Transforming Co3O4 into the inverse spinel by Ga3+ substitution
To implement the desired octahedral environment, we aimed to synthesize Co-based oxides with an inverse spinel crystal structure (Scheme 1).
We reasoned that incorporating a Group III metal could act as an inductor to preferentially occupy the tetrahedral sites, leaving Co2+ to reside in the desired octahedral sites9. We synthesized CoGa hydroxide precursor with different concentrations of Ga3+ using a co-precipitation method and then annealed the precursor in air at 450 oC for 1 hour to yield CoxGa(3−x)O4.
An initial oxygen evolution reaction (OER) activity evaluation of Co-spinel oxides with different Co to Ga ratios was performed. The results in Supplementary Fig. 1 indicate a volcano-shaped trend in OER activity as a function of increasing Ga percentage, with Co1.8Ga1.2O4 exhibiting the highest activity. We then investigated the structural and morphological characteristics of Co1.8Ga1.2O4. X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern and refinement in Fig. 1a show that Co1.8Ga1.2O4 has a well-ordered cubic spinel crystal structure, with each diffraction peak located between the corresponding peak of Co3O4 (#65-3103) and CoGa2O4 (#11–0689). The lattice parameter of Co1.8Ga1.2O4 (8.21 Å) also falls between those of Co3O4 (8.0837 Å) and CoGa2O4 (8.3250 Å), confirming a structural transformation from Co3O4 to CoGa2O4 upon Ga3+ substitution. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image in Fig. 1b exhibits the lattice fringe of Co1.8Ga1.2O4, with a 0.245 nm fringe corresponding to the (311) facet, which is also the dominant exposed facet.
Raman spectroscopy was used to reveal the site occupancy change after Ga3+ substitution. The results in Fig. 1c show that the introduction of Ga3+ neither forms Ga2O3 nor brings additional peaks to the Raman spectra of Co-based spinel. However, the peak corresponding to the octahedral site in the spinel structure at 680 cm− 1 undergoes a red shift upon the introduction of Ga3 + 10, which can be attributed to the site transformation of Co2+ with a larger ionic radius compared to Co3+, indicating minor lattice expansion11. As we increase the Ga3+ dopant concentration, the tetrahedron peak (at ~ 205 cm− 1) shifts to higher wavenumbers, suggesting that the smaller Ga3+ preferentially occupy the tetrahedral sites, leading to lattice shrinkage12.
Soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy (sXAS) was conducted to ascertain the Co site occupancy transformation by comparing the Co L-edge spectra for different Co-based materials. A peak centered at 776.1 eV is present only in Co1.8Ga1.2O4, a feature that indicates the occupation of Co2+ at the octahedron site, akin to Co(OH)2 and CoO13–15. The spin state of the mixed Co1.8Ga1.2O4 spinel, revealed by analyzing the branching ratio L3/(L2 + L3) from Fig. 1d, confirms a higher spin state, which is positively correlated with the increased number of unpaired electrons (Supplementary Fig. 2) and potentially high redox activity in Co1.8Ga1.2O416,17. We find a higher average coordination number for Co of 5.6 in the case of Co1.8Ga1.2O4 compared to 5.3 in the case of Co3O4 normal spinel (K-edge in Fig. 1e and 1f). Furthermore, the Cooh-Cooh distance in Co1.8Ga1.2O4 falls between those of Co3O4 and CoO, consistent with Co2 + Oh-Co3 + Oh. Additionally, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Supplementary Fig. 3) reveals that the peak at 780.2 eV assigned to Co3+ diminishes as the Ga3+ ratio increases, while the peak at 782.2 eV assigned to Co2+ intensifies. This again indicates the partial replacement of Co3+ ions by Ga3+ ions at the octahedral sites.
In sum, Raman, sXAS, and XPS data collectively indicate a mixed CoGa spinel structure, where partial Co2+ transfers from tetrahedral sites to octahedral sites upon Ga3+ substitution.
Electrochemical investigations and performance
To investigate whether electrochemical behavior provides evidence of the structural transformations noted above, we used linear sweep voltammetry to analysis the Co site transformation in CoxGa(3−x)Oy in comparison to Co(OH)2 and Co3O4. The oxidation peaks at 1.1, 1.4, and 1.6 V (vs RHE) (Fig. 2a) are attributed to CoOh2+/3+, CoTd2+/3+, and CoOh3+/4+, respectively18. With increased Ga3+, the oxidation of CoOh3+/4+ shifts cathodically, consistent with electron transfer from Ga3+ to CoOh3+, a shift that produces electron-rich and easily oxidized CoOh3+ 19. The oxidation peak of CoTd2+ also shifts cathodically and becomes closer to the CoOh2+/3+ oxidation peak in Co(OH)2, which can be possibly attributed to the more exposed Co2+ in octahedral sites.
