Human activity has transformed and is continuing to transform the Earth`s terrestrial ecosystems1,2,3. Over recent centuries, both land-use intensity and the human population have undergone exponential growth, resulting in profound impacts on ecosystems in ways that fundamentally differ from those experienced previously in geological history4,5,6,7. Archaeological and palaeoecological evidence show that much of Earth’s land has been inhabited by humans for millennia, transforming natural landscapes into “anthromes” (i.e. anthropogenic biomes) through activities such as hunting, fire use, deforestation, and cultivation8. Human impact likely varied with human migrations, societal development, technological advancements, and population densities, altering natural systems in different regions at varying rates1. Although some have argued that humans have shaped most of nature over the last 12,000 years8, so far there has been no quantitative analysis of palaeoecological records to assess the magnitude of human influence on properties of past vegetation globally.
Properties of past vegetation can be derived from fossil pollen-assemblage properties with examples including indices of richness, diversity, and temporal and spatial compositional turnover9. Several prior studies have documented regional to continental changes patterns in various aspects of plant diversity during the Holocenee.g. 10,11,12,13,14. However, the underlying causes remain poorly understood, and a major challenge is understanding the influence of past human activity in relation to climate, a well-documented driver of vegetation dynamics throughout the Pleistocene and Holocenee.g. 15,16.
Various hypotheses have emerged regarding when the extent of human impact on past vegetation increased at global- to continental-scales. Ruddiman17 proposes an anthropogenic era that started during the early Holocene with widespread human impact on terrestrial ecosystems inducing changes in the global carbon cycle, as determined from anomalies in CO2 (~ 8 thousand years before present (ka BP) where present = 1950 CE) and CH4 (~ 5 ka BP) concentrations detected in ice cores. Lyons et al.18 suggest that significant human activity altered taxon co-occurrence patterns from the middle Holocene (~ 6 ka BP), although challenged by Bertelsmeier & Ollier19 and Telford et al.20. Several continental-scale studies using fossil pollen data link a change in vegetation to an increase in human activity during the middle to late Holocenee.g. 21,12,11. A global analysis found an accelerated rate-of-change in pollen composition from ~ 4.6 ka BP, but with substantial regional differences13 although no attempt was made to discern the causes of this acceleration. These findings underscore that the relationship between humans and vegetation during the Holocene was complex, with periods of increased human influence at different spatial scales. No consensus thus yet exists regarding whether early-to-mid Holocene humans had a substantial impact on macroecological patterns.
Palaeoecological studies have also documented how climate shapes vegetation dynamics at regional to continental scales. These range from individual taxa that track suitable climate conditions within areas limited by their ability to disperse and establish22, to the formation of vegetation types are governed by Holocene climate variationse.g.23,24,25,15. This variation includes different temporal variability on decadal to centennial scales, such as changes in warming-cooling events and wet-dry phases during the Holocene26, complicating the inference of regional patterns in vegetation dynamics and their relation to human impact.
Several region-specific syntheses using fossil pollen aimed to quantify the long-term effects of human activity and climate, and demonstrated that human impact exceeded climate and significantly changed vegetation patterns at different times during the Holocenee.g.27,28,29,30. However, these studies use a single extrinsic driver at a time, mainly focus on one vegetation property, and are not directly comparable across regions due to their use of different proxies and methodologies. The recent surge in open-access repositories housing extensive palaeoecological and archaeological records31,32,33, alongside palaeoclimate databases34, creates new opportunities to combine different sources of information from independent proxies to quantify the still-unknown relative effects of human influence and climate on comparable regional to global scales.
To address the question of how widespread and profound was the early human influence on terrestrial ecosystems, we seek to quantify and formally attribute the relative influence of early-to-mid Holocene (8.5–2 ka BP) human and climate impact on past pollen-assemblage properties (hereafter properties) at a global scale, encompassing climate zones and continents. These properties are Hill`s diversity numbers of palynological richness (N0), diversity (N1, N2), and evenness (N2/N1, N1/N0), turnover (detrended canonical correspondence analysis axis 1; DCCA 1), rate-of-change (RoC), density of diversity changes (DDC), and density of compositional change (DCC) (see Methods). We analyse temporal and spatial patterns of these properties and the internal relationships between properties collectively to evaluate the overall importance of humans in relation to climate as a reference. We explore two hypotheses. Our first hypothesis (H1) proposes that human impact was the primary driver of temporal changes in properties at the climate-zone and continental scales during the early-to-mid Holocene (8.5–2 ka BP). We compare the importance of human impact relative to climate in two ways, spatially and temporally; 1) between records summarised within different climate zones and continents (spatial), and 2) the spatial extent of properties across continents between time slices (temporal). Our second hypothesis (H2) proposes that human impact significantly altered the internal relationships between the properties of vegetation within climate zones and continents during the early-to-mid Holocene. If the amount and extent of past human impact are an important driver of change in past pollen assemblages, then we expect human impact to be as high or even exceed the influence of climate.
