Table 2 shows univariate analysis of factors influences place of delivery. Education levels are notably skewed, with the majority lacking formal education (84.22%), followed by those with primary (11.84%) and secondary education (2.88%), and a small fraction with higher education (1.06%). In terms of decision-making, that husbands predominantly make healthcare decisions (51.28%), followed by joint decision-making (33.42%), and a smaller percentage by the respondents themselves (14.85%). Regarding birth order, the majority falls within the 1–3 range (93.45%), followed by 4–6 (6.38%), and a tiny fraction with more than 7 children (0.17%). Occupational engagement in husbands over the last year stands at 46.24%, while 53.76% have not been occupied.
Age distribution of respondents is mainly concentrated in the 25–34 years range (51.80%), followed by 35–44 years (22.08%), 15–24 years (24.52%), and those over 45 years old (1.60%). The number of children ever born varies, with 0–3 children at 33.02%, 4–7 children as the majority (49.78%), and over 8 children at 17.20%. Age at first childbirth is primarily within the 17–26 years range (75.68%), followed by 7–16 years (18.93%), 27–36 years (5.30%), and individuals of 37 years old and over (0.10%). As shown, the respondents entered their first marriage between 12–20 years old (79.64%), followed by 21–29 years old (17.36%), 30–38 years old (0.88%), and those 39 years old and over (2.12%).
A small proportion of respondents engage in watching TV (9.86%), while the majority does not 90.14%. Male household heads dominate (68.02%), with female household heads comprising 31.98%. Household sizes with 1–5 member households comprising the majority (50.07%), followed by 6–10 member households (9.00%), and those with 11 and over members (40.92%). Regarding proximity to health facilities, 63.53% of respondents reported having problems with the distance, while 36.47% did not face such issues. Residence locations vary, with 25.93% in rural areas, 41.13% in urban areas, and 32.95% leading a nomadic lifestyle. Wealth distribution, shows that 45.90% are categorized as poor, 38.49% fall into the middle wealth category, and 15.60% belong to the rich category.
associations Across different regions on place of delivery, Banadir has the highest frequency (11.29%), followed by Sanaag (8.22%), and Sool (7.54%). Notable regions include Woqooyi Galbeed (6.63%), Togdheer (6.79%), and Nugaal (5.94%). Lower frequencies are observed in Bay (2.33%) and Awdal (4.55%).
Table 2
Univariate analysis of factors associated the place of delivery among women at childbearing age in SHDS 2020.
Independent Variables | Frequency (N) | Percentage (%) |
Highest education level | | |
No education | 13,611 | 84.22 |
Primary | 1,914 | 11.84 |
Secondary | 465 | 2.88 |
Higher | 172 | 1.06 |
Healthcare decision making | | |
Respondent | 2,400 | 14.85 |
Husband | 8,288 | 51.28 |
Jointly | 5,402 | 33.42 |
Other | 72 | 0.45 |
Birth Order | | |
1–3 | 15,104 | 93.45 |
4–6 | 1,031 | 6.38 |
7 and more | 27 | 0.17 |
Husband Occupation Last 12 month | | |
Yes | 7,474 | 46.24 |
No | 8,688 | 53.76 |
Age of the respondents | | |
15–24 | 3,963 | 24.52 |
25–34 | 8,372 | 51.80 |
35–44 | 3,569 | 22.08 |
45 and more | 258 | 1.60 |
Total children ever born | | |
0–3 | 5,336 | 33.02 |
4–7 | 8,046 | 49.78 |
8 and more | 2,780 | 17.20 |
Age at 1st birth | | |
7–16 | 3,059 | 18.93 |
17–26 | 12,231 | 75.68 |
27–36 | 856 | 5.30 |
37 and more | 16 | 0.10 |
Age at 1st marriage | | |
12–20 | 12,871 | 79.64 |
21–29 | 2,806 | 17.36 |
30–38 | 143 | 0.88 |
39 and more | 342 | 2.12 |
Watching Tv | | |
Yes | 1,593 | 9.86 |
No | 14,569 | 90.14 |
Gender of household head | | |
Male | 10,994 | 68.02 |
Female | 5,168 | 31.98 |
Household Number | | |
1–5 | 8,093 | 50.07 |
6–10 | 1,455 | 9.00 |
