Non-invasive intra-uterine administration of Botulinum Toxin A enhances endometrial angiogenesis and improves the rates of embryo implantation

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-47485/v1

Download PDF

Research

Non-invasive intra-uterine administration of Botulinum Toxin A enhances endometrial angiogenesis and improves the rates of embryo implantation

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-47485/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background. Endometrial angiogenesis plays crucial roles in determining the endometrial receptivity. Defects in endometrial receptivity often cause repeated implantation failure, which is one of the major unmet needs for infertility and contributes a major barrier to the assisted reproductive technology. Despite the numerous extensive research work, there are currently no effective evidence-based treatments to prevent or cure this condition.

Method. As a non-invasive treatment strategy, Botulinum toxin A (BoTA) was administered into one side of mouse uterine horns and saline was infused into the other side of horns for the control. Impact of BoTA was assessed in the endometrium at 3 or 8 days after infusion.

Results. We demonstrated that BoTA administration enhances the capacity of endothelial cell tube formation and sprouting. The intrauterine BoTA administration significantly induced endometrial angiogenesis displaying increased numbers of vessel formation and expression levels of related-marker genes. Moreover, BoTA intrauterine application promoted the endometrial receptivity and the rates of embryo implantation were improved with BoTA treatment with no morphologically retarded embryos.

Conclusion. Intrauterine BoTA treatment has a beneficial effect on vascular reconstruction of functional endometrium prior to embryo implantation by increasing endometrial blood flow near the uterine cavity suggesting BoTA treatment as a potential therapeutic strategy for patients who are suffering from repeated implantation failure with the problems with endometrial receptivity.

Translational Medicine

endometrial receptivity

embryo implantation

Botulinum Toxin A

non-invasive treatment

angiogenesis

Angiogenesis is the process of new capillary formation from existing vascular structure by elongation or sprouting of endothelial cells, and is tightly regulated since most organs in the adult usually do not undergo physiological angiogenesis unless they are not injured by trauma or infection [1–3]. Whilst the female reproductive tract requires continuous and cyclic angiogenesis for the growth of primordial follicles during the ovulation, receptive endometrium for the embryo implantation, and placental and embryonic development for successful pregnancy [4–6]. In particular, endometrial angiogenesis is a fundamental process for the menstrual cycle, endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation [7]. Prior to embryo implantation, the endometrium undergoes dynamic changes of shedding and repair induced by ovarian steroid hormones to produce a period of uterine receptivity referred to as the ‘window of implantation’ [8–10]. During the menstrual cycle, endometrial vasculature experiences continuous growth and regression, and coordinated vascular development induced by endometrial angiogenesis is essentially required for successful embryo implantation [11]. Direct or indirect association between implantation success and the endometrial angiogenesis facilitated by the conformational changes of end arterioles arising from arcuate arteries still need to be elucidated. Recent studies showing the increased expression levels of angiogenesis-related factor, VEGF, and its receptor in the late secretory and early pregnancy strongly suggest that the endometrial angiogenesis plays crucial roles in endometrial response to the implanting blastocyst, likely a key factor of endometrial vasculature in determining the endometrial receptivity [3, 12]. Even though there are several trials to improve endometrial environment via inducing angiogenic effect with many kinds of substances including granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) [13–15], the efficacy of those substances is still controversial due to the lack of evidences [16–18].

Botulinum toxin A (BoTA) is widely used in the plastic, reconstructive, and aesthetic surgery fields [19, 20]. In addition to these usages, BoTA is commonly used in medical applications to treat chronic myofascial pain, headache, urinary incontinence, and hyperhidrosis [21–24]. Lately, there have been reports demonstrating the effect of BoTA on flap survival, which was suggested to occur by increased vasodilation and angiogenesis via elevated hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)1α and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [25, 26]. Moreover, BoTA is reported to enhance re-epithelialization of human keratinocytes and angiogenesis of endothelial cells [27]. However, there was no report that evaluates the therapeutic effect of BoTA in the endometrium, especially endometrial angiogenesis, regarding the reproductive functionality. This led us to explore the impact of BoTA on endometrial angiogenesis and further investigation into the capacity of BoTA for the rates of embryo implantation for successful pregnancy via elevation of endometrial receptivity.

Cell culture and Botulinum Toxin A treatment.

Human Umbilical Vein Cells (HUVEC, ATCC) and Human Uterine Microvascular Endothelial Cells (HUtMEC, PromoCell) were maintained in EGM^TM-2 endometrial cell growth medium 2 (Lonza) and Endothelial Cell Growth Medium MV (PromoCell) respectively. Ishikawa (ATCC) and CRL-4003 cells (kindly gifted from the laboratory of Dr. Haeng Seok Song) were maintained in DMEM/F12 media (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) as previously described [28]. All experiments were conducted using cells of the passages between 1 and 10. For the analyses for the effects of BoTA, cells were treated with commercially available BoTA (Botulax, Hugel, Seoul, Korea) for 24h, 48h or 72h at concentration of 0.5, 2.0, 10, or 20IU. Botulax is the type for Clostridium Botulinum Toxin A derived from the strain of Clostridium Botulinum CBFC26 and for the utilization of BoTA from Botulax (Hugel) to perform the all analyses, the powder form of BoTA was dissolved and diluted in sterile 0.9% Saline solution.

Tube formation assays

Assessment of the rates of endothelial tube formation in the presence or absence of BoTA (0, 0.5 IU and 2.0 IU) was performed in a 96-well plate. 2x10⁴ HUVECs or HUtMECs were seeded onto growth factor reduced Matrigel matrix (#354230, Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) pre-coated wells in 100ul of EGM^TM-2 endometrial cell growth medium 2 and Endothelial Cell Growth Medium MV, respectively. Following incubation at 37°C overnight, each well was analyzed directly under a microscope. The images (10× magnification) were subsequently analyzed using Image J.

Sprouting assays

Microfluidic device with the center channel of 800μm of width was used for HUVEC sprouting assays that were previously described [29]. The microfluidic chips were fabricated by polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS, Sylgard 184, Dow Corning) mold embedded with channel structures that was patterned by standard photolithography photoresist SU-8 (MicroChem). Demolded PDMS was punched out by using a biopsy punch (6mm) and sharpened syringe needle (0.5mm) to make reservoirs for the medium and hydrogel injection ports. A PDMS device and a glass coverslip was treated with oxygen plasma for 1 min before bringing them into contact. The devices were incubated in an 80°C dry oven for at least 48h to restore hydrophobicity of PDMS. The devices were sterilized by UV irradiation before use. CRL4003 (8×10⁶/ml) cells were mixed with fibrinogensolution (2.5 mg/ml fibrinogen with 0.15 U/ml aprotinin). Thrombin (0.5 U/ml) was added to cell mixture and immediately introduced into the channel for stromal cell. Fibrinogen solution (2.5 mg/ml fibrinogen with 0.15 U/ml aprotinin) was mixed with thrombin (0.5 U/ml) was applied to the vessel channel. After 3min, the upper reservoirs of each device were filled with EGM-2 culture medium and aspirated gently from the lower reservoirs to wet the hydrophobic media channel. Subsequently, HUVECs (5×10⁶/ml) were plated into the media channel. The device was then tilted 90°in an incubator for 40 min to attach the cell mixture to the gel-media interface. The device with multilayer of cells was incubated for 7 days until fully lumenized microvessels had formed. A schematic illustration of cell loading and generation of perfused microvessel on the device is shown in Figure 1.

