3.1. Synthesis of [Re(CO)3(OH2)(Hpmdc)] (1), [99mTc(CO)3(OH2)(Hpmdc)] (2) and [Re(CO)3(OH2)(etpmdc)] (3)
Monomeric complex [Re(CO)3(OH2)(Hpmdc)] (1) was formed by reacting the chelating ligand pyrimidine-4,6-dicarboxylic acid (H2pmdc) with [Re(CO)5Br] in distilled water (Scheme 1). The formation of 1 was enhanced by the denticity of H2pmdc ligand and its good solubility in polar solvents like water. Complexes 1 is orange-yellow colored and it is soluble in polar solvents like water, ethanol and methanol and display low solubility in non-polar solvents. Technetium (99m) complex homologous of 1 typically [99mTc(CO)3(OH2)(Hpmdc)] (2) was directly formed from the reaction of fac-[99mTc(CO)3(OH2)3]+ with H2pmdc in water at 80oC for 30 min (Scheme 1). Complex 2 was also formed by heating aqueous fac-[99mTc(CO)3(OH2)3]+ solution with H2pmdc in microwave under the same reaction conditions. The Hpmdc− anion in the complexes 1 and 2, coordinated to the fac-[M(CO)3]+ core as bidentate N,O-donor chelate, coordinating to the metal center via one of the pyrimidinic nitrogens and carboxylate-oxygen atoms, giving five-membered metallacycle ring (Scheme 1).
The complex [Re(CO)3(OH2)(etpmdc)] (3) was obtained from the reaction of H2pmdc with [Re(CO)5Br] in ethanol. The formation of 6-(ethoxycarbonyl)pyrimidine-4-carboxylate (etpmdc−) anion was surprisingly enhanced by [Re(CO)5Br]-catalysed mono-esterification of H2pmdc and simultaneously coordinated to the fac-[M(CO)3]+ core as Hpmdc− in 1 and 2. The ability of rhenium(I) complexes [Re(CO)5X] (X = Cl, Br) to catalyse esterification reaction of carboxylic acid by alcohol was previously reported in the literature [11], and it is supported by the Lewis acidity character of these complexes [11]. The reaction of 5-(5-aminopyrimidine-2,4(1H,3H)-dioxamido)-1,2,3,6-tetrahedro-2,6-dioxopyrimidine-4-carboxylic acid (H2amp) with [Re(CO)5Cl] in ethanol which led to the rhenium(I) complex [Re(CO)3(H2O)(amef)] where amef is 5-(5-ammoniumpyrimidine-2,4(1H,3H)-dioxamido)-1,2,3,6-tetrahedro-2,6-dioxopyrimidine-4-ethylformate, and was formed by [Re(CO)5Cl]-catalysed esterification of H2amp by ethanol, and coordinated to the fac-[Re(CO)3]+ core as a bidentate N,N-donor chelate [11]. Complexes 3 is orange and it is soluble in polar solvents like water, ethanol and methanol but not soluble in non-polar solvents. Attempt to synthesize 99mTc complex homologous of 3 in the same synthetic route as one used for the synthesis of [99mTc(CO)3(OH2)(Hpmdc)] (2) with addition of ethanol was not successful but the reaction also led to complex 2.
A variety of metal complexes of pyrimidine-4,6-dicarboxylic acid (H2pmdc) such as lanthanide(III) [6], scandium (III) [7] and manganese(II) [8] have been reported, and H2pmdc ligand coordinated to the above-mentioned metal ions as in complexes 1 and 2. To the best of our knowledge, the complexes [Re(CO)3(OH2)(Hpmdc)] (1) and [99mTc(CO)3(OH2)(Hpmdc)] (2) are the first reported rhenium and technetium complexes with pyrimidine-4,6-dicarboxylic acid (H2pmdc) ligand. Due to the lability of aqua-ligand, complexes 1, 2 and 3 are biologically important as aqua-ligand have been identified to exchange with a variety of biological molecules in biological system [19]. Such exchange shall not affect the rest part of complexes 1, 2 and 3 as result of high kinetic and thermodynamic stability of complexes based on the organometallic fac-[M(CO)3]+ (M = Re and Tc) unit, granting the potential application of these complexes as radiopharmaceutical probes.
