Table 2 Physico-chemal parameters of the differents oils used in our study
Alimentary diets
|
Acid index
(mg NaOH/g of oil)
|
Iodine value
(ml/g)
|
Peroxide index
|
Specific gravity
|
RPO
|
1.40±0.15 a*
|
52.67±1.34 a*
|
5.07±0.14 a*
|
0.92±0 a*
|
HCL
|
7.57±0.19 aaa/bb/cc
|
67.04±1.50aa/bbb/ccc
|
0.57±0.06 aaa/bbb/ccc
|
0.90±0 aa /bbb / ccc
|
HLS
|
6.61±0.43 aaa /b*
|
41.61±0.73aaa/b*
|
4.13±0.23 aa /b*
|
0.94±0 aa / b*
|
HCM
|
8.39±0.23 aaa/bb/c*
|
54.92±1.27a/bbb/c*
|
1.06±0.06aaa/bbb/c*
|
0.92±0 a / bbb / c*
|
Values are means ± SE for three determinations
-HDI : Refined palm oil « Dinor » ;
-HLS : Lagenaria siceraria seeds oil ;
-HCL : Citrullus lanatus seeds oil ;
-HCM : Cucumeropsis mannii seeds oil
* this sign mean that comparison is made according to this oil
a ; b ; c = no significant difference because p > 0.05.
aa ; bb ; cc = significant difference because p ≤ 0.05.
aaa ; bbb ; ccc = high significant difference because p ≤ 0.01.
aaaa ; bbbb ; cccc = very high significant difference because p ≤ 0.001
Molecular characterization of the differents oils
The results of the characterization are shown that Citrullus lanatus seeds oil (HCL) and Lagenaria siceraria seeds oil (HLS) contain high quantity of lauric acid. The percentage of lauric acid found in these oils is up above 15 % of the total component. The quantity of lauric acid found in Cucumeropsis mannii seeds oils (HCM) is the half of that found in Citrullus lanatus seeds oil and Lagenaria siceraria seeds oil when lauric acid found in refined palm oil do not reach 1 % of it total component.
Among the experiment oils, refined palm oil is the most saturated followed respectively by Cucumeropsis mannii seeds oil, Lagenaria siceraria seeds oil and Citrullus lanatus seeds oil. Refined palm oil is also the most rich in palmitic acid and stearic acid among the four oils. Citrullus lanatus seeds oil contain more polyinsaturated fatty acids than the others oils and refined oil is the most lower in polyinsaturated fatty acids. All these results are shown in table 3.
Table 3 Fatty acid found in the different oils used in the experimentation
Lipids (oils)
|
Number of carbon and omega bond position
|
Refined palm « DINOR » (%)
|
Citrullus lanatus
(%)
|
Lagenaria siceraria
(%)
|
Cucumeropsis mannii
(%)
|
Lauric acid
|
C12: 0 n-0
|
0.87
|
16.08
|
16.90
|
7.51
|
Palmitic acid
|
C16: 0 n-0
|
22.34
|
---
|
11.21
|
5.35
|
Stearic acid
|
C18: 0 n-0
|
20.46
|
6.08
|
8.01
|
2.93
|
Arachidic acid
|
C20: 0 n-0
|
4.75
|
2.51
|
1.41
|
22.90
|
Total SFA
|
---
|
48.42
|
24.67
|
37.53
|
38.69
|
Oleic acid
|
C18: 1 n-9
|
41.79
|
4.72
|
19.05
|
22.69
|
Linoleic acid
|
C18: 2 n-6
|
0.59
|
44.12
|
15.56
|
11.59
|
Linolenic acid
|
C18: 3 n-3
|
9.2
|
22.05
|
10.81
|
12.52
|
Total PUFA
|
---
|
9.79
|
66.17
|
26.37
|
24.11
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
1.64
|
14.47
|
14.09
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
1.58
|
2.57
|
0.41
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
1.22
|
---
|
---
|
Total fatty acids indeterminate
|
---
|
---
|
4.44
|
17.04
|
14.50
|
-SFA : Sarurated Fatty acids
-PUFA : Polyunsaturated Fatty acids
-UFA: Unsaturated Fatty acids
Growth performance of rats fed with the experimental diets
Growth performance of rats which are consumed the different diets differing by the kind of oil used are shown on figure 2. On this figure, it is shown a rapid growth of rats whatever the kind of oil consumed. However, this increase is higher in case of Lagenaria siceraria seeds oil consumed than the other oils which have practically the same influence on rats growth.
