Lab mice
SPF female KM mice weighed 18-22g were purchased from the animal center of Hebei Medical University (SCXK (JI)2013-1-003, 1410014, Shijiazhuang, China). The mice were maintained in an environment with controlled temperature (20 to 25℃) and humidity (50% ± 5%), with food and water available at any time and a natural light. The health of the mice was monitored every day. Before blood collection or immune organ index test, mice were anesthetized with ether, and the other mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation under anesthesia with isoflurane.
Cell lines and lentinan
The murine liver cancer cell line H22 cells (China PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics (100 u/mL penicillin and 100 g/mL streptomycin) at 37℃ in an atmosphere of 5% CO2[12]. Lentinan used in this study was gifted from Kang Yuan (Jiangsu, China).
Immunogen preparation
We need to co-culture cancer cells with lentinan. H22 cells suspension (1×107) and lentinan solution (170μL/mg). The co-cultures were cultured at 37 ℃ and 5% CO2 for 48 hours. The co-cultures were frozen and thawed repeatedly in a low temperature refrigerator of -80 ℃, then centrifuged and purified for immune test. Finally, the concentration of antigen protein was determined by Coomassie brilliant blue method[13].
Immunization protocol
A sample of 100 mice were randomly and equally divided into 5 groups, including divided equally among the control group, model-1 group, model-2 group, LHA-1 group and LHA-2 group(n = 20). The LHA-1 group and LHA-2 group were treated intraperitonially (i.p.) with antigens (0.2 mL/mouse), once per week for 3 weeks. The mice in control and model groups were treated with 0.9% normal saline. One week after the third immunization, all of the mice except the control group were inoculated with H22 cells (1.5×106 cells/mouse). The model-1 group and LHA-1 group were inoculated with H22 cells with i.p to establish the H22 ascitic tumor model[14]. And the model-2 group and LHA-2 group were inoculated with H22 cells with s.c(subcutaneous) to establish the H22 solid tumor model[15]. From day 10 to day 21, the tumor size of tumor bearing mouse was tested by vernier calip. 21 days after establishment of the H22 mouse models, the body weights of the mice in each group were recorded.
Tumor incidence and immune organ index
Ten mice in each group were selected randomly to calculate the volume and weight of the tumor, immune organ (thymus and spleen) index and cellular immunity. The spleen and thymus were collected from each mouse, and the growth index for each thymus or spleen was recorded[16].
HE staining
At the conclusion of the experiments, the tumors were harvested and stained with hematoxylin-eosin(HE) to discern the histopathological response and evaluate the tumors’ morphology. HE staining was conducted according to routine protocols[17]. Briefly, after deparaffinization and rehydration, 5 μm longitudinal sections were stained with hematoxylin solution for 5 min followed by 5 dips in 1% acid ethanol (1% HCl in 70% ethanol) and then rinsed in distilled water. Then the sections were stained with eosin solution for 3 min and followed by dehydration with graded alcohol and clearing in xylene. The mounted slides were then examined and photographed using an Olympus BX53 fluorescence microscope (Tokyo, Japan).
Scanning electron microscopy
For studies, solid tumors were cut and the size of the tissue block was 1 mm3. The specimens were cleaned with normal saline and then were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at 4℃ for 3 hours, 10~15min per time. After drying with alcohol gradient dehydration (50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%) for two times, and 75% and 100% tert-butanol on 4℃ for 10 min orderly, the specimens were gold coated by sputtering (SCD 040 Balzers device, Bal-Tec)[18]. The samples were then examined with a Cambridge Stereoscan 360 scanning electron microscope (Cambridge Instruments, Cambridge, United Kingdom).
Splenocyte lymphocyte proliferation experiment
The mice were sacrificed and the spleens were obtained, and then the spleen cell suspension was obtained after washing, grinding and centrifugal lysis. The T lymphocyte transformation test and B lymphocyte transformation experiment were carried out according to the instructions of the kit(American Biolegend Co., Ltd.). With the results were tested at 570nm, the stimulation index was calculated to judge the proliferation rate of T lymphocytes and B lymphocytes[19]. The stimulation index is according to the following formula.
CTL cell killing activity detection
The immunized mouse spleen cells (effector cells) suspension was taken, and the cell concentration was adjusted to 1×105cells/mL, by adding 10% fetal bovine serum medium RPMI-1640. The spleen cells suspension was cultured at 37℃ for 24 hours. According to the ratio of 50: 1(spleen cells: H22 cells), H22 cells(target cells) were added into spleen cells suspension for coculture. Three multiple samples were set up in each group and cultured for 24 hours. After that, MTT solution (5g/L) 20μL was added to each well and cultured at 37 ℃ for 4 hours before centrifugation. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to each well and placed for 20 minutes after shaking. The absorbance under 490nm was measured by enzyme labeling instrument, and then the cytotoxicity of CTL cells was calculated by the following formula.
