Media Optimization for Enhanced In Vitro Flower Induction
Cannabis is known to exhibit a high rate of hyperhydricity in tissue culture systems, a phenomenon that varies depending on the genotype [13]. Several methods can be employed, to address this issue, including the incorporation of activated charcoal into the growth medium [14]. To determine the best media for inducing flowering in vitro in cannabis and to assess the tissue's response to activated charcoal, we tested two media commonly used for stem explants: MS and DKW-based media (see Materials and Methods), with or without activated charcoal. Adding activated charcoal to the DKW medium significantly reduced the number of flowers compared to the DKW medium alone but had no effect on the MS medium (Fig. 2a). These findings indicate that activated charcoal does not benefit cannabis flowering in tissue culture. Activated charcoal is known to absorb plant growth regulators and other organic supplements [15]. It might be that the presence of activated charcoal reduced the availability of important substances to the plant, thereby reducing flowering.
Statistical tests comparing the performance of plants in the two media without activated charcoal showed that plants in the DKW medium exhibited higher flower production than those in the MS medium at multiple time points (Fig. 2a, marked by an asterisk (*)).
Next, we tested how different concentrations of sucrose in the media affect flowering by comparing various sucrose concentrations in the MS medium (Fig. 2b) and DKW medium (Fig. 2c). In tissue culture systems, sugar serves two primary roles: as an energy source [16] and as a signal for flower induction [17]. However, there were no significant differences in flowering across the concentrations, except between the 2% and 1% sucrose concentrations in the MS medium at three-time points, where a decrease was observed at 1%.
Besides sucrose, hormones can also play a role in increasing the number of flowers. Cytokinins, for instance, can influence meristem size, which in turn may enhance flower production [18]. Additionally, cytokinins have been shown to facilitate the transition from vegetative to floral meristems in tissue culture [19]. The 6-Benzylaminopurine (BA) cytokinin is particularly recognized as a highly effective inducer of floral induction in vitro [20, 21]. To test the effect of BA on the in vitro flowering of cannabis, we added either 2 mg/L of BA solely during the vegetative phase or 1 mg/L and 5 mg/L of BA during the flowering phase. Surprisingly, BA did not enhance flower production; instead, it resulted in a significant decrease (Fig. 2d). This effect might be attributed to our basic DKW medium, which contains adenine hemisulfate (see Materials and Methods), a precursor of cytokinins resulting in excessively high concentrations of cytokinin.
Other elements that have the potential to affect flower numbers, such as phosphate in the media or lower temperature during vegetative growth to increase meristem size, didn’t show better performance (Fig. S1 and S2).
To summarize, our analysis indicates that DKW media without activated charcoal and BA is most effective. Since there are no significant differences between 2% and 3% sucrose, and 2% is more economical and potentially reduces contamination, we will continue using 2% sucrose.
Evaluating photosynthesis and light response in tissue-cultured cannabis
Our results, showing no significant difference between 2% and 3% sucrose concentrations, raise the question of whether the plants in the vessel conduct photosynthesis. To address this, we first examined the presence of stomata, which is essential for gas exchange. Scanning electron microscopy analysis of abaxial fan leaves from plants growing in tissue culture and growth room reveals that leaves in tissue culture develop stomata similar to those in growth room plants (Fig. 3a). To compare stomatal density, we employed the nail polish method and found that leaves grown in tissue culture possess significantly fewer stomata (average of 35 per 0.15mm²) compared to those from growth room plants (average of 45 per 0.15mm²) (Fig. 3b). However, the normal appearance of the stomata of the tissue culture leaves suggests that the plants are potentially capable of photosynthesis. Subsequently, we tested the plants' capacity for photosynthesis by cultivating stem nodes in a medium devoid of carbon energy sources. Since photosynthesis requires gas exchange, we used two types of vessels: one hermetically sealed and the other equipped with a gas-permeable filter. Both were placed under 71±14 µmol· m−2⋅s−1 light in an 18/6 h photoperiod.