11 and more | 6,614 | 40.92 |
Distance to the health facility | | |
Problem | 10,267 | 63.53 |
No Problem | 5,895 | 36.47 |
Place of Residence | | |
Rural | 4,190 | 25.93 |
Urban | 6,647 | 41.13 |
Nomadic | 5,325 | 32.95 |
Wealth quantile | | |
Poor | 7,419 | 45.90 |
Middle | 6,221 | 38.49 |
Rich | 2,522 | 15.60 |
Region | | |
Awdal | 736 | 4.55 |
Waqooyi galbeed | 1,071 | 6.63 |
Togdheer | 1,098 | 6.79 |
Sool | 1,219 | 7.54 |
Sanaag | 1,329 | 8.22 |
Bari | 986 | 6.10 |
Nugaal | 960 | 5.94 |
Mudug | 963 | 5.96 |
Galgaduud | 889 | 5.50 |
Hiraan | 793 | 4.91 |
Middle Shabelle | 832 | 5.15 |
Banadir | 1,825 | 11.29 |
Bay | 377 | 2.33 |
Bakool | 1,054 | 6.52 |
Gedo | 993 | 6.14 |
Lower juba | 1,037 | 6.42 |
Table 3 shows bivariate analysis of Factors Associated the place of delivery among childbearing women of Somalia, firstly, demonstrated significant association between the highest education level attained by women and the chosen place of delivery (home versus health facility). The frequency of home deliveries declined as the education level increased. Specifically, women with no education exhibited the highest percentage of home deliveries at 84.26%, followed by those with primary education at 63.79%. Conversely, women with secondary education displayed a lower percentage of home deliveries at 44.09%, while those with higher education had the lowest percentage at 24.42%. Conversely, the percentage of health facility deliveries increased with higher education levels. The Chi-square test indicated a statistically significant difference in the place of delivery based on the highest education level attained by women (p < 0.001). in contrast the examination of healthcare decision-making in relation to the place of delivery unveils compelling associations (p < 0.001) among various decision-makers. When respondents autonomously made the decision, a notable majority (74.71%) favored home delivery. Conversely, when husbands assumed the decision-making role, an even higher proportion (83.29%) opted for home deliveries. Similarly, joint decision-making resulted in a prevalent preference (77.51%) for home delivery. These findings underscore the profound influence of decision-makers on the choice between home and health facility deliveries.
Concerning birth order, no statistically significant association was observed with the chosen place of delivery. For birth orders 1–3, 80.03% opted for home deliveries, while 19.97% chose health facility deliveries. Similarly, birth orders 4–6 exhibited similar percentages, with 80.02% home deliveries and 19.98% health facility deliveries. Conversely, for birth orders of 7 and more, 88.89% favored home deliveries compared to 11.11% at health facilities. However, the Chi-square test did not reveal statistical significance (p = 0.52), additionally the analysis underscores a significant association between the place of delivery and the occupational status of the husband within the last 12 months. Among women whose husbands were employed, 72.13% opted for home deliveries, while 27.87% chose health facilities. Conversely, among women whose husbands were not employed, a significant majority (86.86%) favored home deliveries, with only 13.14% opting for health facilities.
Similarly, the age of respondents exhibits a significant association with place of delivery. Among women aged 15–24, 77.95% delivered at home and 22.05% at a health facility. In the 25–34 age bracket, 80.26% preferred home delivery, with 19.74% opting for a health facility. For those aged 35–44, 81.31% chose home delivery, while 18.69% opted for a health facility. Notably, for women over 45, 87.98% delivered at home compared to 12.02% at a health facility. The chi-square test confirms the statistical significance of these differences (p < 0.001).