Quantitative RT-PCR-based analysis of mRNA expression

SYBR Green (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) assay were used to quantitate angiogenesis- and embryo implantation-related genes in BoTA-treated and control samples. Total RNA extracted using TRIzol reagent (Ambion, Life Technologies Corporation, CA, USA) at 1ug was converted to cDNA using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), dNTP (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and oligo dT primer (Labopass, Seoul, Korea). With 1/10 volume of cDNA, gene expression was quantitatively analyzed. Amplifications were run in a CFX Connect^TM Real-Time PCR Detection System (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). A DNA melting-curve was used to confirm the presence of a single PCR product in each assay. Real-time PCR results for angiogenesis- and embryo implantation-related genes were normalized to β-actin mRNA expression and analyzed using the ordinary one-way ANOVA analysis with Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests. Primer sequence pairs used for these analyses are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Immunofluorescence and microscopy

Immunofluorescence staining was performed as previous described [30]. Localization studies were performed using antibody to HIF1-α (Cell signaling technology; #3434, 1:50), Integrin avb3 (MILLIPORE; MAB1976, 1:100), LIF (NovusBiologicals; NBP1-85717, 1:100), CD31 (abcam; ab28364, 1:100), CD34 (abcam; ab8536, 1:100), and further incubated with anti-rabbit IgG fluorescence (Invitrogen) or anti-mouse IgG fluorescence (Invitrogen). Cover glasses were mounted in Vectashield mountant with DAPI (Vector Laboratories) as nuclear stain. Images were captured using oil immersion 63x objectives Zeiss 510 microscopy (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Röttingen, Germany) and processed using Zen software (ZEISS).

Immunohistochemistry

Histology and immunohistochemistry were performed as previously described [28] by using antibodies to integrin b3 (Cell Signaling; #13166) and OPN (Enzo; ADI-905-629) and detected with HRP-conjugated anti-mouse or rabbit secondary antibodies, and counterstained with DAPI (Sigma).

Animal uses and BoTA infusion

All experiments were conducted under a Home Office license and the Animal Act, 1986, and had local ethical approval for care and use of laboratory animals. C57BL/6 strain mice were maintained by strict accordance with the policies of the CHA University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC, approval number 190126). All mice were housed under standard environmental conditions of 12h light: 12h dark at a controlled room temperature (20-22℃ and 40-60% humidity) and fed ad libitum. Five-week-old female and seven-week-old male mice provided by Orientbio (Gapyeong, Gyeonggi, South Korea) were used for the analyses and evaluation of impact of BoTA. The female mice were anesthetized via intraperitoneal injection of tribromoethanol (avertin). A vertical incision was made to expose the uterus in the abdominal wall. BoTA was prepared in 30ul of saline and infused using 31-gauge insulin syringe into one side of mouse uterine cavities and saline was infused into the other side of horns for the control. After 8 days of BoTA-infusion, female mice were weakly stimulated for the ovulation with 2.5IU of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG, Daesung Microbiological, Korea) and ovulation was synchronized by 1.25IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG, Sigma, USA) 46–48h later, both by intraperitoneal injection. Females were placed singly with the same strain male mice overnight. The presence of a vaginal plug the following morning (day 1 of pregnancy) was used as an indicator of successful mating. Both sides of uterine horns were obtained 16 days after mating for further analyses.

Mouse embryo collection and co-culture

For the embryo collection, female mice (6–8 weeks) were superovulated with 10IU of PMSG and ovulation was synchronized by 5IU hCG 46–48h later, both by intraperitoneal injection. Females were placed singly with males of the same strain overnight. The morning of the presence of a vaginal plug was designated day 1 of pregnancy. Pregnant mice were killed on day 1. One-cell embryos were obtained from the oviduct using a 30G dissecting needle of 1ml syringe to tear open the ampulla of the oviduct and release. Cumulus cell around of the one-cell embryo were washed with 0.1% hyaluronidase drop at 37°C for 5-10 mins and dissociated by gentle pipetting to glass pipettes. Collected embryos were washed with M2 media (Sigma, USA) supplemented with 4 mg/ml BSA washed in KSOM (Millipore, USA) and cultured in a 20ul drop of KSOM covered with mineral oil at 5% CO₂, 37°C until the blastocyst stage. Only expanded blastocysts with clearly observable inner cell mass and trophectoderm on day 5 were included in the study. Day 5 mouse embryos were transferred onto saline- or BoTA-treated Ishikawa cells in independent wells of 24-well plate. Multiple observations of stability for embryo attachment were performed to identify the distinct stages of attachment from 12h to 48h of co-culture as previously reported [28, 30]. Standardized plate movement protocol was applied to assess the stability of embryo attachment. The plate was tapped three times laterally and orthogonally to detect unattached embryos. Five stages of attachment were defined and used as a measurement scale as previously described [30, 31].

Library preparation and sequencing for RNA-seq analysis

For control and test RNAs, the construction of library was performed using QuantSeq 3’ mRNA-Seq Library Prep Kit (Lexogen, Inc., Austria) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, each 500ng total RNA was prepared and an oligo-dT primer containing an Illumina-compatible sequence at its 5’ end was hybridized to the RNA and reverse transcription was performed. After degradation of the RNA template, second strand synthesis was initiated by a random primer containing an Illumina-compatible linker sequence at its 5’ end. The double-stranded library was purified by using magnetic beads to remove all reaction components. The library was amplified to add the complete adapter sequences required for cluster generation. The finished library is purified from PCR components. High-throughput sequencing was performed as single-end 75 sequencing using NextSeq 500 (Illumina, Inc., USA). The raw and normalized data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data base (accession number: GSE146934).

Data analysis

QuantSeq 3’ mRNA-Seq reads were aligned using Bowtie2 (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012). Bowtie2 indices were either generated from genome assembly sequence or the representative transcript sequences for aligning to the genome and transcriptome. The alignment file was used for assembling transcripts, estimating their abundances and detecting differential expression of genes. Differentially expressed gene were determined based on counts from unique and multiple alignments using coverage in Bedtools (Quinlan AR, 2010). The RC (Read Count) data were processed based on quantile normalization method using EdgeR within R (R development Core Team, 2016) using Bioconductor (Gentleman et al.,2004). Gene classification for Gene Ontology (GO) and pathway analysis was performed by DAVID (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) and Medline databases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Classified genes and their fold enrichment values were visualized into dotplots by using R and automatically categorized by ClueGO [32, 33]. The significance cutoffs were set for fold-change (≥2.0), P-value (<0.05) and FDR (<0.05).