We harmonised 1262 fossil pollen records from North America, Central and South America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania (Fig. 1; Methods; Extended Data Fig. 1). Rather than adhering to geopolitical borders, the continental regions are pragmatically divided according to physical geography and dominant vegetation types. After filtering datasets by our selected criteria, Africa was excluded as the pollen data were too sparse (< 11 in total, see Methods). The response data are matrices of properties represented by N0, N1, N2, N2/N1, N1/N0, DCCA1, RoC, DCD, and DCC. The predictor variables of past human activity are the summed probability density (SPD) of archaeological radiocarbon dates33 and an expert-based detection of ‘human-impact events’, which are identified based on anthropogenic indicator taxa in individual pollen diagrams (Methods; Extended Data Fig. 2). Palaeoclimate is represented by summer and winter precipitation, mean annual temperature, and minimum temperature of the coldest month extracted from the CHELSA-TraCE21k Paleoclimate database version 134.
To quantify the amount and extent to which past human activity and palaeoclimate are important predictors of changes in the properties (H1), we employed hierarchical variation partitioning (HVARPART), using redundancy analysis (RDA) with standardisation of properties as responses, and past human presence and activity and palaeoclimate as predictors (Methods; Extended Data Fig. 3). This method is a robust approach for evaluating the importance of predictors35. The importance (adjusted r2) of each predictor is the sum of the averaged unique and average shared partitions accounting for different orders of predictors in the model35. The ratio of predictor importance of human activity and palaeoclimate relative to each other are calculated within and between individual records for each 500-year time slice (Fig. 1; Methods). To summarise the predictor importance for the continental regions and subdivisions of the Köppen-Geiger climate zones36, we calculated the mean ratios of the individual predictor importance weighted by the sum of the predictor’s importance. Our analyses focus on the early-to-mid Holocene (8.5–2 ka BP) because we only assessed time slices for which sufficient SPD could be built (Table 1), which are limited by a lack of compiled datasets of radiocarbon dates for past humans during the last 2 millennia in Europe and Asia33. However, to support our past human-presence reconstructions, we complement the temporal analysis by using human-impact events as a human-activity predictor (Methods).
Table 1
Data summary for each continental region. Number of pollen records included in the analyses for the assessed period of 8.5–2.0 calibrated thousand years before present (cal ka BP), the number of records with summed probability densities (SPD) within a 250 km or 500 km radius of the site, and the number of records with human-impact events.
Continents | Number of fossil pollen records | Number of records with SPD 250 km | Number of records with SPD 500 km | Number of records with human-impact events detected |
North America | 554 | 512 | 43 | 217 |
Central & South America | 87 | 65 | 15 | 87 |
Europe | 396 | 383 | 14 | 143 |
Asia | 177 | 47 | 64 | 95 |
Oceania | 48 | 37 | 1 | 28 |
To quantify changes in the internal relationships between properties in response to humans and palaeoclimate (H2), we interpolated estimated properties at 500-year time slices within climate zones across continents. We used a principal component analysis (PCA) with standardisation of all properties to quantify the correlation and covariance for each time slice and employed symmetrical Procrustes sum-of squares (m2) to estimate the total change in configurations between the properties in pairwise time slices within climate zones37 (see Methods). This provided pairwise m2 distance matrices that are used as response variables in HVARPART to quantify the importance of past human activity and climate on changes in relationships between all the properties within regional climate zones for the period 8.5–2 ka BP (Fig. 1). To determine the general patterns of past humans (SPD) and palaeoclimate for the different climate zones, we used a hierarchical generalised additive model (HGAM38), in a Bayesian modelling framework (Extended Data Figs. 4–8). Subsequently, the predicted mean trend from the model is integrated as a predictor in the HVARPART analyses.
Palaeoclimate has a substantially greater importance than past human presence for changes in the past properties, a trend consistent globally (Fig. 2). Our spatial analysis shows high variation in the ratios of predictor importance of past human presence and palaeoclimate in driving changes in past properties during the early and middle Holocene (Fig. 2). Both have been important in shaping patterns of properties at individual sites with the ratio of importance of past humans ranging between 0 and 0.57, and palaeoclimate from 0–0.90. As spatial scale increases, so does the relative importance of climate. At the climate zone level, weighted mean ratios range from 0–0.71 for humans to 0.29–1 for palaeoclimate. On continental scales, these ratios are 0.16–0.32 for humans to 0.68–0.85 for palaeoclimate. Despite being less important than palaeoclimate, the importance of human presence is higher in certain climate zones (except Polar and Cold climate zones) than its weighted mean across continents. Outliers in Oceania are based on too few sites to be considered robust (< 5 records).
