This study reveals that two short wavelengths present in the human visual range, 420 and 450nm both generated by LEDs and common in the built environment have significant detrimental impact on mice. Critically, exposure to these wavelengths result in significant and rapid increases in body weight above that in controls. Over the 8-week period controls put on approximately 1g in weight while experimental animals put on an average of approximately 5 g. An unexpected feature of this weight gain was its rapid development with differences between experimental and controls apparent after just one week.
In bees 420nm light dysregulates blood sugars resulting in their elevation in a standard blood glucose tolerance test, while 670nm significantly improves glucose tolerance. Glucose was not monitored in this study, but in light of previous work it is possible that 420nm and 450nm both reduced mitochondrial function resulting in reduced demand for serum glucose 13. Although similar experiments have not been undertaken in humans, it is established that 670nm light that increases mitochondrial activity results in increased oxygen consumption and tighter regulation of serum glucose 9. While short wavelength exposure has a significant and very rapid impact on human physiology, particularly heart rate and blood pressure 1, but it remains unknown if this includes blood glucose regulation.
These data are of importance in a wider human context. Reduced control of blood sugars and progression towards diabetes is a growing concern in the Western world. Such concerns sit within a world in which artificial lighting in the built environment has shifted towards use of LEDs that have almost no energy above 650nm but often strong peaks in the 420-450nm range. This maybe a matter of concern for public health.
The short wavelength exposures changed serum cytokine expression in both 420nm and 450nm exposed animals in roughly similar ways. The changes in each are likely to be interdependent and complex and no attempt is made here in their analysis due to these complexities. This is similar to previous complex cytokine changes following long wavelength light exposure 12. But the important point is that cytokines do change as this may act as a signal across the body.
Light penetration of tissue in vivo is wavelength dependent. Short wavelengths such as those used here are unlikely to penetrate beyond the skin, while longer wavelength will penetrate deep into the body. Consequently, 420nm and 450nm are probably only absorbed by the skin but this absorption likely sets up cytokine changes that run throughout the body including its deeper regions. Hence, it is possible that cytokine shifts induced by light represents a form of communication influencing all tissues. This remains a largely unexplored feature of light exposure that may impact on general physiology.
Flies exposed to 420nm have reduced mitochondrial complex activity and ATP production. Also, their mobility is reduced 2. But mice exposed to shorter wavelengths here did not have reduced mobility. Rather, those exposed to either wavelength had similar mobility to controls. The only difference was that light exposed mice showed a reluctance to occupy the central area of the open field. This is a common feature of stress.
Short wavelength light can be proinflammatory increasing reactive oxygen species 14–18 and inflammation can drive anxiety and depression and stress 19–21. This may be the explanation why mice exposed to short wavelength light avoided central open field locations as they were experiencing light induced inflammation that was translated to stress.
The results of this study offer cautionary data to the potential health risks of short wavelength light that now dominates the built environment. However, any research in this area will suffer from significant limitations because there are too many variables. Known variables include light wavelength, its energy, the integration of energy over time, the age and health status of those exposed to light along with others that at present remain unclear. In spite of this, the key finding of this study regarding the changes in body weight in response to short wavelength light is a major concern in that is a potential matter for public health.