Furthermore, there exists a significant association between the total number of children ever born and the place of delivery. Among women with 0–3 children, 75.34% favored home delivery and 24.66% chose a health facility. In the group with 4–7 children, 82.49% opted for home delivery, whereas 17.51% chose a health facility. Similarly, for those with more than 8 children, 82.01% delivered at home compared to 17.99% at a health facility. The chi-square test underscores the statistical significance of these variances (p < 0.001).
The analysis demonstrates a significant correlation between the age at first birth and the chosen place of delivery (home versus health facility). Notably, among women whose first birth occurred between ages 7–16, 82.97% opted for home delivery, while 17.03% chose a health facility. Similarly, for those with first births between ages 17–26, 79.31% delivered at home compared to 20.69% at a health facility. In the age group with first births between ages 27–36, 80.14% preferred home delivery, while 19.86% opted for a health facility. Moreover, for women whose first birth was at or after age 37, 75% delivered at home, while 25% chose a health facility. The statistical significance of these disparities is confirmed by the chi-square test (p < 0.001).
Likewise, there exists a significant association between the age at first marriage and the selected place of delivery. Among women married between ages 12–20, 80.93% opted for home delivery, with 19.07% choosing a health facility. For those married between ages 21–29, 75.59% favored home delivery compared to 24.41% at a health facility. Similarly, in the age group with first marriages between ages 30–38, 74.13% chose home delivery, while 25.87% opted for a health facility. Additionally, for women marrying after age 39, 85.96% delivered at home, while 14.04% chose a health facility. The chi-square test underlines the statistical significance of these variations (p < 0.001). also, the findings reveal a notable correlation between watching television and the place of delivery Notably, among women who watched TV, 50.78% opted for home delivery while 49.22% chose a health facility. Conversely, for those who did not watch TV, 83.25% favored home delivery compared to 16.75% who opted for a health facility. This dissimilarity in delivery location between the two groups is statistically significant (p < 0.001).
The household head gender showed a marginally significant association with the chosen place of delivery. Male-headed households witnessed 79.63% home deliveries and 20.37% health facility deliveries, while female-headed households experienced 80.92% home deliveries and 19.08% health facility deliveries. With a p-value of 0.056, the Chi-square test indicated a borderline significance in this association between the household head gender and the place of delivery.
Also, the analysis indicates a significant association between household size and the chosen place of delivery. Among households with 1–5 members, 82.42% opted for home delivery, whereas 17.58% chose a health facility. Similarly, in households with 6–10 members, 83.23% preferred home delivery compared to 16.77% at a health facility. Notably, in households with more than 11 members, 74.44% chose home delivery, while 23.56% opted for a health facility. The chi-square test confirms the statistical significance of these differences (p < 0.001). in contrast data presented highlight a significant correlation between the distance to the health facility and the selected place of delivery. Notably, Women who faced difficulties accessing a health facility had a higher percentage of home deliveries at 83.60%, while those who did not have such difficulties had a lower percentage of 73.86%. Conversely, the percentage of health facility deliveries was higher for women without access issues, at 26.14%, compared to 16.40% for those who faced access difficulties. The Chi-square test underscored a statistically significant disparity in the place of delivery based on the distance to the health facility (p < 0.001).
Moreover, the analysis revealed that the place of residence, encompassing rural, urban, and nomadic areas, did not exhibit a significant association with the chosen place of delivery (p = 0.22). Home delivery frequency was higher in rural areas at 80.48%, followed by nomadic areas at 80.53%, and urban areas at 79.39%. Conversely, the percentage of health facility deliveries was lower in rural areas at 19.52%, followed by nomadic areas at 19.47%, and urban areas at 20.61%. The Chi-square test did not identify a statistically significant difference in the place of delivery based on the place of residence, suggesting that other factors may play a more influential role in determining where women choose to deliver. Similarly, delivery location vs wealth quantiles reveal a significant association (p < 0.001) between socioeconomic status and delivery preferences. Distinct patterns emerge across different wealth categories. Among the impoverished, an overwhelming majority (93.84%) opted for home deliveries. In the middle-income bracket, a more balanced distribution was observed, with 74.57% choosing home deliveries and 25.43% opting for health facilities. Conversely, among the affluent, while home deliveries still prevailed (80.05%), a larger proportion (19.95%) opted for health facilities, indicating a heightened utilization of healthcare facilities among wealthier populations.
