3.1. Analysis and characterization
The proposed superhydrophobic coating was fabricated, as explained, by spraying the mixture of the zinc suspension and the polyurethane suspension onto an aluminum flake. After fixed with polymerization, the proposed coating with a zinc-mediated surface was thus formed. Figures 1–5 show the analysis and characterization of the prepared coating materials. For the comparative discussion, the control coating prepared in the absence of zinc was also displayed together. The proposed coating revealed a few principal bands at 3100–3750 cm− 1, 2900–3000 cm− 1, ~ 1750 cm− 1, 1650–1750 cm− 1, and 1000–1300 cm− 1, plus a few fingerprint bands (Fig. 1). These principal and fingerprint bands may be spectroscopically connected to the stretching O-H (F-H), N-H (C-H), C = O, Si-O and Zn-O bonds and their corresponding rotation [15, 16]. The incorporation of zinc oxide into the proposed coating evidently displayed Zn-O bands in comparison to the control coating. This outcome suggests that the proposed coating was prepared in consistence with the preparation process (cf. Sections 2.2 and 2.3). The EDX profiles (Fig. 2) and the XPS spectra (Fig. 3) upheld the FTIR analysis and manifested the element composition of C, N, O, F, Si and Zn. Figure 4 further refines the energy effect of zinc on the proposed coating, where silicon (2p) was tentatively considered due to the narrowest band that may eliminate overlapping and accordingly avert the complicated analysis. The incorporation of zinc into the proposed coating decreased the binding energy by 0.16 eV, implying the active electronic properties of zinc which may help induce anti-ultraviolet properties. Figure 5 shows the SEM imaging of the coating surfaces. The incorporation of zinc oxide into the proposed coating increased the roughness of the surface. The proposed coating was prepared in the desired form. Hence, the proposed coating is desired to have stronger superhydrophobicity and weather resistance. In the context, the further studies were performed.
Figure 1. The FTIR spectra of the prepared coating materials
Figure 2. The EDX profiles of the prepared coating materials
Figure 3. The XPS spectra of the prepared coating materials
Figure 4. The XPS spectra of silicon from the prepared coating materials
Figure 5. The SEM imaging of the surfaces of the prepared coatings (a: N@PUC; b: Zn@PUC)
3.2. Superhydrophobic properties
Figure 6 and Fig. 7 present the superhydrophobic phenomena of the prepared coatings. The proposed coating showed a contact angle as large as 157.1° and a rolling angle as small as 4.2°. By comparison, the control coating only revealed a contact angle 141.8° and a rolling angle 16.1°. The proposed coating authenticated the typical superhydrophobic phenomena but the control coating felt failure. The incorporation of zinc oxide into the proposed coating caused the occurrence of the superhydrophobic phenomena. This can be attributed to the mediated surface texture of zinc oxide in the proposed coating (cf. Figure 5), which made possible the reinforced superhydrophobic phenomena.
Figure 8 displays the dependence of the zinc dosage on the superhydrophobic phenomena. The increasing use of zinc did not persistently result in the increasing superhydrophobic properties but an initial increase and a subsequent decrease. There was an optimal dosage of zinc oxide with respect to the superhydrophobic phenomena. This outcome, as unmasked in Fig. 9, can be ascribed to the agglomeration of zinc oxide with an increasing dosage, which led to the superhydrophobic surface changed from the appropriate texture to the destructed texture. As such, a certain amount of zinc oxide is encouraged to use, so as to acquire the optimized superhydrophobic properties (such as 1.2 g in the present study).