The lowest OER overpotential observed at a current density of 10 mA/cm2, corrected for iR drop and normalized by electrochemical surface area (ECSA data is shown in Supplementary Fig. 4), is 310 mV (Fig. 2b). This lowest overpotential was achieved at 30% of Co2+ occupied octahedral sites, corresponding to Co1.8Ga1.2O4. The integrated formula for this mixed spinel is (Co2 + 0.4Ga3+0.6)[Co2 + 0.6Co3+0.8Ga3+0.6] (note that only half of the total Ga3+ will occupy the tetrahedral site8). The best-performing Co1.8Ga1.2O4 also has a lower Tafel slope (57 mV/dec compared to 106 mV/dec, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 5) and a smaller charge transfer resistance than Co3O4 (Supplementary Fig. 6).
The OER stability (Fig. 2c) is significantly improved in Co1.8Ga1.2O4 compared to Co3O4. Co1.8Ga1.2O4 operates at 200 mA/cm2 for 200 hours, whereas Co3O4 normal spinel operates only at 50 mA/cm2 for 20 hours before exhibiting noticeable decay in OER performance. Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) results in Supplementary Fig. 7 compare the dissolution amount of Co in normal and mixed spinel under the same working conditions, showing that Co in Co1.8Ga1.2O4 dissolves at 1/6 the rate of Co3O4. Post-mortem characterization shows that the crystal structure, morphology and valence state of the Co1.8Ga1.2O4 inverse spinel are well-maintained (Supplementary Fig. 8). Compared to previous reports of PGM-free acidic OER electrocatalysts, Co1.8Ga1.2O4 exhibits a union of low overpotential at 10 mA/cm2 and superior stability when considering both test time and current density6,20–31 (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Table 1).
When incorporated into the proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) system (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 9), Co1.8Ga1.2O4 operates stably for 200 mA/cm2 for 450 h, while Co3O4 fails to operate after 25 hours. We sought to deconstruct the contributions to voltage from kinetics, ohmic loss, and mass transfer in the PEMWE system (Fig. 2g-2h) and investigate these components before vs. after a 12-hour runtime at 200 mA/cm2. We found that both the kinetics and mass transfer overpotential show a negligible increase over this timeframe for both the reference and Co1.8Ga1.2O4 inverse spinel catalysts, while the ohmic overpotential is significantly increased following operation in the case of the reference catalyst.
Taking into account the fast dissolution of Co from Co3O4 normal spinel, we propose that the dissolved Co ions, which can be adsorbed to the proton exchange membrane by electrostatic force between the cathode and metal cations and serve as the inhibitor to proton transfer, is the driving force of the increased ohmic overpotential. The removal of the increased ohmic overpotential by acid wash (Fig. 2i) confirms that Co3O4 suffered from this effect. In contrast, with Co1.8Ga1.2O4, PEMWE exhibits consistent performance (Fig. 2j), and thus sees no benefit from acid wash, underscoring the critical role of stability of Co1.8Ga1.2O4 against dissolution in maintaining the functionality of PEMWE.
Mechanistic study of Co-based metal oxide catalysts
The volcano shape of OER activity as a function of octahedrally-coordinated Co2+ mentioned above (Supplementary Fig. 3) prompts us to further investigate the origin of the optimal Co2+:Co3+ ratio.
We used in situ Raman spectroscopy to study OER intermediates. After background removal, Co-O vibration peaks at 210, 488, 520, and 685 cm− 1, and peaks corresponding to H2SO4 at 980 cm− 1 (S-O signal) are present across the applied potentials. When we increase the anodic potential to 1.35 V (vs RHE), two additional peaks centered at 926 and 1067 cm− 1, corresponding to µ-OO peroxide (Co-OO-Co) and superoxide intermediates20, appear in the Co1.8Ga1.2O4 inverse spinel; while these features are absent in Co3O4 (Fig. 3a and 3b). This suggests a dual OER active site involvement in Co1.8Ga1.2O4, wherein water deprotonation occurs on adjacent Co sites, enabling O-O radical coupling without the need for lattice oxygen participation or extra *OOH involvment32. The appearance of µ-OO peroxide intermediates in the Co1.8Ga1.2O4 inverse spinel compared to the Co3O4 normal spinel is in line with the OER polarization curves that show higher OER activity in the case of Co1.8Ga1.2O4 (Fig. 2).
Previous studies on cobalt hydroxides for alkaline OER reported that lattice oxygen participates in the OER process, resulting in excellent activity but sacrificing the structural stability of the Co-based electrocatalysts33. To investigate the possibility of lattice O exchange during the OER in the present system, we carried out differential electrochemical mass spectroscopy (DEMS) and in situ Raman using H218O. From DEMS (Fig. 3c), we find that when using the Co3O4 catalyst and H218O, the molecular weight distribution of the evolved O2 is: 47% m/z 32, 32% m/z 34, and 21% m/z 36. In contrast, when using the Co1.8Ga1.2O4 catalyst, 84% of the evolved O2 has a molecular weight of m/z 36. From these results, we estimate that the rate of lattice oxygen exchange in Co1.8Ga1.2O4 is four times lower than in Co3O4.