Finally, the data provided demonstrate a significant association between the region and the chosen place of delivery. The frequency of home deliveries exhibited variation across regions, with the highest percentage in Bari at 90.47% and the lowest in Gedo at 3.42%. In contrast, the percentage of health facility deliveries ranged from 9.53% in Bari to 27.54% in Sanaag. The Chi-square test confirmed a statistically significant difference in the place of delivery across regions, indicating that regional factors play a crucial role in determining where women choose to deliver.
Table 3
Bivariate analysis of factors associated the place of delivery among childbearing women of Somalia
Variable | Place of delivery | Df | P-value |
Chi2-test |
| Home(N/%) | Health facility(N/%) | | |
Highest education level | | | 3 | < 0.001 |
No education | 11,469(84.26) | 2,142(15.74) | | |
Primary | 1,221(63.79) | 693 (36.21) | | |
Secondary | 205(44.09) | 260(55.91) | | |
Higher | 42(24.42) | 130(75.58) | | |
Healthcare decision making | | | 3 | < 0.001 |
Respondent | 1,793(74.71) | 607(25.29) | | |
Husband | 6,903(83.29) | 1,385(16.71) | | |
Jointly | 4,187(77.51) | 1,215(22.49) | | |
Other | 54(75) | 18(25) | | |
Birth Order | | | 2 | 0.52 |
1–3 | 12,088(80.03) | 3,016(19.97) | | |
4–6 | 825(80.02) | 206(19.98) | | |
7 and more | 24(88.89) | 3(11.11) | | |
Husband Occupation Last 12 month | | | 1 | < 0.001 |
Yes | 5,391(72.13) | 2,083(27.87) | | |
No | 7,546(86.86) | 1,142(13.14) | | |
Age of the respondents | | | 3 | < 0.001 |
15–24 | 3,089(77.95) | 874(22.05) | | |
25–34 | 6,719(80.26) | 1,653(19.74) | | |
35–44 | 2,902(81.31) | 667(18.69) | | |
45 and more | 227(87.98) | 31(12.02) | | |
Total children ever born | | | 2 | < 0.001 |
0–3 | 4,020(75.34) | 1,316(24.66) | | |
4–7 | 6,637(82.49) | 1,409(17.51) | | |
8 and more | 2,200(82.01) | 500(17.99) | | |
Age at 1st birth | | | 3 | < 0.001 |
7–16 | 2,538(82.97) | 521(17.03) | | |
17–26 | 9,701(79.31) | 2,530(20.69) | | |
27–36 | 686(80.14) | 170(19.86) | | |
≥ 37 | 12(75) | 4(25) | | |
Age at 1st marriage | | | 3 | < 0.001 |
12–20 | 10,416(80.93) | 2,455(19.07) | | |
21–29 | 2,121(75.59) | 685(24.41) | | |
30–38 | 106(74.13) | 37(25.87) | | |
39 and more | 294(85.96) | 48(14.04) | | |
Watching Tv | | | 1 | < 0.001 |
Yes | 809(50.78) | 784(49.22) | | |
No | 12,128(83.25) | 2,441(16.75) | | |
Gender of household head | | | 1 | 0.056 |
Male | 8,755(79.63) | 2,239(20.37) | | |
Female | 4,182(80.92) | 986(19.08) | | |
Household Number | | | 2 | < 0.001 |
1–5 | 6,670(82.42) | 1,423(17.58) | | |
6–10 | 1,211(83.23) | 244(16.77) | | |
11 and more | 5,056(74.44) | 1,558(23.56) | | |
Distance to the health facility | | | 1 | < 0.001 |
Problem | 8,583(83.60) | 1,684(16.40) | | |
No Problem | 4,354(73.86) | 1,541(26.14) | | |
Place of Residence | | | 2 | 0.22 |
Rural | 3,372(80.48) | 818(19.52) | | |
Urban | 5,277(79.39) | 1,370(20.61) | | |
Nomadic | 4,288(80.53) | 1,037(19.47) | | |
Wealth quantile | | | 2 | < 0.001 |
Poor | 6,962(93.84) | 457(6.16) | | |
Middle | 4,639(74.57) | 1,582(25.43) | | |
Rich | 12,937(80.05) | 3,225(19.95) | | |
Region | | | 15 | < 0.001 |
Awdal | 497(67.53) | 239(32.47) | | |
Waqooyi galbeed | 817(76.28) | 254(23.72) | | |
Togdheer | 697(63.48) | 401(36.52) | | |
Sool | 805(66.04) | 414(33.96) | | |
Sanaag | 963(72.46) | 366(27.54) | | |
Bari | 892(90.47) | 94(9.53) | | |
Nugaal | 843(87.81) | 117(12.19) | | |
Mudug | 899(93.35) | 64(6.65) | | |
Galgaduud | 796(89.54) | 93(10.46) | | |
Hiraan | 689(86.89) | 104(13.11) | | |
Middle Shabelle | 619(74.40) | 213(25.60) | | |
Banadir | 1,399(76.66) | 426(23.34) | | |
Bay | 299(79.31) | 78(20.69) | | |
Bakool | 854(81.02) | 200(18.98) | | |
Gedo | 959(96.58) | 34(3.42) | | |
Lower juba | 909(87.66) | 128(12.34) | | |