By eluting complex 1 in the ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) system, it was detected at the retention time of 1.80 min (Fig. S1). The vibrational peaks at 2042, 1908 and 1932 cm− 1 in the infrared spectrum of 1 (Fig. S2) are ascribed to the fac-[Re(CO)3]+, and they are at 1873, 1883, 2015 cm− 1 in 3 (Fig. S6). The peaks at 3225 and 3110 cm− 1 in 1 are ascribed to the ѵ(O − H) for the free OH in the coordinated ligand and water respectively whereas the ѵ(O − H) for the OH of the coordinated water in 3 occur at 3364 cm− 1 (Figure S6). The 1HNMR spectrum of 1 in D2O (Fig. S3) displayed two protons H(3) and H(6) at 8.56 and 9.66 ppm respectively. Homologous protons in 3 occur at 8.61 and 9.64 ppm respectively in the 1HNMR of 3 measured in CD3OD (Fig. S7). The triplet and quartet signals at 1.45 ppm and at 4.52 ppm in the 1HNMR of 3 are assigned to the -CH3 and -CH2 respectively, while the protons of the coordinated water are displayed as singlet signal at 4.07 ppm. The 13CNMR in CD3OD gave the promised signals at 122.76, 159.52, 162.97, 167.41, 171.40, 175.89 ppm for 1 (Fig. S4); and 123.13, 160.72, 160.76, 162.34, 164.30, 173.79 for 3 (Fig. S8). The signals at 194.96 and 198.01 ppm are due to CO ligands in 1 and they are at 197.37, 197.05, 193.94 ppm in 3. The signals at 14.85 and 64.88 ppm in the 13C NMR of 3 are ascribed to -CH3 and -CH2 respectively. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) analysis of complex 1 (Fig. S5) displayed m/z peaks at 457.03 ascribed to [C9H6N2O8Re]+ or [1 + H]+ and 438.06 in accordance with [C9H4N2O7Re]+ or [1-H2O + H]+ as well as 479.99 reflecting [C11H7N3O7Re]+ or [1 + MeCN + H-H2O]+. Similarly, ESI-MS spectrum of 3 (Fig. S9) showed m/z peaks typically 467.21 for [C11H8N2O7Re]+ or [3-H2O + H]+, and 508.15 for [C13H11N3O7Re]+ or [3 + MeCN + H-H2O]+.
The Fig. 2 shows ORTEP drawing of complex 3 and its crystal details and structure refinement data are described in Table 1. The CCDC 2260652 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for 3, and can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif. As generally observed to rhenium(I) complexes based on the fac-[Re(CO)3]+ unit, the geometry around the rhenium metal center is a distorted octahedral [11, 18, 19], with oxygen atom of the coordinated water O(4) and two donor atoms N(1) and O(5) of etpmdc− anion in a facial arrangement as imposed by the fac-[Re(CO)3]+ core.
