Air drying does not provide stability to VSV; Freeze drying with trehalose alone does not stabilize, but pullulan and trehalose provides improved protection
To the best of our knowledge, the best thermal stability data published to date demonstrated a 4-log decrease in VSV titer after spray drying and thermal treatment at 37oC for 7 days when formulated with trehalose [23] Previous work demonstrated thermal stability of viral vaccines by air drying with pullulan and trehalose [22]. To assess if the air-dried methodology (Table S1) could stabilize VSV, we formulated the virus in two different formulations and tested process loss and thermal stability at 37oC (fig S1). The formulation utilized in Leung et al. (Table 1; formulation F1) had complete loss of titer during the drying process, and formulation F2 had high process loss of 1.78 ± 0.04 Log PFU. After 14-day incubation at 37oC, a total PFU loss for VSV in F2 was 3.5 ± 0.17 log, making it clear air drying was not a viable strategy for stabilizing VSV.
Our next experiment was to understand if a standard freeze-drying schedule (Table S1) with formulation F3 or trehalose alone (F4) could outperform the published data (Fig. 1). Visual observation of the dried film revealed F2, and F5 films had cake-like appearances, whereas F3 (higher concentration of pullulan and trehalose) and F4 led to a collapsed cake structure (Fig. 1A). For the three formulations with pullulan and trehalose, no significant difference was observed for process loss, and total log titer loss after 7 days at 37oC (Fig. 1B). Interestingly, trehalose alone (F4) performed the worst, with the highest process loss and a complete loss of detectable plaques after 7 days at 37oC. Despite the improvement of 1 log titer in stability of the freeze dry methodology after 7 days at 37oC relative to spray drying, we did not view ~ 3 log titer loss of formulated VSV as acceptable, and therefore transitioned to exploring vacuum drying methodologies for further process improvement.
Vacuum Drying at 25 o C has high process loss with formulation F7, but no thermal stability loss over 14-day incubation at 37 o C
Unlike freeze drying, vacuum drying does not induce stresses such as freezing and/or ice crystals potentially damaging the VSV lipid membrane. We next assessed if drying VSV in formulation F7/F8 at room temperature with a vacuum pump could improve process loss and thermal stabilization (Fig. 2). Samples were dried for 48 hours at room temperature under a vacuum pressure of 1e− 4 mBar (Table S1). Visual observation of VSV dried in pullulan and/or trehalose (F7/F8) had a bubbly foam architecture, whereas VSV dried in buffer alone (F6) did not yield a film (Fig. 2A). All three conditions had significant process loss of VSV titer due to drying, with formulation F6 providing no recoverable plaques after 7 days incubated at 37oC (Fig. 2B/C). Interestingly, both F7 and F8 films did not show significant additional thermal challenge loss over two weeks at 37oC. This observation of VSV being thermally stable once dried in a film led us to explore different mechanisms to improve the drying process with additional excipients and improvements to the drying schedule.
Addition of serum albumin significantly improves stability of VSV in a lot-to-lot dependent manner
Several experiments were conducted testing different pH’s (6.8–8.1), concentration of Tris buffer (between 10-50mM), and excipients including hydroxyectoine, ectoine, β-cyclodextran, PEG 200, PEG 4000, PEG 6000, Histidine, Glutamic acid, and increased gelatin concentrations with no improvement in VSV stabilization. We also observed no difference in process loss or thermal stability of vacuum dried VSV between 24 and 48 hr dry schedules.
We observed the addition of serum albumin, specifically bovine serum albumin (BSA), improved stability of VSV in a lot-to-lot dependent manner (Fig. 3). Two different lots of purified VSV had significantly different total protein content as determined by Bradford assay both pre and post dialysis into the formulation buffer despite no significant difference in the titer of the viral stock (3e10 vs 4e10 PFU/mL; Fig. 3A). We hypothesize the difference is due to cell culture carryover from the purification protocol. Analysis of the process loss of the conditions tested revealed VSV lot 1 (low total protein) had significantly more process loss in the absence of BSA (F9) compared to the addition of 0.5% (Fig. 3B). VSV lot 2 (high total protein) showed no difference in process loss with (F10) or without BSA (F9). For the samples with the two lots mixed at a 1:1 ratio, no significant difference was observed between formulation F9 and F10 for process loss. After 18 days incubation at 37oC, the VSV lot 1 samples had ~ 2 log difference between +/- BSA, the Lot 2 samples had no difference, and the mixed group was improved by ~ 0.7 logs with the addition of BSA. VSV manufactured in GMP processes are typically done in FBS-free conditions, resulting in less protein carryover during the purification of the viral vector. These results led to the conclusion that the addition of serum albumin, and in this case BSA, improves stability of VSV in low total protein conditions.