Palaeoclimate is also the dominant driver accounting for temporal variation in spatial patterns of past properties across continents (Fig. 3). Our temporal analysis with SPD or human-impact events as predictors, reveals the varying importance of human presence, human-impact events, and palaeoclimate over time (Fig. 3). The trends between the analyses run with SPD as the predictor or with human-impact events are relatively consistent among the different regions, except in Asia where human importance by SPD is likely underestimated due to limited radiocarbon dates, and human-impact events indicate an increasing extent of human impact across the continent after 3.5 ka BP. In Europe, SPD are likely underestimated after 3 ka BP, though the extent of human impact is relatively stable after this period as assessed by human-impact events (Fig. 3). The weighted mean ratios for human presence (SPD) in relation to palaeoclimate, and human-impact events in relation to palaeoclimate are presented in Extended Data Tables 3 and 4.
Palaeoclimate rather than past human presence is also the primary predictor for internal changes in relationships between properties within climate zones between 8.5 and 2 ka BP globally (Fig. 4). The spread and distance in the time trajectories indicate the amount of change in correlations between the properties in different time slices, and whether changes in these internal relationships are temporarily or continually changing in different directions (Fig. 4). The coldest regions, in particularly Europe and North America`s Polar, Cold, and Temperate without dry season zones, show, overall, considerably less change in internal relationships between properties compared to other climate zones. This may suggest climatic filtering on past assemblages and underlying ecological processes remaining unchanged or changing synchronously during the investigated period. In contrast, other regions with higher environmental variation in Cold, Temperate, Tropical, and Arid zones globally are more dynamic and show that internal relationships between properties evolve in different directions, mainly caused by climatic variability, but also influenced in some regions by a varying degree of past human presence.
Our findings thus refute hypotheses that early-to-mid Holocene human activities were a primary driver for changes in assemblage properties of vegetation (H1) or in the internal relationships between the properties (H2) at continental to global scales. While past humans have acted as strong disturbance factors at specific sites, their importance is considerably lower than that of palaeoclimate during the early and middle Holocene, and the human signal decreases with increasing spatial scales. Even though humans were most likely present in all studied locations, population densities and land use type and intensity varied spatially. An increasing impact on macroecological scales does not emerge before population sizes increase across continents during the middle Holocene (> 5 ka BP) and is not spatially coherent. Consistent increasing human importance is mainly revealed in Asia (human-impact events) and Oceania (human-impact events and SPD) that surpasses palaeoclimate at 2.5 or 2.0 ka respectively. In North America, Central and South America, and Europe, palaeoclimate remains the dominant driver of vegetation dynamics throughout the early-to-mid Holocene, albeit with increasing human importance after 2.0, 1.0, or 3.5 ka BP, respectively. A higher weighted mean of human importance in some climate zones compared to the weighted continental means (Fig. 2), may indicate that the extent of human influence was greater at some sites in these regions. Early Holocene peaks in human importance correspond with initial cultivation events, despite their limited extent or small populations (Fig. 3).
Humans have affected ecosystems throughout the Holocene, but the impact was localised and secondary to climate for most of the early-to-mid Holocene. These results align with research showing climate can have a strong and consistent filtering on pollen assemblages as assessed by comparing local and regional assembly pools39. The observed increase of RoC in vegetation starting from 4.6 ka BP to the present detected in different regions by Mottl et al.13 can now be more closely linked to the increasing extent of human presence and impact globally. A weak trend of climate mismatch throughout the middle and late Holocene might be the result of constraints on species dispersal caused by human-induced habitat fragmentation39. Although the degree of human importance increased during this period, it did not exceed climate impact for most regions, except in Asia. This finding supports the likely human-induced changes in the vegetation property patterns detected by Cao et al.40 in eastern Asia. Rapid rate-of-compositional changes during the late Holocene suggest interactions between changes in regional climate and human activity shaping novel vegetation patternse.g.41 during the late Holocene to the present. This aligns with the ongoing challenge of defining global tipping points42 for terrestrial ecosystems. Therefore, attempts to define a global `Anthropocene` era in ecological datasets is challenging or even impossible due to the high heterogeneity between regions and factors affecting assemblages of taxa in varying degrees both temporally and spatially.
Considering uncertainties in proxies due to missing data or data gaps, especially in relation to past human proxies younger than 3 ka BP, future studies using more data and improved proxies may provide further insights into the importance of human activities on the property patterns of past vegetation. By comparing similarities and differences between regional and site-based property patterns and their relationships to environment and human activity, important drivers particularly during the late Holocene (younger than 4 ka BP), may be uncovered.
Through numerical analyses of fossil pollen, archaeological, and palaeoclimate data, we explored the complex historical legacies of humans and past climate on early-to-mid Holocene vegetation via pollen-assemblage properties. This study uniquely quantifies diverse properties patterns of past vegetation, offering a holistic view of their dynamics across temporal and spatial scales. Our results challenge the hypothesis of extensive global human impact in the early and middle Holocene. Our findings show it was consistently low compared to climate, supporting the view that climate is the primary driver for shaping terrestrial vegetation globally, and signals of localised high effects of past humans are not transferrable to broader spatial scales. Therefore, evidence for strong site-based human impacts should not be generalised to a continental or global scale.