Potential assessment of CCUS source and sink and its matching research of deep unworkable seam in Huainan coalfield of China

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4339552/v1

It is of great significance for the engineering popularization of CO₂-ECBM technology to evaluate the potential of CCUS source and sink and study the matching of pipeline network of deep unworkable seam. In this study, the deep unworkable seam was taken as the research object. Firstly, the evaluation method of CO₂ storage potential in deep unworkable seam was discussed. Secondly, the CO₂ storage potential was analyzed. Then, the matching research of CO₂ source and sink was carried out, and the pipe network design was optimized. Finally, this study puts forward suggestions on the design of pipeline network from the perspective of time and space scales. The results show that the average annual CO₂ emissions of coal-fired power plants vary greatly, and the total emissions are 58.7608 million tons. The CO₂ storage potential in deep unworkable seam is huge with a total amount of 762 million tons, which can store CO₂ for 12.97 years. During the 10-year period, the deep unworkable seam can store 587.6 million tons of CO₂, and the cumulative length of pipeline is 251.6129 km with requiring a cumulative capital of 4.26*10¹⁰ dollars. In the process of CCUS source-sink matching, the cumulative saving mileage of carbon sink is 98.7502 km, and the cumulative saving cost is 25.669 billion dollars with accounting for 39.25% and 60.26% of the total mileage and cost, respectively. Based on the three-step approach, the whole line of CO₂ source and sink in Huainan coalfield can be completed by stages and regions, and all CO₂ transportation and storage can be realized. CO₂ pipelines include gas collection and distribution branch lines, intra-regional trunk lines, and interregional trunk lines. Based on the reasonable layout of CO₂ pipelines, a variety of CCUS applications can be simultaneously carried out, intra-regional and inter-regional CO₂ transport network demonstrations can be built, and integrated business models of CO₂ transport and storage can be simultaneously built on land and sea. The research results can provide reference for the evaluation of CO₂ sequestration potential of China's coal bases, lay a foundation for the deployment of CCUS clusters, and promote the realization of China's dual-carbon strategy.

Earth and environmental sciences/Environmental social sciences/Energy and society

Earth and environmental sciences/Environmental social sciences/Environmental economics

Earth and environmental sciences/Solid earth sciences

Earth and environmental sciences/Solid earth sciences/Geology/Stratigraphy

Carbon capture

utilization and storage (CCUS)

Source-sink matching model

CO2 geological storage

Mileage saving method

Deep unworkable seam

Huainan coalfield

CCUS stands for CO₂ Capture, Utilization and Storage ¹. On the one hand, CCUS technology can reduce CO₂ emissions in the atmosphere and reduce the concentration of greenhouse gases ^2–3. On the other hand, it can help CO₂ high-emission industries achieve low-carbon development and promote economic transformation ^4–5. Therefore, CCUS technology has broad application prospects in the field of global energy and environment. Coal is the main energy source in China, and CO₂ emissions from coal are the largest source of carbon emissions in China, but it will take a long time for China to transform its energy structure ^6–7. Therefore, based on CCUS technology, it is of profound significance to reduce CO₂ emissions from coal in China, and can promote the realization of China's dual-carbon strategy.

CO₂ geological sequestration, a core component of CCUS, is an effective way to achieve large-scale de-carbonization ^8–9. Scientific evaluation of CO₂ storage potential in sedimentary basin and realization of source-sink matching are the basis of CCUS cluster deployment ^10–11. Major sedimentary basin in China have great potential for CO₂ storage, and the storage forms are diverse ¹². However, due to the lack of unified methods for CO₂ storage potential in sedimentary basin in China, the assessment of CO₂ storage potential varies greatly ¹³. The CO₂ sequestration potential of geological body in China, such as oil and gas fields, deep unrecoverable seam, production and closed mines and goaf areas, is unclear and needs to be evaluated in detail.

Carbon emission sources in China's coal base are concentrated, and CO₂ emission sources and CO₂ storage sinks are highly overlapping ¹⁴, which provides favorable conditions for CCUS cluster deployment. CCUS technology is the only way for coal base to achieve near zero CO₂ emission in the future, and the deployment of "Coal base + CCUS" cluster has scale and agglomeration effects ¹⁵. Geological body, such as deep unrecoverable seam, is the most typical forms of CO₂ storage in coal bases ^16–17. However, its CO₂ geological storage is still in the exploration stage, and there are few studies on its CO₂ storage potential ¹⁸. Therefore, it is necessary to establish potential assessment methods suitable for the characteristics of China’s coal bases.

The process of CO₂ storage in deep unworkable seam can be simplified as the reverse process of mining for coalbed methane (i.e., CBM), and its core mechanism is the dynamic process of CO₂ adsorption and displacement of CBM ^19–20. Therefore, the mechanism of CO₂ geological storage in unworkable seam is mainly about the mechanism of CO₂ adsorption-desorption in coal seam ²¹. The coal resource in Huainan and Huaibei coalfields account for 97.7% of the whole province, and the distribution is concentrated and the research data are abundant ^22–24. Therefore, this paper determines the Huainan coalfield as the estimation coalfield for CO₂ storage evaluation. At present, the coal mining depth in Anhui province is close to 1000 m, so the coal seam with a depth of 1000–2000 m in Huainan and Huaibei coalbeds is considered as the unrecoverable seam ¹⁶, that is, the geological reserves with burial depth of 1000–2000 m seam are used to estimate the CO₂ storage potential in Anhui province.

In this study, the deep unworkable seam in Huainan coalfield was taken as the research object. Firstly, the evaluation method of CO₂ storage potential in deep unworkable seam was discussed. Secondly, the CO₂ geological storage potential was analyzed. Then, based on the lowest cost objective function and improved mileage saving method, the CO₂ source and sink matching research for CO₂ geological storage was carried out, and the pipe network design was optimized. Finally, from the perspective of time and space scale, this study puts forward suggestions on the design of network planning of CCUS source and sink in Huainan coalfield. The research innovations are described as follows: (1) Evaluation method of CO₂ storage potential in deep unworkable seam is discussed; (2) Matching problem of CO₂ source and sink is studied, and its pipe network design is optimized; (3) Design idea of network planning of CCUS source and sink is systematically proposed. The results can provide reference for the evaluation of CO₂ sequestration potential of coal bases in China, and lay a foundation for CCUS cluster deployment.

