Since October 2023, in Catalonia, nirsevimab has been recommended, financed with public funds, and administered in all PCPs and hospitals as a preventive measure to protect children against RSV in their first season and high-risk children in their second RSV season. It was expected to reduce severe disease by 80% (12). Our findings suggest that the risk of RSV infection for infants aged 0-11m-old regarding > 35m-old has been reduced by 75.6% (73.4–77.5) from last season, and the risk for all-cause bronchiolitis regarding 12-35m-old by 61.9% (60.9–62.9) from the pre-pandemic period and by 39.8% (39.3–40.2) from 2022/23 epidemic, despite a high RSV community transmission, especially among children aged ≥ 12 months. Remarkably, the reduction in RR for bronchiolitis diagnoses would be more significant if only RSV-bronchiolitis were considered, but these data are not publicly available at the primary care level.
The coverage rate for nirsevimab for those born between April and September 2023 has been 88%, and the global coverage rate for children under 1 year of age, estimated until the end of January 2024, is 82.2%. Note that there is a delay in data registration; therefore, these percentages might be even higher than reported.
Unlike other previously published studies about reducing RSV-associated hospitalisation with nirsevimab (13, 14), our study used PCP data, which contains the greatest health care burden as it is the primary health care and because of its universality and gratuity, hence with a larger sample size and study period from September 1, 2014, to January 31, 2024. Besides, we provide the RR of incidence of RSV infection and all-causes bronchiolitis diagnosis of infants eligible for nirsevimab concerning non-eligible cohorts, allowing for quantifying the consequences of the immunisation on the RSV epidemics and potentially related severe disease (bronchiolitis).
Similarly, concerning the last outbreak, we found a substantial reduction in all-causes bronchiolitis for 0-11m-old. Additionally, there were fewer cases of RSV infection in this age group. Nonetheless, we observed more all-causes bronchiolitis cases and a higher incidence of RSV infection in older infants, particularly 12-35m-old, pointing to a high-circulation epidemiological context in the absence of immunisation. Previously published studies mentioned an increased mean age of hospital-admitted children but did not provide a comprehensive age-specific analysis (13, 14).
Comparable findings have been observed in Galicia, another autonomous community of Spain that introduced nirsevimab in the autumn of 2023 (15). They also noted an increased community transmission of RSV, although lower 0-11m-old incidences of bronchiolitis and RSV infections.
Interestingly, RSV positivity for 0-4y-old infants in Germany in 2023/24 was similar to the previous year (16), even after the implementation of the immunisation. After introducing the immunisation in France, bronchiolitis in children < 35m-old reached pre-pandemic incidences during season 2023/24, slightly lower than in 2022/23 (17). These differences would be attributed to the divergent immunisation protocols and coverage rates and the reported irregularities in nirsevimab supplies (5).
As for limitations, we must consider that compliance with the protocol for testing children with a RAT is not necessarily homogeneous among PCP paediatricians despite its availability; therefore, data about community incidence cannot be deduced from RSV-confirmed cases. Nevertheless, we assume there have not been significant changes in time in each particular PCP, so the season-to-season compatibility is still feasible. Also, aggregated epidemiological data do not incorporate relevant confounders like those related to socioeconomic factors, which could bias the results. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the measured impact is consistent with other results, thus pointing to a minor effect of these confounders. Moreover, when calculating the RR, a historically consistent baseline group should be used to provide robustness when comparing between periods. For that reason, the > 35m-old was used as the control group to assess the divergence in the incidence of RSV infections among epidemics since, in every epidemic, the number of infected > 35m-old was similar. However, for all-causes bronchiolitis, we are limited by the diagnosis criteria and the age resolution of the reported data. Thus, we used 12-35m-olds as the control group, which may have biased our results.
Despite this, our study also has several strengths. Using primary care data, we account for all children attending PCP in Catalonia, potentially 1.5 million children (18) since healthcare is universal and free. Moreover, while most previous studies have only reviewed hospitalisation data, we have provided a depiction of the changes in primary school outcomes since the introduction of nirsevimab, which we have not found in any previous literature. Therefore, this work provides epidemiological context for this 2023/24 RSV season in Catalonia, which can be used for other related studies willing to estimate the effectiveness of nirsevimab. Finally, the quality and completeness of the SIVIC database is to be highlighted, being used for surveillance of respiratory infections in Catalonia and served in numerous studies (19–21).