Table 4 shows multivariate analysis of factors associated place of delivery. Education level showed a strong association, with higher education levels significantly increasing the odds of facility-based delivery compared to no education: primary education (aOR = 3.04, 95% CI = 2.74–3.37, P < 0.001), Secondary Education (aOR = 6.79, 95% CI = 5.62–8.20, P < 0.001), and higher education (aOR = 16.57, 95% CI = 11.68–23.54, P < 0.001).
Regarding healthcare decision-making, women whose husbands made healthcare decisions were less likely to deliver at a healthcare facility (aOR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.53–0.66, P < 0.001) compared to those who made decisions independently, and joint decision-making also decreased the likelihood of facility-based delivery (aOR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.77–0.96, P = 0.007). Additionally, if the husband had not been employed in the last 12 months, the odds of facility-based delivery decreased (aOR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.36–0.42, P < 0.001).
Similarly, Age was a significant factor, with women aged 25–34 (aOR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.79–0.95, P = 0.003), 35–44 (aOR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.72–0.91, P < 0.001), and 45 and above (aOR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.33–0.70, P < 0.001) being less likely to deliver at a facility compared to those aged 15–24. Parity (Total Children everborn) also influenced the place of delivery, with women having 4–7 children (aOR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.59–0.70, P < 0.001) and 8 or more children (aOR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.60–0.75, P < 0.001) being less likely to deliver at a facility compared to those with 0–3 children. The age at first birth also had an impact, with women having their first birth between ages 17–26 (aOR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.14–1.41, P < 0.001) being more likely to deliver at a facility compared to those with their first birth at ages 7–16. The age at marriage played a role, with women marrying between ages 21–29 (aOR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.24–1.51, P < 0.001) and 30–38 (aOR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.01–2.16, P = 0.041) being more likely to deliver at a facility, while those marrying at age 39 and above were less likely (aOR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.51–0.94, P = 0.02) compared to those marrying between ages 12–20.
Moreover, Women's exposure to media also played a role, with those who did not watch TV being less likely to deliver at a facility (aOR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.19–0.23, P < 0.001) compared to TV viewers. Household size had an impact, with households of 11 or more members being more likely to deliver at a facility compared to those with 1–5 members (aOR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.33–1.56, P < 0.001). also, The distance to the health facility was significant, with shorter distances ("No Problem") increasing the likelihood of facility deliveries (aOR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.67–1.95, P < 0.001) compared to those who faced distance-related difficulties. Additionally, Economic status played a significant role, with women in the middle wealth quantile (aOR = 5.19, 95% CI = 4.65–5.80, P < 0.001) and rich wealth quantile (aOR = 13.52, 95% CI = 11.96–15.29, P < 0.001) having higher odds of delivering at a healthcare facility compared to those in the poor category. Similarly, Region also played a role, most regions show significantly lower odds of facility-based delivery compared to Awdal, with the magnitude of effect varying across regions. Togdheer (aOR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.98–1.46, p = 0.75) and Sool (aOR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.88–1.30, p = 0.50) are the only regions shows not statistically different.
