4.3 Results
The findings are divided into two categories based on the study's original goals: (I) trial discoveries from a spout test in an air stream and the approval of its recreation; and (ii) reproduction of the last spout diffuser model and examination of wet air dehumidification in a control volume.
4.3.1 Results of the Experimental Nozzle and Simulation Validation
Table 1 and the CFD simulations of the third test, represent the key findings from the sampling procedure in the entrance and exit nozzle zones of the open loop wind tunnel.
Table 1
Experimental findings in a straightforward nozzle T stand for temperature, Vel for speed, RH for relative humidity, and PD for pressure drop.
Inlet
|
Outlet sampled
|
Outlet simulated
|
Test
|
T (0C)
|
Vel (m/s)
|
RH (%)
|
Vel (m/s)
|
RH (%)
|
PD (Pa)
|
Vel (m/s)
|
RH (%)
|
PD (Pa)
|
1
|
20.4
|
1.9
|
53
|
10.3
|
53
|
72
|
10.88
|
55
|
60
|
2
|
20.0
|
1.3
|
78
|
7.4
|
76
|
33
|
7.35
|
79
|
34
|
3
|
20.0
|
1.5
|
92
|
7.2
|
94
|
33
|
7.35
|
94
|
30
|
The channel conditions were indistinguishable in the genuine cycle and the reenactment, as displayed, for instance, in the third trial of Table 1 concerning relative stickiness and speed appropriations, and, surprisingly, in point values in the middle line. This is steady with prior research about this approval system.
Visualization of the Results
Figure 5 presents the simulation results that show the comparison between experimental data that demonstrate the inlet and outlet parameters which include relative humidity, pressure drop, and velocity. The errors between the sampled results and the simulated results showcase the difference and major areas for model refinement.
Figure 6 compares the simulated and sampled humidity at the outlet which shows consistent overestimation by the model.
Figure 7 compares the sampled and simulated outlet velocities that showcase the regular overestimation in simulation with errors of 0.51, 1.03, and 1.85 m/s.
Figure 8 shows the comparison in sampled and simulated outlet pressure drops that demonstrates the deviations with errors of 12.0, 1.0, and − 15.0 Pa.
4.3.2 Simulation of a nozzle diffuser under internal flow
After the spout approval test, a spout diffuser recreation of the inside climate was made utilizing 6,800,000 hubs and a computing technique that required over five hours every re-enactment, with airspeed going from 1 to 6 m/s and relative dampness going from 65–95%. The realistic shows different cases. the most elevated speed esteem with a general dampness of 95% and an entry speed of 5 m/s in the spout diffuser throat. The moist air condensation is connected to the most elevated relative stickiness of 100 percent. The effect of indoor air relative mugginess and admission speed on the general moistness values at the spout throat was then inspected. To accomplish this, a few reproductions of info speeds somewhere in the range of 1 and 6 m/s and relative dampness levels somewhere in the range of 85% and 95% were performed.
4.4 Discussion
To comprehend this dehumidifier's behavior, it is first important to provide a brief explanation of the correlations between the variables related to wet air thermodynamics.
To comprehend this dehumidifier's behavior, it is first important to provide a brief explanation of the correlations between the variables related to wet air thermodynamics. This intends that while moist air extends, the particular mugginess (w) stays steady and Condition (3 expects that the incomplete tension of fume (pv) declines as the inner strain (p) diminishes.
$$\:\mathbf{w}=0.622\left(\frac{{\mathbf{p}}_{\mathbf{v}}}{\mathbf{p}-{\mathbf{p}}_{\mathbf{v}}}\right)\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\left(3\right)$$
Conditions (4) and (5) show that assuming the temperature is over 0°C, the fractional fume tension of the immersion of fume in moist air (Pvast) is still up in the air by the temperature.
$$\:{\mathbf{p}}_{\mathbf{v}\mathbf{a}\mathbf{s}\mathbf{t}}=\mathbf{f}\left(\mathbf{T}\right)={\mathbf{e}}^{\mathbf{F}}\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\left(4\right)$$
$$\:\mathbf{F}=\frac{{\mathbf{C}}_{8}}{\mathbf{T}}+{\mathbf{C}}_{9}+{\mathbf{C}}_{10}+{\mathbf{C}}_{11}{\mathbf{T}}^{2}+{\mathbf{C}}_{13}\mathbf{I}\mathbf{n}\mathbf{T}\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\left(5\right)$$
The fractional fume strain will at long last be equivalent to the halfway fume tension of the immersion esteem at one point during the extension cycle in the spout when the temperature decreases, and thus, condensation will begin because a general mugginess worth 100 percent was obtained.
Table 2
Energy use of the mechanical dehumidifiers and nozzle-diffuser system at various flow rates.
|
Velocity (m/s)
|
Flow (m/h)
|
Power (Kw)
|
Extractor S E
|
1 m/s
|
463.17
|
0.065
|
Extractor S E
|
2 m/s
|
908.33
|
0.144
|
Extractor S E
|
3 m/s
|
1367.47
|
0.227
|
Ventilator S E
|
4 m/s
|
1806.62
|
0.133
|
Ventilator S E
|
5 m/s
|
2272.83
|
0.300
|
Industrial dehumidifier
|
-
|
552
|
0.725
|
Industrial dehumidifier
|
-
|
700
|
0.900
|
Industrial dehumidifier
|
-
|
1700
|
1.750
|
Industrial dehumidifier
|
-
|
2400
|
3.200
|
Industrial dehumidifier
|
-
|
3600
|
4.555
|
From Table 2, it tends to be gathered that a mechanical dehumidifier may consume up to 10 fold the amount of energy as a fan utilized in a spout diffuser framework. As per Table 2, involving a fan and spout diffuser for 2272 m3/h utilizes 0.3 kW, though a modern dehumidifier for 2400 m3/h utilizes 3.200 kW, or over multiple times how much power that the framework that we recommend in this study consumes.
4.5 Energy Consumption Analyses
Figure 9 demonstrates the analyses of Energy consumption which is depicted as Python code to create a plot of energy consumption in which the Extractor, Ventilator, and Industrial Dehumidifier are depicted that shown in a plot of Power consumption and Flow rate.
Figure 10 illustrates a plot of energy used for mechanical dehumidifiers and Nozzle-Diffuser Systems that depicts the variation for Extractor, Ventilator, and Industrial dehumidifiers among the power consumption and flow rate.