1. Kleinstiver, B.P. et al. Genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 nucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 869-874 (2016).
2. Zetsche, B. et al. Cpf1 Is a Single RNA-Guided Endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas System. Cell 163, 759-771 (2015).
3. Fonfara, I., Richter, H., Bratovic, M., Le Rhun, A. & Charpentier, E. The CRISPR-associated DNA-cleaving enzyme Cpf1 also processes precursor CRISPR RNA. Nature 532, 517-521 (2016).
4. Swarts, D.C., van der Oost, J. & Jinek, M. Structural basis for guide RNA processing and seed-dependent DNA targeting by CRISPR-Cas12a. Mol. Cell 66, 221-233 (2017).
5. Stella, S., Alcón, P. & Montoya, G. Structure of the Cpf1 endonuclease R-loop complex after target DNA cleavage. Nature 546, 559-563 (2017).
6. Shmakov, S. et al. Discovery and Functional Characterization of Diverse Class 2 CRISPR-Cas Systems. Mol. Cell 60, 385-397 (2015).
7. Ling, X. et al. Improving the efficiency of CRISPR-Cas12a-based genome editing with site-specific covalent Cas12a-crRNA conjugates. Mol. Cell 81, 4747-4756 (2021).
8. Zhang, X. et al. Engineered circular guide RNAs boost CRISPR/Cas12a- and CRISPR/Cas13d-based DNA and RNA editing. Genome Biol. 24, 145 (2023).
9. Moon, S.B. et al. Highly efficient genome editing by CRISPR-Cpf1 using CRISPR RNA with a uridinylate-rich 3 '-overhang. Nat. Commun. 9, 3651 (2018).
10. Nguyen, L.T., Smith, B.M. & Jain, P.K. Enhancement of trans-cleavage activity of Cas12a with engineered crRNA enables amplified nucleic acid detection. Nat. Commun. 11, 4906 (2020).
11. Rossetti, M. et al. Enhancement of CRISPR/Cas12a trans-cleavage activity using hairpin DNA reporters. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 8377-8391 (2022).
12. Li, S.Y. et al. CRISPR-Cas12a has both cis- and trans-cleavage activities on single-stranded DNA. Cell Res. 28, 491-493 (2018).
13. Chen, J.S. et al. CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity. Science 360, 436-439 (2018).
14. Mohammad, N., Katkam, S.S. & Wei, Q. A Sensitive and Nonoptical CRISPR Detection Mechanism by Sizing Double‐Stranded λ DNA Reporter. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202213920 (2022).
15. Mohammad, N., Talton, L., Hetzler, Z., Gongireddy, M. & Wei, Q. Unidirectional trans-cleaving behavior of CRISPR-Cas12a unlocks for an ultrasensitive assay using hybrid DNA reporters containing a 3' toehold. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 9894-9904 (2023).
16. Li, S.-Y. et al. CRISPR-Cas12a-assisted nucleic acid detection. Cell Discov. 4, 20 (2018).
17. Broughton, J.P. et al. CRISPR-Cas12-based detection of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 870-874 (2020).
18. Dai, Y. et al. Exploring the Trans-Cleavage Activity of CRISPR-Cas12a (cpf1) for the Development of a Universal Electrochemical Biosensor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 17399-17405 (2019).
19. Li, T. & Cheng, N. Sensitive and Portable Signal Readout Strategies Boost Point-of-Care CRISPR/Cas12a Biosensors. ACS Sens. 8, 3988-4007 (2023).
20. Shi, Y. et al. CRISPR‐Cas12a System for Biosensing and Gene Regulation. Chem.-Asian J. 16, 857-867 (2021).
21. Dronina, J., Samukaite-Bubniene, U. & Ramanavicius, A. Towards application of CRISPR-Cas12a in the design of modern viral DNA detection tools. J. Nanobiotechnol. 20, 1-15 (2022).
22. Mao, Z. et al. CRISPR/Cas12a-based technology: A powerful tool for biosensing in food safety. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 122, 211-222 (2022).
23. Ma, P.X. et al. MeCas12a, a Highly Sensitive and Specific System for COVID-19 Detection. Adv. Sci. 7, 2001300 (2020).