Factors that do not show a significant association with the place of delivery include situations where healthcare decisions are made by "others" (aOR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.57–1.69, p = 0.95), various birth orders such as 4–6 (aOR = 1.00, 95%CI = 0.85–1.17, p = 0.99), and 7 or more (aOR = 0.50, 95%CI = 0.15–1.66, p = 0.26). for women aged between 27 to 36 at their first birth, the association is marginally significant (aOR = 1.21, 95% CI-= 0.99–1.46, P = 0.055), 37 and above (aOR = 1.62, 95%CI = 0.52–5.05, p = 0.4). The household head gender also does not significantly affect the place of delivery (p = 0.056), which is similar to the study (Ahinkorah et al., 2021). household size ranging from 6 to 10 people (aOR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.81–1.09, p = 0.45), place of residence Urban (aOR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.97–1.18, p = 0.169), and nomadic lifestyle (aOR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.90–1.10, p = 0.953), this result contradicts to the study (Bekele et al., 2022)
Table 4
Multivariate analysis of factors associated the place of delivery among women at childbearing age of Somalia.
Independent variables | cOR (95% CI) | P-value | aOR (95% CI) | P-value |
Highest education level | | | | |
No education | Referenced | | Referenced | |
Primary | 1.82(1.61–2.05) | < 0.001 | 3.04(2.74–3.37) | < 0.001 |
Secondary | 2.74(2.21–3.38) | < 0.001 | 6.79(5.62–8.20) | < 0.001 |
Higher | 4.54(3.06–6.72) | < 0.001 | 16.57(11.68–23.54) | < 0.001 |
Healthcare decision making | | | | |
Respondent | Referenced | | Referenced | |
Husband | 0.84(0.74–0.95) | 0.007 | 0.59(0.53–0.66) | < 0.001 |
Jointly | 0.87(0.77–0.99) | 0.044 | 0.86(0.77–0.96) | 0.007 |
Other | 1.1(0.60–2.19) | 0.678 | 0.98(0.57–1.69) | 0.955 |
Birth Order | | | | |
1–3 | Referenced | | Referenced | |
4–6 | 1.04(0.87–1.24) | 0.681 | 1.00(0.85–1.17) | 0.992 |
7 and more | 0.37(0.11–1.29) | 0.119 | 0.50(0.15–1.66) | 0.259 |
Husband Occupation Last 12 month | | | | |
Yes | Referenced | | Referenced | |
No | 0.72(0.66–0.79) | < 0.001 | 0.39(0.36–0.42) | < 0.001 |
Age of the respondents | | | | |
15–24 | Referenced | | Referenced | |
25–34 | 0.93(0.82–1.06) | 0.286 | 0.87(0.79–0.95) | 0.003 |
35–44 | 1.10(0.91–1.32) | 0.310 | 0.81(0.72–0.91) | < 0.001 |
45 and more | 0.72(0.46–1.12) | 0.147 | 0.48(0.33–0.71) | < 0.001 |
Total children ever born | | | | |
0–3 | Referenced | | Referenced | |
4–7 | 0.68(0.60–0.76) | < 0.001 | 0.65(0.59–0.70) | < 0.001 |