Table 1
Structure refinement parameters data and selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (˚) for [Re(CO)3(OH2)(etpmdc)] (3)
Structure refinement Parameters | Structure refinement Parameters data | Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (˚) |
Chemical formula Formula weight Temperature (K) Crystal system Space group Unit cell dimensions (Å˚) Crystal size/mm3 Volume (Å 3) Z Density (calc.) (g/cm3) Absorption coefficient (mm− 1) F (000) Radiation θ range for data collection (deg) Index ranges h,k,l max Reflections collected Independent reflections Data/restraints/parameters Goodness-of-fit on F2 Final R indexes [I > = 2σ (I)] Final R indexes [all data] Largest diff. peak and hole(e/Å3) | C11H9N2O8Re 483.40 160 K Monoclinic P 21/c a = 7.05850(12) α = 90 b = 7.82584(13) β = 93.1000(16) c = 24.5852(5) γ = 90 0.14 × 0.08 × 0.01 1356.07(4) 4 2.368 9.006 912.0 MoKα (λ = 0.71073) 5.464 to 61.016 -10 ≤ h ≤ 10,-10 ≤ k ≤ 11,-35 ≤ l ≤ 35 41731 4123 [Rint =0.0320, Rsigma = 0.0157] 4123/0/208 1.148 R1 = 0.0200, wR2 = 0.0395 R1 = 0.0227, wR2 = 0.0402 1.53/-1.41 | Re(1)-C(1) 1.922(3) Re(1)-C(2) 1.900(3) Re(1)-C(3) 1.900(3) Re(1)-O(4) 2.211(2) Re(1)-O(5) 2.1489(19) Re(1)-N(1) 2.179(2) C(4)-O(5) 1.272(3) C(4)-O(6) 1.235(3) C(9)-O(7) 1.213(3) C(9)-O(8) 1.309(3) C(10)-O(8) 1.474(3) C(5)-N(1) 1.349(3) C(8)-N(1) 1.348(3) C(8)-N(2) 1.327(3) C(7)-N(2) 1.339(3) C(2)-Re(1)-O(5) 175.09(11) C(3)-Re(1)-O(4) 176.93(11) C(1)-Re(1)-N(1) 170.68(11) O(5)-Re(1)-N(1) 75.19(7) Re(1)-C(1)-O(1) 176.9(3) C(2)-Re(1)-C(1) 88.41(13) O(5)-Re(1)-O(4) 83.39(7) N(1)-Re(1)-O(4) 81.99(8) C(3)-Re(1)-C(1) 86.41(14) |
The rhenium-centered bond angles C(2)-Re(1)-O(5) = 175.09(11)o, C(3)-Re(1)-O(4) = 176.93(6)o and C(1)-Re(1)-N(1) = 170.68(11)o deviated from the linearity supporting the distortion in 3. Such distortion is furtherly supported by rhenium-centered bond angles C(2)-Re(1)-C(1) = 88.41(13)o, (5)-Re(1)-O(4) = 83.39(7) o, N(1)-Re(1)-O(4) = 81.99(8)o and C(3)-Re(1)-C(1) = 86.41(14) o which deviated from the orthogonality.
The etpmdc− chelate coordinated to rhenium(I) center via one of the pyrimidinic nitrogen N(1) and carboxylate oxygen O(5) forming a bite angle of O(5)-Re(1)-N(1) = 75.19(7)o. For the reported similar pyrimidine derivatives complexes of rhenium(I), this angle was found 75.54(6)o and 75.14(5)◦ [19, 36]. The bond distance Re(1)-O(5) = 2.1489(19) Å in 3 agrees well with the reported RI-O distances in pyrimidine derivatives complexes of rhenium(I) based on the fac-[Re(CO)3]+ unit [19, 36]. The Re − N(1) bond distance of 2.179(2) Å is compatible with the range 2.15 − 2.22 Å previously reported for rhenium(I) − N(imines) distances [11, 37]. The average Re-C bond distances is 1.907(3) Å, and falls in the range 1.900(2)-1.928(2) Å reported for ReI-C distances [11, 18, 19]. The crystal packing diagram of 3 (Fig. S16) displays two asymmetric units in the unit cell and four intramolecular hydrogen bonds (blue dashed) which are typically C(8)-H(8)..O(6), C(10)-H(10A)..O(3), O(4)-H(4A)..O(3) and O(4)-H(4B)..O(6).