24. Ooi, K.H. et al. An engineered CRISPR-Cas12a variant and DNA-RNA hybrid guides enable robust and rapid COVID-19 testing. Nat. Commun. 12, 1739 (2021).
25. Hu, M. et al. Photocontrolled crRNA activation enables robust CRISPR-Cas12a diagnostics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 119, e2202034119 (2022).
26. Chen, Y.J. et al. Contamination-free visual detection of SARS-CoV-2 with CRISPR/Cas12a: A promising method in the point-of-care detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 169, 112642 (2020).
27. Park, J.S. et al. Digital CRISPR/Cas-Assisted Assay for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of SARS-CoV-2. Adv. Sci. 8, 2003564 (2021).
28. Rananaware, S.R. et al. Programmable RNA detection with CRISPR-Cas12a. Nat. Commun. 14, 5409 (2023).
29. Moon, J. & Liu, C. Asymmetric CRISPR enabling cascade signal amplification for nucleic acid detection by competitive crRNA. Nat. Commun. 14, 7504 (2023).
30. Wu, Y. et al. Nucleic Acid Enzyme-Activated CRISPR-Cas12a With Circular CRISPR RNA for Biosensing. Small, e2303007 (2023).
31. Xiong, Y. et al. Functional DNA regulated CRISPR-Cas12a sensors for point-of-care diagnostics of non-nucleic-acid targets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 207-213 (2019).
32. Niu, C. et al. Aptamer assisted CRISPR-Cas12a strategy for small molecule diagnostics. Biosens. Bioelectron. 183, 113196 (2021).
33. Wang, X. et al. Universal and highly accurate detection of circulating tumor DNA mutation in non-small cell lung cancer based on CRISPR/Cas12a system. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 383, 133493 (2023).
34. Li, Y. et al. Cas12a-based direct visualization of nanoparticle-stabilized fluorescence signal for multiplex detection of DNA methylation biomarkers. Biosens. Bioelectron. 244, 115810 (2024).
35. Hu, M. et al. Light-Start CRISPR-Cas12a Reaction with Caged crRNA Enables Rapid and Sensitive Nucleic Acid Detection. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202300663 (2023).
36. Joung, J. et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 with SHERLOCK One-Pot Testing. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 1492-1494 (2020).
37. Xu, Z. et al. Microfluidic space coding for multiplexed nucleic acid detection via CRISPR-Cas12a and recombinase polymerase amplification. Nat. Commun. 13, 6480 (2022).
38. Wang, B. et al. Cas12aVDet: A CRISPR/Cas12a-Based Platform for Rapid and Visual Nucleic Acid Detection. Anal. Chem. 91, 12156-12161 (2019).
39. Wang, R. et al. opvCRISPR: One-pot visual RT-LAMP-CRISPR platform for SARS-cov-2 detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 172, 112766 (2021).
40. Arizti-Sanz, J. et al. Streamlined inactivation, amplification, and Cas13-based detection of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Commun. 11, 5921 (2020).
41. Lu, S. et al. Fast and sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using suboptimal protospacer adjacent motifs for Cas12a. Nat. Biomed. Eng 6, 286-297 (2022).
42. Yin, K. et al. Dynamic Aqueous Multiphase Reaction System for One-Pot CRISPR-Cas12a-Based Ultrasensitive and Quantitative Molecular Diagnosis. Anal. Chem. 92, 8561-8568 (2020).
43. Chen, Y. et al. Photoactivatable CRISPR/Cas12a Strategy for One-Pot DETECTR Molecular Diagnosis. Anal. Chem. 94, 9724-9731 (2022).
44. Li, Q.-N. et al. Photoactivatable CRISPR/Cas12a Sensors for Biomarkers Imaging and Point-of-Care Diagnostics. Anal. Chem. 96, 2692-2701 (2024).
45. Sun, Y.J. et al. A Conformational Restriction Strategy for the Control of CRISPR/Cas Gene Editing with Photoactivatable Guide RNAs. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202212413 (2023).
