PPARα and PPARβ/δ Expression is Associated with Proinflammatory Markers in an Obese Pediatric Population

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-47488/v1

Download PDF

Research

PPARα and PPARβ/δ Expression is Associated with Proinflammatory Markers in an Obese Pediatric Population

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-47488/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 31 Oct, 2020

Read the published version in Journal of Inflammation →

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Background

Obesity configures a pathophysiological profile that predisposes the development of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, critically impacting public health. The chronic dysregulation of immuno-metabolic components triggered by obesity directly affects the metabolism of various tissues. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are a group of nuclear receptors and transcription factors essential for energy homeostasis of different tissues. Despite its wide-ranging expression and function, the functional mismatch of the PPAR subtypes establish biological mechanisms responsible for metabolic diseases from childhood. In addition, the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) activation can influence insulin secretion, but also the cytokine profile possibly mediated through PPARγ activation. However, to date, the role of PPARs and GLP-1R in leukocytes from obese pediatric patients has been unclear. Therefore, we examined the expression of PPARs isotypes and GLP-1R, and its correlation with metabolic, hormonal, inflammatory, and anthropometric markers in an obese pediatric population.

Results

Obese children and adolescents presented a significant increase in anthropometric and body composition parameters, TG, VLDL, TG/HDL, A/G index, and HOMA score when compared to the control group. Obese participants exhibited a pro-inflammatory profile with an augment of IL-8 (p = 0,0081), IL-6 (p = 0,0005), TNF-α (p = 0,0004), IFN-γ (p = 0,0110), MCP-1 (p = 0,0452), and adipsin (p = 0,0397), whereas displayed a reduction of adiponectin (p = 0,0452). The expression of PPARα and GLP-1R was lower in the leukocytes from obese participants than in lean subjects. Furthermore, PPARα correlates negatively with TNF-α (p = 0,0383), while GLP-1R did not show correlation with any inflammatory variable. However, both receptors correlate negatively with the abdominal skinfold. Although PPARβ/δ expression was similar between groups, it was negatively associated with IL-8 levels (p = 0,0085).

Conclusions

PPARα and PPARβ/δ expression are negatively associated with the proinflammatory markers TNF-α and IL-8, respectively, suggesting participation in the regulation of inflammation observed in pediatric obesity. Furthermore, PPARα and GLP-1R are downregulated in leukocytes from obese children and adolescents, and both receptors are associated with the abdominal skinfold suggesting a role in fat distribution that could indirectly affect the function of different immune cells and the secreted cytokines. Thereby, these findings may impact the understanding and implementation of PPARα or GLP-1R agonists in the clinic.

Pediatrics

obesity

children

adolescents

PPAR

GLP-1R

cytokines

Obesity is a chronic disease with a high impact on public health due to its increased prevalence, and it constitutes a risk factor for associated comorbidities. Obese subjects have a metabolic phenotype that determines their predisposition to the development of cardiometabolic diseases, metabolic syndrome (MS), and type 2 diabetes (T2D) [1].

Childhood and adolescence are stages of greater vulnerability to adopt unhealthy lifestyles, e.g., low physical activity and increased consumption of foods loaded with sugar or salt. However, those habits can be modified with early interventions [2]. The development of obesity at the early stages has become a topic of great interest in the formulation of preventive and protective public health policies to reach healthy adulthood life [3].

According to global obesity trends, between 1975 and 2016, there has been an increase in the global prevalence of obesity from 0.7–5.6% and 0.9–7.8% in girls and boys, respectively [4]. Likewise, Colombia presented between 2010 and 2015, an augment of excess weight of 5.6% in children and 2.4% in adolescents, without any difference in gender [5]. In 2007, the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) established abdominal obesity as one of the main risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), MS, and insulin resistance (IR), based on expert agreements, which considered only studies of children between 10 and 15 years [6, 7].

The metabolic phenotype in obese subjects is determined by alterations in metabolic regulation of triglycerides and glucose, inflammatory balance, regulation of oxidative stress, among others [8]. Notably, the lipid profile displayed an association with exacerbated alterations in obesity that could lead to the development of a chronic inflammatory status [8, 9].

A chronic inflammatory profile is characterized by increased circulation of proinflammatory cytokines, affecting tissues with a high metabolic rate. Inflammation is a determining factor in the complications of patients with obesity, which highlights the relationship between nutrition, tissues responsible for high metabolic expenditure, and the immune system [10, 11].

