Materials. Mangnese chloride tetrahydrate (MnCl2·4H2O), Iron (III) chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O) were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Reagent Co., Ltd. Zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn (NO3)2·6H2O), Sodium acetate, Trisodium citrate dihydrate, sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) were obtained from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. Ethylene glycol, 2-Methylimidazole, Phenol red, Ethanol, Methanol, Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 35%) were purchased from Beijing Yinuokai Technology Co., Ltd. All chemicals in this work were of analytical grade and used according to the received standards.
Characterization. The morphologies of MnFe2O4 and MnFe2O4@ZIF-8 were observed by SEM (SU8010, Japan). TEM images were recorded on a JEM 2100F (Japan Electronics Corporation). The XRD pattern was recorded on a D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker, Germany). XPS analysis was carried out on a Thermo ESCALAB 250XI (Thermo Kalpha, USA). TG analysis was performed on a TG209F1 Thermogravimetric Analyzer (Netzsch, Germany). The hysteresis loop was detected on a PPMS DynaCool (Quantum Design, USA). The production of hydroxyl radicals was tested on an EMX Plus (Bruker, Germany).
The contents of Mn elements were measured using an inductively coupled plasma instrument (ICP-AES, JY 2000-2, Horiba, France). MPI performances of magnetic tracers were investigated using the magnetic particle imaging system (Magnetic Insight, Inc., USA). The frequency of MPI is 45 kHz; the magnetic gradient strength of MPI is 5.7 T m− 1. The original data obtained from the MPI scanner were processed by Vivo Quant software.
Synthesis of MnFe2O4
Firstly, MnCl2·4H2O (0.396 g, 2 mmol) and FeCl3·6H2O (1.08 g, 4 mmol) were dispersed in ethylene glycol (20 mL) solution, and ultrasonically disperse uniformly. Subsequently, NaAc (1.20 g) and Na3Cit·2H2O (0.24 g) were added, and ultrasonically dispersed again to obtain a yellow-brown liquid. After the mixed solution was stirred vigorously for 30 min, it was sealed in a hydrothermal reactor and reacted in an oven at 200 ℃ for 12 h. After the reaction, it was cooled to room temperature, and the reaction product was separated with a permanent magnet, and washed with ethanol and deionized water several times.[14]
Synthesis of PrSMZ Nanoparticles
Briefly, 5 mg MnFe2O4 were dispersed in 40 mL methanol solution containing 8.2 mg (0.1 mmol) 2-MIM, and ultrasonically disperse uniformly. Subsequently, 5 mL of methanol solution containing 29.7 mg (0.1 mmol) Zn (NO3)2·6H2O was added to the above mixed solution by means of gradual dropwise addition method, and the reaction was maintained at room temperature for 2 h. After the reaction, the prepared nanoparticles were separated with permanent magnets and washed with methanol three times. The thickness of the ZIF-8 shell can be adjusted by adjusting the ratio of Zn2+ to 2-MIM as shown in Table 1.[12b]
Table 1
The preparation recipes of the PrSMZ-n nanoparticle.
Sample | MnFe2O4(mg) | 2-MIM(mg) | Zn(NO3)2·6H2O (mg) | 2-MIM/Zn2+ |
PrSMZ-1a) | 10 | 8.2 | 29.7 | 1:1 |
PrSMZ-2 | 10 | 16.4 | 29.7 | 2:1 |
PrSMZ-5 | 10 | 41 | 29.7 | 5:1 |
PrSMZ-8 | 10 | 65.6 | 29.7 | 8:1 |
a) Ratio of 2-MIN/Zn2+ employed in the assembly process.
Chemodynamic Activity of MnFe2O4
The MnFe2O4 (10 µg mL− 1), H2O2 (10 mM), and MB (7 µg mL− 1) were prepared in NaHCO3 aqueous solution (5–50 mM); the total volume was 1 mL. Then the reaction system was shaken at 37°C in the dark. The solution was centrifuged at different time points of the reaction (0 h, 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h), and then the absorbance at 664 nm of the remaining MB in the supernatant was measured by an UV/vis spectrophotometer.[13]
GSH Consumption
Firstly, 100 µL MnFe2O4 nanoparticles of different concentrations (0, 200, 500 and 1000 µg/mL) were incubated with 50 µL H2O2 (20 mM) and 500 µL GSH (2 mM) at 37 ℃ for 3 h. Then, the MnFe2O4 nanoparticles were magnetically separated, the supernatant was collected, and GSH was detected with GSH kit (Beyotime Biotechnology). Specifically, 10 µL of supernatant was added into 150 µL of GSH kit reaction mixture for 5 min and measured by UV–vis to determine GSH concentration.[5]
Photothermal Effect and Thermal Stability of MnFe 2 O 4 : Different concentrations (0-100 µg mL− 1) of MnFe2O4 aqueous solutions were exposed to 808 nm laser (2 W cm− 2) for 500 s. At the same time, an infrared thermal imaging camera is used to record the thermal imaging temperature results every 10 s. Then, the thermal stability of MnFe2O4 aqueous solution was detected. Typically, MnFe2O4 nanoparticle aqueous solution (100 µg mL− 1) was irradiated with a 808 nm laser (2 W/cm2) for 400 s, and naturally cooled to room temperature. Then repeat the above heating and cooling cycle process three times. At the same time use the infrared thermal imaging camera to record the thermal imaging temperature results every 10 s.[23]
Photothermal Effect of PrSMZ: Different concentrations (0-200 µg mL− 1) of PrSMZ aqueous solutions were exposed to 808 nm laser (2 W cm− 2) for 500 s. At the same time, an infrared thermal imaging camera is used to record the thermal imaging temperature results every 10 s.
