Multi-stepped Sb2Te3 nanoplates and hetero-structures (Bi2Te3/Sb2Te3) were grown on graphene layers using an UHV MBE system. The graphene substrates were prepared onto either SiO2/Si wafers or SiNx/Si TEM-compatible membranes. Initially, Sb2Te3 was grown on graphene layers atop SiO2/Si to study its morphology. Once the optimal conditions were identified, hetero-structures were then grown on graphene layers supported by membranes, allowing for TEM observations to be conducted without the need for additional sample processing. High-purity sources of Sb (99.9999%), Bi (99.9999%), and Te (99.9999%) were used to facilitate material growth under Te-rich conditions, while maintaining the background pressure of the growth chamber at a low 10− 9 Torr. For more details, refer to the Materials and methods sections A & B.
We investigated the surface morphology of Sb2Te3 grown at various temperatures using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Figure 1(a) illustrates the morphology of Sb2Te3 grown at 250, 270, 285, and 320\(\text{℃}\). At lower temperatures of 250 and 270 \(\text{℃}\), high-density, multi-spiral structures covered the surface of the sample, preventing the formation of isolated islands. At 320 \(\text{℃}\), the islands drastically shrank in size with minimal material remaining on the graphene surface, indicating that the coverage by as-grown materials decreases as temperature increases. To delve deeper into the structural changes, we analyzed the contrasts in the FE-SEM images, which are indicative of topographic contrasts due to variations in the height of the as-grown materials affecting the emission of secondary electrons and thus the image brightness21. Notably, the material height increases towards the center for all Sb2Te3 grown at various temperatures. However, a change in the morphology from spiral to triangular stacking was observed as temperature increased to 285 \(\text{℃}\), indicating a growth mode transition. According to the Burton-Cabrera-Frank (BCF) theory22,23, crystal growth can proceed via dislocation-driven or layer-by-layer (LBL) modes. Dislocation-driven growth is characterized by the addition of atoms at defect sites within the crystal, often resulting in spiral steps around these dislocations24. Conversely, the LBL mode involves sequential atom deposition, building new layers on the existing surface25,26. Previous studies have reported spiral morphology in Sb2Te3 nanoplates due to screw dislocation-driven (SDD) growth27,28. In this respect, a transition in the growth mode occurred at temperatures between 270 and 285 \(\text{℃}\), shifting from SDD to LBL mode29. Consequently, the multi-stepped Sb2Te3 nanoplates grown at 285 \(\text{℃}\) appear to follow the LBL growth mode, exhibiting multiple layers with a decreasing lateral size towards the center.
Surface morphology of a multi-stepped Sb2Te3 nanoplate, grown at 285 \(\text{℃}\), was investigated using atomic force microscopy (AFM), providing a nanometer scale information of the surface. Figure 1(b) presents the 2D surface morphology and corresponding line profile of the Sb2Te3 nanoplate. We revealed that the height of the outermost step was 2∼3 nm and the heights of inner steps were specified to be less than 1 nm. In addition, each terrace has width of ∼100 nm, which offers sufficient space for shell growth with width of several tens of nanometers, avoiding lateral overgrowth. So the presence of multiple steps with sufficient terrace width suggests the feasibility of step-edge growth, depicted in Fig. 2(a).
The surface morphologies of multi-stepped Sb2Te3 nanoplates can be classified into two types; rotational and parallel hierarchical, as depicted in the left sides of Figs. 2(b), (c). For the first case where the below step is triangular (or hexagonal) and the upper step is also triangular (or hexagonal) with all pairs of edges parallel to each other, the parallelism of the edges across the hierarchical steps, maintains a consistent orientation from one level to the next. For the second case, where the below step is triangular (or hexagonal) and the upper step is also triangular (or hexagonal) but is rotated 180 degrees from the below step, the rotational transformation applied to the subsequent hierarchical step, indicates a significant orientation change while preserving the shape’s symmetry. As previously mentioned, our Sb2Te3 follows LBL growth mode where vdW interaction exists between the layers. In this respect, parallel hierarchical ones would be straightforward and energetically favorable configuration, considering R\(\stackrel{-}{3}\)m group’s symmetry (from Fig. 3(c)). However, due to the triangular (or hexagonal) shape’s inherent symmetry, rotating by 180 degrees does not change the relative positions of the lattice points. Thus, rotational hierarchical configuration is not abnormal. The point is that despite their distinct geometric features, they commonly possess multiple step-edges which allows the subsequent Bi2Te3 growth.