46. McMahon, M.A., Prakash, T.P., Cleveland, D.W., Bennett, C.F. & Rahdar, M. Chemically Modified Cpf1-CRISPR RNAs Mediate Efficient Genome Editing in Mammalian Cells. Mol. Ther. 26, 1228-1240 (2018).
47. Sadelain, M., Papapetrou, E.P. & Bushman, F.D. Safe harbours for the integration of new DNA in the human genome. Nature Reviews Cancer 12, 51-58 (2012).
48. Hayashi, H., Kubo, Y., Izumida, M. & Matsuyama, T. Efficient viral delivery of Cas9 into human safe harbor. Scientific Reports 10, 21474 (2020).
49. McCarty, D.M., Young, S.M. & Samulski, R.J. Integration of Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV) and Recombinant AAV Vectors. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38, 819-845 (2004).
50. Luk, K. et al. Optimization of Nuclear Localization Signal Composition Improves CRISPR-Cas12a Editing Rates in Human Primary Cells. Gen Biotechnol. 1, 271-284 (2022).
51. Zhou, Y. et al. High-throughput screening of a CRISPR/Cas9 library for functional genomics in human cells. Nature 509, 487-491 (2014).
52. Piepenburg, O., Williams, C.H., Stemple, D.L. & Armes, N.A. DNA detection using recombination proteins. PLoS Biol. 4, e204 (2006).
53. Shebanova, R. et al. Efficient target cleavage by Type V Cas12a effectors programmed with split CRISPR RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 1162-1173 (2022).
54. Johnson, D.A. et al. Plasma Septin9 versus fecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening: a prospective multicenter study. PLoS One 9, e98238 (2014).
55. Visnes, T. et al. Targeting BER enzymes in cancer therapy. DNA Repair 71, 118-126 (2018).
56. Fleming, A.M., Ding, Y. & Burrows, C.J. Oxidative DNA damage is epigenetic by regulating gene transcription via base excision repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 2604-2609 (2017).
57. Fleming, A.M. & Burrows, C.J. On the irrelevancy of hydroxyl radical to DNA damage from oxidative stress and implications for epigenetics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 6524-6528 (2020).
58. Harcourt, E.M., Kietrys, A.M. & Kool, E.T. Chemical and structural effects of base modifications in messenger RNA. Nature 541, 339-346 (2017).
59. Jun, Y.W. & Kool, E.T. Chemical Tools for the Study of DNA Repair. Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 3495-3506 (2022).
60. Shu, X. et al. Genome-wide mapping reveals that deoxyuridine is enriched in the human centromeric DNA. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 680-687 (2018).
61. Haldar, T. et al. Unexpected complexity in the products arising from NaOH-, heat-, amine-, and glycosylase-induced strand cleavage at an abasic site in DNA. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 35, 218-232 (2022).
62. Kumar, A. et al. Interlocking activities of DNA polymerase β in the base excision repair pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2118940119 (2022).
63. Su, M.-T. et al. Uracil DNA glycosylase BKRF3 contributes to Epstein-Barr virus DNA replication through physical interactions with proteins in viral DNA replication complex. J. Virol. 88, 8883-8899 (2014).
64. Prichard, M.N., Duke, G.M. & Mocarski, E.S. Human cytomegalovirus uracil DNA glycosylase is required for the normal temporal regulation of both DNA synthesis and viral replication. J. Virol. 70, 3018-3025 (1996).
65. Dusseau, C. et al. Analysis of uracil DNA glycosylase in human colorectal cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 18, 393-399 (2001).
66. Lindahl, T., Ljungquist, S., Siegert, W., Nyberg, B. & Sperens, B. DNA N-glycosidases: properties of uracil-DNA glycosidase from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 252, 3286-3294 (1977).
67. Zhang, Q., Li, C.-c., Ma, F., Luo, X. & Zhang, C.-y. Catalytic single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer biosensor for uracil-DNA glycosylase detection and cellular imaging. Biosens. Bioelectron. 213, 114447 (2022).
68. Freudenthal, B.D., Beard, W.A., Cuneo, M.J., Dyrkheeva, N.S. & Wilson, S.H. Capturing snapshots of APE1 processing DNA damage. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 924-931 (2015).