Expression patterns of the flbC gene in the three strains
A1151, A1159, and A1280 as laboratory strains with suppressed non-homologous repair for genetic modification were deposited in FGSC. The strains CEA17, D141, and ATCC46645 were the parental strains of A1151, A1159, and A1280, respectively33. The flbC gene in strain Af293 (Afu2g13770) was searched in the draft genomes of strains CEA17 and found AFUB029400-T. Using this sequence as a reference, primers were designed to amplify the entire CDS length of the flbC gene. Amplification was attempted using the genomic DNA of the three strains as a template, and amplification products were obtained in all groups. The sequences in the CDS of the amplified products were checked for point mutations and were found to be completely homologous in all three strains, suggesting that there is probably no difference in the amino acid sequence of the FlbC protein produced in the three strains. Next, to compare the expression patterns of the flbC gene in the three strains, RNA was extracted from spores and mycelia obtained at different incubation times, and the relative amounts of flbC gene transcripts were quantified over time. The flbC gene transcript was not amplified immediately after the start of incubation, when almost all spores formed buds, but was detected after approximately 8 h and reached peak expression in all three strains after 16 h (Fig. 1). Thereafter, a gradual downward trend was observed in A1151 and A1280, followed by a slight increase in A1159 at 72 h. These trends are consistent with previous research, in which the flbC transcript levels in A. nidulans during vegetative growth peaked at approximately 18–24 h and decreased thereafter34. However, some heterogeneity appeared among the three strains, with expression ratios of approximately 3-fold in A1151, 4-fold in A1159, and 9-fold in A1280 at 16 h. In summary, the flbC gene appears to reach peak expression level approximately 16 h after the start of culture, that is, at the same time as peak mycelial growth. Comparison of three representative laboratory strains suggested that the CDS internal sequence of the flbC gene and the timing of the maximum expression level were generally the same, but the range of expression changes was slightly different. These results suggest that the differences among strains in the range of expression changes are dependent on differences in upstream expression of flbC.
Effect of flbC expression heterogeneity on strain phenotype
To investigate the effect of heterogeneity in the flbC expression pattern on the phenotype of the three laboratory strains, we produced flbC gene disruption mutant strains (ΔflbC) in each background. Because the internal sequence of flbC was exactly the same, we planned highly efficient gene disruption using the CRISPR-Cas9 method with the PAM sequence common to the three strains. The ΔflbCs were generated by inducing double-strand breaks via Cas9 (CRISPR#1, 2) binding, followed by insertion of pyrithiamine resistance gene markers through homologous recombination, using each of the three strains as parent (Fig. 2a, b). ΔflbCs were slightly reduced at radial growth circle than the parental strains (WT) on MM at 37°C (Fig. 2c). The three WT strains grew differentially under these conditions, with the A1280 strain growing slightly weaker on day 3 or earlier than the other two. The radial growth of the flbC gene-deficient strain was almost identical to this trend. Notably, when grown with the cell wall effector Congo red, A1280 showed weaker growth among the WT strains; however, growth was restored by flbC gene deletion (Fig. 2d). This was in contrast to A1151 and A1159, whose growth was suppressed by Congo red treatment. These findings suggest that the differences in the growth phenotypes observed in the three laboratory strains may be due to the function of the flbC gene.
Effect of flbC expression patterns on brlA expression
BrlA, which plays a central- and entry point- role in the central developmental pathway, is regulated by FlbC transcription factor30,34. To investigate how different expression patterns of the flbC gene affect the brlA expression, we measured brlA transcript over time in WT and ΔflbC of the three laboratory strains. WT of the A1151 and A1159-background reached peak mRNA expression at 16–24 h, with an approximate 3- to 4-fold increase than the expression at 4 h, whereas this increase was suppressed in the ΔflbC (Fig. 3, upper and middle panel). In contrast, the WT of A1280-background showed little increase in brlA gene expression until 48 h after the start of incubation, and ΔflbC in the A1280-background also showed little change in brlA gene expression (Fig. 3, bottom panel). In summary, brlA gene expression level in WT of A1151 and A1159 peaked at 16–24 h, whereas this peak was removed by flbC gene deletion. In contrast, A1280 showed a flat expression up to 48 h in brlA gene expression in both WT and ΔflbC rather than a peak-like pattern. These results suggest that the brlA gene expression pattern is different among the three laboratory strains and that there is heterogeneity in the regulatory role of the flbC gene on brlA gene expression.
