Materials and reagents
Green tea leaves (Camellia sinensis L.) pruned below the two leaves following the apical bud were used as discarded leaves in the study. They were harvested from gardens in Rize province (Turkey), in October and transferred to the laboratory immediately. Ethanol (99.5%) was obtained from Tekkim (Bursa, Turkey). Analytical grade methanol (99.9%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) while acetic acid (99.5%) was from Carlo-Erba (Milano, Italy). Analytical standards of (–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), (–)-epicatechin gallate (ECG), (–)-epigallocatechin (EGC), (–)-epicatechin (EC) and caffeine (CAF) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA).
The macroporous resins of AB-8, H-103, NKA-2, NKA-9 and X-5 were purchased from Chemical Plant affiliated to Nankai University (Tianjin, China). Other adsorbents (XAD7HP, XAD16N, DAX-8 and HP2-MG) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). The properties of the adsorbent resins were specified by manufacturers and summarized in Table 1.
Table 1
Physical properties of macroporous resins used.
Resins | Polarity | Matrix material | Particle diameter (mm) | Surface area (m2/g) | Average pore diameter (A°) |
HP2-MG | Polar | Polymethacrylate | 0.56–0.71 | ≈ 500 | 170 |
NKA-2 | Polar | Acrylamide | 0.30–1.25 | 160–200 | 145–155 |
NKA-9 | Polar | Acrylamide | 0.30–1.25 | 250–290 | 155–165 |
DAX-8 | Semi-polar | Acrylic ester | 0.56–0.71 | 140 | 225 |
XAD7HP | Semi-polar | Acrylic | 0.56–0.71 | 380 | 300–400 |
AB-8 | Weak-polar | Styrene-divinylbenzene | 0.30–1.25 | 480–520 | 130–140 |
XAD16N | Non-polar | Styrene-divinylbenzene | 0.56–0.71 | 800 | 200 |
X-5 | Non-polar | Styrene-divinylbenzene | 0.30–1.25 | 500–600 | 290–300 |
H-103 | Non-polar | Styrene-divinylbenzene | 0.30–1.25 | 1000–1100 | 85–95 |
Instruments and equipment
The extracts were clarified using Thermo Scientific SL 16R centrifuge (Waltham, WA, USA). Caffeine, EGCG and other catechins found in green tea extract were determined by using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) directly equipped with a Lichrospher RP18 reverse-phase column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm), an autosampler (SIL-20A HT), a column oven (CTO-20A), a degasser system (DGU-20A5), a gradient pump (LC-20AD), a UV-visible detector (SPD-M20A) and a software package (LC solution). A Sartorius orbital shaker incubator (Darmstadt, Germany) was used for mixing resins well with the solution in adsorption and desorption trials.
Methods
Extraction of catechins from green tea leaves
Extraction was performed according to directions stated by Vuong et al. (2013). Briefly, tea leaves were subjected to water steam for 30 s to inactivate oxidizing enzymes. They were dried in a vacuum oven at 70°C until reaching a constant weight. All fragments were grounded and downscaled by using a blender and then sieved into < 1 mm particle size with a stainless-steel sieve (Endocotts; London, England). Grounded leaves (100 g) were placed into a beaker containing 1.2 L of water, and held at 80°C for 30 min. It was filtered through Whatman no.1 filter paper, and the sediment was brewed in 800 mL of water once again. The extracts were combined right after the brewing and filtering process. It was clarified with centrifugation at 3000 xg, at 4°C for 5 min. The extracts were filtered through by the filter paper and stored in the dark at + 4°C until use. Samples taken for polyphenol and caffeine analysis were passed through 0.45 µm nylon syringe filter and transferred to amber-colored HPLC vials for further analysis.
Determination of catechins in the extract
A volume of 20 µL sample was injected into the HPLC column and compounds were monitored at 278 nm using UV-visible detector. 0.5% (v:v) acetic acid in ultrapure water (A) and analytical grade methanol (B) were applied for compound separation at 30°C. Gradient elution was set according to phase (B) as following: linear gradient from 80–70% in 0–15 min, from 70–65% in 15–27 min, from 65–80% in 27–35 min, and isocratic flow at 80% of B for 5 min; at a constant flow rate of 1 mL min–1. Quantification was achieved by using a calibration curve obtained from five-point serial dilutions of the analytical standards.
Pretreatment of adsorbent resins
The resins were soaked in 99.5% ethanol for 24 h and washed with distilled water to remove impurities. They were dried in oven at 70°C and stored at + 4°C by tightly sealed boxes until use. All resins were dipped in ethanol for overnight and rinsed with distilled water once again before using (Jin et al. 2015).
Adsorption and desorption capacities
0.5 g (dry weight, dw) of pretreated resins were weighed into 250-mL Erlenmeyer flasks and 100 mL of green tea extract (827.3 µg mL–1 EGCG) was added over. The flasks were sealed with cotton plugs and left to orbital shaker incubator at 25°C and 120 rpm for 24 h. At the end of time, resins were separated by filtration and washed with distilled water. Subsequently, resins were dipped into 100 mL of ethanol (70%) and left for desorption in the same conditions as adsorption (Jin et al. 2015).