Evaluation of parameters in relation with diets consumption
Dry matter ingested by rats fed with diet RHDI is significantly low (p < 0.05) than that of rats fed with diet RHCL and high significantly low (p < 0.01) than that of rats fed with diet RHLS. On the other hand, dry matter calculated in case of diet RHDI consumed is high than that of rats fed with diet RHCM. Dry matter ingested by rats fed with diet RHCL is virtually the same with that of rats fed with diet RHLS.
Body weight of rats fed with the different diets are shown on table III. There is no significant difference (p > 0.05) between these values obtained on rats fed with diet RHDI, diet RHCL and diet RHCM. However, body weight of rats fed with diet RHLS is higher (p < 0.05) than body weight of rats fed with diet RHDI, diet RHCL and diet RHCM.
All the mean alimentary efficacy coefficient calcuted whatever the diet consumed are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other. Table 4 is shown the parameters in relation with diet consumed.
Viscera weight of rats fed with the different diets
Mean heart weight of rats fed with diet RHDI, diet RHCL and diet RHLS are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other. These differents mean heart weight are significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of rats fed with diet RHCM. Mean kidneys weight, mean liver weight, mean spleen weight and mean stomach weight of rats fed with the differents diets are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other. Mean lung weight of rats fed with diet RHDI, diet RHCL and diet RHCM are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other. The mean lung weight of rats fed with diet RHLS is not significantly different to that of diet RHCL. On the other hand, mean lung weight of rats fed with diet RHCM or diet RHDI are significantly low (p < 0.05) than mean lung weight of rats fed with diet RHLS. Viscera weight of rats fed with the different diets are shown on table 5.
Table 4 Parameters in relation with diet consumption
Diets
|
Dry matter ingested
(g/d)
|
Mean body weight
(g/d)
|
Mean alimentary efficacy coefficient
|
RHDI
|
0.78±0.05 a*
|
1.01 ± 0.16 a*
|
1.31 ± 0.28 a*
|
RHCL
|
1.04±0.16 aa/b/ccc
|
1.09 ± 0.15 a/bbb/c
|
1.10 ± 0.31 a / b / c
|
RHLS
|
1.18±0.03 aaa/b*
|
1.54 ± 0.09 aaa/b*
|
1.42 ± 0.31 a / b*
|
RHCM
|
0.6±0.16 aa/bbb/c*
|
1.14 ± 0.39 a/bb/c*
|
2.00 ± 0.90 a / b / c*
|
The values are shown as means ± SE.
RHDI : diet in which oil used is refined palm oil
RHCL : diet in which oil used is Citrulus lanatus oil
RHLS : diet in which oil used is Lagenaria siceraria oil
RHCM : diet in which oil used is Cucumeropsis mannii oil
* mean the comparison is made using this diet as reference
a ; b ; c = when there is no significant difference (p > 0.05) ;
aa ; bb ; cc = signifficant difference (p ≤ 0.05) ;
aaa ; bbb ; ccc = high significant difference (p ≤ 0.01) ;
aaaa ; bbbb ; cccc = very high significant difference (p≤ 0.001).
Table 5 Viscera weight of rats fed with the different diets
Diets
|
Heart
(g)
|
Kidneys
(g)
|
Liver
(g)
|
Spleen
(g)
|
Stomach
(g)
|
Lung
(g)
|
RHDI
|
0.55±0.05a*
|
0.87±0.12a*
|
5.10±0.94a*
|
0.35±0.09a*
|
1.70±0.42a*
|
0.92±0.18a*
|
RHCL
|
0.58±0.07a/b/cc
|
0.95±0.08a/b/c
|
4.91±0.72a/b/c
|
0.30±0.10a/b/c
|
1.60±0.33a/b/c
|
1.10±0.20a/b/c
|
RHLS
|
0.55±0.05a/b*
|
0.93±0.09a/b*
|
5.40±0.79a/b*
|
0.35±0.08a/b*
|
1.80±1.37a/b*
|
1.20±0.11aa/b*
|
RHCM
|
0.47±0.05aa/bb/c*
|
0.90±0.16a/b/c*
|
4.60±0.52a/b/c*
|
0.33±0.03a/b/c*
|
1.52±0.42a/b/c*
|
0.97±0.09a/bb/c*
|
The values are shown as means ± SE.