2.1 Geological background of the study area

Based on regional structural analysis, the Huainan coalfield is located at the southern margin of North China Plate. In the west-east direction, the coal field boundary lies between the Kouziji-Nanzhaoji faults and the Xinchengkou-Changfeng faults. From north to south, the coalfield boundary lies between the Shangtangming-Longshan faults and Yingshang-Dingyuan faults (Fig. 1) ^25–26. The coalfield is a near east-west hedge tectonic basin with imbricate fan composed of nappe structures on both sides of the basin and simple synclinic structure in the interior (Fig. 1).

The coal-bearing strata are Taiyuan Formation of upper Carboniferous series, Shanxi Formation of lower Permian series, lower Shihezi Formation, and upper Permian Shangshihezi Formation, with a total thickness of about 900 m and about 40 layers of coal seams ^27–28. The coal seams with single-layer thickness greater than 0.7 m on average are 9 ~ 18 layers, the maximum thickness is 12 m, and the total thickness is 23 ~ 36 m, distributed in Shanxi Formation, lower Shihezi Formation and upper Shihezi Formation. The macro-composition of coal is mainly bright coal and semi-bright coal, and the maceral component of vitrinite accounts for about 75%. The reflectance of vitrinite is mostly between 0.75% and 0.85% ^{16, 28}. In this study, the CO₂ emission sources were 10 coal-fired power plants in the coalfield with numbered D1-D10, respectively. Deep unworkable seams are CO₂ storage sinks, which are bounded by faults and numbered B1-B15, respectively (Fig. 1).

2.2 Evaluation method of CO₂ geological storage potential

In deep unworkable seam, CO₂ geological storage is mainly in adsorbed, dissolved and free states ²⁹. Among them, adsorption storage is the main storage form of coal seam, which is different from other geological bodies ³⁰. Considering the storage differences of different phase CO₂, the following potential assessment model of CO₂ storage can be adopted ^{16, 31}:

$${M_{CO2}}=0.001{\rho _{CO2}}{M_{Coal}}({m_{ab}}+{m_d}+{m_f})$$

1

Where, M_CO2 is CO₂ storage capacity, t; ρ_CO2 is the CO₂ density, kg/m³; M_coal is deep proved coal reserves, t; m_ab, m_d and m_f are the stored quantity of CO₂ adsorbed, dissolved and free states in coal per unit mass, m³/t.

In the unit mass coal, the storage potential of CO₂ adsorbed state in deep unworkable seam can be characterized by the following formula ^{16, 31}:

$${m_{ab}}={m_{ex}}/(1 - p{T_c}/8Z{p_c}T)$$

2

Where, P is the reservoir pressure, which is also CO₂ adsorption pressure, MPa; T_c is CO₂ critical temperature, K; Z is the CO₂ compression coefficient; p_c is CO₂ critical pressure, MPa; T is the reservoir temperature, and also CO₂ adsorption temperature, K; and m_ex is the CO₂ excess adsorption amount per unit mass of coal, m³/t, which can be calculated using the following D-R adsorption model ^{16, 31}:

$${m_{ex}}={m_0}(1 - {\rho _f}/{\rho _a}){e^{ - D\mathop {\left[ {\ln ({\rho _a}/{\rho _f})} \right]}\nolimits^{{^{2}}} }}+k{\rho _f}$$

3

Where, m₀ is the maximum CO₂ adsorption capacity of coal per unit mass tested by adsorption experiment, m³/t; ρ_f and ρ_a are the densities of free and adsorbed CO₂ under the real temperature and pressure conditions, kg/m³; and D is the adsorption constant and k is the constant associated with Henry's Law.

In coal reservoir, CO₂ density is a function of pressure and temperature, which can be expressed as ρ_f = f(p, T), and can be further characterized as follows ^{16, 31–32}

$${\rho _g}=p/((1+\delta \phi _{\delta }^{\tau })\cdot RT)$$

4

Where, δ = ρ_c/ρ_f is the CO₂reduced density; ρ_c is the CO₂ critical density, kg/m³; τ = T_c/T is the reduced temperature; and ϕ(δ,τ) is the Helmholtz free energy, which can be controlled by temperature and density ^{16, 31–32}:

$$\phi (\delta ,\tau )={\phi ^0}(\delta ,\tau )+{\phi ^r}(\delta ,\tau )$$

5

Where, ϕ^o(δ, τ) is the Helmholtz free energy of ideal fluid, and ϕ^r(δ, τ) is the Helmholtz free energy of the residual fluid.

In deep unworkable seam, the storage potential of dissolved CO₂ per unit mass of coal is a function of coal porosity, water saturation, coal density and CO₂ solubility, which can be characterized as follows ^{16, 31}:

$${m_d}=1000\cdot \varphi {S_w}{S_{CO2}}/{\rho _{Coal}}$$

6

Where, φ is the coal porosity, %; S_w is the water saturation, %; S_CO2 is the CO₂ solubility, and ρ_coal is the coal density, kg/m³.

According to Boyle-Mariotte law, the free CO₂ storage potential per unit mass of coal in deep unworkable seam can be characterized as follows ^{16, 31}:

$${m_f}=1000\cdot \varphi {S_g}p{T_0}/({\rho _{visual}}Z{p_0}T)$$

7

Where, S_g is the gas saturation, %; P₀ is the standard atmospheric pressure, MPa; T₀ is the temperature under the standard condition, K; and ρ_visual is the coal apparent density, kg/m³.