Due to very low concentration of 99mTc in solution which exists in nano-scale and similarity in the coordination chemistry of Re and Tc, the structural identity of 99mTc-complexes is routinely confirmed by comparing their HPLC profiles with HPLC profiles of the homologous rhenium complexes, fully characterized by routine chemistry analytical techniques [19]. This consists of coinjecting 99mTc complex with its homologous rhenium complex in the HPLC with UV/vis detection coupled with a γ-detector followed by comparison of retention times of the displayed γ-peaks of 99mTc complex and UV peak of Re complex [19]. Therefore, the chemical similarity of 1 and 2 was assessed by coinjection of 10 µl of these complexes in the HPLC with UV/vis detection coupled with a γ-detector, and complex 1 was detected at Rt = 11.7 min in UV (Fig. 3b) which coincides with the radiochemical peak of 2 detected at Rt = 12.8 min in γ (Fig. 3a) confirming their structural similarity. The difference of 1.1 min for 1 and 2 is due to the UV/vis and γ-detectors separation and HPLC settings [19].
3.2. Synthesis of (Et3NH)2[(µ-pmdc)2(Re(CO)3)2 (4) and [(µ-pmdc)2(Re(CO)3)(99mTc(CO)3)]2− (5)
Dimeric complex (Et3NH)2[(µ-pmdc)2(Re(CO)3)2] (4) was obtained from the reaction of H2pmdc with [Re(CO)5Br] in distilled water with addition of triethylamine (Et3N) as supporting base (Scheme 2). Complexes 4 is orange and it is soluble in polar solvents like water, ethanol and methanol, and exhibit a very low solubility in non-polar organic solvents. In the dimer 4, pmdc− 2 coordinated to the fac-[M(CO)3]+ core as bidentate N,O-donor chelate, coordinating to the metal center via on of the pyrimidinic nitrogen and carboxylate-oxygen atoms, and the other carboxylate oxygen atom is coordinated to the other fac-[Re(CO)3]+ core. The reaction of [99mTc(CO)3(OH2)3]+ and [Re(CO)5Br] with H2pmdc led to the heterodinuclear 99mTc/Re complex [(µ-pmdc)2(Re(CO)3)(99mTc(CO)3)]2− (5) (Scheme 2), and it is parallelly formed with complexes 1 and 2.
Similar dimers of scandium(III) [15] and manganese(II) [32] with H2pmdc have been reported and pmdc2− coordinated to the metal center as in complexes 4 and 5. Complex 4 and 5 have shown good stability in aqueous solution. The previous studies revealed that the pKa value of organic acid ligands reflects its relative coordination ability to the metal ions, and determine the strength of the resulting metal-ligand bonds, and therefore the stability of metal-organic framework [38]. High value of pKa for organic acid ligands indicates its deprotonation weakness, and such ligand will mostly necessitate the supporting base to promote its deprotonation for coordinating to the metal ions [39–41]. The deprotonated organic acid ligand with high value of pKa strongly coordinates to the metal ions resulting in metal-organic framework with high stability [38]. The H2pmdc ligand is a weak acid with pKa value of 2.035, and therefore, its full deprotonation for forming dinuclear rhenium complex 4 necessitated triethyl amine (Et3N) as supporting base, and this complex has shown a significant stability. Similarly for forming heterodinuclear 99mTc/Re complex 5, the full deprotonation of H2pmdc has been supported by unidentified anionic base which is in place as a counterion of the cationic precursor complex [99mTc(CO)3(OH2)3]+.
In the infrared spectrum of 4 (Fig. S11), sharp bands at 2016 and 1875 cm− 1 are associated with fac-[Re(CO)3]+ units. In the 1HNMR spectrum of 4 in D2O (Fig. S12), the CH3 and CH2 protons of Et3NH+ counterions occur as triplet at 1.28 ppm and quartet at 3.20 ppm respectively. The singlet signals at 8.44 and 9.59 ppm are ascribed to H(3) and H(6) respectively. The 13CNMR of 4 in D2O (Fig. S13) displayed signals at 8.04 and 46.64 ppm for CH3 and CH2 respectively for Et3NH+ counterions. The carbon atoms of the coordinated pmdc2− ligands occur at 120.33, 156.80, 160.48, 164.89, 168.80 and 173.41 ppm; while the carbona toms of the CO ligands are displayed at 193.00 and 195.59 ppm. Complex 4 was eluted in the UPLC and it was detected at 2.06 min (Fig. S10). The m/z peaks principally 872.91 [C18H5N4O14Re2]− or [4 + H]−, 916.10 [C20H10N5O14Re2]+ or [4 + 3H + MeCN]+ were detected in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) analysis of 4 (Fig. S14 and Fig. S15) and furtherly confirmed its structure.
