Structural analysis: Patterns of X-ray diffraction for the crystalline nature of the synthesized ZnO and Li2O in Figure 3 are shown. Figure 3(a) presents the XRD patterns of (ZnO) thin films. From Figure 3(a), it should be noted that the patterns have peaks around diffraction 2θ~ 31.723, 34.378, 36.199, 47.493, 56.539, 62.798, 67.897 and 68.991, referred to (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), (103), (112) and (201) favorite directions respectively, which agree with the JCPDS card no. 00-036-1451, and also with other reports [19]. The favorite direction is presented in Table (I). The diffraction peaks of the prepared thin film show hexagonal wurtzite structure. Accordingly, the XRD results revealed that the film obtained in this study consisted of a pure (ZnO) phase without any secondary phases. Figure 3(b) display the XRD patterns of Li2O thin films prepared from pure Lithium. From the figure, it can be noted that the patterns exhibit diffraction peaks around 2θ~ 30.319, 33.513, 36.023 and 63.020 referring to (101), (003), (012) and (202) favorite directions respectively. The diffraction peaks of prepared thin film exhibit cubic structure, which is in agreement with the JCPDS card no. 01-074-6256. Other peaks are due to the phase formation of non-oxidized lithium and lithium oxide represented by Li, Li2O2, and LiO2 which are assigned in the figure by the symbols (*,• and ♦) respectively. These results are in agreement with previous reports [19-21].
As is well known, Li's reactivity with oxygen is extremely high and in theory different Li-O compounds can arise based on the oxidative status and complexes of dioxygen together with Li-ions. [21]. The lattice parameters for ZnO were found to be equal to a = b = 0.3253 nm, and c = 0.5217 nm. Both values are consistent with the theoretical values (a = 0.3249 nm and c = 0.5206 nm) and with other studies, respectively. [22, 23]. On the other hand, the lattice parameters for Li2O were found to be a=b=c= 4.627 nm, which is in agreement with theoretical value a=4.610 nm and other reports [24]. For the ZnO and Li2O films, the crystallite size is determined using the Scherrer formula using the relationship. [25]:
where, (K) is constant, (λ) is the wavelength of x-ray, which is equal to 0.15406 nm, (β) is the full-width at half-maximum, and (θ) is Bragg angle [26].
Table I: Structural parameters of (ZnO, Li2O) thin films.
|
Zinc oxide (ZnO)
|
Lithium oxide (Li2O)
|
2Ө (deg)
|
36.199
|
33.513
|
hkl
|
(101)
|
(003)
|
d (Å)
|
2.479
|
2.671
|
(FWHM) (rad)
|
0.0066
|
0.0031
|
(D) (nm)
|
22.04
|
45.6
|
Lattice Constants (nm)
|
a=b
|
0.3253
|
a=b=c
|
4.627
|
c
|
0.5217
|
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Figure 4 represents SEM images with two magnifications of (ZnO, Li2O) NPs prepared by chemical precipitation method and simple precipitation method, respectively, and deposited on glass substrate by the drop casting method. From the figure, it is observed that ZnO and Li2O NPs have different morphologies, where Figure 4(a) shows semi-spherical shapes of zinc oxide whose dimensions do not exceed 253 nm whileFigure 4(b) consists of sheetsof lithium oxide whose dimensions do not exceed 1 μm.
Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM)
Figure 5 represents FESEM images of p-type porous silicon. The image reveals that electrochemical etching has been effective in preparing the porous surface of the silicon wafer. Also, it can be observed that the pores distribution is irregular. The pores indicate that silicon's surface area is increased [27]. The figure shows that the pores are formed in the sphere shapes and their dimensions do not exceed 70 nanometers.
ZnO:Li2O/p-type PSi Heterojunction Solar Cell Properties
Figure 6 shows the current-voltage for Al/Li2O/PSi/Si/Al and Al/(ZnO: Li2O)/PSi /Si/Al for various ratios of mixtures: (0.25:0.75), (0.5:0.5), and (0.75:0.25), in the dark and under light conditions, producing photocurrent under a 10 mWm-2 tungsten lamp illumination, and the effective area of the cell (0.785 cm2). It has been shown that the reverse current value for the ZnO:Li2O/ p-type PSi hetetrojunction under illumination at a given voltage is higher than that in the dark. This means that the light produced by the carrier-contributing photocurrent is the result of electron-hole output and light absorption. Such behavior yields useful information about the pairs of the electron-hole that are effectively produced by incident photons in the junction.
Figure 7 shows (I-V) dark characteristics of Al/Li2O/Si/Al and Al/ZnO: Li2O/Si/Al solar cells in forward and reverse direction. The forward current of solar cells is very weak at voltages lower than 1.8 V. This current is referred to as a recombination current which exists only at low voltages. This is created when the conductive band is excited by each electron to form the valence band. The second high voltage region represents the diffusion or recombination region, which depends on the resistance of the series. The bias voltage will deliver electrons with sufficient energy in this field to penetrate the barrier between the two sides of the junction.