2.3 Construction of matching model of CCUS source-sink

2.3.1 CCUS source and sink matching

CCUS source-sink matching is the basis of CCUS cluster deployment and its pipe network design and construction, with the goal of minimizing CO₂ transportation cost and maximizing carbon removal. Its essence is the optimization planning of CCUS cluster system ^35–36. Based on CO₂ emission source, storage sink, storage geological process, transport network connecting source and sink and corresponding parameter data, the dynamic optimal matching between CO₂ source and sink can be achieved in terms of target quantity, continuity and economic efficiency (Fig. 2).

The matching of CCUS source and sink is mainly based on the characteristics of large number, different types and scattered locations of CO₂ emission sources (i.e., thermal power, steel, cement, chemical industry, etc.) and storage sinks (i.e., saltwater layer, CO₂-ECBM, CO₂-EOR, MCO₂-ILU, CO₂-SDR, etc.). Based on the discussion of constraint conditions and determination of objective function, the influence of regional geographical conditions, traffic, population density, transportation cost and transportation mode on CO₂ transport between emission sources and storage sinks is fully considered in the CCUS system. The optimal matching of CO₂ emission sources, storage sinks and transportation parameters was realized, so as to determine scientific and reasonable CCUS source and sink matching schemes (Fig. 2).

2.3.2 Objective functions

Based on the theory of network analysis in operations research, theoretical models of CO₂ source-sink matching within CCUS technology can be constructed in Huainan coalfield by using the minimum support tree method. Among them, the construction of theoretical models should meet the following basic assumptions: (1) Source and sink with the lowest cost should be firstly matched; (2) Allow the matching of one source with multi sinks or one sink with multi sources; (3) Sequestration sink must meet the requirement of CCUS planning period.

In this study, the lowest total cost of matching of CO₂ source-sink in CCUS technology is taken as the objective function, namely:

$$COS{T_{\hbox{min} }}=\sum\limits_{{i=1}}^{m} {\sum\limits_{{j=1}}^{n} {({C_C}+C{}_{T}+{C_S}} } )$$

8

Where, i refers to the i^th CO₂ source; j means the j^th CO₂ sink; m indicates the number of CO₂ sources and the value is 10, and n indicates the number of CO₂ sinks with the value of 15.

(1) CO₂ capture cost (i.e., C_C)

Based on the analysis of the industrial sources report published by the National Energy Technology Laboratory of the United States, the average capture cost of CO₂ source in coal-fired power plants is 64.35 $/t ^{30, 37}. Therefore, the capture cost of CO₂ source in Huainan coalfield can be characterized as follows:

$${C_C}=\sum\limits_{{i=1}}^{m} {\sum\limits_{{j=1}}^{n} {{\omega _{ij}}{X_{ij}}} }$$

9

Where, ${\omega _{ij}}$ represents the CO₂ capture cost in the i coal-fired power plant, $/t; and X _ij represents CO₂ transport amount from the i coal-fired power plant to the j sequestration sink, t.

(2) CO₂ transportation cost (i.e., C_T)

CO₂ transport is most common by pipeline, ship and tanker. Among them, pipeline transportation is suitable for directional transportation with large capacity, long distance and stable load, which mainly includes construction cost and operation and maintenance cost, and can be characterized as follows:

$${C_T}=(1+0.015N) \times 9970 \times \sum\limits_{{i=1}}^{m} {\sum\limits_{{j=1}}^{n} {{L^{1.13}}X_{{ij}}^{{0.35}}} }$$

10

Where, N represents the transportation cycle of the pipeline, year; and L is the distance of pipeline transportation, km.

(3) CO₂ sequestration cost (i.e., C_S)

The cost of CO₂ geological storage is closely related to the amount of CO₂ storage and the type of storage site, and the average storage cost coefficient in reservoir is 5.59 $/t ^{30, 37}. Therefore, the cost of CO₂ geological storage in coal reservoir can be characterized as follows:

$${C_S}=\sum\limits_{{i=1}}^{m} {\sum\limits_{{j=1}}^{n} {{\varepsilon _{ij}}{X_{ij}}} }$$

11

Where, ${\varepsilon _{ij}}$ is the sequestration cost factor of transporting CO₂ from coal-fired power plant i to sequestration sink j, $/t.

In summary, by substituting formulas (9), (10) and (11) into formula (8), the minimum objective function of the total cost of CO₂ source-sink matching in CCUS technology can be obtained:

$$MinZ=\sum\limits_{{i=1}}^{m} {\sum\limits_{{j=1}}^{n} {({\omega _{ij}}{X_{ij}}+(1+0.015N) \times 9970 \times {L^{1.13}}X_{{ij}}^{{0.35}}+{\varepsilon _{ij}}{X_{ij}}} } )$$

12

2.3.3 Constraint conditions

Based on the basic assumptions of theoretical model, in the planning process of matching pipe network of CO₂ source-sink with CCUS technology, the constraint conditions of the lowest total cost objective function are as follows:

(1) The total amount of CO₂ captured by all CO₂ emission sources is equal to the total amount of pipeline transport, that is:

$${a_i}=\sum\limits_{{j=1}}^{n} {{X_{ij}}}$$

13

Where, a_i is the CO₂ capture amount of the i coal-fired power plant.

(2) The CO₂ content transported by the pipeline to the storage site shall not exceed the storage capacity of the storage sink, that is:

$${b_j} \geqslant \sum\limits_{{i=1}}^{m} {{X_{ij}}}$$

14

Where b_j is the storage capacity of the j^th storage sink.

(3) The amount of CO₂ captured in all coal-fired power plants must not exceed the total capacity of all potential sequestration sinks, that is:

$$\sum\limits_{{i=1}}^{m} {{a_i}} \leqslant \sum\limits_{{j=1}}^{n} {{b_j}}$$

15

(4) Non-negative constraint: the pipeline of CO₂ transport content is non-negative, that is:

$${X_{ij}}>0$$

16

2.4 Optimization of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink

In this study, based on the mileage saving method, the optimization of matching network of CCUS source-sink can be carried out. The core idea of the mileage saving method is to combine the two round-trip routes into a closed loop during the transportation process, and the distance reduction is the largest in the merging process (Fig. 3). Based on the traditional mileage saving method, when the goods are transported from point A to two points B and C, the mileage saved is L_AB+L_AC-L_BC, that is, the difference between 2*(L_AB+L_AC) and (L_AB+L_AC+L_BC) (Fig. 3-a).