The starting reagent used to synthesize compounds 1, 3 and 4 is [Re(CO)5Br]. As the ligand H2pmdc was deprotonated and release H+ ions in solution, the bromide ions (Br−) reacted with H+ ions from the deprotonated H2pmdc to form hydrobromic acid (HBr) as reaction byproduct. The HBr is inorganic acid and due to its high solubility in organic solvents, it was eliminated by several time washing of compounds 1, 3 and 4 using organic solvents. In addition, the HBr has some degree of volatility and a particular quantity of it was eliminated by being volatilized in the air. Therefore, there is no Br maintained in the isolated materials of 1, 3 and 4 [11, 19]. The formation of rhenium(I) complexes from [Re(CO)5X] (X = Cl, Br) without the ligand deprotonation only leads to rhenium(I) complexes with Br− or Cl− ligand maintained in the isolated products [11, 18].
Injection of 10 µl of the product from the reaction of [99mTc(CO)3(OH2)3]+ with H2pmdc and [Re(CO)5Br] in the HPLC with UV/vis detection coupled with a γ-detector displayed signals at retention times of 12.1 and 18.7 min in gamma with signal corresponding to the unreacted [99mTc(CO)3(OH2)3]+ and low intensity signal due to [99mTcO4]− from the oxidation of 99mTcI to 99mTcVII (Fig. 4a). It has also shown two signals in UV at 11.2 and 18.4 min (Fig. 3b). The signal at Rt = 11.2 min in UV (Fig. 4b) is due to the formation of [Re(CO)3(OH2)(Hpmdc)] (1) which coincides with the radiochemical signal at Rt = 12.1 min in γ (Fig. 3a) suggesting the formation of [99mTc(CO)3(OH2)(Hpmdc)] (2) as observed in Fig. 2. The difference of 0.9 min for 1 and 2 is due to the detector separation and HPLC settings. The signal at Rt = 18.4 min in UV (Fig. 4b) is due to the formation of heterodinuclear 99mTc/Re complex [(µ-pmdc)2(Re(CO)3)(99mTc(CO)3)]2− (5) which coincides with its radiochemical signal at Rt = 18.7 min in γ (Fig. 4a), and the difference of 0.3 min is also due to the UV and γ-detectors separation and HPLC settings, and it was formed at yield of approximatively 35%. The obtained low yield of complex 5 (35%) is due to the fact that it was parallelly formed with complex 1 and 2. In addition, unreacted quantity of [99mTc(CO)3(OH2)3]+ and its small quantity which has been oxidized to [99mTcO4]− also partially contributed to such low yield of complex 5.
The product at Rt = 18.7 min in γ is [(µ-pmdc)2(Re(CO)3)(99mTc(CO)3)]2− (5) rather than the dimer [(µ-pmdc)2(99mTc(CO)3)2]2− due to the fact that the low concentrations of 99mTc makes the formation of dimeric 99mTc species kinetically unlikely [19], and even if it is formed, it should not be detected in the UV as observed for [(µ-pmdc)2(Re(CO)3)(99mTc(CO)3)]2− (5) (Fig. 5b) due to its extremely low concentration. The formation of [(µ-pmdc)2(Re(CO)3)(99mTc(CO)3)]2− (5) was furtherly confirmed by injecting its homologous non-radioactive dimer complex [(µ-pmdc)2(Re(CO)3)2]2− (4) in the same HPLC which also displayed the UV signal at 18.4 min equivalent to that of [(µ-pmdc)2(Re(CO)3)(99mTc(CO)3)]2− (5) (Fig. 4b). The observed similar retention times in UV for 4 and 5 confirms their structural identity. This is furtherly supported by the fact that the metals technetium and rhenium are located in the same position in the Periodic Table of elements, and have comparable atomic radii, and their homologous complexes should consequently display the same electronic properties and coordination parameters [11, 42]. Further characterizations of heterometallic radiocomplex 5 are not applicable due to the above-mentioned reason of its low concentration in solution.