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are recognized transcription factors, comprising a group of three isotypes: PPARα, PPARβ/δ, and PPARγ. They play an essential role in regulating the expression of genes responsible for lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, as well as maintenance mitochondrial metabolic rate [12]. Its function aimed at maintaining the proper balance between the formation of adipose tissue, caloric expenditure, and a proven anti-inflammatory role [11, 13].

PPARs participate in the regulation of the expression of the cytokine profile from adipose tissue but also in immune cells [12, 14]. In particular, PPARα plays a vital role in the modulation of target genes that control lipid metabolism, absorption, and transport [15]. Furthermore, PPARα overlaps its expression with PPARβ/δ, and PPARγ in tissues such as the skin, gut, skeletal, heart muscles, adipose tissue, brain, vascular cells, and immune cells, being linked in processes of cell repair, differentiation, and proliferation [11]. Nevertheless, studies of PPARs are scarce, particularly on leukocytes from obese children and adolescents.

An additional factor that can contribute to modulate the inflammation in obesity is the activation of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)/GLP-1R axis. GLP-1 is a hormonal factor that increases the pancreatic release of insulin [16, 17]. Its cytoprotective role has been reported mainly in pancreatic β-cells, delaying the establishment of obese T2D [16, 18]. Indeed, the activation of GLP-1R affects the profile of cytokines, since GLP-1R signaling on iNKT cells can enhance the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 [16]. Besides, GLP-1R also downregulates proinflammatory cytokines expression mediated through PPARγ activation, followed by NF-kB inhibition [19].

Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the expression of key metabolic genes, such as PPARs, and GLP1R in leukocytes and its association with metabolic, hormonal, and inflammatory markers, body composition, and anthropometric factors in a Colombian's obese pediatric population.

Obese children and adolescents have an impaired metabolic and anthropometric profile

The anthropometric, body composition, and biochemical variables of the studied individuals stratified by BMI percentile status are shown in Table 1. Age and gender of the participants were not significantly different among the control and obese group, the median age was 11 years old, and 48% were girls. All mean values of skinfold thickness, waist circumference (WC), arm circumference (AC), waist-to-height ratio (WHR), arm muscle circumference, and neck circumference were significantly increased in participants with obesity in comparison with healthy weight children and adolescents (Table 1). Regarding body composition, the percentage of arm, leg, trunk, android, gynoid, and body fat were significantly elevated in obese patients compared to control subjects (Table 1). In obese children, fat distribution was similar between different body areas, and there were no significant differences in mean values of lean mass between groups.