The design and optimization of CCUS source-sink matching pipe network has its own particularities: (1) CO₂ transport has a unique direction and there is no loop; (2) A small increase in CO₂ transport may change pipeline design and increase transport costs. In this study, the traditional mileage saving algorithm can be improved, while considering the cost reduction caused by distance saving and the cost increase caused by the increase in traffic volume, and automatically determine whether and how to merge the pipelines in the scheme, and finally get the optimization scheme (Fig. 3-b). In the process of transporting CO₂ source X to CO₂ storage sinks Y and Z, based on the improved mileage saving method, the pipeline mileage saving can be L_XY-L_ZY or L_XZ-L_YZ, from which the optimal pipeline transportation optimization scheme can be selected (Fig. 3-b).

3.1 CCUS source and sink characteristics

3.1.1 Characteristics of CO₂ sources

In Huainan coalfield, CO₂ emission sources are 10 coal-fired power plants within the coalfield, of which 9 have been put into operation, 1 has finished commissioning and plans to put into operation. Based on the average annual power generation statistics of each power plant, the average annual CO₂ emissions of each coal-fired power plant can be analyzed (Table 1).

Table 1

Estimated average annual CO₂ emissions from 10 coal-fired power plants in Huainan coalfield.
Number	Coal-fired power plant	Annual power generation (10⁸kwh)	Average annual CO₂ emissions (10⁶t)
1	D1	102	8.16
2	D2	4.45	0.356
3	D3	96	7.68
4	D4	28.94	2.3152
5	D5	73.57	5.8856
6	D6	66	5.28
7	D7	214	17.12
8	D8	19.32	1.5456
9	D9	60.23	4.8184
10	D10	70	5.6
Total		734.51	58.7608

As can be seen from Table 1, the average annual CO₂ emissions of coal-fired power plants vary greatly, ranging from 0.356 million tons to 17.12 million tons. Among them, the average annual CO₂ emissions of D7 power plant reach 17.12 million tons, accounting for about 30% of the total annual CO₂ emissions. The total annual CO₂ emissions of all coal-fired power plants are 58.7608 million tons, which includes 5.28 million tons of emissions from the proposed D6 power plant (Table 1).

3.1.2 Assessment of CO₂ sink

The core parameters of potential assessment of CO₂ geological storage are mainly derived from engineering data, test data, experimental data and scientific research papers (Table 2). In this study, for deep unworkable seam in Huainan coalfield, the proved reserves with burial depth < 1500 m are obtained from coal exploration, and the proved reserves with burial depth > 1500 m are predicted reserves by the resource management department. The geothermal gradient is 3.10 ◦C/100 m. When the depth of coal seam is less than 1000 m, the pressure gradient is 0.95 MPa/100 m. When the depth of coal seam is more than 1000 m, the pressure gradient is 1.08 MPa/100 m ^{16, 31}. The remaining core parameters can be detailed in Table 2.

Table 2

Core parameters of CO₂ geological storage potential assessment [16, 31, 38–39].
Meaning	Value	Unit
Proven reserves of coal buried 1000-1500m	1.99×10⁹	t
Proven reserves of coal buried 1500-2000m	4.03×10⁹	t
Pressure gradient	1.08	MPa/100m
Geothermal gradient	3.10	℃/100m
Constant temperature zone depth	30.00	m
Constant temperature zone temperature	298.95	K
CO₂ critical pressure	7.38	MPa
CO₂ critical temperature	304.21	K
Critical density of CO₂	0.45×10³	kg/m³
Maximum adsorption capacity of CO₂ at the depth of 1000-1500m	26.36	m³/t
Maximum adsorption capacity of CO₂ at the depth of 1500-2000m	21.98	m³/t
Coal seam porosity	3.89	%
Water phase saturation	70.00	%
Gas phase saturation	60.00	%
True density of coal seam	1.45	kg/m³
Apparent density of coal seam	1.62	kg/m³

The CO₂ geological storage potential of deep unworkable seam in Huainan coalfield is huge, and the total amount is 762 million tons. Among them, the adsorbed, free and dissolved CO₂ can be stored 685 million tons, 53 million tons and 24 million tons, respectively. The adsorbed CO₂ geological storage in deep unworkable seam is the most dominant, accounting for 89.895% of the total storage. When the buried depth of coal seam is < 1500 m and > 1500 m, the total CO₂ geological storage is 253 million tons and 510 million tons, accounting for 33.17% and 66.83% of the total storage, respectively. Regardless of the state in which CO₂ is stored, the total amount of CO₂ stored when the buried depth is greater than 1500 m is greater than that under the same state when the buried depth is less than 1500 m (Table 3).

Table 3

Evaluation results of CO₂ storage potential in deep unworkable coal seams.
Burial depth /m	Adsorbed state/10⁸t	Free state/10⁸t	Dissolved state/10⁸t	Storage capacity/10⁸t
1000–1500	2.29	0.16	0.08	2.53
1500–2000	4.57	0.37	0.16	5.10
Total	6.85	0.53	0.24	7.62

When the buried depth of coal seam is > 1500 m and < 1500 m, the proved coal reserves are 4.03 billion tons and 1.99 billion tons, respectively, with a ratio of 2.025. For the total amount of CO₂ geologic storage and its adsorption, free and dissolved state, the ratio of coal seam buried depth > 1500 m and < 1500 m is 2.016, 1.996, 2.312 and 2.000, respectively. The main reason why the ratio of total CO₂ geological storage and total adsorption state is lower than 2.025 is that although the CO₂ geological storage potential of deep unworkable seam is positively correlated with the proved coal reserves, the maximum CO₂ adsorption capacity at the depth < 1500 m is much higher than that at the depth > 1500 m. With the increase of burial depth, the reservoir pressure gradually increases, and the free CO₂ storage potential in pore structures gradually increases, which will make the free CO₂ ratio far greater than 2.025.