Theoretical study of catalytic activity and stability of Co-based metal oxide catalysts
We first conducted density functional theory (DFT) calculations to study the enhanced catalytic activity (Fig. 4a,b) and underlying mechanisms of OER on (311) surface of Co1.8Ga1.2O4 inverse spinel compared to Co3O4 normal spinel (Supplementary Fig. 10). We adopted a four-step adsorbate evolution mechanism (AEM) through the *OH, *O, and *OOH (Supplementary Figs. 11 and 12). Additionally, we integrated the insights from in situ Raman and DEMS results (Fig. 3) and considered a five-step oxide path mechanism (OPM). The OPM mechanism involves *OH, *OH-*OH, *OH-*O, and µ-OO peroxide (*O-*O) (Supplementary Figs. 13 and 14), and we compared its energetics with that of the conventional AEM. The calculated free energy diagrams of OER at 1.23 V vs RHE for different sites following the suggested reaction pathways are depicted in Fig. 4a,b. Specifically, for Co3O4, we determined that the potential-determining step (PDS) for AEM is the oxidation of *O to *OOH with a ΔGmax of 0.44 eV on the CoTd2+ site. For comparison, we also included the free energy diagram of Co1.8Ga1.2O4 which gives a significantly lower ΔGmax for OPM, underscoring the essential role of Ga atoms in facilitating the OER of Co3O4. On the Co1.8Ga1.2O4 surface, the most thermodynamically favored mechanism is OPM, with the PDS being the first step of *OH formation on the CoOh2+–CoOh3+ site, exhibiting a ΔGmax of 0.34 eV. Our simulation results suggest that the catalytic activity and reaction pathway are dependent on the identity of Co sites in Co-based metal oxide catalysts.
We also performed DFT calculations to assess the energetics of Co dissolution and oxygen vacancy formation, to understand why Co1.8Ga1.2O4 inverse spinel is more stable than Co3O4 normal spinel (Fig. 2c and 2e). The stability of a catalyst is determined by the surface dissolution rate (Fig. 4c), which includes metal (Co) dissolution, *OOH formation from the lattice oxygen (Ol) through H2O deprotonation, and oxygen vacancy formation (O2 release).34 We found the deprotonation step to be the most thermodynamically unfavorable in both pathways on Co3O4 and Co1.8Ga1.2O4 surfaces (Supplementary Figs. 15–17). As shown in Fig. 4d, we defined the experimental degradation rate, a metric that describes how fast a catalyst breaks down (degradation rate, µV h− 1) under experimental conditions (a current density of 200 mA cm− 2geo), and confirmed its correlation with the reaction free energy of least thermodynamically favored step in the M and O dissolution pathway (ΔG′max). Additionally, we also calculated the oxidation states on both Co3O4 and Co1.8Ga1.2O4 surfaces to determine the bonding strength. Compared to the Co3O4 surface, we observed that more electrons are transferred from Co to O on the Co1.8Ga1.2O2 surface which is evidenced by the lower oxidation states on Co and O according to the Bader charge analysis, indicating a stronger Co–O bond (Fig. 4e). We further computed the project crystal orbital Hamilton population (− COHP) and its integrated value (ICOHP), to better understand the metal-oxygen bonding strength and adsorbate-surface interaction. As demonstrated in Fig. 4e, we found ICOHP values Co-O and Ga-O bonds on the Co1.8Ga1.2O4 surface (Co1–O1: −1.09 eV, Ga1–O1: −2.51 eV) are more negative compared to the Co-O bonds on Co3O4 surfaces (Co1–O1: −1.07 eV, Co2–O1: −1.06 eV). We, therefore, conclude that the enhanced thermodynamic stability can also be ascribed to the stronger Ga-O bond compared to the Co-O bond.
In conclusion, this work reports the combination of good activity (310 mV overpotential at 10 mA/cm2) and increased stability (450 hours of PEMWE operation at 200 mA/cm2) in a PGM-free oxide catalyst, linked to the Co geometrical configuration and electronic structure. By incorporating Ga3+ to facilitate the transformation of Co2+ from tetrahedral to octahedral sites, the Co1.8Ga1.2O4 mixed normal and inverse spinel, with its unpaired electrons, strong Co-O bond, and adjacent Co-Co dual active sites, promotes a favored OER pathway at its surface. Looking ahead, we expect that the consideration of the coordination environment, as demonstrated in this work, will open up a new strategy to rationally design active and stable catalysts for electrocatalysis.