Figure 6. The contact angles of the prepared coatings (a: N@PUC; b: Zn@PUC)
Figure 7. The rolling angles of the prepared coatings (a: N@PUC; b: Zn@PUC)
Figure 8. The contact angles of the prepared coatings with an increasing zinc dosage (from a to e with zinc oxide (g): 0, 0.6, 1.2, 1.8, 2.4)
Figure 9. The SEM imaging of the surfaces of the prepared coatings with an increasing zinc dosage (from a to e with zinc oxide (g): 0, 0.6, 1.2, 1.8, 2.4)
3.3. Ultraviolet resistance
Figure 10 displays the ultraviolet resistance of the prepared coatings. For the proposed coating, the superhydrophobic phenomena did not substantively change after the irradiation. By comparison, the increasing irradiation on the control coating resulted in a significant decrease in the contact angles. The incorporation of zinc into the proposed coating made a contribution to the increasing ultraviolet resistance which was essential for outdoor applications. In conjunction with the analysis and characterization (cf. Section 3.1), this may be due to the lower binding energy of electrons in zinc, which led to the inherent ultraviolet adsorption and thereby helped induce the ultraviolet resistance. This outcome may be further evidenced from the ultraviolet adsorption spectra (Fig. 11). The proposed zinc-mediated coating exhibited stronger ultraviolet adsorption in contrast to the zinc-free control coating. It is therefore clear that the incorporation of zinc into the proposed coating not only reinforced the superhydrophobic properties but also extra granted the proposed coating ultraviolet resistance.
Figure 10. The dependence of the contact angles on the irradiation time (254 nm)
Figure 11. The ultraviolet absorption properties from the prepared coatings
3.4. Abrasion resistance
The abrasion resistance of the prepared coatings was studied with the tape-peeling testing and the sandpaper friction. The increasing cycles of friction and stripping from the proposed coating did not lead to a substantive change in the superhydrophobic properties (Fig. 12 and Fig. 13). The increasing cycles of friction and stripping from the control coating resulted in a significant decrease in the contact angles. The incorporation of zinc into the proposed coating induced stronger wear resistance. In conjunction with Section 3.1 and Section 3.2, this may be due to the mediation of zinc oxide on the surface textures of the prepared coatings, in which zinc oxide itself as a transition-metal oxide possessed better wearing quality. In couple with the prominent wear resistance of the polyurethane layer, the proposed coating authenticated the sturdy ultraviolet and abrasion resistance.
Figure 12. The abrasion resistance from sandpaper friction testing
Figure 13. The abrasion resistance from tape-stripping testing
3.5. Anti-corrosion properties
The anti-corrosion properties of the prepared coatings were studied by immersing individually the coatings into hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide solutions and then taken out for testing. The increasing time for immersing the proposed coating did not lead to a substantial decrease in the superhydrophobic properties, regardless of the specified solution (Fig. 14 and Fig. 15). By comparison, the increasing time for immersing the control coating resulted in a substantial decrease in the contact angles. The incorporation of zinc into the proposed coating caused better anti-corrosion properties. In conjunction with the superhydrophobic phenomena (cf. Section 3.2), this may be attributed to the enforced superhydrophobic properties induced by zinc, which helped inhibit the contact of water to the surfaces and thus led to better anti-corrosion properties.
The anti-corrosion behavior of the prepared coatings was further analyzed and detected with the electrochemical impedance spectra (Fig. 16). The Nyquist curve of the proposed coating displayed a larger radius of capacitance in comparison to the counterpart of the control coating. This reveals that the proposed coating held larger resistance to charge transfer in comparison to the control coating. As such, the proposed coating showed the better anti-corrosion properties.
Figure 14. The resistance of the prepared coatings to hydrochloric acid corrosion
Figure 15. The resistance of the prepared coatings to sodium hydroxide corrosion
Figure 16. The electrochemical impedance spectra of the prepared coatings
3.6. Self-cleaning properties
The self-cleaning properties of the prepared coatings are displayed in Fig. 17, in which the coatings were smeared with coffee powder. The proposed coating left behind a clear surface when washed with 5 mL of water (cf. Case b). Under comparable conditions, the control coating left behind a few residues after undergoing the identical processes (cf. Case a). The proposed coating authenticated better self-cleaning behaviors in comparison to the control coating. This may be due to the enforced superhydrophobic properties, as explained, which made possible the better self-cleaning functions.
The self-cleaning properties were further checked by immersing the prepared coatings into a methylene-blue aqueous solution and then taken out (Fig. 18). The blue solution quickly rolled off the proposed coating and accordingly left behind a clear coating. By comparison, despite the pending time, the blue solution invariably left behind a few residues over the control coating. Once again, this outcome indicates that the proposed coating possessed better self-cleaning properties in comparison to the control coating.
Figure 17. The self-cleaning properties with coffee powder (a: N@PUC; b: Zn@PUC)
Figure 18. The self-cleaning properties with methylene-blue solution (a: N@PUC; b: Zn@PUC)