Cell proliferation and cytotoxicity assay

Cell proliferation assay of Ishikawa cells was performed by cell proliferation assay kit (BIOMAX, Seoul, Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 1x10⁴ cells were seeded and maintained in the presence or absence of BoTA at indicated concentrations for 24h, 48h, or 72h. Absorbance was measured using microplate reader (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) at 450nm wavelength followed by adding 10ul QuantiMAX™ mixture (BIOMAX, Seoul, Korea). Cytotoxicity of Ishikawa cells depending on BoTA treatment was measured using EZ-LDH^TM cytotoxicity assay kit (BIOMAX, Seoul, Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 5x10³Ishikawa cells were treated with BoTA at indicated concentrations for 24h, 48h, or 72h and absorbance was measured by adding 10ul of LDH reaction mixture. Reaction of LDH mixture was performed on a shaker for 90mins, then the number of survived cells were counted.

Wound healing assay

Ishikawa cells were seeded in 6-well plate and cultured to 100% confluence. After 24h of starvation, a linear scratch was generated using a sterile 1ml pipette tip. Cells were treated with BoTA at indicated concentrations for 48h. Images of wound closure were taken using inverted microscope (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and the gap distances of wound closure were analyzed using image J.

Statistical analysis

Comparison groups were analyzed with unpaired Student t-test for parametric distributions. For multiple comparisons, the ordinary one-way ANOVA analysis with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. For all cases, a P-value that was <0.05 was considered statistically significant (P<0.05(*), P<0.01(**), P<0.001(***) and P<0.0001(****)).

BoTA-induced enhancement of angiogenesis in endothelial cells

To investigate the effect of BoTA treatment on the tube formation ability of human endothelial cells, we plated HUVECs onto Matrigel-coated plate and 0.5 IU or 2.0 IU of BoTA was applied. The tube formation as measured by the total number of tube loops and branching points was significantly higher in BoTA-treated HUVECs compared to saline-treated controls (Fig. 1a, 1b). More specifically, the assessment of tube formation of human uterine endothelial cells (HUtMEC) revealed that BoTA induced the angiogenic effect exhibiting dramatically thicker and higher numbers of tube formation in BoTA (0.5 IU)-treated groups compared to control (Fig. 1c, 1d). Interestingly, unlike HUVECs, HUtMECs showed no significant difference between the total numbers of tube formation at 0.5 IU and 2.0 IU of BoTA-treated condition. Furthermore, we implemented a micro-engineered 3-dimensional angiogenesis system to explore the effect of BoTA on the ability of vessel formation and sprouting using HUVECs and endometrial stromal CRL4003 cells. The device consists of 5 primary channels; 2 fluidic microchannels separate 3 hydrogel-laden microchannels from each other to facilitate the supply of fresh media through the device (Fig. 1e). This co-culture system enables paracrine interaction between HUVECs and endometrial stromal layer, mediating the angiogenic morphogenesis. The micro-engineered angiogenesis model was exposed to BoTA at 0.5 IU or 2.0 IU. These analyses revealed that BoTA treatment induced an increasing effect on angiogenesis displaying promoted angiogenic sprouting of HUVECs in BOTA-treated group compared to control (Fig. 1f), which is consistent with data from tube formation assay. This increasing angiogenic effect was further quantified through the analysis of the sprout area (Fig. 1g).

BoTA-induced elevation of endometrial receptivity markers in endometrial cells in vitro

To investigate the effect of BoTA in the endometrial cells in regards to the regulation of endometrial receptivity, BoTA was applied to endometrial epithelial (Ishikawa) and stromal (CRL4003) cells in vitro. Quantitative RT-PCR analyses revealed that BoTA treatment induces significant increases of mRNA expression levels of endometrial receptivity-related genes including ITGB3, HIF1-α, VEGFR2, VIMENTIN, IL-6, and IL-8 in both Ishikawa and CRL4003 cells (Fig. 2a, 2b) suggesting both endometrial epithelial and stromal cells are responsive to BoTA treatment. Particularly, our data show that endometrial epithelial cells are more sensitive to BoTA treatment rather than stromal cells, which are evidenced by the findings showing that Ishikawa cells were more responsive to BoTA with a short-term treatment compared to CRL4003 cells. Even though both Ishikawa and CRL4003 immortalized cells might lack normal physiological features compared to primary endometrial cells, these data might implicate that endometrial epithelial layer is the more effective target of BoTA to induce the faster response of endometrial receptivity. Induction of endometrial receptivity-related genes was validated with immunofluorescence (IF) staining analyses, displaying higher expression of HIF1α, integrin αvβ3, and LIF in BoTA-treated group compared to control (Fig. 2c). Of note, relatively high concentration (10 IU) of BoTA treatment rather led to reduction of all the expressions of endometrial receptivity-related markers (supplementary Fig. 1a, 1b). Furthermore, to evaluate the toxicity or safety of BoTA treatment we performed the cell-based in vitro assays to test if BoTA treatment induces cytotoxicity or aberrant cell proliferation in endometrial epithelial cells prior to further investigation for the clinical applicability of BoTA treatment. These analyses revealed that BoTA treatment induces impact on neither cytotoxicity nor aberrant cell proliferation in endometrial epithelial cells regardless of the concentration ranges between 0.5 IU and 20 IU (supplementary Fig. 2a, 2b). Additionally, BoTA-induced migratory effects of endometrial cells were assessed. Fully confluent cells in the condition of starvation were scratched and their migratory capacity was assessed by measuring the gap distance in between of two sides of cells (supplementary Fig. 2c, 2d). No significant differences were observed in BoTA-treated (0.5 and 2.0 IU) groups compared to controls indicating BoTA has no stimulatory effect on migratory capacity of both endometrial epithelial and stromal cells (supplementary Fig. 2e, 2f). Our observations here demonstrate that BoTA treatment at an appropriate concentration induces positive regulatory effect of endometrial receptivity in both endometrial epithelial and stromal cells in vitro implicating BoTA treatment as a potential therapeutic strategy for infertility patients with specific issues of uterine microenvironment with insufficient receptivity.