Table 1

Anthropometric, body composition and clinical cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents^†
	Control	Obesity	p value
	n = 19	n = 18
Gender
Female	8	10
Male	11	8
Age (years)	10,47 ± 2,87	11,33 ± 2,93	0,3515
Tanner	2,88 ± 1,72	2,72 ± 1,32	0,8826
BMI	49,92 ± 28,03	96,37 ± 8,50	< 0,0001****
Arm circumference (cm)	20,41 ± 3,23	27,45 ± 3,50	< 0,0001****
Arm muscle circumference (cm)	16,77 ± 2,83	20,64 ± 3,19	0,0008***
Neck circumference (cm)	28,29 ± 3,03	32,47 ± 2,82	0,0003***
Triceps skinfold (cm)	11,68 ± 4,61	21,64 ± 4,94	< 0,0001****
Subscapular skinfold (cm)	6,85 ± 2,27	21,17 ± 5,40	< 0,0001****
Suprailiac skinfold (cm)	10,91 ± 4,78	26,61 ± 5,79	< 0,0001****
Abdominal skinfold (cm)	10,53 ± 5,01	27,64 ± 6,17	< 0,0001****
Waist circumference (WC) (cm)	63,75 ± 7,53	83,75 ± 6,94	< 0,0001****
Waist/Height ratio (WHR)	0,45 ± 0,03	0,58 ± 0,04	< 0,0001****
Arm fat (%)	33,07 ± 9,44	45,91 ± 7,73	< 0,0001****
Leg fat (%)	32,82 ± 7,74	44,41 ± 5,82	< 0,0001****
Trunk fat (%)	21,06 ± 8,95	42,9 ± 6,79	< 0,0001****
Android fat (%)	18,58 ± 9,93	44,33 ± 7,53	< 0,0001****
Gynoid fat (%)	28,88 ± 8,21	44,68 ± 5,96	< 0,0001****
Body fat (%)	26,28 ± 7,35	39,9 ± 5,89	< 0,0001****
Lean mass (kg)	32,83 ± 10,31	22,84 ± 11,25	0,0073**
Fasting blood glucose (mg/dL)	87,61 ± 5,55	87,59 ± 6,25	0,936
2 hours glucose (mg/dL)	91,74 ± 13	94,23 ± 13,58	0,7617
Insulin (mcU/mL)	7,77 ± 4,78	19,77 ± 8,02	< 0,0001****
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)	150,15 ± 21,83	158,29 ± 24,91	0,3758
Triglycerides (mg/dL)	76,48 ± 18,47	117,27 ± 31,64	0,0001***
HDL (mg/dL)	50,34 ± 8,22	41,39 ± 9,51	0,0077**
LDL (mg/dL)	84,55 ± 18,04	94,70 ± 20,67	0,2547
VLDL (mg/dL)	15,29 ± 3,69	23,45 ± 6.33	0,0001***
HOMA-IR (score)	1,50 ± 1,19	4,28 ± 1,72	< 0,0001****
TG/HDL ratio	1,60 ± 0,61	3,02 ± 1,24	< 0,0001****
Android-gynoid % fat ratio	0,61 ± 0,17	0,99 ± 0,08	< 0,0001****
GLP-1 (ng/mL)	15,98 ± 0,69	17,70 ± 0,66	0,0725
GIP (pg/mL)	2637 ± 486,89	3137 ± 512,44	0,6299
^†BMI: body mass index. HDL: high-density lipoprotein. VLDL: very low-density lipoprotein. LDL: low-density lipoprotein. HOMA-IR: homeostatic model of assessment for insulin resistance. GLP-1: glucagon-like peptide 1. GIP: gastric inhibitory polypeptide. Values are presented as percentage or mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between groups were evaluated using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. * p < 0.05, p < 0.005, * p < 0.0001.

The mean of fasting glucose and 2-hours glucose fell within the normal ranges, as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (Table 1) [20]. However, insulin was significantly higher in children with obesity than in the standard weight group. Accordingly, the HOMA score was increased in obese children; this score overcomes the 3,4 cut-off indicating IR (Table 1) [21]. TG and VLDL levels were higher in obese children than those of lean subjects, whereas HDL-c levels were significantly reduced in obese subjects in contrast with the control group (Table 1). The levels of total cholesterol were similar among groups (Table 1).

TG/HDL and A/G ratios are frequently used as indicators of cardiometabolic risk, and here, those ratios were significantly elevated in the obese group in comparison with the lean patients. Based on this data, obese children and adolescents have an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease and T2D. Incretins gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and GLP-1 did not show significant differences between the study groups (Table 1).

Triceps skinfold displayed a positive correlation with body composition parameters

Relationships between fat body distribution and anthropometric data are shown in Table 2. Triceps skinfold displayed a positive correlation with all body composition parameters, the stronger correlation was observed with total body fat percentage (r = 0,6554, p = 0,0071), and a weaker association with Android fat percentage (r = 0,4974, p = 0,0516) (Table 2). Furthermore, WHT ratio showed a positive association with arm (r = 0,691, p = 0,0038), leg (r = 0,5245, p = 0,0388), android (r = 0,5528, p = 0,0282), and total body fat percentages (r = 0,5379, p = 0,0334) (Table 2).

Table 2

Correlation of DEXA fat measurements with anthropometric data^†
	Arm fat (%)	Leg fat (%)	Trunk fat (%)	Android fat (%)	Gynoid fat (%)	Body fat (%)
BMI	0,060	0,131	-0,013	-0,063	-0,028	0,081
Arm circumference	-0,118	0,014	-0,167	-0,217	-0,179	-0,046
Arm muscle circumference	-0,340	-0,202	-0,437	-0,419	-0,425	-0,299
Neck circumference	-0,449	-0,278	-0,411	-0,496	-0,391	-0,355
Triceps skinfold	0,590^a	0,627^a	0,604^a	0,497^a	0,579^a	0,655^a
Subscapular skinfold	0,148	0,022	0,294	0,186	0,179	0,171
Suprailiac skinfold	-0,041	-0,186	0,099	0,140	0,031	-0,027
Abdominal skinfold	0,189	-0,029	0,117	0,289	-0,004	0,119
Waist circumference (WC)	-0,105	-0,110	-0,255	-0,217	-0,234	-0,149
Waist/Height ratio (WHR)	0,691^b	0,525^a	0,442	0,553^a	0,482	0,538^a
^† BMI: body mass index. Spearman's rank correlation test, ^a p < 0.05 and ^b p < 0.005.