Plants cultured in media without sucrose appeared pale and less developed than those grown with 2% sucrose, although the ones in the filtered vessel exhibited better growth (Fig. 3d-e, Fig. S3). To quantify this, we measured the chlorophyll content and found that plants grown with 2% sucrose exhibited higher chlorophyll content in both vessels compared to those grown without a carbon source (Fig. 3f). However, plants cultivated in a filtered vessel, with or without sucrose, exhibited significantly higher chlorophyll content compared to their equivalents in a sealed box, implying that gas exchange allows in vitro plants to carry out photosynthesis. As a result, we have incorporated the use of a filtered box into our protocol.
The light intensity in ex-vitro-grown plants directly affects photosynthesis, with increased light levels enhancing photosynthetic activity until reaching a saturation point [22]. Light also impacts morphogenesis and the induction of flowering [23]. To test the effect of increasing light intensity on in vitro cannabis flowering, we cultured plants under an 18/6 h cycle for three weeks at two different light intensities measured at plant height: low (71±14 µmol· m−2⋅s−1) and high (173±20 µmol· m−2⋅s−1). We then transferred the plants to a flowering photoperiod (12/12 h) and redistributed them into the two light intensities, resulting in four treatment groups based on changes in light intensity: Low to Low, Low to High, High to Low, and High to High. Plants exposed to low light intensity during the flowering-promoting photoperiod produced significantly more flowers (Fig. 4b-d) with a final average of 9.3 (Low to Low) and 9.9 (High to Low) flowers per plant and appeared to have longer stigmas compared to those exposed to high intensity (Fig. 4e). Plants under high light intensity during the 12/12 h cycle had a final average of 7.3 flowers per plant, regardless of the light intensity during the vegetative phase. It is important to note that the selected light intensity was significantly lower than what is typically used in growth rooms (Fig. 4a), demonstrating that tissue-cultured plants are more susceptible to damage from high-intensity light.
Variability and response of cannabis cultivars to in vitro flowering
Cannabis cultivars exhibit significant variability in inflorescence traits, including flowering time, architecture, number of flowers, flower size, and compaction [5, 24-26]. To assess the response of different cultivars to in vitro flowering, we selected three cultivars that exhibit distinct inflorescence phenotypes when grown in a growth room (Fig. 5b) and introduced them to tissue culture. Following flower induction, we identified three distinct phenotypic differences: number of flowers, stigma length, and stigma browning (Fig. 5, Fig. S4, and Fig. S5)). In all cultivars, flowers began to appear on day 9. The Sky 1 cultivar produced significantly more flowers than the Magic 9 and TA5 cultivars (Fig. 5a), displaying a notable difference from its growth room equivalent (Fig. 5b). The TA5 stigmas appeared to be shorter than those of Sky 1 and Magic 9 and changed their color to brown before those of the other cultivars (Fig. 5e), suggesting that TA5's receptivity declines more quickly. This is consistent with the TA5 stigma observed in the growth room plants.
This experiment demonstrates that different cultivars behave differently in tissue culture, and their inflorescence characteristics do not always match their growth room phenotype, suggesting an interaction between genetic background and in vitro growth conditions.
In vitro pollination and seed development in cannabis
To assess the potential of in vitro flowering as a method for rapid breeding, we examined the ability of male plants to produce viable pollen and female plants to develop viable seeds. To this end, we cultured male cannabis plants (Bt cultivar) and female plants (cultivar Sky 1) for two weeks under an 18/6 h cycle before transferring them to a 12/12 h flowering photoperiod.
After 18 days, all plants produced flowers and were ready for pollination (Fig. 6a-d). Since the anther did not dehisce and release the pollen, we manually pinched the anther with a needle and tapped it over vessels containing female plants. All female inflorescent (25 plants) developed seeds in vitro (Fig. 6e) with an average of 4.41 ± 0.36 seeds per plant. However, only 2.44 ± 0.17 seeds per plant germinated (mean ± SE calculated per vessel, with five plants per vessel) (Table S1). In vitro hybrid plants were grown from seeds to fully developed plants (Fig. 6f-h).
Altogether, eight weeks were needed from the introduction of the stem segment to tissue culture to the production of viable seeds, highlighting the in vitro flowering system as an excellent method for fast and practical breeding.