RHDI : diet in which oil used is refined palm oil
RHCL : diet in which oil used is Citrulus lanatus oil
RHLS : diet in which oil used is Lagenaria siceraria oil
RHCM : diet in which oil used is Cucumeropsis mannii oil
* mean the comparison is made using this diet as reference
a ; b ; c = when there is no significant difference (p > 0.05) ;
aa ; bb ; cc = signifficant difference (p ≤ 0.05) ;
aaa ; bbb ; ccc = high significant difference (p ≤ 0.01) ;
aaaa ; bbbb ; cccc = very high significant difference ( p≤ 0.001).
Biochemical parameters of rats fed with the differents diets
Parameter of Carbohydrate Metabolism : Glycaemia
Glycaemia of rats fed with diet RHCL, diet RHCM and diet RHLS are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to that of diet RHDI. The values of glycaemia measured in blood sample of rats fed with diet RHCL and diet RHCM are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other. On the other hand, glycaemia of rats fed with diet RHCL is significantly low (p > 0.05) compared to that of rats fed with diet RHLS (table 6).
Parameters of Nitrogen Metabolism : ureamia and creatinine
Ureamia of rats fed with the different diets are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other. Rats fed with diets RHDI, RHLS and RHCL have quantity of blood creatinine which are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other. On the other hand, rats which consumed diets RHDI and RHLS have blood creatinine which are significantly high (p ≤ 0.05) than that of rats which are consumed diet RHCM (table 6).
Parameters of Lipid Metabolism
Total cholesterol measured on blood sample of rats fed with diets RHCM and RHLS are not significantly differents (p > 0.05) to each other. On the other hand, these blood total cholesterol are significantly high (p ≤ 0.05) than that measured on rats fed with diet RHCL. But, blood sample measured on rats fed with diet RHCL is significantly low (p ≤ 0.05) than that measured on rats fed with diet RHCM (table 6).
LDL Cholesterol level observed on blood sample of rats fed with diets RHCL, RHCM and RHCL are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other. On the other hand, these LDL Cholesterol level are significantly low (p ≤ 0.01) compared to that of rats fed with diet RHCM (table 6).
HDL Cholesterol level observed on blood sample of rats fed with diets RHDI, RHLS and RHLS are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other. On the other hand, HDL Cholesterol level observed on blood sample of rats fed with diets RHCL and RHCM are significantly high (p ≤ 0.05) compared to that measured on blood sample of rats fed with diet RHDI. Concerning HDL Cholesterol measured on rats fed with diet RHCL, it is significantly high (p ≤ 0.01) compared to that of rats fed with diet RHDI (table 6).
Calculation of atherogenicity index of rats fed with diets RHLS and RHCL are not significantly different to each other. On the other hand, these values of atherogenicity index calculated are very low compared to that of rats fed with diets RHDI and RHCM. However, atherogenicity index of rats fed with diet RHDI is significantly low (p ≤ 0.05) compared to that fed with diet RHCM (table 6).
- Measurement of Blood Triglyceride
Blood triglyceride of rats fed with diets RHCL and RHLS are not significantly different (p ≥ 0.05) to each other but they are very significantly low (p≤ 0.001) compared to that obtained on rats fed with diet RHDI and die RHCM. On the other hand, blood triglyceride measured on rats fed with diets RHDI are significantly low (p ≤ 0.05) compared to that measured on rats fed with diets RHDI (table 6).
Parameters in relation with liver functioning : TGO and TGP
TGO level on blood sample of rats fed with diets RHLS and RHCM are not significantly different (p ≥ 0.05) to each other but these blood sample level are significantly low (p ≤ 0.05) compared to that fed with diet RHCM. TGO level on blood sample of rats fed with diets RHCL is not significantly different to that measured on rats fed with diet RHDI but it is very significantly high ( p ≤ 0.001) compared to TGO level of rats fed with diet RHLS (table 6).
TGP level on blood sample of rats fed with diets RHDI and RHCL are not significantly different (p ≥ 0.05) to each other. Again, TGP level on blood sample of rats fed with diets RHLS and RHCM are not significantly different (p ≥ 0.05) to each other but these blood sample level are significantly high (p ≤ 0.05) compared to that fed with diet RHDI (table 6).