Trunk fat percentage presented a significant association with A/G ratio (r = 0,558, p = 0,027). Likewise, Android fat percentage also displayed a positive correlation with A/G ratio (r = 0,558, p = 0.006). Arm circumference parameter correlated negatively with LDL (r=-0,572, p = 0,013) and no-HDL (r=-0,502, p = 0,034) whereas arm muscle circumference exhibited a weak negative correlation with LDL (r=-0,486, p = 0,041) (Supplementary table 2).

The correlation of different variables with the suprailiac skinfold indicates a positive association with Total Cholesterol (r = 0,658, p = 0,003), and no-HDL (r = 0,724, p = 0,001) while showed a weaker association with LDL (r = 0,550, p = 0,018) (Supplementary Table 2). There was a positive correlation between Abdominal skinfold with HOMA-IR (r = 0,459, p = 0,055).

PPARα and GLP-1R gene expression is reduced in leukocytes from obese subjects

To determine the expression of PPAR isotypes in the leukocytes, the expression of each isotype was analyzed by qPCR. PPAR-α expression showed a significant reduction in the leukocytes from obese patients in comparison with the control group, with a 50% reduction in the expression of this gene (p = 0,0484) (Fig. 1a). PPAR-β did not show differential expression between the study groups (Fig. 1b). In contrast, PPAR-γ expression was undetectable in leukocytes from all the samples. To corroborate this finding, we used adipose tissue cDNA as a positive control, since this isotype is mainly present in adipose cells. This sample presented a positive amplification and a single peak in the dissociation curve, indicating that the reaction was specific (data not shown). Likely, PPAR-γ transcripts were not expressed on leukocytes or are expressed at low levels but just in some cell lineages of these samples.

Besides, analysis from mRNA expression levels of incretin receptors was also evaluated in the studied individuals. GLP-1R expression was significantly reduced in the obese group as compared to the healthy weight participants (p = 0,1358) (Fig. 2a), whereas no difference was observed in GIPR expression between the two groups (Fig. 2b).

Obese children and adolescents showed a proinflammatory profile of adipokines and cytokines

To identify the inflammatory serum profile in obese children and adolescents, the levels of several adipokines and cytokines were measured by flow cytometry using a multiplex assay. Obese subjects showed a significant increase in the levels of IL-8 (p = 0,0081), IL-6 (p = 0,0005), TNF-α (p = 0,0004) IFN-γ (p = 0,0110), and MCP-1 levels (p = 0,0452) in comparison with the normal weight group (Fig. 3a and b). Serum levels of IL-10 and IP-10 were detected but did not differ significantly between the groups.

The serum adiponectin concentration presented a significant reduction in the obese group (p = 0,0452) compared to the control group (Fig. 4). Conversely, adipsin displayed a concentration significantly higher (p = 0,0397) in the obese group in comparison with the control group, which had a concentration of 7,688 ± 6,116 pg/mL. (Fig. 4). Resistin showed similar levels between the study groups, with concentrations of 13,102 ± 8,342 pg/mL and 16,792 ± 8,302 pg/mL for the obese and control participants, respectively (Fig. 4). Leptin was also analyzed; however, it presented considerably high levels in the group with obesity, which exceeded the concentrations determined in the calibration curve, which did not allow to quantify it using the test used. Finally, RBP4 did not present a representative concentration in any of the study groups, indicating that it is not secreted in serum at detectable levels under the evaluated conditions.

PPARα and PPARβ/δ correlate negatively with proinflammatory markers

Analysis of the relationships between PPAR-α, PPAR-β, and GLP-1R expression and the levels of cytokines, chemokines, adipokines and anthropometric parameters of the obese subjects showed that PPAR-α transcript levels had a significant negative correlation with TNF-α levels (r = -0,583, p = 0,03883) (Table 3), as well as with abdominal skinfold (r = -0,712, p = 0,0016). Besides PPAR-β showed a significant negative correlation with IL-8 levels (r = -0,667, p = 0,0085) and arm fat percentage (r = -0,651, p = 0,0132) (Tables 3 and 4).