Effect of flbC gene on the heterogeneity of secondary metabolite production
To investigate the effect of the flbC gene on the heterogeneity of secondary metabolite production, we measured the fumagillin-production capacity of these strains. Remarkably, given that previous studies have shown the loss of fumagillin-producing capacity in several A. fumigatus strains15, all three WT strains produced fumagillin (Fig. 4). The effect of flbC gene deletion on fumagillin production was tripartite: in A1151, fumagillin production was below the detection limit due to flbC gene deletion; in A1159, fumagillin production was reduced but not eliminated due to flbC gene deletion; and A1280 produced sufficient amount of fumagillin in both WT and ΔflbC, with little difference in production level (Fig. 4). These results indicate that although all three laboratory strains are capable of producing fumagillin, there is heterogeneity in the effects of the flbC gene deletion. To investigate whether the heterogeneity in producing fumagillin is dependent on differences in the expression levels of the genes responsible for fumagillin biosynthesis, we measured the transcripts belonging to fma gene family involved in the fumagillin gene cluster (fma-TC / fmaA, fma-P450 / fmaG, fma-C6H / fmaF, fma-AT / fmaC, and fma-ABM / fmaE) and those not involved in fumagillin biosynthesis but located within the gene cluster (Afu8g00430, Afu8g00440 / psoF and Afu8g00500). In A1151-background, the expression levels of many fumagillin biosynthesis-related genes, including fma-TC / fmaA, fma-P450 / fmaG, fma-C6H / fmaF, and fma-AT / fmaC, were significantly reduced in ΔflbC than those in WT (Fig. 5a). Some genes not involved in fumagillin biosynthesis were also downregulated (Fig. 5b). A comparison of the A1159 background strains showed the same trend, except for fma-AT / fmaC (Fig. 5a). In contrast, comparisons of A1280 background strains showed significant differences in the reduced expression of fma-TC / fmaA and fma-C6H / fmaF, but the extent of the reduction was weaker than that in A1151 and A1159, and differences in the expression of other fma genes was not significant (Fig. 5a). In summary, in the ΔflbC of A1151 and A1159 backgrounds, the expression of the fma gene family was generally and coordinately suppressed, consistent with the reduced fumagillin production, while in A1280, where flbC gene deletion did not result in reduced fumagillin production, the degree of suppression of fma gene family expression was weaker than in the other two strain. Thus, the heterogeneity in the three laboratory strains between the WT and ΔflbC with regard to fumagillin production may be dependent on differences in the expression levels of the fma gene family and probably correlates with the degree of hetero-chromatinization of the fumagillin gene cluster.
Expression of the upstream transcription factors laeA and fapR
The production of secondary metabolites requires the coordinated action of global and cluster-specific transcription factors. In the case of fumagillin, the transcriptional activation of biosynthetic genes is achieved by the histone methyltransferase LaeA, which acts as a global transcription factor, and FapR, which acts as a cluster-specific transcription factor. The fapR gene is located within the fumagillin gene cluster, and production of the FapR transcription factor is initiated by the release of heterochromatin from the cluster by LaeA. To determine whether there are differences in the upstream gene of the fma gene family, we measured the expression levels of laeA and fapR genes in the A1151 and A1280 backgrounds between WTs and ΔflbCs, which had contrasting difference in the fumagillin production. In the A1151-background strains, laeA gene expression peaked after 16–24 h and then decreased in the WT, whereas the peak was delayed to 48–72 h in the ΔflbC (Fig. 6a, left panel). In contrast, in A1280, the expression of the laeA gene peaked at 16 h in the WT as same as that in A1151, while the ΔflbC showed a similar pattern to that of the WT (Fig. 6a, right panel). The fapR gene showed reduced gene expression at 16–24 h in the ΔflbC than that in the WT of the A1151 background (Fig. 6b, left panel), while there was no significant difference in expression levels at 24 h in the A1280 background (Fig. 6b, right panel). In summary, in the A1151 background strain, the flbC gene deletion resulted in delayed expression of the laeA gene and suppressed the expression of fapR, but not in the A1280 background. These results indicate that the heterogeneity in fumagillin production between strains A1151 and A1280 may be due to the different levels of transcriptional activation of FapR and LaeA. More specifically, this suggests a dependence on different direct or indirect interactions between flbC and genes regulating the expression of the fumagillin gene cluster, such as laeA and fapR.
Effect of heterogeneities on virulence
The analysis of the three laboratory strains shows that the deletion of the flbC gene may create new heterogeneity or reduce that which was present originally. To estimate the effects of these heterogeneities on virulence, a pathogenicity test was conducted on silkworms. We found that the deletion of the flbC gene probably does not contribute to silkworm-pathogenicity of the strains because there was no significant difference in the survival among WT and ΔflbC of any background (Fig. 7). Deletion of the flbC gene reduced the growth of the laboratory strains on MM and showed differences in the production of the mycotoxin fumagillin; however, these differences were not observed in the pathogenicity test.