Identification of alterations in gene expression induced by intrauterine BoTA infusion in mice

To examine the in vivo effects of intrauterine application of BoTA, BoTA was infused into one side of mouse uterine horns and saline was infused into the other side of horns for the control (Fig. 3a). Mouse uterine tissues were obtained 3 or 8 days after BoTA infusion and total RNA was extracted from the whole endometrial tissues (Fig. 3b). In order to further examine the alterations of global gene expression depending on the intrauterine application of BoTA, RNA-seq data were generated from BoTA-treated versus saline-treated (control) endometrial tissues. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analyses using a fold change cutoff of 2 and a P-value cutoff of 0.05 identified a total of 197 (88 genes were up-regulated and 109 genes were down-regulated) and 573 (266 genes were up-regulated and 307 genes were down-regulated) differentially expressed genes in BoTA-Day 3 and Day 8 groups, respectively (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 3a). To perform functional clustering of 573 differentially expressed genes, which were captured from Day 8 BoTA-treated uterine tissues, gene ontology (GO) and pathway analyses were performed by using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) online tools [34]. Enriched GO terms in each category and pathway including associated-gene counts, P-value, and FDR are shown in Table 1. The P-value and fold enrichment (FE)-value were calculated by Fisher’s exact test and multiple comparisons test, respectively (P < 0.05 and FE > 1.5). A total of 573 differentially expressed genes were classified according to GO terms, including biological process, BP; cellular component, CC; molecular function, MF; and KEGG pathway, KP (Fig. 3d and Table 1). These analyses demonstrate that specific BP categories, including response to steroid hormone (P = 0.023429), positive regulation of growth hormone secretion (P = 0.022572), decidualization (P = 0.002337), positive regulation of vasodilation (P = 0.012491), lung vasculature development (P = 0.001022), and cell adhesion (P = 0.006471) were enriched in BoTA-treated (Day 8) uterine tissues implicating biological processes particularly related to angiogenesis and the early phase of embryo-endometrial interaction in response to hormones. Moreover, enriched terms of the CC category include integral components of plasma membrane (P = 4.39xE^− 08), apical plasma membrane (P = 8.52xE^− 04), extracellular region (P = 6.03xE^− 14), and cell surface (P = 0.004213). Among the enriched CC components, integrin αvβ3-integrin IGF1-IGF1R complex (P = 0.003231) is specifically reported to be strongly correlated to the early stage of embryo implantation [28]. Integrin binding (P = 0.010497), signal transducer activity (P = 0.002136), hormone activity (P = 0.018643), fibroblast growth factor binding (P = 0.023895), and extracellular matrix binding activity (P = 0.029068) were composed of enriched MF terms. Pathway enrichment analyses based on KEGG pathway (KP) analyses were performed using either Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, revealing that pathways including cytokine-cytokine interaction (P = 1.30xE^− 04) and PI3K-AKT signaling pathway (P = 0.032839), hematopoietic cell lineage (P = 0.005628), focal adhesion (P = 0.037505), and ECM-receptor interaction (P = 0.023927) were enriched in BoTA-treated (Day 8) uterine tissues (Fig. 3d and Table 1). These analyses implicate that intrauterine BoTA treatment might induce the intracellular signaling including ERK and PI3K-AKT pathway to possibly result in promoting angiogenesis [35, 36], which is supported by enrichment of signal transducer activity classified in BP and MF categories. Moreover, intercellular interactions might be enhanced in BoTA-treated endometrium, which was evidenced by high levels of responses including cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction (P = 1.30xE^− 04), chemokine-mediated signaling pathway (P = 0.009934), immune response (P = 0.014198), and oxidation-reduction process (P = 0.006635). Furthermore, in-depth clustering analyses revealed that BoTA treatment are strongly associated with the regulation of decidualization, hormonal activity, and interaction between surface adhesion molecules and ECM, which are critically correlated with endometrial receptivity, the process of embryo implantation, and maintenance of pregnancy [37].

Table 1

Whole Gene ontology (GO) and pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes of BoTA-day8 samples compared to control using DAVID tool. The cutoff for significance was set by P-value < 0.05 and Fold Enrichment (FE) > 1.5. biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), and molecular function (MF). KEGG pathway (KP) annotations.
Category	Term	Gene Count	P-value	Fold Enrichment
Biological process (BP)	GO:0070374 ~ positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade	15	1.77E-04	3.3319
Biological process (BP)	GO:0008285 ~ negative regulation of cell proliferation	22	3.94E-04	2.392489
Biological process (BP)	GO:0060426 ~ lung vasculature development	4	0.001022	18.55992
Biological process (BP)	GO:0046697 ~ decidualization	5	0.002337	8.699962
Biological process (BP)	GO:0007165 ~ signal transduction	47	0.002526	1.563913
Biological process (BP)	GO:0090131 ~ mesenchyme migration	3	0.005429	25.05589
Biological process (BP)	GO:0007155 ~ cell adhesion	22	0.006471	1.89426
Biological process (BP)	GO:0055114 ~ oxidation-reduction process	28	0.006635	1.729696
Biological process (BP)	GO:0070098 ~ chemokine-mediated signaling pathway	6	0.009934	4.555616
Biological process (BP)	GO:0045909 ~ positive regulation of vasodilation	5	0.012491	5.494713
Biological process (BP)	GO:0006955 ~ immune response	14	0.014198	2.149402
Biological process (BP)	GO:0048146 ~ positive regulation of fibroblast proliferation	6	0.019461	3.854752
Biological process (BP)	GO:0060124 ~ positive regulation of growth hormone secretion	3	0.022572	12.52794
Biological process (BP)	GO:0048545 ~ response to steroid hormone	4	0.023429	6.424587
Biological process (BP)	GO:0030308 ~ negative regulation of cell growth	8	0.030527	2.672628
Cellular component (CC)	GO:0005576 ~ extracellular region	94	6.03E-14	2.267361
Cellular component (CC)	GO:0005615 ~ extracellular space	90	3.68E-16	2.530285
Cellular component (CC)	GO:0005887 ~ integral component of plasma membrane	58	4.39E-08	2.178032
Cellular component (CC)	GO:0009986 ~ cell surface	27	0.004213	1.815047
Cellular component (CC)	GO:0016324 ~ apical plasma membrane	19	8.52E-04	2.449371
Cellular component (CC)	GO:0035867 ~ alphav-beta3 integrin-IGF-1-IGF1R complex	3	0.003231	31.7129
Molecular function (MF)	GO:0042803 ~ protein homo dimerization activity	31	0.010672	1.609802
Molecular function (MF)	GO:0004871 ~ signal transducer activity	29	0.002136	1.854542
Molecular function (MF)	GO:0005178 ~ integrin binding	8	0.010497	3.315154
Molecular function (MF)	GO:0005179 ~ hormone activity	8	0.018643	2.959959
Molecular function (MF)	GO:0017134 ~ fibroblast growth factor binding	4	0.023895	6.375297
Molecular function (MF)	GO:0050840 ~ extracellular matrix binding	4	0.029068	5.919919
Molecular function (MF)	GO:0001968 ~ fibronectin binding	4	0.031859	5.715783
KEGG pathway (KP)	mmu04060: Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction	18	1.30E-04	2.918663
KEGG pathway (KP)	mmu04151: PI3K-Akt signaling pathway	16	0.032839	1.788709
KEGG pathway (KP)	mmu04510: Focal adhesion	11	0.037505	2.085207
KEGG pathway (KP)	mmu04640: Hematopoietic cell lineage	8	0.005628	3.693157
KEGG pathway (KP)	mmu04512: ECM-receptor interaction	7	0.023927	3.121347