Following Fig. 2(a), preceding hetero-structure formation was done on graphene layers on TEM-compatible membranes. For the growth, Bi2Te3 was grown at same temperature with time of 2 minutes right after Sb2Te3was grown. Right sides of Figs. 2(b), (c) show the FE-SEM images of Bi2Te3/Sb2Te3 hetero-structures. For a single Sb2Te3 growth, the contrasts on the Sb2Te3 nanoplate become brighter as they approach the core due to their multiple steps. However, for Bi2Te3/Sb2Te3, bright and dark contrasts alternately repeated from the outer to the core of the nanoplate. This change implies Bi2Te3 was grown on the multi-stepped Sb2Te3 nanoplate.
In addition, we controlled the width of Bi2Te3 shell by changing the growth time. Figure 2(d) depicts the FE-SEM images of the three cases-growth time of Bi2Te3 being 1, 2, and 3 minutes. The widths of outermost shells were ∼20 nm and ∼40 nm for 1 and 2 minutes, respectively. However, for 3 minutes of growth, it was difficult to mark the outermost shell, and the inner steps were not clearly specified due to lateral overgrowth, previously mentioned in Introduction section. The result made it possible to tune the degree of horizontal growth next to the step of the Sb2Te3 suggesting the possibility to control the shell width to some extent, by varying growth parameters beyond just growth time, such as source fluxes. If such refined width control becomes feasible, it opens up the possibility for in-depth research on various structures. A prime example of this would be nanowires made of topological insulators. In the case of hetero-structures of topological insulators, the topological properties are preserved14. Under these circumstances, by considering each shell as a wire structure and adjusting the width, one can examine the variations in properties such as quantum confinement of surface states30. Given that each step’s height is same or less than 2 nm, and the shell’s width does not surpass the terrace’s width avoiding lateral overgrowth, this platform offers the potential for significant dimensional confinement. In addition, as the horizontal length of the shells decreases towards the interior of the island, it becomes possible to investigate the impact of this length on transport characteristics31, in one specimen.
To characterize the crystal structure and the epitaxial relationship between Sb2Te3 and Bi2Te3, plan-view TEM observations were proceeded. Since the membrane is TEM- compatible, no additional sampling processes were required. Figure 3(a) shows the low- magnification plan-view image obtained using high-angle annular dark field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM). The inset shows a FE-SEM image of the target nanoplate. First, the outermost region boxed with the red line (the first step of the multi-stepped Sb2Te3 nanoplate and the lateral Bi2Te3 shell) was investigated. Aberration-corrected (Cs-corrected) atomic resolution images are exploited as shown in Fig. 3(b). The overlaid ball-stick model is obtained through the calculation of lattice parameters from FFT patterns. The ratio of d-spacing of {10 − 10}ST, BT to {11 − 20}ST, BT is \(\sqrt{1/3}\) which can be converted to ratio of \(\sqrt{3}\) in real space. In addition, {11 − 20}ST, BT peaks make an angle of \({30}^{^\circ }\) to {10 − 10}ST, BT peaks. Thus, Sb2Te3 and Bi2Te3 both are classified as rhombohedral phase with the trigonal crystal system (space group of R\(\stackrel{-}{3}\)m, a = b ≈ 4.25 \(\dot{A}\) for Sb2Te3 and a = b ≈ 4.4 \(\dot{A}\) for Bi2Te3)32. Since the contrast shown in the STEM image is dependent on Z values, the interface of Sb2Te3 and Bi2Te3 is apparently shown. Then, to understand the relation between two materials, fast Fourier transforms (FFTs) from three regions-Sb2Te3, Bi2Te3, and their interface were obtained. Figure 3(c) depicts the FFT patterns. From the peaks’ orientation; {11 − 20}BT ∥ {11 − 20}ST and {10 − 10}BT ∥ {10 − 10}ST, their lateral relation is confirmed. The pattern from the interface shows that peaks from Sb2Te3 and Bi2Te3 almost overlap indicating that the orientations of the two materials are lateral to each other.