3.2 Matching characteristics of CCUS source-sink

3.2.1 Plane distribution characteristics of CO₂ sinks

The total CO₂ storage potential of deep unworkable seam in Huainan coalfield is 762 million tons (Table 3). For the average annual CO₂ emissions of the 10 coal-fired power plants, it can be stored for 12.97 years. Therefore, the deep unworkable seam is the most potential ground body for CO₂ storage in Huainan coalfield, and CO₂ enhanced CBM mining (i.e., CO₂-ECBM) is the most promising CO₂ geological disposal method. The unrecoverable coal seam with buried depth < 1500 m can meet the CO₂ geological storage requirements of major coal-fired power plants for 4.31 years. Considering the technical challenges and implementation costs of CO₂ storage in coal seams with different burial depths, the unworkable seam with burial depths < 1500 m should be the main target reservoir for the implementation of CO₂-ECBM technology in the next five years.

With fault structure as the boundary, the deep unworkable seam can be divided into 15 CO₂ storage blocks, and the comparative analysis of the plane distribution of CO₂ storage sinks can be carried out according to the plane area size (Fig. 4). The main blocks of CO₂ geological storage are B9, B12, B8 and B5, and their sealable stocks are 124 million tons, 114 million tons, 97 million tons and 85 million tons, respectively, among which the largest two blocks, B9 and B12, can store the CO₂ emissions of 10 coal-fired power plants for nearly four years. The four blocks with larger area are also the main blocks of the CCUS source-sink matching.

3.2.2 Matching characteristics of CCUS source-sink

According to the preliminary potential assessment analysis, for the average annual CO₂ emissions of the 10 coal-fired power plants in Huainan coalfield, the deep unworkable seam can be stored for 12.97 years. Therefore, in this study, the matching study of CCUS source-sink was conducted based on the cumulative CO₂ emissions of 10 coal-fired power plants in Huainan coalfield in 10 years for deep unworkable seam (Fig. 5).

Based on the matching results of CCUS source and sink during the 10-year cycle in Huainan coalfield, it can be seen that the coal-fired power plant of D1 can be mainly stored in blocks of B2, B3, B4 and B7, with the stored stocks of 20.2 million tons, 0.19.7 million tons, 30.9 million tons and 10.8 million tons, respectively. Coal-power plant of D2 is mainly stored in block of B5, and the stored stock is 0.036 million tons. The coal-power plant of D3 is mainly stored in blocks of B7 and B10, with a stored stock of 0.25.8 million tons and 0.51 million tons, respectively. Coal-fired power plant of D4 is mainly stored in blocks of B8 and B9, with a storage capacity of 10.9 million tons and 12.3 million tons, respectively. Coal-fired power plant of D5 is mainly stored in block of B9, with a stored stock of 58.9 million tons. Coal-fired power plant of D6 is mainly stored in block of B9, and the stored stock is 0.528 million tons. Coal-fired power plant of D7 is mainly stored in blocks of B8, B12 and B14, with stored stocks of 0.611 million tons, 58.3 million tons and 518 million tons, respectively. Coal-fired power plant of D8 is mainly stored in block B8, with a stored stock of 0.15.5 million tons. Coal-fired power plant of D9 is mainly stored in block of B13, and the stored stock is 482 million tons. The coal-fired power plant of D10 is mainly stored in block of B12, with a stored stock of 560 million tons (Fig. 5). During the 10-year cycle, the CO₂ in deep unworkable seam can be stored up to 587.6 million tons, and the cumulative planned pipeline is 251.6129 km, which will require a cumulative capital of 4.26*10¹⁰ $.

4.1 Optimization of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink

4.1.1 Analysis of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink

Based on the analysis of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink in deep unworkable seam, it can be seen that the transportation routes of pipelines of 9, 4, 16, 5 and 8 are relatively long, accounting for 53.65% of the total transportation route length (Fig. 6). Because the transportation cost is proportional to the route, it is important to optimize the line length of pipelines of 9, 4, 16, 5 and 8 to reduce the total cost.

Based on the analysis of CO₂ storage and transport costs and their proportion in deep unworkable seam, it can be seen that the transport costs of blocks of 8, 7, 12 and 13 are the highest, accounting for 36.96%, 14.01%, 11.60% and 11.86% of the total CO₂ storage and transport costs, respectively. The transportation cost of four CO₂ storage sinks accounted for 74.43% of the total cost. Therefore, blocks of 8, 7, 12 and 13 of deep unworkable seam will be the focus of optimization of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink. Blocks of 1, 6, 11 and 15 do not need to bear CO₂ geological storage for the time being, which can be used as alternative blocks for CO₂ storage (Fig. 5 and Fig. 7).

4.1.2 Optimization of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink

Based on the improved mileage saving method, the optimization results of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink in deep unworkable seam in Huainan coalfield can be obtained (Fig. 8). Among them, the unchanged pipe network paths are D1-B4, D1-B7, D3-B10, D4-B8, D4-B9 and D7-B13 (Fig. 8), and the routes among other source-sink take the minimum total transportation cost as the objective function, and the pipe network optimization is carried out according to the constraints of the emission source and the storage capacity (Fig. 8).

Based on the optimization results of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink in Huainan coalfield, it can be seen that the accumulated mileage saved is 98.7502 km, and the accumulated cost saved is 25.669 billion dollars, accounting for 39.25% and 60.26% of the total mileage and cost of pipeline, respectively (Table 4). Among them, the mileage and cost savings of 13 and 14 blocks in deep unworkable seam are more obvious, accounting for 10.43% and 10.10% of the total mileage and 16.20% and 16.01% of the total cost, respectively (Table 4).