Table 3

Correlation between hormones and cytokines with *PPAR-α, PPAR-β and GLP-1R* expression in children and adolescents^†
	PPAR-α	PPAR-β	GLP-1R
Adiponectin	0,496	-0,330	-0,084
Adipsin	0,067	-0,667	0,357
MCP-1	0,324	0,011	0,235
IP-10	0,370	-0,300	0,033
IL-10	-0,125	0,000	-0,136
IL-8	0,233	-0,664^b	-0,007
IL-6	-0,343	-0,200	0,317
IFN-γ	0,130	-0,411	-0,130
Resistin	0,172	-0,311	0,323
TNF-α	-0,583^a	-0,059	0,304
^† Spearman's rank correlation test. ^a p = 0,0383, ^b p = 0,0085

Table 4

Correlation between anthropometric and biochemical parameters with gene expression of metabolic markers in children and adolescents^†
	PPAR-α	p value	PPAR-β	p value	GLP-1R	p value
BMI	0,049	0,854	-0,257	0,354	-0,086	0,773
Arm fat (%)	0,052	0,850	-0,651	0,013	-0,364	0,246
Leg fat (%)	0,208	0,438	-0,515	0,061	-0,266	0,404
Trunk fat (%)	0,096	0,723	-0,436	0,118	-0,322	0,309
Android fat (%)	-0,028	0,915	-0,339	0,231	-0,420	0,177
Gynoid fat (%)	0,108	0,690	-0,513	0,062	-0,189	0,546
Body fat (%)	0,096	0,723	-0,511	0,063	-0,343	0,276
Arm circumference	-0,094	0,713	0,306	0,266	-0,147	0,608
Arm muscle circumference	-0,173	0,501	0,411	0,128	0,042	0,892
Waist circumference (WC)	-0,308	0,226	0,050	0,860	0,059	0,844
Neck circumference	-0,048	0,852	0,190	0,496	0,090	0,758
Waist/Height ratio (WHR)	-0,262	0,291	-0,448	0,090	-0,326	0,241
Triceps skinfold	0,210	0,415	-0,390	0,146	-0,277	0,330
Subscapular skinfold	0,142	0,586	-0,225	0,413	0,183	0,527
Suprailiac skinfold	-0,429	0,084	0,285	0,301	-0,236	0,405
Abdominal skinfold	-0,712	0,002	0,379	0,163	-0,678	0,009
Fasting blood glucose	-0,364	0,149	0,340	0,214	-0,279	0,333
2 hours glucose	0,042	0,876	-0,412	0,125	-0,051	0,868
Insulin	-0,185	0,471	0,293	0,287	-0,288	0,318
Total cholesterol	-0,021	0,934	0,075	0,790	0,209	0,473
Triglycerides	-0,247	0,335	-0,064	0,815	-0,125	0,671
HDL	0,416	0,098	-0,054	0,845	0,354	0,215
VLDL	-0,248	0,333	-0,064	0,815	-0,117	0,685
LDL	0,033	0,900	-0,086	0,756	0,077	0,797
HOMA-IR	-0,367	0,146	0,343	0,209	-0,341	0,234
TG/HDL ratio	-0,396	0,115	0,097	0,731	-0,182	0,532
^† BMI: body mass index. HDL: high-density lipoprotein. VLDL: very low-density lipoprotein. LDL: low-density lipoprotein. HOMA-IR: homeostatic model of assessment for insulin resistance. Spearman's rank correlation test.

In contrast, GLP-1R expression did not correlate with any inflammatory parameters (Table 3). However, GLP-1R showed a negative correlation with Abdominal skinfold (r= -0,678, p = 0,009) (Table 4).

Childhood and adolescence are critical periods where fundamental metabolic and hormonal changes start and have an impact on adulthood health. Excess weight at these life stages is a critical factor for the onset of cardiometabolic disease and T2D. Thus, those stages are vital periods for timely intervention. We evaluated the expression of essential metabolic genes, such as PPARs and GLP-1R, in leukocytes and its correlation with metabolic, immune, and anthropometric factors in a Colombian's obese pediatric population.