Furthermore, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was performed to validate the growth of Bi2Te3 at each step of the multi-stepped Sb2Te3. First, the outermost region is investigated. The HAADF-STEM image of the target region is shown in Fig. 4(a). The image includes three regions-I: the outermost Bi2Te3 shell (lateral to the first-step of Sb2Te3), II: the first-step of Sb2Te3 and III: the inner Bi2Te3 shell (vertical/lateral to the first/second-step of Sb2Te3). As depicted in 2D EDS spectra map, in region I, the Bi signal is dominant, whereas a negligible Sb signal is observed, while it is vice versa in region II. The interfaces of regions I and II in the 2D EDS image match well with the interface shown in the HAADF-STEM image. For region III, since it is not the outermost (the first) shell of the nanoplate, it is the second Bi2Te3 shell with the first-step of Sb2Te3 beneath it. Therefore, the Sb signal (from the first-step) emerges in region III together with the Bi signal. The EDS data also represent Te signals emerging regardless of the region, which is trivial.
The inner parts of the nanoplate are shown in Fig. 4(b). Similar to the previous investigation, four regions were identified. I: the first-step of Sb2Te3, II: the second Bi2Te3 shell (vertical/lateral to the first/second-step of Sb2Te3), III: the second-step of Sb2Te3, and IV: the third Bi2Te3 shell (vertical/lateral to the second/third-step of Sb2Te3). Since regions I and III are suspected to be the regions where only Sb2Te3 is grown, weak Bi signals are observed. Furthermore, considering the 2D EDS spectra for regions II and IV, which are suspected to be the shell regions, the sections where Bi signals appear well match the contrasts shown in HAADF-STEM image. Since the investigated area contains the first-(region I and beneath II), and the second-(region III and beneath IV) step of Sb2Te3, the Sb signal comes out from the entire area just like Te signal.
Unlike the atomic resolution HAADF-STEM image shown in Fig. 3(b), the 2D EDS data reveal more than just the presence of the outermost Bi2Te3 shell; they also indicate the formation of inner shells, each vertically/laterally grown above/to, the respective steps of the Sb2Te3 nanoplate. This is further corroborated by the alignment between the alternating Bi signals and the contrasts observed in 2D EDS and HAADF- STEM images, respectively. This makes it possible to claim that multiple Bi2Te3 shells are separately grown at each step of the multi-stepped Sb2Te3 nanoplate.
Computational analyses were conducted to investigate the formation of multi-stepped Sb2Te3 nanoplate-based hetero-structures through density functional theory (DFT) calculations. At first, this study aimed to ascertain the preference of Bi2Te3 towards step-edge growth by evaluating its total energy. As illustrated in Fig. 5(a), four distinct scenarios were established in accordance with the methodologies outlined in the ‘D. Computational Details’ section. Each scenario involved a multi-stepped Sb2Te3 nanoplate configuration, characterized by a reduced domain width at the second step, which served as a constant parameter across all models. The top row of Fig. 5(a) describes instances of vertical Bi2Te3 growth, which occurs via van der Waals (vdW) interactions with the base layer of Sb2Te3 at the second step. Conversely, the bottom row presents scenarios that incorporate a combination of two distinct interactions: the formation of dangling bonds with the Sb2Te3 at the second step, and vdW interactions with the Sb2Te3 at the first step. A comparative analysis of the total energies for each pair (column) of scenarios reveals that the configurations in the bottom row exhibit lower total energies; 4.6852 and 4.7415 eV lower, respectively. This suggests a thermodynamic preference for Bi2Te3 growth at the step edges of Sb2Te3 nanoplates. Additionally, the findings generally align well with the growth behavior that favors a mix of in-plane bonding and vdW interactions rather than isolated interactions33,34.
We have also calculated the interfacial energies for Bi2Te3/Graphene and Bi2Te3/Sb2Te3 with supercells depicted in Fig. 5(b). As-grown Bi2Te3 shells can be classified into two; the outermost and the others. They are commonly grown via step-edge growth, assisted by dangling bonds from the side of Sb2Te3. So the only difference is induced from the base materials. Since Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 have negligible lattice mismatch compared to graphene, the interfacial energy was expected to be lower. The calculation reveals that Bi2Te3/Graphene has approximately 0.0058 eV/\({\dot{A}}^{2}\) higher interfacial energy which might be induced from the existence of the strains. As previously mentioned, the hetero-structure we have grown can act as a platform offering multiple Bi2Te3 nanowires. In this context, the calculation highlights the hetero-structure’s potential for investigating distinct strain-induced transport behaviors35–37.