Table 4

Cumulative mileage and cost savings of CCUS source and sink matching each geological storage sink.
CCUS sink	Mileage saving/km	Cost saving/ Billion dollars	Proportion of total distance transported	Proportion of total transportation cost
B2	7.5000	12.40	2.98%	2.91%
B3	2.0833	2.88	0.83%	0.68%
B5	2.5000	1.95	0.99%	0.46%
B7	4.1667	7.83	1.66%	1.84%
B8	18.3334	56.70	7.29%	13.31%
B9	3.3334	9.33	1.32%	2.19%
B12	9.1667	28.40	3.64%	6.67%
B13	26.25	69.00	10.43%	16.20%
B14	25.4167	68.20	10.10%	16.01%
Total	98.7502	256.69	39.25%	60.26%

4.2 Planning and design of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink

4.2.1 Pipeline network planning on a time scale

By analyzing the optimization results of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink in Huainan coalfield and the amount of CO₂ transported by each pipe network line, it can be seen that the entire pipe network is centrally distributed in the east and west regions, and it is obvious that the transport amount of the eastern pipe network is significantly greater than that of the western one (Fig. 9). The thicker the lines of the route, the greater the traffic amount (Fig. 9). The planning and design of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink should refer to the thickness of the transportation line, that is, the amount of CO₂ transported (Figs. 10–12). The planning and design of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink in Huainan coalfield is proposed in accordance with three steps:

First step: It is recommended to preferentially plan the pipeline route of D9-D8-D7-B12-D6-D4-B8 in the eastern region, and the D3-B10 and D1-B4 in the western region. This planned pipeline can effectively connect the coal-fired power plants of D9, D8, D7, D6 and D4, and unworkable blocks of B12, B8, B10 and B4 of Huainan coalfield (Fig. 10). At this step, the total amount of CO₂ that can be transported by the pipeline network is 6.65 billion tons, and the total amount of CO₂ that can be stored is 2.27 billion tons, accounting for 56.99% and 38.74% of the total transportation and storage stock of CO₂, respectively.

Second step: It is recommended to further plan the pipeline lines of D10-D9, D7-B13, D7-B14, D4-B9, D5-B9, B10-B7, and B4-B3-B2, which can further effectively connect the deep unworkable seam in the east, middle and west areas (Fig. 11). After the pipeline network planning at this step, the total amount of CO₂ transported can be 10.345 billion tons, and the total amount of CO₂ stored can be 5.842 billion tons, accounting for 88.66% and 99.39% of the total CO₂ transport and storage, respectively.

Third step: Complete the design of all remaining pipelines to connect the deep unworkable seam in the east and west of the study area. It is suggested to add the design of B3 and B4 pipelines, so as to run through all CO₂ emission sources and CO₂ storage sinks in Huainan coalfield, so as to realize all CO₂ transportation and geological storage (Fig. 12).

4.2.2 Pipeline network planning at the spatial scale

In this study, the location of each point in deep unworkable seam is determined by taking the center location of each region (Fig. 1), but in the actual well location layout, the regional center location is often not the only consideration. Therefore, the analysis of the type of CCUS pipeline within each region and the planning of CCUS pipeline network between each region are very important (Fig. 13).

According to the location and use of CO₂ pipelines in the pipe network, CO₂ pipelines can be defined as the following four types (Fig. 13): (1) Gas collection branch, that is, the pipeline that communicates CO₂ source and transfer point, and the transport phase is determined according to its economy; (2) Distribution branch, that is, the pipeline from the end of the communication pipeline to the carbon sequestration point; (3) Intra-regional trunk lines, that is, trunk pipelines from the transfer point to the carbon sequestration point in the region; (4) Interregional trunk lines, that is, shared pipelines connecting regions. As far as Huainan coalfield is concerned, in terms of spatial scale, priority should be given to planning intra-regional pipe networks in various regions within unworkable seam bounded by faults, that is, the pipe networks in various regions within B1-B15 (Fig. 13).

Whether it is a small area of Huainan coalfield or the whole large area of China, the CCUS pipe network layout should follow the following ideas. First of all, small-scale carbon sources in the region should be transferred to main pipelines through gas collection branch lines, and commercial CO₂ pipeline demonstration projects can be built. Secondly, the collection and distribution pipelines of regional carbon sources can be planned within the basin to form a backbone sharing pipeline, and a variety of CCUS carbon sequestration applications can be simultaneously carried out to build an interregional transport network demonstration. Then, for areas that do not have the conditions for storage, inter-regional trunk pipelines should be built to gradually form a cross-regional carbon network on land to fully meet the matching transport of source and sink. Offshore CO₂ storage resources should be developed, suitable coastal injection points should be selected, marine transport pipelines and ship transport should be simultaneously carried out, and integrated business models of transport and storage based on land and sea should be built (Fig. 13).

In this study, the deep unworkable seam was taken as the research object. Firstly, the evaluation method of CO₂ storage potential in deep unworkable seam was discussed. Secondly, the CO₂ storage potential was analyzed. Then, the matching research of CO₂ source and sink was carried out, and the pipe network design was optimized. Finally, this study puts forward suggestions on the design of pipeline network from the perspective of time and space scales. The main conclusions are as follows:

(1) The total annual CO₂ emissions of each coal-fired power plant are 58.7608 million tons, and the average annual CO₂ emissions of each coal-fired power plant vary greatly, ranging from 0.356 million tons to 17.12 million tons. The CO₂ geological storage potential of deep unworkable seam is huge, and the total amount is 762 million tons. It can store 685 million tons, 53 million tons and 24 million tons of CO₂ in adsorbed, free and dissolved states, respectively. For the average annual CO₂ emissions of coal-fired power plants, deep unworkable seam can be stored for 12.97 years. During the 10-year period, the deep unworkable coal seam can store 587.6 million tons, and the cumulative planning pipeline is 251.6129 km, requiring a cumulative capital of 4.26*10¹⁰ $.

(2) The main blocks of CO₂ geological storage are B9, B12, B8 and B5, with stored stocks of 124 million tons, 114 million tons, 97 million tons and 85 million tons, respectively. The matching of CCUS source and sink saved 98.7502 km, and saved 25.669 billion dollars, accounting for 39.25% and 60.26% of the total mileage and cost, respectively. The mileage and cost savings in 13 and 14 blocks are more obvious, accounting for 10.43%, 10.10% and 16.20% and 16.01% of the total mileage and cost, respectively.