A few numbers of heterodinuclear complexes containing Re and 99mTc were previously reported in the literature. Recently, the highly stable complex [99mTcRe3 (µ3-OH)4(CO)12] has been reported, and it was obtained at 94% yield from the reaction of aqueous [99mTc(CO)3(OH2)3]+ with [Re3 (µ2-OH)3(µ3-OH)(CO)9]− [17]. The formation of 99mTcRe3 (µ3-OH)4(CO)12] was also achieved at 90% yield from the reaction of aqueous [99mTc(CO)3(OH2)3]+ with (NEt4)2[ReBr3(CO)3] [17]. The reaction of (E)-2-((m-tolylimino)methyl)phenol ligand with [99mTc(CO)3(OH2)3]+and (NEt4)2[ReBr3(CO)3] in acetonitrile has been also studied, and led to the heterodinuclear 99mTc/Re complex with exception stability [17]. Heterodinuclear 99mTc/Re complex namely [Re(CO)3(bipy){(4-PyrIDA)99mTc(CO)3}] where 4-PyrIDA is N-carboxylato-N-(pyridin-4-ylmethyl)glycinate has been reported as the first example of 99mTc/Re-based heterometallic assembly which could act as a potential bimodal optical/SPECT probe [43]. Such complex displayed similar retention time in the HPLC with its homologous dinuclear Re complex [Re(CO)3(bipy){(4-PyrIDA)Re(CO)3}] fully characterized by routine analytical techniques [43] confirming their structural identity as observed for complexes 4 and 5 reported in this study. Dinuclear Re and its homologous heterodinuclear 99mTc/Re complexes based on the fac-[M(CO)3]+ core typically [Re(CO)3(pyta-COOMe){(4-pyrIDA)Re(CO)3}] and [Re(CO)3(pyta-COOMe){(4-pyrIDA)99mTc(CO)3}] where pyta-COOMe and PyrIDA are methyl 2-(4-(2-pyridyl)-[1, 2, 3]triazol-1-yl)acetate and 2,2'-((pyridin-4-ylmethyl)azanediyl)diacetate) respectively have been also reported [44]. Heterodinuclear 99mTc/Re complex [Re(CO)3(pyta-COOMe){(4-pyrIDA)99mTc(CO)3}] was the first reported example of a functionalized dual fluorescent/radiolabeled imaging agent, and it was characterized by comparing its HPLC profile with the HPLC profile of its homologous and fully characterized dinuclear Re complex Re(CO)3(pyta-COOMe){(4-pyrIDA)Re(CO)3}] [44]. Both complexes displayed similar retention times in the HPLC as observed for complexes 4 and 5 reported in this study confirming their structural identity [44].
Multinuclear complexes are advantageous in medicinal inorganic chemistry as they may target more than one unit in the body, and can be delivered by more than one bioactive moiety [17]. In addition, the possibility of combining radiometal agents with cytotoxicity and imaging properties gave rise to a new concept of molecule-based theranostic radiopharmaceuticals with a specific amount of therapeutic and imaging agents [17]. In this way, the existence of similar coordination chemistry between Re and Tc makes possible to afford stable heterodinuclear 99mTc/186/188Re complexes with 99mTc and 186/188Re showing similar electronic properties, and such complexes act as theranostic radiopharmaceuticals displaying imaging and therapeutic properties [45]. Therefore, heterodinuclear 99mTc/Re complex [(µ-pmdc)2(Re(CO)3)(99mTc(CO)3)]2− (5) reported in this study will be a model for future design of theranostic radiopharmaceuticals combining imaging and therapy.