Several previous studies analyzed NLA data, using different approaches to find relations of MCs and environmental variables across lakes 29–32. For example, Merder et al. 29 used the dataset to explore the impact of warming on the likelihood of high MC concentration, using a framework of Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) including parameters previously discovered to affect MCs. Whereas those studies use relatively complex models including flexible regressions and smoothing functions, we used a much simpler and more targeted approach of basic regression analyses. Further, rather than looking at correlations across lakes, we limit our analysis to the change of MC concentrations within individual lakes across time, because the absolute concentrations may vary among different lakes due to other factors, and this is more representative of a change due to management.
Samples were collected in 2007, 2012 and 2017 and the database comprises 9821 sampling events including 1999 detections of MC concentrations (fig. 2). This included 453 time pairs, i.e. data points with detectable MC concentrations at different times within a lake. We correlate changes of different parameters (e.g. MC concentrations) with changes in TP concentrations, where change is quantified as relative change using log2 of the ratio, i.e. fold change. However, note that the observed change in phosphorus may not be due to management, but natural hydrological variations. This means that nitrogen may also change along with it (e.g. dry or wet years affect nutrient nonpoint source input and flushing). Thus, a change in TP may or may not be associated with a concomitant change in TN so it may be a representative of a phosphorus only or dual nutrient reduction of a management plan. We therefore split the dataset into two groups (see visualization in fig. 2): in the first group TP and TN concentrations change in the same direction, corresponding to a dual nutrient reduction. In the second group TP and TN concentrations change in opposite directions, corresponding to a phosphorus only reduction. This group was further divided into two sub-groups which are either phosphorus limited or not, depending on changes in biomass in the same or opposite direction as TP concentrations. We first present and discuss the results for the time pairs where phosphorus only was reduced and which were phosphorus limited.
In fig. 3 changes in TP concentrations are shown, correlated with changes of various other parameters. A phosphorus only management action would move a lake from right to left on the x- axis. The phosphorus limited subset was defined based on a positive correlation between changes in TP and biomass (fig. 3 A). Changes in TP correlate negatively with changes in DIN concentration (fig. 3 B1) and positively with changes in turbidity (fig. 3 B2), showing an increasing availability of nitrogen and light with reduced TP concentrations. A negative correlation of TP concentrations with MC concentration per biomass was identified (fig. 3 C). This analysis illustrates that if TP concentration decreases, the phytoplankton stoichiometry changes. Specifically, MC concentrations per biomass increase, consistent with the above mechanism: a reduction in biomass results in higher availability of nitrogen and light (both observed in the data), which stimulates MC production and increases toxigenic fraction. This counteracts the decrease in biomass (theoretical dashed line in fig. 3 D) and results in an increase in MC concentrations with reduced TP concentrations (solid line in fig. 3 D).
The results for different subsets of the data provide further insights into how MC concentration is expected to change under different management scenarios. In figure 4, we show the correlations of TP and MC concentrations (solid lines) and the corresponding theoretical lines assuming a constant phytoplankton stoichiometry (i.e. changes in biomass, dashed lines) for the different groups defined in fig. 2. In the subset where TP and TN concentrations change concomitantly, corresponding to a dual nutrient reduction management strategy, MC concentration decreases along with biomass (figure 4B). This is consistent with the mechanisms discussed above: nitrogen availability decreased and less MC is produced (see also fig. S2). In the group corresponding to a phosphorus only reduction, lower TP resulted in an increase in MC concentration (fig. 4 C). Biomass does not change with reduced TP concentrations (dashed line), because not all lakes were phosphorus limited. This prompted us to split the group into sub-groups being phosphorus limited and not phosphorus limited. In the group of phosphorus limited lakes, MC concentrations increase with reduced TP concentrations as discussed above (fig. 4 D). In the group which are not phosphorus limited, a reduction in TP is associated with an increase in TN and an increase in biomass, and MC concentration changes along with biomass (fig. 4 E and S4).