Selectivity of the resins was determined according to adsorption capacity (Qe, mg g–1 dry resin) (Eq. 1) and desorption capacity (Qd, mg g–1 dry resin) (Eq. 2) at equilibrium, and desorption rate (D, %) (Eq. 3) obtained by following equations:
Q e = \(\frac{\left({C}_{0}- {C}_{e}\right)}{W} \times {V}_{e}\) (1)
Q d = \(\frac{{C}_{d} \times {V}_{d}}{W}\) (2)
D = \(\frac{{C}_{d} \times {V}_{d}}{({C}_{0}- {C}_{e}) \times {V}_{e}} \times 100\) (3)
where C0 and Ce are initial and equilibrium concentrations of EGCG (mg mL–1), respectively. W indicates the weight of dry resin (g). Vd refers to the volume of desorption solution while Ve is the volume of the extract (mL). Cd indicates EGCG concentration (mg mL–1) in the desorption solution.
Adsorption kinetics
The selected resin (0.5 g, dw) was pretreated and placed into 250-mL flask which included 100 mL of tea extract (containing 567.5 µg mL–1 EGCG). It was incubated at 25°C, for 5 h with 120 rpm orbital shaking (Jin et al. 2015). Aliquot (1 mL) samples were taken from flask at different time intervals and EGCG amounts were monitored by HPLC. Results were evaluated according to pseudo-first (Eq. 4) and pseudo-second order models (Eq. 5) to reveal static adsorption kinetics (Shin and Kim 2016).
$${ln} \left({Q}_{e}-{Q}_{t}\right)= {ln}{Q}_{e}- {k}_{1}t$$
4
$$\frac{t}{{Q}_{t}}=\frac{1}{{k}_{2} {Q}_{e}^{2} }+ \frac{1}{{Q}_{e}} t$$
5
where, Qe and Qt are amount of EGCG adsorbed (mg g–1) at equilibrium and any time (t, min), respectively. k1 and k2 are the rate constants of pseudo-first and pseudo-second order models, respectively.
Adsorption isotherms
EGCG concentrations ranging between 149.8-827.3 µg mL–1 were used for plotting adsorption isotherm curves at 25°C, 35°C and 45°C. The activated resins (0.5 g, dw) and six aliquots of 100 mL extract solutions were mixed in 250-mL flasks. They were left to incubation for 3 h, at 120 rpm shaking. Initial and equilibrium concentrations of EGCG were determined by using HPLC. The obtained results were examined according to Langmuir (1918) and Freundlich (1907) models to reveal adsorption characteristics in given temperatures.
The Langmuir model can be figured as given formula:
$${Q}_{e}=\frac{{Q}_{m}.{K}_{L}.{C}_{e}}{1+ {K}_{L}.{C}_{e}}$$
6
The equilibrium value (RL) can be stated by the following equation:
$${R}_{L}=\frac{1}{1+{K}_{L}.{C}_{0}}$$
7
The Freundlich model can be calculated through the following formula:
$${Q}_{e}= {K}_{F}.{C}_{e}^{1/n}$$
8
where, Qe denotes adsorption capacity (mg g–1) and Ce refers to EGCG concentration (mg mL–1) at equilibrium. KL and KF are the constants of each model, respectively. C0 is the highest initial EGCG concentration (mg mL–1) used in kinetic trials. 1/n is the empirical constant related to adsorption driving force; Qm is the empirical constant defining maximum adsorption capacity (mg g–1 dry resin).
The evaluation of RL is done as follows: irreversible (= 0), favorable adsorption (between 0–1), linear (= 1), unfavorable adsorption (> 1). Similarly, 1/n value can be expressed as follows: irreversible (= 0), favorable adsorption (between 0–1), unfavorable adsorption (> 1) (Park et al. 2021).
Thermodynamic parameters
Thermodynamic parameters were evaluated by estimating the change in Gibbs free energy (∆G), enthalpy (∆H) and entropy (∆S). ∆G (kj mol–1) was calculated by using Eq. 9, while ∆H (kj mol–1) and ∆S [j (mol.K) –1] were obtained from Van't Hoff equation (Eq. 10) (Shin and Kim 2016):
$$\varDelta G=-RT{ln}{K}_{L}$$
9
$${ln}{K}_{L}=\frac{\varDelta S}{R}-\frac{\varDelta H}{RT}$$
10
where, KL is the constant of Langmuir model (Eq. 6). R refers to universal gas constant [8.314 j (mol.K) –1] whereas T indicates the absolute temperature (K).
Dynamic adsorption and desorption
Dynamic adsorption and desorption trials were carried out on a lab-scale glass column (15 mm i.d. × 200 mm height). The column was packed with 15 g (dw) of the selected resin. Bed volume (BV) was approximately 19 mL and a total of 30 BV tea extract (567.5 µg mL–1 EGCG) flowed through the column at a flow rate of 2.38 mL min–1. Elution coming from column-out was collected into tubes at time intervals of 8 min. The adsorbate-laden column was rinsed with 3 BV of distilled water before desorption process. Desorption was performed by using 20 BV of 70% ethanol. The flow rate and sampling time intervals were kept same as for the adsorption process. Non-adsorbed and desorbed EGCG contents were monitored by HPLC system.
Statistical analysis
Results were expressed as means followed by standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed by using IBM SPSS 16.0 package program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Comparison between test units was carried out using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey’s test was used for comparison of the means at a significance level of p < 0.05.