Further analyses of enriched GO categories of Day 8 BoTA-treated endometrium compared to saline-treated group, visualized by ClueGO, revealed that BoTA-induced enrichment includes angiogenesis-related pathways such as angiogenesis, cell migration, signaling receptor binding, reproductive structure development, tube development, embryo implantation, and decidualization (Fig. 3e). Among these enrichments, 13 significantly differentially expressed genes including Ccl7, Cyr61, Itgb3, Foxc1, Clec14a, Hif3a, Gpx1, Cd34, Ccbe1, Tgfbi, Lif, Stc1, and Stc2, were specifically associated with GO terms of angiogenesis (GO:0001525) or embryo implantation (GO:0007566) (Table 2).

Table 2

Differentially expressed genes of BoTA-day8 compared to control, which are specifically associated with GO terms of angiogenesis (GO:0001525) or embryo implantation (GO:0007566).
	Gene symbol	BoTA-Day8 /Control		Description
	Gene symbol	Fold change	P-value	Description
Angiogenesis	Ccl7	7.979	0.029	chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 7
	Cyr61	4.683	0.004	cysteine rich protein 61
	Itgb3	2.894	0.002	integrin beta 3
	Foxc1	2.803	0.001	forkhead box C1
	Clec14a	2.779	0.034	C-type lectin domain family 14, member a
	Hif3a	2.153	0.049	hypoxia inducible factor 3, alpha subunit
	Gpx1	2.125	0.026	glutathione peroxidase 1
	Cd34	2.047	0.038	CD34 antigen
	Ccbe1	0.448	0.018	collagen and calcium binding EGF domains 1
	Tgfbi	0.326	0.015	transforming growth factor, beta induced
Embryo Implantation	Lif	4.021	0.008	leukemia inhibitory factor
	Itgb3	2.894	0.002	integrin beta 3
	Stc2	2.522	0.033	stanniocalcin 2
	Stc1	0.447	0.018	stanniocalcin 1

Enhanced endometrial blood vessel formation by intrauterine BoTA treatment

In order to validate our RNA-seq data, genes that are classified and strongly related to angiogenesis including Ccl7, Cry61, Itgb3, Clec14a, Hif3a, Gpx1, Cd34, Ccbe1, Tgfbi, Vegfr1, and Tie1 were subjected to quantitative QRT-PCR analyses. The validation revealed that the expression pattern examined by QRT-PCR was concordant with RNA-seq data (Fig. 4a). To further corroborate the evidence for the induction of endometrial angiogenesis with BoTA infusion in mouse uterus, our interrogation of paraffin-embedded BoTA-treated endometrial tissue sections with IF staining of CD31, a surrogate marker for blood vessel formation, revealed that BoTA treatment increased CD31 expression in mouse uterus compared to control group (Fig. 4b, supplementary Fig. 4a), which is consistent with our RNA-seq analyses. In particular, BoTA-infused endometrial tissues exhibited enhanced CD31 levels in the stromal layer especially close to the lining of epithelium. Moreover, the total number and surface area of CD31 staining were further quantified exhibiting significant and gradual increase in BoTA-treated groups (Day 3 & 8) compared to control (Fig. 4c, 4d). As a novel marker for angiogenesis of vascular endothelial cells and progenitor cells with stemness [38], CD34 expression pattern was assessed in paraffin-embedded BoTA-treated endometrial tissue sections revealing more abundantly expressed CD34 in BoTA-treated groups compared to control (Fig. 4e, 4f). These observations indicate that BoTA infusion might have an angiogenic effect to enhance the development of new capillaries from pre-existing blood vessels in the endometrium.

Improved endometrial receptivity by intrauterine BoTA treatment

Among significantly altered embryo implantation-related genes, differential expression pattern of Itgb3 and Lif upon BoTA treatment showed consistency with data from in vitro analyses shown in Fig. 2. In order to further support our RNA-seq data, genes that are classified and strongly related to embryo implantation, including Integrin β3, osteopontin (OPN), LIF, STC1, and STC2, were subjected to Immunohistochemistry or QRT-PCR analyses. Integrin β3 and its ligand OPN proteins were remarkably highly expressed in BoTA-treated endometrial tissue section compared to saline-treated control group (Fig. 5a, 5b). The validation with QRT-PCR revealed concordant pattern of expression of Lif, Stc1, and Stc2 with those from RNA-seq analyses (Fig. 5c-5e), suggesting that intrauterine infusion of BoTA might be an effective method to improve the endometrial receptivity for patients who are suffering from implantation failure with poor receptivity.

BoTA-treated uterine fertility assessment

Angiogenesis is known to participate in a wide range of the process in pregnancy including folliculogenesis, early implantation, placentation, and embryonic development [2, 39]. This led us to examine the correlation of enhanced neovascular activity and increased molecular features of endometrial receptivity induced by BoTA treatment with the outcomes of embryo implantation and pregnancy. For the assessment of BoTA effect on the stability of embryo attachment in vitro, a total of 73 day 5 mouse embryos were transferred (one embryo per well) to confluent Ishikawa cells, which were treated with BoTA (primed; 5 h of exposure to BoTA prior to embryo co-culture, non-primed; commence BoTA exposure at the time of embryo co-culture) and co-cultured for 19 h, 24 h, 28 h or 45 h. The stability of attached mouse embryo was assessed according to the 5-stage standard: score 1, floating; 2, weakly attached but detached after tapping; 3, weakly attached but stuck at the attachment site after tapping; 4, stably attached; and 5, stably attached and showed outgrowth [30, 31]. Up to 24 h of co-culture, embryos transferred onto both control and BoTA-treated cells showed no significant difference in their attachment stability. However, at the late stage of co-culture (24 h-48 h) embryos were more stably attached onto BoTA-primed treated Ishikawa cells compared to controls (Fig. 6a). Of particular note, no significant difference was observed in the stability of attached embryo onto non-primed BoTA-treated Ishikawa cells compared to that of control cells (Supplementary Fig. 5a), suggesting an effective time-point for BoTA treatment to improve the rates of embryo implantation, which should be primed for the embryo transfer onto endometrial epithelial cells. In order to verify the efficacy of BoTA in vivo, BoTA was applied to mouse uterus in a same manner as shown in Fig. 3a. After 8 days of BoTA-infusion, both sides of uterine horns were obtained to expose the embryo implantation sites 16 days after mating (Fig. 6b). These analyses revealed that the total number of implantation sites in BoTA-treated group was significantly higher than controls (P = 0.0121) (Fig. 6c, 6d). Intriguingly, increased numbers and thickness of uterine arteries, which formed the network towards each site of embryo implantation in mouse uterus, were observed at the open abdominal surgery in BoTA-administered side compared to control (Fig. 6e). This might be because of increased endometrial neomicrovessles, which might have been developed and stimulated from pre-existing uterine arteries, induced by BoTA intrauterine treatment. Importantly, no retarded embryos were detected in both groups and the weight of embryos from both groups showed no significant difference (Fig. 6f-6 h). Representative images of the implantation sites in the uterus of mice and embryos obtained from different conditions are shown in Fig. 6c and 6 f.