Phenol Red Shows the Change of Solution pH
Different concentrations of 2-MIM, ZIF-8 and PrSMZ with different shell thickness were added to pH = 6.5 PBS solution. Subsequently, 20 µL of phenol red indicator with a mass fraction of 0.1% was added to each of the above systems. The pH meter is used to test the pH value of different system solutions. Finally, according to the distribution of carbonic acid at different pH, the percentage of HCO3− ion in the current solution is calculated.
Cytotoxicity of MnFe2O4 and PrSMZ
Cytotoxicity evaluation of MnFe2O4 and PrSMZ was performed on mouse fibroblast cells (3T3), and 4T1 mouse breast tumor cells, respectively. These cells were implanted in 96-well microtiter plates and allowed to grow overnight. Subsequently, the culture medium was substituted by fresh culture medium including MnFe2O4 or PrSMZ at diluted sample concentrations of 0, 5, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, and 200 µg mL− 1, respectively. After the coincubation for 24 h, the culture medium was substituted by MTT (20 µg mL− 1) culture solution and incubation for 4 h. Ultimately, dimethyl sulfoxide (150 µL) was added to each well. Cell viability was calculated by measuring the absorbance at λ = 490 nm to the control via a microplate reader.[23]
In vitro Synergistic Therapeutic Efficacy
The 4T1 cancer cells were cultivated into 96-well plates. And then treated with PBS, laser, MnFe2O4, PrSMZ or PrSMZ plus laser irradiation (100 µg mL− 1) at 37°C. Subsequently, the cells were irradiated with 808 nm laser (2 W cm− 2) for 8 min. After that, the cells of each group were incubated with CA (4 µM) and PI (4 µM) staining reagents for 10 min and then observed using CLSM.
DCFH-DA Detection •OH: DCFH-DA ROS assay kit was utilized to monitor the intracellular ROS generation. 4T1 cells were implanted into 6-well plates and grew adherently to the wall. Fresh culture medium containing MnFe2O4 or PrSMZ (100 µg mL− 1) was added, which was further cultured for 6 h. After washing three times with PBS, the cells were irradiated upon 808 nm laser (2 W cm− 2) for 8 min. Then, 10 µM DCFH-DA was added to culture with 4T1 cells for another 30 min. The generation of free radicals was observed by CLSM.[21]
Hemolysis Assay
Red blood cells (RBCs) were isolated from serum by centrifugation, washed, and diluted with PBS. Then, 0.2 mL of RBC suspension was mixed with 0.8 mL of PrSMZ (1 − 200 µg mL− 1) in PBS.[21]
0.8 mL of PBS solution (negative control group), or 0.8 mL of water (positive control group). After incubated at 37 ℃ for 3–4 h, these samples were centrifuged and the supernatants were collected to analyze by UV/vis absorbance at 541 nm.
Animal Experiment: Animal protocols related to this study were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Fourth Military Medical University (approval number: 20230458). All applicable institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. SPF female healthy BALB/c mice (4–5 weeks) were purchased from Beijing Huafukang Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China). The tumor model was established by the subcutaneous injection of 4T1 cells (5.0 × 105 cells) into the right buttock of each female BALB/c mouse. A breast cancer can be successfully established in about a week. When the tumor volume reached 50–80 mm3, the 4T1-tumor-bearing mice were used for in vivo therapy experiments. The mice were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 5/group), including (1) PBS, (2) NIR, (3) PrSMZ, (4) MnFe2O4 + M, (5) PrSMZ + M, and (6) PrSMZ + M + NIR, M means magnetic targeting. Tumor-bearing mice were injected with 100 µL MnFe2O4 or PrSMZ (10 mg/kg), and the mice were kept in a magnetic field for 4 hours. The mice were then irradiated with an 808 nm laser (2 W cm− 2) for 8 min. During the treatment, the tumor volume was recorded every 2 days with a digital vernier caliper. The tumor volume is calculated by the following formula: V = length × width2/2. (Relative tumor volumes were calculated as V/V0, V0 was the tumor volume when the treatment was initiated). Besides, the body weights were also recorded during the treatment. All mice were sacrificed after 14 days of treatment; tumors and main organs were collected for H&E staining and analyzed with a microscope.
Statistical Analysis: The error of parallel test was calculated as mean ± SD. Statistical difference was calculated through two-tailed t-test: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.