≥ 8 | 0.70(0.59–0.83) | < 0.001 | 0.67(0.60–0.75) | < 0.001 |
Age at 1st birth | | | | |
7–16 | Referenced | | Referenced | |
17–26 | 1.19(1.05–1.35) | 0.005 | 1.27(1.14–1.41) | < 0.001 |
27–36 | 0.88(0.67–1.15) | 0.340 | 1.21(0.99–1.46) | 0.055 |
37 and more | 0.77(0.18–3.26) | 0.723 | 1.62(0.52–5.05) | 0.403 |
Age at 1st marriage | | | | |
12–20 | Referenced | | Referenced | |
21–29 | 1.31(1.16–1.49) | < 0.001 | 1.37(1.24–1.51) | < 0.001 |
30–38 | 1.86(1.12–3.10) | 0.017 | 1.48(1.01–2.16) | 0.041 |
39 and more | 0.78(0.56–1.11) | 0.169 | 0.69(0.51–0.94) | 0.020 |
Watching Tv | | | | |
Yes | Referenced | | Referenced | |
No | 0.69(0.61–0.80) | < 0.001 | 0.21(0.19–0.23) | < 0.001 |
Gender of household head | | | | |
Male | Referenced | | Referenced | |
Female | 1.01(0.91–1.11) | 0.871 | 0.92(0.85-1.00) | 0.056 |
Household Number | | | | |
1–5 | Referenced | | Referenced | |
6–10 | 0.77(0.65–0.92) | 0.004 | 0.94(0.81–1.09) | 0.452 |
11 and more | 0.93(0.82–1.05) | 0.251 | 1.44(1.33–1.56) | < 0.001 |
Distance to the health facility | | | | |
Problem | Referenced | | Referenced | |
No Problem | 1.17(1.07–1.29) | 0.001 | 1.80(1.67–1.95) | < 0.001 |
Place of Residence | | | | |
Rural | Referenced | | Referenced | |
Urban | 1.05(0.92–1.19) | 0.455 | 1.07(0.97–1.18) | 0.169 |
Nomadic | 0.63(0.55–0.73) | < 0.001 | 1.00(0.90–1.10) | 0.953 |
Wealth quantile | | | | |
Poor | Referenced | | Referenced | |
Middle | 4.24(3.75–4.80) | < 0.001 | 5.19(4.65–5.80) | < 0.001 |
Rich | 6.47(5.56–7.52) | < 0.001 | 13.52(11.96–15.29) | < 0.001 |
Region | | | | |
Awdal | Referenced | | Referenced | |
Waqooyi galbeed | 0.65(0.51–0.83) | 0.001 | 0.65(0.52–0.80) | < 0.001 |
Togdheer | 0.89(0.70–1.12) | 0.308 | 1.20(0.98–1.46) | 0.075 |
Sool | 0.79(0.63–0.99) | 0.040 | 1.07(0.88–1.30) | 0.499 |
Sanaag | 0.59(0.47–0.74) | < 0.001 | 0.79(0.65–0.96) | 0.018 |
Bari | 0.21(0.15–0.28) | < 0.001 | 0.22(0.17–0.28) | < 0.001 |
Nugaal | 0.29(0.22–0.38) | < 0.001 | 0.29(0.22–0.37) | < 0.001 |
Mudug | 0.10(0.07–0.14) | < 0.001 | 0.15(0.11–0.20) | < 0.001 |
Galgaduud | 0.24(0.18–0.32) | < 0.001 | 0.24(0.19–0.32) | < 0.001 |
Hiraan | 0.30(0.22–0.40) | < 0.001 | 0.31(0.24–0.41) | < 0.001 |
Middle Shabelle | 0.57(0.44–0.74) | < 0.001 | 0.71(0.57–0.89) | 0.003 |
Banadir | 0.45(0.35–0.56) | < 0.001 | 0.63(0.52–0.76) | < 0.001 |
Bay | 0.31(0.22–0.44) | < 0.001 | 0.54(0.40–0.73) | < 0.001 |
Bakool | 0.40(0.31–0.52) | < 0.001 | 0.49(0.39–0.60) | < 0.001 |
Gedo | 0.09(0.06–0.14) | < 0.001 | 0.07(0.05–0.11) | < 0.001 |
Lower juba | 0.21(0.16–0.28) | < 0.001 | 0.29(0.23–0.37) | < 0.001 |