In this current study, we demonstrate that the intrauterine BoTA administration significantly induces endometrial angiogenesis displaying increased numbers of vessel formation, which is consistent with the findings of increased tube formation and sprouting area of endothelial cells in vitro. Furthermore, BoTA administration enhances the endometrial receptivity and subsequently improves the rates of embryo implantation with no morphologically retarded embryos. Even though the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying BoTA-induced endometrial angiogenesis and its direct or indirect correlation with embryo implantation remains to be defined, this might suggest intrauterine application of BoTA, which is totally non-invasive causing no traumatic injury to the endometrium at all, as an effective therapeutic strategy for patients who are suffering from repeated implantation failure with the problems with endometrial receptivity.

Endometrial angiogenesis is thought to be fundamental in supporting endometrial growth and repair that provide vascularized endometrial receptivity, which usually refers to the ability of the endometrial lining to accept and accommodate a nascent embryo [39, 40]. To support this notion, it has been previously reported that increased endometrial blood flow is associated with the pregnancy outcome during the time of window of implantation [41]. This can be evidenced by our observations displaying the enhanced capacity of endothelial cell tube formation and sprouting towards the endometrial stromal cell layer with BoTA treatment, implicating the impact of BoTA on the increased vascular network and blood supply to the endometrial lining, which might provide a better microenvironment for the embryo implantation. This is consistent to the previous findings from reconstructive and aesthetic surgery fields evaluating the angiogenic effect of BoTA application demonstrating increased endothelial cell sprouting with higher numbers of vessel formation in vitro [27], and elevated transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap survival by BoTA-induced angiogenic effect via increased HIF1α/VEGF signaling [26]. Significant induction of endometrial receptivity-related genes both in cultured endometrial epithelial or stromal cells with BoTA treatment indicates that BoTA induces the expression of those genes even in the independent and separate culture condition of endometrial epithelium or stroma (Fig. 2). Moreover, the positive regulation of BoTA application in the endometrial angiogenesis and receptivity was strongly evidenced by the comparison of RNA-seq of BoTA-treated mouse uterus tissues to saline-treated controls. Thirteen significantly differentially expressed genes, including CCL7, CYR61, ITGB3, FOXC1, HIF3A, GPX1, CD34, CCBE1, TGFBI, LIF, STC1, and STC2 were sorted for GO terms of angiogenesis or embryo implantation. It has been reported that CCL7, CYR61, FOXC1, and CD34 play crucial roles in vascular remodeling and endothelial cell proliferation [42–45]. Additionally, LIF is known to be strongly related to both angiogenesis and embryo implantation via activation of JAK/STAT and MAPK signaling [46]. STC1 and STC2 have been suggested as key players displaying increased expression levels at the sites of embryo implantation [47]. This has been dramatically supported by the data showing increased levels of CD31 and CD34 expression in intrauterine BoTA-treated mouse endometrial lining compared to control; effects of BoTA in vessel formation were assessed by measuring the total numbers of staining and quantification of stained surface area (Fig. 4b-4f). Furthermore, the pregnancy outcomes revealing significantly higher rates of embryo implantation in BoTA-treated horn of mouse uterus compared to the rates in saline-treated uterine horn support RNA-seq analyses (Fig. 4 and Fig. 6). However, high concentration of BoTA application restores or even reduces the levels of angiogenesis and endometrial receptivity-related gene expression back to the levels observed in control groups (supplementary Fig. 1), which is consistent to the previous findings showing the interference of angiogenesis by high concentrations of BoTA treatment in endothelial cells in vitro [27]. This might implicate that the dose selection and adjustment might be a critical process for the clinical trial to patients with endometrial problems.

The effect of BoTA on the microvascular remodeling and its activation has been studied to a lesser extent. Consistent with the previous reports demonstrating a significant increase in resting diameter of arterioles and venules with the topical application of BoTA to the rat cremaster muscle [25, 48], in the present study we have demonstrated that non-invasive intrauterine BoTA administration increases the numbers of microvessel formation in the lining of the endometrium, which has been shown with the assessment of CD31 and CD34 immunoreactivity in the longitudinally-sectioned tissues (Fig. 4), and more abundant and thicker uterine arteries were observed surrounding the sites of embryo implantation in the BoTA-applied mouse uterus compared to controls (Fig. 6g). Even though the detailed mechanisms of these actions are still required to be elucidated in the future study, these data might imply that absorbed BoTA from the endometrial surface by the non-invasive intrauterine administration stimulates the formation of neovessels or elongation of existing microvessels towards the innermost lining of the endometrium and also induces the formation of uterine arteries outside the uterus probably to provide better and more fertile environment to the sites of embryo implantation.

A variety of studies evaluated the impact of BoTA on temporary muscular paralysis and relief of the tension on the sites of wound, which may aid to prevent the hypertrophy and hyperpigmentation of wound sites [49, 50]. BoTA is also widely investigated and applied in pain management of myofascial syndrome, headaches, arthritis, and neuropathic pain by induction of muscle chemodenervation via preventing the release of neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine and noradrenaline [51, 52]. A broad range of all these BoTA utilization may affirm its safety in human body, which has been addressed in previous studies by demonstrating the remarkably effective and safe results of BoTA treatment for the facial aesthetic purposes, which obtained from 1474 subjects [53], and quantitatively safe and tolerable profiles of BoTA utilization from the meta-analysis involving 2309 subjects [54]. Consistent with these reports, in our current study we revealed that BoTA induces neither cytotoxicity, aberrant cell proliferation, nor irregular migratory ability (supplementary Fig. 2). Moreover, there was no significant difference observed in the weight of day 16 embryos between BoTA-treated and saline-treated groups, especially no retarded embryos were observed in any groups (Fig. 6f-6 h), suggesting non-invasive intrauterine administration of BoTA as an effective therapeutic strategy with the safety.