Figure (8) shows the J-V curve for Li2O/ p-type PSi, ZnO: Li2O/ p-type PSi heterojunction. Based on the J–V curve, the fill factor (FF) was calculated according to the formula (3) [28, 29]:
Where (Vmax) is maximum photo voltage, (Jmax) is the maximum photocurrent density, Voc is the open-circuit photo voltage and (Jsc) is the short circuit photocurrent density. The efficiency of the photoelectric conversion (ɳ) was estimated by the following equation (4) [30]:
Where Pin: - is the incident power.
The measured open-circuit voltage (Voc), short-circuit current density (Jsc), fill factor (FF %) and efficiency (ɳ) were calculated and depicted in Table (II). The findings suggest that the mixture of unique proportions of zinc oxide and lithium oxide improves the performance of the ZnO solar cell as well as the absorption efficiency over a greater fraction of the solar spectrum. A catalyst's photo activity is driven by its ability to create electron-hole pairs that are photo generated. It has been noted that ZnO's solar energy conversion efficiency is influenced by its optical absorption ability, which is related to its wide band energy difference. As a photo catalyst for the solar-driven photo degradation process of persistent organic pollutants, ZnO nanostructures have been shown to be a possible candidate. This is due to its low cost of production, non-toxicity and ability to absorb larger fractions of the solar spectrum[31]. It was observed that Li generates additional holes at the Zn substitution site, while it generates additional electrons at the interstitial site. It can be hypothesized that Li serves as a defect mediator in ZnO NPs [32, 33].
Li has the smallest group-I element ion radius, which is very similar to that of Zn (0.74 Å) and is a significant factor in obtaining high p-type ZnO optical efficiency. Li ions also act in significant types of Zn sites as shallow acceptors. However, it can conveniently hold an interstitial position (Li) due to the limited ionic radius of the Li-ion, which can serve as a donor. In general, the combination of ZnO with Li-ions boosts Egopt's value over that of pure ZnO films [33]. Lithium itself does not induce any visible emission of luminescence, although the relative concentration of inherent defects varies with increasing doping percentage. This will assist in tuning the emission linked to the intrinsic defect. These types of defect in ZnO NPs with the Li provide efficient use of materials in the visible light. New oxide-based catalytic materials are particularly suitable for environmentally sustainable processes and for the reduction in manufacturing costs of modern catalysis [34]. This study represents an excellent premise to obtain less expensive photo catalysts using ZnO and Li2O to build heterogeneous structures to increase charge separation efficiency by creating photo catalysts with high efficiency and improved response capacity to visible light [35]. All results indicate that the sandwich structure of the ZnO:Li2O/p-type PSi could be used as a solar cell. [36].
Table II: (J-V) measurements of solar cells (SC) for Li2O/ p-type PSi hetetrojunction and different mixing of (ZnO: Li2O)/ p-type PSi.
Mixing ratio
(ZnO:Li2O)
|
Jm
(mA/cm2) 0-2
|
Vm (mV)
|
JSC (mA/cm2) 0-2
|
VOC (mV)
|
F.F%
|
𝜂%
|
Li2O
|
0.057
|
38
|
0.1
|
65.2
|
29.67
|
2.17
|
(0.25 : 0.75)
|
0.89
|
11.2
|
1.45
|
18.2
|
37.78
|
9.98
|
(0.5 : 0.5)
|
0.84
|
13.2
|
1.29
|
21.2
|
40.28
|
11.09
|
(0.75 : 0.25)
|
0.79
|
12.5
|
1.40
|
21.1
|
33.39
|
9.87
|
Comparison of the porous silicon solar cells performance
A comparison of the conversion efficiency (%) of the present study with that of the previous studies based on different studies (materials and parameters), is shown in Table (III). In this analysis, the prepared form mixing ratio Al/(ZnO:Li2O)/PSi/p-Si/Al solar cell showed lower efficiency compared with references [38, 39], the reason is to achieve good lateral conduction of electrons and holes through the material. Also, the electrochemical environment, the physical location (depth below surface) of the pn junction, and the thickness of the porous silicon film proper were suitable for accomplishing different role of electrochemical etching conditions in the growth of (PSi) layers. In this study, higher efficiency was recorded compared to the references [37, 40] because mixing has been shown to be very effective in improving the device's working function and electrical conductivity, resulting in efficient separation and collection of electron-hole pairs in solar cells that are photo-induced.
Table III: Comparison between the efficiency of the PSi device and previous studies
Structure of PSi solar cells
|
𝜂%
|
References
|
Titanium Oxide/(PSi)/n-Si
|
10.49
|
Dong Hee Shin et. al [37]
|
TFSA-GR/MoS2/(PSi)/n-Si/TiOx
|
13.18
|
Chan Wook Jang et. al [38]
|
ZnO nanoflowers/(PSi)/Si
|
12.95
|
Morteza Taheekhani et. al [39]
|
ZnO /CH3NH3PbX3/CuO/(PSi)/p-Si
|
8.21
|
Kawther A. Khalaph et. al [40]
|
ZnO:Li2O/(PSi)/p-Si
|
11.09
|
Present study
|