.
Long term stability of VSV in F2 formulation at 37 o C demonstrates stable titer after initial loss
To determine the long-term thermal stability of the F2 formulation for VSV, we employed an AdVantage Pro drying system for greater control of the foam drying schedule. As described in previous literature, most viral vectors are formulated and dried with sorbitol and gelatin, which we employed as a control formulation [24]. Samples were dried for 24 hours at 25oC at a pressure of 16 uBar, manually stoppered and crimped (Fig. 4). F2 formulation dried samples were observed to be a bubbly film, whereas the gelatin/sorbitol samples were a flatter and more uniform glassy film (Fig. 4A). Both formulations had similar process loss (Fig. 4B/C). After 1 week incubation at 37oC, no viable VSV plaques were observed for the F11 samples and were confirmed for week 2 and 4 samples. Conversely, F2 samples showed a total log loss of 2.2 for 1 and 2-week samples, and 3.0 ± 0.19 log loss at 4 weeks at 37oC. Interestingly, we observed from weeks 4 to 27 a smaller additional log loss of VSV titer, resulting in a total loss at 27 weeks of 4.27 ± 0.07 log VSV at 37oC. Modelling of the VSV in formulation F2 with a one phase decay non-linear regression model results in a R2 value of 0.94 and a 95% confidence interval of the plateau between 3.84–4.60 log PFU loss. These data suggest the trehalose and pullulan-based formulations, once stable, have limited additional loss of VSV titer.
Two stage temperature drying schedule improves process loss and short-term stability at 37oC
We next sought to improve the drying schedule of foam drying the PT formulation to improve VSV stability. Several different drying schedules were assayed and compared with the F2 formulated VSV (Fig S2). Of the conditions tested, the two worst total log loss by day 14 were the freeze dry schedule and drying for 24 hours at 4oC under 16 µBar pressure. The schedule that had the least amount of process loss was a 24-hour dry schedule (Table S1). Comparable total log losses were observed with alternative schedules, but we decided to continue optimizing the VSV stability work with the 4/25oC schedule due to the lowest observed process loss.
Long-term stability with 4/25 o C dry schedule has less titer loss with Formulation F2 compared to drying at 25 o C alone at 37 o C thermal challenge; significantly less PFU loss at 4 o C
Using the optimized drying schedule, we assayed the long-term stability for 32 weeks of our formulations at 4oC, 25oC, and 37oC (Fig. 5). We compared two formulations, F2 and F12, dried over 24 hours with 4/25oC dry schedule which were manually stoppered and crimped (Fig. 5A). Both formulations had comparable process losses and both statistically lower than F2 dried with 25oC alone dry schedule (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002 respectively). For the thermal stability test at 4oC (Fig. 5B), the titer loss for both formulations increased to 1.23 ± 0.07 by 8 weeks, and at the end of 32 weeks we observed total titer loss for F2 of 1.82 ± 0.13 log and for F12 of 1.93 ± 0.18 log (P = 0.29). Modelling with a one phase decay non-linear regression model results in a R2 value of 0.93 for both F2 and F11. The calculated plateau for each formulation at 4oC was 1.87 and 2.12 log PFU loss for F2 and F11 respectively.
For samples incubated at 25oC (Fig. 5C), both formulations had significant titer loss up to week 8 with F2 outperforming F12 for total PFU loss (P = 0.0021). Interestingly, for both formulations only a slight increase in loss was observed between week 8 and week 32 samples. At the conclusion of the experiment at 25oC, a total loss was observed for F2 was less than the loss observed for formulation F12 (P = 0.0001). Modelling with a one phase decay non-linear regression model results in a R2 value of 0.94 for F2 and 0.98 for F11. The calculated plateau for each formulation at 25oC was 2.40 and 3.00 log PFU for F2 and F11 respectively.
A similar trend occurred for samples incubated at 37oC (Fig. 5D). By 8 weeks, the F2 formulation total PFU loss was 2.88 ± 0.10 log and F12 was 3.33 ± 0.28 log, with the F2 dried with 4/25oC outperforming both the F12 formulation and F2 dried at 25oC (P = 0.0012 and P = 0.0018 respectively). After 32 weeks at 37oC, the F2 formulation total loss was 3.13 ± 0.10 log but significantly more loss was observed for F12 (4.20 ± 0.16 log; P < 0.0001). For the 25oC dry schedule, formulation F2 total log loss was 4.3 ± 0.07 at week 27, like the loss observed for F12 at 32 weeks. Modelling with a one phase decay non-linear regression model results in an R2 value of 0.96 for F2 and 0.88 for F11. The calculated plateau for each formulation at 37oC was 2.94 and 3.69 log PFU for F2 and F11 respectively. The calculated plateau for F11 was significantly less log loss compared to the data collected, suggesting additional factors may be involved resulting in greater VSV titer loss in this formulation.
