Cotton, known as the "King" of fibre crops, is a significant kharif crop. In terms of both botanical variety and fibre quality, the Indian cotton crop stands out as the most diverse globally. According to the Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare in New Delhi, the estimated cotton production in India for the period of 2022-23 is 323.11 lakh bales of 170 kg each, grown across 124.69 lakh hectares of land, with a productivity of 441 kg lint per hectare (Anon. 2024). Three species of Gossypium, namely hirsutum, arboreum, and herbaceum, are commercially cultivated in India, contributing to the cotton trade and industrial consumption. Globally, the ELS (Extra Long Staple) cotton is primarily contributed by the
G. barbadense species. However, in India, both G. barbadense and hybrids between G. hirsutum and
G. barbadense are responsible for the production of ELS cotton. The ELS category is particularly sought worldwide for the production of superior ring spun yarns, with a length of 35 mm or more. Due to its notable attributes such as high length, strength, and micronaire, it is favoured for the manufacturing of high-quality ring-spun yarns. However, unlike the other three cultivated species, G. barbadense is highly vulnerable to diseases and pests.
Cotton productivity is hindered by various bacterial, fungal and viral diseases. Among the viral diseases that affect cotton, Cotton Leaf Curl Virus (CLCuV) and Tobacco Streak Virus (TSV) hold significance. The most devastating one is necrosis disease caused by Tobacco Streak Virus (TSV). TSV, which was initially described by Johnson in 1936, belongs to the Ilarvirus genus of the Bromoviridae family. It exhibits quasiisometric particles measuring 27 to 35 nm in size (Fauquet et al., 2005). TSV has a broad range of hosts, infecting over 200 plant species across 30 dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plant families (Fulton, 1985; EPPO, 2005). TSV has been documented in over 26 countries globally (EPPO, 2005). In India, TSV was first identified in sunflower affected by sunflower necrosis disease (SND) and groundnut affected by peanut stem necrosis disease (PSND) in Andhra Pradesh (Prasada Rao et al., 2000; Reddy et al., 2002). Since its initial discovery, the virus has been found to cause significant damage to groundnut, sunflower and diverse annual crops in in Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra, and Tamil Nadu (Kumar et al., 2006; Jain et al., 2008). Despite its global prevalence, the virus is not known to trigger destructive epidemics on the scale witnessed in India (Prasada Rao et al., 2000) and more recently in Australia (Report, 2006; Sharman et al., 2008). Common symptoms of TSV include leaf chlorosis, necrosis, streaks on stems and floral parts, leading to stunted growth. TSV can cause premature death in seedlings and often goes unnoticed in weed hosts like parthenium, which show no symptoms. During the SND/TSV epidemics, extensive yield losses primarily resulted from the premature death of plants. In 2005, a TSV outbreak affected around 20,000 hectares of cotton fields in Khammam and Warangal districts of Andhra Pradesh (Kumar and Prasada Rao, unpublished data). These observations emphasize the need for a careful evaluation of cotton disorders associated with TSV. Prasada Rao et al., (2009) described TSV infection in cotton fields, characterized by chlorotic and necrotic lesions on leaves, accompanied by leaf purpling, necrotic buds and drying of young bolls. The incidence of the disease was higher in Bt cultivars compared to non-Bt cultivars. Over the past five years, the necrosis disease caused by TSV has been frequently documented in cotton-growing regions of India. Jagtap et al., (2012) conducted a study on the host range and transmission of TSV, which leads to the development of cotton mosaic disease.
The occurrence, host range and symptom expression of TSV in cotton-growing areas of Tamil Nadu were reported by Rageshwari et al., (2016). The disease was observed in Dharmapuri, Perambalur, and Salem districts in 2010, with an incidence ranging from 12.6–38.8%. This disease has been known to cause a maximum yield loss of 60–65%. Vinodkumar et al., (2017) reported that the surveyed locations in central and southern states of India, Telangana had the highest incidence of TSV of 51.11% in hybrid RCH659. Valarmathi and Dhamayanthi, (2020a) studied the distribution of TSV in the ELS germplasm of G. barbadense in Coimbatore over a period of two-year from 2017 to 2019. The percentage of disease incidence varied from 5.81% (DB 3, DB 25) to 26.60% (ICB 71). In recent years, TSV has caused panic among farmers in Kurnool and Nandyal districts of Andhra Pradesh, affecting approximately 10–15% of the cotton crop (Anonymous, 2022a). Survey conducted in cotton-growing districts, namely Guntur, Krishna and Kurnool, recorded incidences of TSV in different hybrids ranging from 0–30.0% in farmers' fields (Anonymous, 2023).
TSV primarily spreads through pollen, with thrips assisting in its transmission (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and can also be experimentally transmitted through mechanical sap inoculation, grafting and the dodder plant (Cuscuta campestris). However, it is not transmitted through contact or soil (Fulton, 1985). The symptoms resulting from TSV infection in cotton plants closely resemble physiological or nutritional disorders and herbicide phytotoxicity, making it challenging to differentiate them. Therefore, the detection of TSV in cotton requires special attention. For TSV diagnosis, confirmatory testing using serological or nucleic acid-based diagnostic assays is essential. Polyclonal antibodies raised against TSV have been employed for virus detection through immunosorbent electron microscopy (ISEM) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Reddy et al., 2002). Serological assays using double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) have shown the presence of TSV in various parts of the cotton plant, including leaves, squares, stems, roots, petioles, and pollen grains of G. barbadense germplasm and advanced generations. Among these, leaf samples exhibited the highest absorbance, followed by petioles and squares in terms of TSV detection (Valarmathi and Dhamayanthi, 2020b).
In India, TSV isolates were found to be serologically related and the antiserum raised against one isolate could be effectively used for detecting other isolates. Detection of TSV was also carried out using the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay (Bhat et al., 2002; Reddy et al., 2002). Molecular confirmation and serological assays using Direct Antigen Coating-ELISA were conducted on the CO 14 cotton variety, as confirmed by Rageshwari et al., (2017). Gawande et al., (2019) for the first time optimized the protocol for rapid diagnosis of infected cotton samples using Reverse Transcription-Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification (RT-LAMP). The combined role of Thrips palmi and Parthenium pollen grains in TSV transmission was studied, revealing that thrips facilitate the movement of TSV-infected pollen grains, thereby contributing to the active spread of the virus in cotton (Shanmuga Prema et al., 2020).
The most cost-effective and practical approach to managing TSV is through the cultivation of resistant varieties. However, resistance to TSV has not been identified in cultivated species in India. For example, a study evaluating 150 groundnut cultivars and advanced breeding lines found them to be susceptible to TSV (Kalyani et al., 2005). Similarly, a large number of sunflower germplasm evaluated under field conditions in Andhra Pradesh at the Regional Agricultural Research Station in Nandyal were also found to be susceptible to TSV (Jain et al., 2008). Nevertheless, variations in symptom expression were observed among different genotypes of groundnut and sunflower, indicating that not all cultivars are equally susceptible to TSV. Ahmed et al., (2005) investigated the natural occurrence of TSV in cotton in Pakistan and screened for resistant sources. Screening germplasm to identify resistant sources is an essential step towards addressing the challenges posed by this hazardous virus. Such screening can be utilized in breeding programs to develop TSV-tolerant or resistant cotton varieties. Since the existing literature suggests the lack of any known resistance sources for TSV in ELS cotton, the present study primarily focuses on field evaluation of G. barbadense germplasm to identify resistance against TSV.