Analysis of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC pathway)
Splenocytes were prepared following the method described previously (Xu et al., 2019).The immune antiserum was diluted 1:50 times with complete RPMI 1640 medium. To confirm the role of antigen in ADCC activation induced by lentinan, H22 cells were seeded into a 96-well microplate at 1×105 cells/well in a complete RPMI 1640 medium and treated without(control) or with Spleen lymphocytes and antiserum(LA), Spleen lymphocytes(SL) and antiserum(AS) respectively, and then were subjected to MTT method. The absorbance in each well was determined at 570 nm by using a microplate reader (Multiskan FC, Thermo, USA). The following formula was used for calculating the proliferation ratio:
Flow cytometry was used to determine CD4+T and CD8+T in T cell subsets
Splenic lymphocyte were aseptically isolated from KM mice. After carefully removed, the spleens were minced in HBSS and filtered through a 200-mesh sterile strainer. The pelleted cells were obtained by centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 5 min. Subsequently, lymphocyte separation medium was employed to enrich the lymphocytes, followed by resuspension in a complete RPMI 1640 medium (1640 medium supplemented with 100 UI/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 10% heat inactivated FBS) and adjustment to 1×107 cells/ml with a haemocytometer by trypan blue dye exclusion assay. Lymphocytes were collected and stained using FITC anti-mouse CD4 +T antibody (Biolegend) and PE anti-mouse CD8 +T antibody (Biolegend). Then the cells were washed twice with PBS and subjected to FCM (BD Biosciences, San Jose, California, USA) analysis.
CD80 and CD86 subsets of DC cells were analyzed by flow cytometry
Murine bone marrow cells derived from femurs and tibiae were collected and suspended with Tris-NH4Cl solution for 2 ~ 4 minutes at room temperature to lyse erythrocytes. After washed with PBS solution for twice, the bone marrow cells were cultured for 7 days at a density of 1×106cells/ml in RPMI medium (Thermo, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco, Carlsbad, California, USA), 10 units/ml penicillin, 10 μg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco, USA) (hereafter termed complete medium) and 25 ng/ml murine GM-CSF (Miltenyi Biotech, Germany) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. On day 3, floating cells were discarded and fresh medium containing 25 ng/ml GM-CSF was added. Cells were further differentiated for 4 days with GM-CSF containing complete RPMI 1640 medium. Floating Lymphocytes were collected and stained using FITC anti-mouse CD11c antibody (Biolegend), PE-Cy5 anti-mouse CD80 antibody (Biolegend), and PE anti-mouse CD86 antibody (Biolegend). Then the cells were washed twice with PBS and subjected to FCM analysis.
Analysis of cytokine expression
The lymphocyte suspension was taken and the concentration was adjusted to 2×106 cells/mL. The prepared H22 cell suspension was added to the 96-well plate, and 100ul was added to each well. In the experimental group, 100ul splenocyte suspension was added to each well, and 3 repetitive wells were set up. The control group did not add H22 cell suspension, and then the 96-well plate was cultured in a carbon dioxide incubator at 5% CO2 and 37 degrees Celsius for 24 hours. After collecting the supernatant of cells, IFN-γ and TNF-α in serum and splenocytes were determined by ELISA kit.
Analysis of antigen by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS)
The protein sample of antigens was further concentrated using Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter MWCO3000 (Millipore) and measured by Bradford Assay (Solarbio, Bradford Protein Assay Kit, Beijing, China). An aliquot of the concentrated preparation containing 100μg protein was diluted with 50 mM NH4HCO3 to 70μL and added DTT with final concentration 10mM at 56°C for 1 h. The sample was then incubated with iodoacetamide (10mM final concentration) at room temperature for 40 minutes before digestion with trypsin (trypsin:protein 1:50 w/w) at 37 °C for 14 h. After speed-vac, the sample peptides were reconstituted in 50 mM NH4HCO3 for LC-MS analysis. LC/MS was performed on Thermo Scientific™ Q Exactive equipped with a Nanospray Floex Ion-Soure. Peptides suspension dissolved in 0.1% formic acid were separated by nano- high performance liquid chromatography (Eksigent Technologies) on a secondary reversed-phase analytical column (Eksigent, C18, 3μm, 150 mm * 75μm). Buffer A for the pump consisted of 0.1% formic acid in LC/MS-grade water. Buffer B for the pump consisted of 0.1% formic acid in LC/MS-grade acetonitrile. Gradient conditions for pump B were as follows: 0% to 35% B from 0 to 90 minutes. A total of 5 mL of the prepared peptides was injected onto the trap column for concentration/purification. Flow rates were 300 nL/min. Some parameters in Orbitrap were as follows: spray voltage, 2.0 kV; capillary temperature, 250°C; m/z (mass to charge ratio) range (ms), 350 to 1800. AGC ion injection targets for each FTMS scan were 70,000 (100 ms max injection time). AGC ion injection targets for each MS2 scan were 17,500 (50 ms max ion injection time). Full MS/dd-MS2 (Top10) was used in this analysis, with a dynamic exclusion time of 25 s. Both identification and quantification were done by Proteome Discoverer (version 2.1 demo, Thermo Fischer Scientific). Uniprot-mouse databasewas used for data mining. Peptides were generated from a tryptic digestion with up to 2 missed cleavages, dynamic modifications of methionine oxidation, and a static modification of cysteine carbamidomethylation. Precursor mass tolerance was 10 ppm, and product ions were searched at 0.02-Da tolerances. Peptide spectral matches were validated using percolator based on q-values at a 1% false discovery rate.
Statistical processing
The data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 11.5, SPSS, New York, NY, USA) and P< 0.05
was considered as statistically significant. All the data were presented as mean±SD.