Overall, no significant difference was observed between the two formulation’s stability time course at 4oC, but the F2 outperformed the F12 at 25oC and 37oC with the 4/25oC dry schedule as well as outperforming the 25oC only dry schedule.
Backfilling vials of dried formulation F2 with dry Nitrogen gas causes crystallization to occur in film decreasing viability of VSV
For commercial dried products, it is commonplace to backfill samples with an inert gas like nitrogen to improve stability by reducing chemical instabilities [6]. Over several experimental tests with nitrogen backfilling, we had significantly greater loss of VSV titer compared to the data demonstrated in both Fig. 4 and Fig. 5. To understand if the nitrogen backfilling was affecting the structure of the dried film, XRD analysis was performed on a thermal treated time course at 37oC (Fig. 6). All conditions assayed were completely amorphous on day 0 before incubation at 37oC (Fig S3). After 7 days incubations we detected 2.2% crystallinity in the F2 films when backfilled with nitrogen gas, but no crystallinity when backfilled with atmospheric air. The crystallinity percentage decreased by 14 days incubation to 0.6% in the nitrogen filled vials. According to the XRD trace profiles, we hypothesized calcium sulfate crystals are the causative material for the observed crystallinity. Samples comprised of formulation F13 were completely amorphous for the time course independent of backfilling gas. An interesting observation of samples with UV inactivated VSV had a constant lower crystallinity from Day 0 to Day 14 of the experiment (~ 0.2%) in the F2 formulation with nitrogen backfilling but completely amorphous with F13. These results led to the conclusion in the absence of moisture in the headspace gas, crystallization can occur with the ions present in the formulation, and this stress decreases the stability of VSV.
Nitrogen backfilled vials with formulation F13 improves serum free manufactured VSV stability over atmospheric backfilled formulation F2 modestly at 4 o C and significantly at 25 o C and 37 o C.
To determine if a combination of nitrogen backfilled vials and removing all ions from the formulation would improve the VSV stability, we dried two formulations, F2 and F13 with the 4/25oC dry schedule and backfilled with dried Nitrogen gas (Fig. 7). For this experiment, VSV was manufactured in a serum free media to simulate a GMP process [25]. Both dried formulations had a similar bubbly dried appearance (Fig. 7A) characteristic of a foam dried material. Both formulations had nearly identical process loss. After a 20-week incubation period, differences were observed between the formulations dependent on the incubation temperature. At 4oC, no statistical difference in titer loss was observed between the nitrogen backfilled F13 and F2 as well as the atmospheric backfilled F2 (one-way ANOVA; P = 0.67). Modelling with a one phase decay non-linear regression model results in an R2 value of 0.91 for F13 and 0.98 for 2. The calculated plateau for each formulation at 4oC was different, with a predicted 1.29 log PFU loss for F13, and 2.46 log PFU loss for F2. Samples incubated at 25oC demonstrated nitrogen backfilled F13 and atmosphere backfilled F2 statistically outperformed nitrogen backfilled F2, but no difference between the two conditions (one-way ANOVA; P = 0.0008, P = 0.008, and P = 0.99 respectively). Modelling with a one phase decay non-linear regression model results in an R2 value of 0.91 for F2 and 0.92 for F13. The calculated plateau for each formulation at 25oC was 3.10 log PFU loss for F2, and 2.38 log PFU loss for F13. However, at 37oC, the best performing formulation after 20-week incubation was the atmosphere backfilled F2 compared to nitrogen backfilled F13 and nitrogen backfilled F2 which did not have any detectable PFU (one-way ANOVA P < 0.0001). Modelling with a one phase decay non-linear regression model results in a R2 value of 0.96 for F2 and for F13. The calculated plateau for each formulation at 37oC was not able to be calculated for F2 and was 3.91 log PFU loss for F13. Overall, these data demonstrate that similar levels of stability can be achieved with nitrogen backfilling of F13 formulation to the atmospherically filled F2 formulation at 4oC and 25oC, but atmosphere backfilled formulation F2 outperforms nitrogen backfilled F13 at 37oC.