Significantly, we demonstrated that increased numbers of microvessels were formed in the mouse endometrium with intrauterine BoTA treatment accompanied with elevated levels of angiogenesis-related marker expression. Additionally, enhanced rates of embryo implantation without any retarded embryos were observed in BoTA-treated mice compared to control group. Taken together, we provided a novel evidence suggesting an intrauterine BoTA administration as an effective therapeutic intervention to improve the endometrial microenvironment by increasing endometrial blood supply. Further study will be required to uncover the molecular mechanisms underlying the induction of angiogenesis by BoTA and direct or indirect association between BoTA-induced endometrial angiogenesis and the embryo implantation. Moreover, it will be essential to evaluate the reproductive toxicity of BoTA intrauterine application prior to clinical trials. A better understanding of uterine endometrial angiogenesis induced by BoTA may aid to develop a non-invasive novel method for clinical treatment of repeated implantation failure patients with less risk.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Dr. Haeng-Seok Song for providing CRL4003 cell line and Dr. Tae Hwan Park for his critical and insightful discussion.

Author’s contributions

YJK and HSK planned the studies, conducted analysis and interpretation of all experiments; MJY, SHH, and JHA conducted experiments; HJC and DBL performed RNA-seq analyses; CWP contributed to critical discussion; and HSK, JHA and YJK wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by funding from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) to YJK (No. 2018R1C1B6003), and to HSK (No. 2020R1C1C100787211).

Availability of data and materials

RNA-seq data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in GEO with the primary accession code GSE146934. The authors declare that all other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary information files.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This experimental procedure and animal use protocol have been approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the CHA University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Smith SK: Regulation of angiogenesis in the endometrium. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2001, 12:147-151.
Sherer DM, Abulafia O: Angiogenesis during implantation, and placental and early embryonic development. Placenta 2001, 22:1-13.
Gong X, Tong Q, Chen Z, Zhang Y, Xu C, Jin Z: Microvascular density and vascular endothelial growth factor and osteopontin expression during the implantation window in a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation rat model. Exp Ther Med 2015, 9:773-779.
Geva E, Jaffe RB: Role of angiopoietins in reproductive tract angiogenesis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000, 55:511-519.
Jaffe RB: Importance of angiogenesis in reproductive physiology. Semin Perinatol 2000, 24:79-81.
Smith SK: Angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor and the endometrium. Hum Reprod Update 1998, 4:509-519.
Maas JW, Groothuis PG, Dunselman GA, de Goeij AF, Struyker Boudier HA, Evers JL: Endometrial angiogenesis throughout the human menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 2001, 16:1557-1561.
Dey SK, Lim H, Das SK, Reese J, Paria BC, Daikoku T, Wang H: Molecular cues to implantation. Endocr Rev 2004, 25:341-373.
Psychoyos A: Hormonal control of ovoimplantation. Vitam Horm 1973, 31:201-256.
Tabibzadeh S: Molecular control of the implantation window. Hum Reprod Update 1998, 4:465-471.
Chen X, Man GCW, Liu Y, Wu F, Huang J, Li TC, Wang CC: Physiological and pathological angiogenesis in endometrium at the time of embryo implantation. Am J Reprod Immunol 2017, 78.
Rogers PA: Structure and function of endometrial blood vessels. Hum Reprod Update 1996, 2:57-62.
Kim H, Shin JE, Koo HS, Kwon H, Choi DH, Kim JH: Effect of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment on Refractory Thin Endometrium During the Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycle: A Pilot Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019, 10:61.
Xie Y, Zhang T, Tian Z, Zhang J, Wang W, Zhang H, Zeng Y, Ou J, Yang Y: Efficacy of intrauterine perfusion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for Infertile women with thin endometrium: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Reprod Immunol 2017, 78.
Zhu X, Peault B, Yan G, Sun H, Hu Y, Ding L: Stem Cells and Endometrial Regeneration: From Basic Research to Clinical Trial. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2019, 14:293-304.
Du J, Lu H, Yu X, Lu Z, Mi L, Zhang X: Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of thin endometrium: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020, 99:e18848.
Yin M, Zhou HJ, Lin C, Long L, Yang X, Zhang H, Taylor H, Min W: CD34(+)KLF4(+) Stromal Stem Cells Contribute to Endometrial Regeneration and Repair. Cell Rep 2019, 27:2709-2724 e2703.
Zhao J, Xu B, Xie S, Zhang Q, Li YP: Whether G-CSF administration has beneficial effect on the outcome after assisted reproductive technology? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2016, 14:62.
Kwon KH, Shin KS, Yeon SH, Kwon DG: Application of botulinum toxin in maxillofacial field: Part III. Ancillary treatment for maxillofacial surgery and summary. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2019, 41:45.
Sundaram H, Liew S, Signorini M, Vieira Braz A, Fagien S, Swift A, De Boulle KL, Raspaldo H, Trindade de Almeida AR, Monheit G, Global Aesthetics Consensus G: Global Aesthetics Consensus: Hyaluronic Acid Fillers and Botulinum Toxin Type A-Recommendations for Combined Treatment and Optimizing Outcomes in Diverse Patient Populations. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016, 137:1410-1423.
Chen S: Clinical uses of botulinum neurotoxins: current indications, limitations and future developments. Toxins (Basel) 2012, 4:913-939.
Doft MA, Hardy KL, Ascherman JA: Treatment of hyperhidrosis with botulinum toxin. Aesthet Surg J 2012, 32:238-244.
Escher CM, Paracka L, Dressler D, Kollewe K: Botulinum toxin in the management of chronic migraine: clinical evidence and experience. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2017, 10:127-135.
Hsieh PF, Chiu HC, Chen KC, Chang CH, Chou EC: Botulinum toxin A for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder. Toxins (Basel) 2016, 8.
Aru RG, Songcharoen SJ, Seals SR, Arnold PB, Hester RL: Microcirculatory Effects of Botulinum Toxin A in the Rat: Acute and Chronic Vasodilation. Ann Plast Surg 2017, 79:82-85.
Park TH, Lee SH, Park YJ, Lee YS, Rah DK, Kim SY: Presurgical Botulinum Toxin A Treatment Increases Angiogenesis by Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1alpha/Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Subsequent Superiorly Based Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Survival in a Rat Model. Ann Plast Surg 2016, 76:723-728.
Gugerell A, Kober J, Schmid M, Buchberger E, Kamolz LP, Keck M: Botulinum Toxin A: Dose-dependent Effect on Reepithelialization and Angiogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016, 4:e837.
Kang YJ, Lees M, Matthews LC, Kimber SJ, Forbes K, Aplin JD: MiR-145 suppresses embryo-epithelial juxtacrine communication at implantation by modulating maternal IGF1R. J Cell Sci 2015, 128:804-814.
Chung M, Ahn J, Son K, Kim S, Jeon NL: Biomimetic Model of Tumor Microenvironment on Microfluidic Platform. Adv Healthc Mater 2017, 6.
Kang YJ, Forbes K, Carver J, Aplin JD: The role of the osteopontin-integrin alphavbeta3 interaction at implantation: functional analysis using three different in vitro models. Hum Reprod 2014, 29:739-749.
Carver J, Martin K, Spyropoulou I, Barlow D, Sargent I, Mardon H: An in-vitro model for stromal invasion during implantation of the human blastocyst. Hum Reprod 2003, 18:283-290.
Zhou X, Xu B, Zhang D, Jiang X, Chang HM, Leung PCK, Xia X, Zhang A: Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity. Front Cell Dev Biol 2020, 8:105.
Mlecnik B, Galon J, Bindea G: Automated exploration of gene ontology term and pathway networks with ClueGO-REST. Bioinformatics 2019, 35:3864-3866.
Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA: Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 2009, 4:44-57.
Shin M, Beane TJ, Quillien A, Male I, Zhu LJ, Lawson ND: Vegfa signals through ERK to promote angiogenesis, but not artery differentiation. Development 2016, 143:3796-3805.
Zhang EY, Gao B, Shi HL, Huang LF, Yang L, Wu XJ, Wang ZT: 20(S)-Protopanaxadiol enhances angiogenesis via HIF-1alpha-mediated VEGF secretion by activating p70S6 kinase and benefits wound healing in genetically diabetic mice. Exp Mol Med 2017, 49:e387.
Aplin JD, Ruane PT: Embryo-epithelium interactions during implantation at a glance. J Cell Sci 2017, 130:15-22.
Siemerink MJ, Klaassen I, Vogels IM, Griffioen AW, Van Noorden CJ, Schlingemann RO: CD34 marks angiogenic tip cells in human vascular endothelial cell cultures. Angiogenesis 2012, 15:151-163.
Rizov M, Andreeva P, Dimova I: Molecular regulation and role of angiogenesis in reproduction. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2017, 56:127-132.
Park DW, Yang KM: Hormonal regulation of uterine chemokines and immune cells. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2011, 38:179-185.
Koo HS, Park CW, Cha SH, Yang KM: Serial Evaluation of Endometrial Blood Flow for Prediction of Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation and In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer. J Ultrasound Med 2018, 37:851-857.
Babic AM, Kireeva ML, Kolesnikova TV, Lau LF: CYR61, a product of a growth factor-inducible immediate early gene, promotes angiogenesis and tumor growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95:6355-6360.
Hashimoto T, Shibasaki F: Hypoxia-inducible factor as an angiogenic master switch. Front Pediatr 2015, 3:33.
Popa ER, Harmsen MC, Tio RA, van der Strate BW, Brouwer LA, Schipper M, Koerts J, De Jongste MJ, Hazenberg A, Hendriks M, van Luyn MJ: Circulating CD34+ progenitor cells modulate host angiogenesis and inflammation in vivo. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2006, 41:86-96.
Qi D, Wei M, Jiao S, Song Y, Wang X, Xie G, Taranto J, Liu Y, Duan Y, Yu B, et al: Hypoxia inducible factor 1alpha in vascular smooth muscle cells promotes angiotensin II-induced vascular remodeling via activation of CCL7-mediated macrophage recruitment. Cell Death Dis 2019, 10:544.
Suman P, Malhotra SS, Gupta SK: LIF-STAT signaling and trophoblast biology. JAKSTAT 2013, 2:e25155.
Xiao LJ, Yuan JX, Song XX, Li YC, Hu ZY, Liu YX: Expression and regulation of stanniocalcin 1 and 2 in rat uterus during embryo implantation and decidualization. Reproduction 2006, 131:1137-1149.
Stone AV, Koman LA, Callahan MF, Eckman DM, Smith BP, Plate JF, Smith TL: The effect of botulinum neurotoxin-A on blood flow in rats: a potential mechanism for treatment of Raynaud phenomenon. J Hand Surg Am 2012, 37:795-802.
Al-Qattan MM, Al-Shanawani BN, Alshomer F: Botulinum toxin type A: implications in wound healing, facial cutaneous scarring, and cleft lip repair. Ann Saudi Med 2013, 33:482-488.
Ziade M, Domergue S, Batifol D, Jreige R, Sebbane M, Goudot P, Yachouh J: Use of botulinum toxin type A to improve treatment of facial wounds: a prospective randomised study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013, 66:209-214.
Colhado OC, Boeing M, Ortega LB: Botulinum toxin in pain treatment. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2009, 59:366-381.
Sim WS: Application of botulinum toxin in pain management. Korean J Pain 2011, 24:1-6.
Guo Y, Lu Y, Liu T, Zhou Y, Yang P, Zhu J, Chen L, Yang Q: Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Treatment of Glabellar Lines: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trials. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015, 136:310e-318e.
Naumann M, Jankovic J: Safety of botulinum toxin type A: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2004, 20:981-990.