Parameter of Mineral Metabolism : Blood sodium and blood calcium
Sodium level in blood sample of rats fed with diets RHCL, RHLS and RHCM are significantly high (p ≤ 0.01) compared with that of rats fed with diet RHDI. Sodium level in blood sample of rats fed with diets RHCM is significantly high (p ≤ 0.05) than that of rats fed with diet RHLS. This sodium level in blood sample of rats fed with diets RHCM is significantly high (p ≤ 0.01) than that of rats fed with diet RHCL. There is no significant difference (p > 0.05) of sodium level in blood sample between rats fed with diet RHCL and diet RHLS (table 6).
Values of calcium measured on blood sample of rats fed with the different diets are not significantlt differents (p > 0.05) to each other (table 6)
Table 6 Biochemical parameters of rats fed with the differents diets
Diets
|
Glycemia
|
Uremia
|
Creatinine
|
T.Chol
|
LDL
|
HDL
|
I.A (LDL/HDL)
|
Trigly
|
TGO
|
TGP
|
Sodium
|
Calcium
|
RHDI
|
0.78±0.31a*
|
0.17±0.02a*
|
7.3±1.1a*
|
0.96±0.12a*
|
0.57±0.07a*
|
0.12±0.02a*
|
4.75±3.5a*
|
1.41±0.05a*
|
8±3.27a*
|
2.7±1.49a*
|
93.8±4a*
|
8,43±0,0 3 a* a
|
RHCL
|
0.60±0.39a/bb/c
|
0.17±0.06 a/b/c
|
5.8±1.6a/b/c
|
0.86±0.30a/b/cc
|
0.61±0.14a/b/cc
|
0.19±0.01aaa/b/c
|
3.21±14.0aaa/b/ccc
|
1.09±0.43a/b/c
|
7.8±4.8a/bb/c
|
2.8±1.95a/bb/cc
|
109±6aaa/b/ccc
|
7.05±0.25 a/b/c
|
RHLS
|
0,99±0,12a/b*
|
0.18±0.05 a/b*
|
6.7±0.5a/b*
|
1.14±0.13aa/b*
|
0.60±0.05a/b*
|
0.19±0.04aa/b*
|
3.15±1.25aaa/b*
|
1.50±0.14a/b*
|
3.01±1.4aa/b*
|
1.03±0.5aa/b*
|
116±8aaa/b*
|
8.58±0.03a/b*
|
RHCM
|
0.75±0.27a/b/c*
|
0.18±0.01a/b/c*
|
5.5±0.9a/bb/*
|
1.22±0.03aa/b/*
|
0.84±0.02aaa/bbbc*
|
0.16±0.24aa/b/c*
|
5.25±0.08aa/bbb/c*
|
1.26±0.15a/bb/c*
|
3.45±0.2aa/b/c*
|
1.13±0.04aa/b/c*
|
128±2aaa/bb/c*
|
8.45±0.03a/b/c*
|
The values are shown as means ± SE.
RHDI : diet in which oil used is refined palm oil
RHCL : diet in which oil used is Citrulus lanatus oil
RHLS : diet in which oil used is Lagenaria siceraria oil
RHCM : diet in which oil used is Cucumeropsis mannii oil
* mean the comparison is made using this diet as reference
a ; b ; c = when there is no significant difference (p > 0.05) ;
aa ; bb ; cc = signifficant difference (p ≤ 0.05) ;
aaa ; bbb ; ccc = high significant difference (p ≤ 0.01) ;
aaaa ;bbbb ; cccc = very high significant difference ( p≤ 0.001).
Evaluation of haematoligical parameters measured on blood sample
Erythrocytic bloodline parameters
Red blood count on blood sample of rats fed with diets RHDI, RHLS and RHCM are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other. On the other hand, there are significantly high (p ≤ 0.05) compared to that of rats fed with diet RHCL (table 7).
The quantity of hemoglobin in red blood cells of rats fed with diets RHDI, RHLS and RHCM are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other. On the other hand, there are significantly high (p ≤ 0.01) compared to that of rats fed with diet RHCL (table 7).
The percentage of Red blood cells in blood sample of rats fed with diets RHDI, RHLS and RHCM are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other. On the other hand, there are significantly high (p ≤ 0.01) compared to that of rats fed with diet RHCL (table 7).
- Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)
Mean Corpuscular Volume of rats fed with diets RHDI, RHLS, RHCM and RHCL are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other (table 7).
- Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH)
Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin of rats fed with diets RHDI, RHLS, RHCM and RHCL are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other (table 7).
- Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)
Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration of rats fed with diets RHDI, RHLS, RHCM and RHCL are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other (table 7).
Leucocytic bloodline parameters
White blood cells count on blood sample of rats fed with diets RHDI, RHLS, RHCL and RHCM are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other (table 7).
The number of neutrophil in blood sample of rats fed with diets RHDI, RHLS, RHCL and RHCM are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other (table 7).
The number of neutrophil in blood sample of rats fed with diets RHDI, RHLS and RHCL are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other. On the other hand, there are significantly high (p ≤ 0.01) compared to that of rats fed with diet RHCM (table 7).
The number of monocytes in blood sample of rats fed with diets RHDI, RHLS and RHCM are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other. On the other hand, there are significantly high (p ≤ 0.01) compared to that of rats fed with diet (table 7).
The number of neutrophil in blood sample of rats fed with diets RHDI, RHLS, RHCL and RHCM are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other (table 7).
Platelet
The detailed account of platelet in blood sample of rats fed with the differents diets are not significantly different (p > 0.05) to each other (table 7).
Table 7 Hematological parameters of rats fed the various experimental diets
Parameters
|
Diet
RHDI
|
Diet
RHCL
|
Diet
RHLS
|
Diet
RHCM
|
Erythrocytic bloodline parameters |
|
|
|
|
RBC (106/mm3)
|
1.67±0.05 a*
|
1.28±0.4aa/bb/cc
|
1.73±0.09a/b*
|
1.67±0.05 a/b/c*
|
Hemoglobin (g/100ml)
|
5.51±0.44a*
|
4.35±1aa/bb/cc
|
5.63±0.38a/b*
|
5.9±0.59 a/b/c*
|
Hematocrit (%)
|
16.4±1.32 a*
|
13±3.21 aa/bb/cc
|
16.8±1,17a/b*
|
17.4±1.68 a/b/c*
|
MCV (fl)
|
96.4±4.3 a*
|
103±8.7 a/b/c
|
97.2±5.3 a/b*
|
98.2±3 a/b/c*
|
MCH (pg)
|
32±1.25 a*
|
34.4±2.8 a/b/c
|
32.4±2.42a/b*
|
33±0.9 a/b/c*
|
MCHC (g/100ml)
|
33.4±0.85 a*
|
33.5±0.1 a/b/c
|
33.5±0.33a/b*
|
33.3±0.26 a/b/c*
|
Leucocytic bloodline parameters
RBC (103/mm3)
|
0.64±0.04 a*
|
0.68±0.07 a/b/c
|
0.68±0.07a/b*
|
0.70±0.04 a/b/c*
|
Neutrophil (103/mm3)
|
33.3±12 a*
|
32.2±15.3 a/b/c
|
27±6.3 a/b*
|
24.4±8.4 a/b/c*
|
Eosinophil (103/mm3)
|
8±2 a*
|
8±0.2 a/b/ccc
|
9±2.4 a/b*
|
16±2 aaa/bbb/c*
|
Monocytes (103/mm3)
|
15.5±4.4 a*
|
8±0.21 aa/bb/cc
|
21.4±3.5 a/b*
|
29.6±2.2 a/b/c*
|
Lymphocytes (103/mm3)
|
599±44 a*
|
643±59 a/b/c
|
635±67 a/b*
|
637±58 a/b/c*
|
Platelet
Platelets (103/mm3)
|
140±32 a*
|
134±38 a/b/c
|
139±24 a/b*
|
122.5±19 a/b/c*
|
The values are shown as means ± SE of six determinations
RHDI : diet in which oil used is refined palm oil
RHCL : diet in which oil used is Citrulus lanatus oil
RHLS : diet in which oil used is Lagenaria siceraria oil
RHCM : diet in which oil used is Cucumeropsis mannii oil
* mean the comparison is made using this diet as reference
a ; b ; c = when there is no significant difference (p > 0.05) ;
aa ; bb ; cc = signifficant difference (p ≤ 0.05) ;
aaa ; bbb ; ccc = high significant difference (p ≤ 0.01) ;
aaaa ;bbbb ; cccc = very high significant difference ( p≤ 0.001).