(3) Based on the three-step approach, the whole line of CO₂ emission sources and CO₂ storage sinks in Huainan coalfield can be completed by stages and regions, and all CO₂ transportation and storage can be realized. CO₂ pipelines include gas collection branch lines, gas distribution branch lines, intra-regional trunk lines, and interregional trunk lines. Based on the reasonable layout of various types of CO₂ pipelines, a variety of CCUS carbon sequestration applications can be simultaneously carried out, the intra-regional and inter-regional network demonstration for CO₂ transport can be built, and integrated business models of CO₂ transport and storage can be built simultaneously on land and sea.

Author Contribution

Huihuang Fang and Shuxun Sang: The conception and design of the study, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be submitted. Huihuang Fang and Shua Yu: Drafting the article.Jinran Guo and Huihu Liu: Drawing of all figures. Huihuang Fang and Zhangfei Wang: Collection and analysis of the field data. Shiwen Zhang: Derivation of mathematical models.

Acknowledgment

We would like to express our gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for offering their constructive suggestions and comments which improved this manuscript in many aspects. This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Educational Committee (2023AH040154), the Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2308085Y30), the Anhui Provincial Key Research and Development Project (2023z04020001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42102217; 42277483), and the University Synergy Innovation Program of Anhui Province (No. GXXT-2021-018).

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (Please refer to the manuscript that has been uploaded)

Kong H, Sun Y, Li Z, et al. The development path of direct coal liquefaction system under carbon neutrality target: Coupling green hydrogen or CCUS technology[J]. Appl Enegr 2023;347:121451.
Wang X, Tang R, Meng M, et al. Research on CCUS business model and policy incentives for coal-fired power plants in China[J]. Int J Greenh Gas Con 2023;125:103871.
Wang F, Liao G, Su C, et al. Carbon emission reduction accounting method for a CCUS-EOR project[J]. Petrol Explor Dev 2023;50(4):989–1000.
Han J, Li J, Tang X, et al. Coal-fired power plant CCUS project comprehensive benefit evaluation and forecasting model study[J]. J Clean Prod 2022;385:135657.
Fan J, Li Z, Li K, et al. Modelling plant-level abatement costs and effects of incentive policies for coal-fired power generation retrofitted with CCUS[J]. Energ Policy 2022;165:112959.
Xu S, Lu Y, Mutailipu M, et al. Repowering coal power in China by nuclear energy-implementation strategy and potential[J]. Energies 2022;15(3):1072.
Tian Y, Yang X, Yang J, et al. Evolution dynamic of intelligent construction strategy of coal mine enterprises in China[J]. Heliyon 2022;8(10):e10933.
Zhan J, Su Z, Fan C, et al. Suitability evaluation of CO₂ geological sequestration based on unascertained measurement[J]. Arab J Sci Eng 2022;47(9):11453–67.
Hou L, Yu Z, Luo X, et al. Self-sealing of caprocks during CO₂ geological sequestration[J]. Energy 2022;252:124064.
Sun L, Chen W. Impact of carbon tax on CCUS source-sink matching: Finding from the improved China CCS DSS[J]. J Clean Prod 2022;333:130027.
Fan J, Shen S, Wei S, et al. Near-term CO₂ storage potential for coal-fired power plants in China: A county-level source-sink matching assessment[J]. Appl Enegr 2020;279:115878.
Li Y, Wang Y, Shi Y, et al. Grading evaluation and ranking of CO₂ sequestration capacity in place (CSCIP) in China's major oil basins: theoretical, effective, practical and CCUS-EOR[J]. ACTA Geol Sin-Engl 2023;97(3):873–88.
Ming X, Liu L, Yu L, et al. Thin-film dawsonite in Jurassic coal measure strata of the Yaojie coalfield, Minhe Basin, China: A natural analogue for mineral carbon storage in wet supercritical CO₂[J]. Int J Coal Geol 2017;180:83–99.
Fan J, Xu M, Wei S, et al. Carbon reduction potential of China's coal-fired power plants based on a CCUS source-sink matching model[J]. Resour Conserv Recy 2021;168:105320.
Liu S, Wei N, Jiang D, et al. Emission reduction path for coal-based enterprises via carbon capture, geological utilization, and storage: China energy group[J]. Energy 2023;273:127222.
Liu S, Liu T, Zheng S, et al. Evaluation of carbon dioxide geological sequestration potential in coal mining area[J]. Int J Greenh Gas Con 2023;122:103814.
Wang F, Zhang X, Wu C, et al. Mechanism of supercritical CO₂ on the chemical structure and composition of high-rank coals with different damage degrees[J]. Fuel 2023;344:128027.
Omotilewa O, Panja P, Vega-Ortiz C, et al. Evaluation of enhanced coalbed methane recovery and carbon dioxide sequestration potential in high volatile bituminous coal[J]. Gas Sci Eng 2021;91:103979.
Liu X, Li M, Zhang C, et al. Mechanistic insight into the optimal recovery efficiency of CBM in sub-bituminous coal through molecular simulation[J]. Fuel 2020;266:117137.
Li Y, Wang Y, Wang J, et al. Variation in permeability during CO₂-CH₄ displacement in coal seams: Part 1-Experimental insights[J]. Fuel 2020;263:116666.
Li J, Wang Y, Chen Z, et al. Simulation of adsorption-desorption behavior in coal seam gas reservoirs at the molecular level: A comprehensive review[J]. Energ Fuel 2020;34(3):2619–42.
Hou H, Shao L, Tang Y, et al. Pore structure characterization of middle- and high-ranked coal reservoirs in northern China[J]. AAPG Bull 2023;107(2):213–41.
Liu H, Liu J, Xue S, et al. Insight into difference in high-pressure adsorption-desorption of CO₂ and CH₄ from low permeability coal seam of Huainan-Huaibei coalfield, China[J]. J Environ Chem Eng 2022;16(6):108846.
Yu K, Gan Y, Ju Y, et al. Influence of sedimentary environment on the brittleness of coal-bearing shale: Evidence from geochemistry and micropetrology[J]. J Petrol Sci Eng 2020;185:106603.
Wang G, Ju Y, Yan Z, et al. Pore structure characteristics of coal-bearing shale using fluid invasion methods: A case study in the Huainan-Huaibei Coalfield in China[J]. Mar Petrol Geol 2015;62:1–13.
Fang H, An L, Sang S, et al. Numerical analysis of permeability rebound and recovery evolution with THM multi-physical field models during CBM extraction in crushed soft coal with low permeability and its indicative significance to CO₂ geological sequestration[J]. Energy 2023;262:125395.
Xiong S, Lu J, Qin Y. Prediction of coal-bearing strata characteristics using multi-component seismic data-a case study of Guqiao coalmine in China[J]. Arab J Geosci 2018;11(15):408.
Zhang K, Sang S, Ma M, et al. Experimental study on the influence of effective stress on the adsorption-desorption behavior of tectonically deformed coal compared with primary undeformed coal in Huainan coalfield, China[J]. Energies 2022;15(18): 6501.
Wang M, Huang K, Xie W, et al. Current research into the use of supercritical CO2 technology in shale gas exploitation[J]. Int J Min Sci Techno 2019;29(5): 739–44.
Zhu Q, Wang C, Fan Z, et al. Optimal matching between CO₂ sources in Jiangsu province and sinks in Subei-Southern South Yellow Sea basin, China[J]. Greenh Gase 2019;9(1):95–105.
Xu H, Sang S, Yang J, et al. CO₂ storage capacity of anthracite coal in deep burial depth conditions and its potential uncertainty analysis: a case study of the No. 3 coal seam in the Zhengzhuang Block in Qinshui Basin, China[J]. Geosci J 2021;25(5):715–29.
Span R, Wagner W. A new equation of state for Carbon Dioxide covering the fluid region from the triple - point temperature to 1100 K at pressures up to 800 MPa[J]. J Phys Chem Ref Data 1996;25(6):1509–96.
Wang H, Shen Z, Li G, Wang F, Lang S. Research on the precise calculation method of physical parameters for CO₂[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology 2011;33(5):65–7. (in Chinese with English abstract).
Li J, Xu K, Xiao H, et al. Numerical simulation of CO₂ pipeline based on Span Wagner EOS[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology 2017;33(5):10–5. (in Chinese with English abstract).
Wang J. Optimal design of CCUS source sink matching pipe network for coal fired power plants in North China[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2021.
Sans S, Liu S, Zhu Q, et al. Research progress on technical basis of synergy between CO₂ geological storage potential and energy resources[J]. Journal of China Coal Society 2023;48(7):2700–16. (in Chinese with English abstract).
Mo H, Liu S, Sang S. Matching of CO₂ geological sequestration source and sink for industrial fixed emission source in Subei-Southern Yellow Sea Basin[J]. Geological Review, 2023;69(S1):128–130. (in Chinese with English abstract).
Huang D, Hou X, Wu Y. The mechanism and capacity evaluation on CO₂ sequestration in antiquated coal mine gob[J]. Environment Engineering 2014;32(S1): 1076–80. (in Chinese with English abstract).
Sun W, Zhang E, Wu H. An analysis of production potential of residual CBM in Huainan mining area[J]. Coal Geology of China 2010;22(12): 24 – 8. (in Chinese with English abstract).