JTMSupplementaryTable1KYJ.docx
Supplementary Table 1. Primer sequence pairs used for RT-PCR analyses.
JTMSupplementaryFigureKYJ.pdf
Supplementary Fig. 1 High concentration of BoTA is less effective on induction of endometrial angiogenesis QRT-PCR analysis of VEGFR2 and HIF1-⍺ in BoTA-treated (0.5IU-10IU) endometrial epithelial (Ishikawa) cells (A), and Integrin β3 and VIMENTI in endometrial stromal (CRL4003) cells (B).
Supplementary Fig. 2 No cytotoxic effect of BoTA on endometrial epithelial cells in vitro Effect of BoTA on cytotoxicity (a) measured by viability of Ishikawa cells (BoTA 0.5IU-20IU) and cell proliferation (b) measured by differences in cell number counting. Wound healing assay at 0h and 48h time point after scratch in BoTA-treated vs. saline-treated Ishikawa (c) and CRL4003 cells (d), and wound closure was assessed by measuring the distance of gap (e-f).
Supplementary Fig. 3 Identification of differentially expressed genes of the BoTA-treated uterus vs. control (a) A volcano plot displaying the comparison of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the BoTA-treat (Day 3) and control groups. The red dots indicate up-regulated DEGs, green dots indicate down-regulated DEGs, and blue dots indicate no DEGs between the BoTA-treated (Day 3) and untreated samples. Marked genes are associated with angiogenesis and embryo implantation. DEGs are selected by cut off values of fold change > 2 and p-value < 0.05 to identify significantly differentially expressed genes.
Supplementary Fig. 4 CD31 induction in BoTA-treated mouse uterus (a) Representative two images of IF staining of CD31 in longitudinally-sectioned mouse uterus harvested 8 days after BoTA intrauterine infusion. Saline-treated endometrium were used for control.
Supplementary Fig. 5 Embryo attachment in non-primed BoTA-treated Ishikawa cells (a) Rates of stability of attached mouse embryos onto saline- or non-primed BoTA-treated Ishikawa cells at 19h, 24h, 28h, or 45h of co-culture.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Non-invasive intra-uterine administration of Botulinum Toxin A enhances endometrial angiogenesis and improves the rates of embryo implantation

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Declarations

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1