No competing interests reported.

Potential assessment of CCUS source and sink and its matching research of deep unworkable seam in Huainan coalfield of China

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

1 Introduction

2 Geological setting and analysis method

2.1 Geological background of the study area

2.2 Evaluation method of CO₂ geological storage potential

2.3 Construction of matching model of CCUS source-sink

2.3.1 CCUS source and sink matching

2.3.2 Objective functions

2.3.3 Constraint conditions

2.4 Optimization of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink

3 Results

3.1 CCUS source and sink characteristics

3.1.1 Characteristics of CO₂ sources

3.1.2 Assessment of CO₂ sink

3.2 Matching characteristics of CCUS source-sink

3.2.1 Plane distribution characteristics of CO₂ sinks

3.2.2 Matching characteristics of CCUS source-sink

4 Discussions

4.1 Optimization of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink

4.1.1 Analysis of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink

4.1.2 Optimization of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink

4.2 Planning and design of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink

4.2.1 Pipeline network planning on a time scale

4.2.2 Pipeline network planning at the spatial scale

5 Conclusions

Declarations

Author Contribution

Acknowledgment

Data Availability

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Potential assessment of CCUS source and sink and its matching research of deep unworkable seam in Huainan coalfield of China

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

1 Introduction

2 Geological setting and analysis method

2.1 Geological background of the study area

2.2 Evaluation method of CO2 geological storage potential

2.3 Construction of matching model of CCUS source-sink

2.3.1 CCUS source and sink matching

2.3.2 Objective functions

2.3.3 Constraint conditions

2.4 Optimization of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink

3 Results

3.1 CCUS source and sink characteristics

3.1.1 Characteristics of CO2 sources

3.1.2 Assessment of CO2 sink

3.2 Matching characteristics of CCUS source-sink

3.2.1 Plane distribution characteristics of CO2 sinks

3.2.2 Matching characteristics of CCUS source-sink

4 Discussions

4.1 Optimization of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink

4.1.1 Analysis of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink

4.1.2 Optimization of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink

4.2 Planning and design of matching pipe network of CCUS source-sink

4.2.1 Pipeline network planning on a time scale

4.2.2 Pipeline network planning at the spatial scale

5 Conclusions

Declarations

Author Contribution

Acknowledgment

Data Availability

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

2.2 Evaluation method of CO₂ geological storage potential

3.1.1 Characteristics of CO₂ sources

3.1.2 Assessment of CO₂ sink

3.2.1 Plane distribution characteristics of CO₂ sinks