PPARs participate in the control of the inflammatory process produced by obesity, modulating the expression of proinflammatory cytokines in adipose cells [12]. However, other tissues can contribute to the inflammatory process. Studies of PPARs, particularly of PPARβ/δ and PPARα, on leukocytes from obese children and adolescents, are scarce. However, the assessment of its expression and relation with variables associated with obesity represents an accessible tool for developing therapeutic strategies and understanding the pathophysiology of obesity [22].

In this work, we identify the expression of PPARα and PPARβ/δ, but not PPARγ in leukocytes from obese children and adolescents. The activation of PPARβ/δ has been mainly studied in "endurance-exercise mimetics" particularly focused on the liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue, to reduce inflammation as an obesity treatment [23, 24]. Moreover, PPARβ/δ is involved in lipid metabolism, regulation of fatty acid oxidation (FAO), inflammation, and modulation of glucose and cholesterol levels [25]. Direct activation of this isotype improves insulin sensitivity and the disorders of metabolic syndrome in humans [26]. The use of the agonist GW0742 for PPARβ/δ in obese mice influences the improvement of metabolic parameters positively, increases Foxp3⁺CD4⁺T cells, induced FAO gene expression in lymph node and increases FAO in CD4⁺ T cells [27, 28]. FAO can also influence not exclusively the metabolism, but also the T cells lineages and functions [29]. Those effects are not observed only with exercise and suggest that this transcription factor can present additional effects that need to be explored.

In this study, PPARβ/δ did not show significant differences between the standard weight and obese groups. However, this gene displayed a significant negative correlation with IL-8 levels and arm fat percentage. IL-8 (CXCL8) is a proinflammatory chemokine that mediates the crosstalk between obesity and cardiovascular disease [30, 31]. IL-8 is mainly secreted by adipose tissue, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, monocytes, and macrophages in conditions such as exposure to IL-1β, TNF-α, or LPS [32]. Indeed, we detected a significant increase in TNF-α levels from the serum of obese subjects, which could contribute to the IL-8 secretion in those individuals.

Although the direct link of PPARβ/δ to IL-8 is suggestive, some studies have already related the activation of PPARβ/δ with the modulation of expression of IL-8 in endothelial cells and endometrium tissue participating in inflammation [33–35]. In line with this evidence, our results suggest that a decrease in the PPARβ/δ expression in leukocytes might consequently augment the IL-8 levels and, thereby, the inflammatory response during obesity. Indeed, experiments in mice have associated the deletion in the expression of PPARβ/δ, with the reduction in the number of hepatic macrophages of the M2 type, which results in alterations in lipid metabolism, IR, and decreased expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines [36]. PPARβ/δ senses the effects that chylomicron-derived FAs have on macrophages inducing overexpression of angiopoietin-related protein 4 (ANGTPL4), inhibiting postprandial uptake of saturated FAs into mesenteric lymph nodes macrophages and preventing macrophage activation in an inflammatory response derived from fat accumulation [37]. Those findings show the protective role of PPARβ/δ in the control of lipid metabolism and the development of inflammatory processes.

On the other hand, PPARα acts as a lipid sensor actively expressed in tissues with high metabolic rates, such as the liver, heart, muscle, kidney, intestinal mucosa, and brown adipose tissues [38, 39]. The use of natural ligands or agonists for this isotype has revealed its participation in glucose homeostasis, IR development, inflammation, atherogenesis, and in the expression of genes related to lipid metabolism [40, 41]. In leukocytes, PPARα expression has barely been studied. However, the expression of PPARα has been reported in immune cells such as monocytes/macrophages, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and CD4⁺ T cells [12, 42, 43]. Also, subjects with MS significantly decreased PPARα expression in eosinophils by approximately 21% [44].

Our pediatric obese population showed reduced expression of this isotype in leukocytes when compared to the lean group. Likewise, studies on mice with induced obesity exhibited reduced expression of PPARα and carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT-1) in the liver [45]. PPARγ expression is also reduced in PBMC from obese children and adolescents [46]. Indeed, obese mice treated with Bezafibrate (BZ), an agonist that preferentially activates PPARα and PPARγ, improves biochemical parameters and reduce the WAT proinflammatory state in obese mice [45]. These findings suggest that obesity in the early stages of life influences the expression of PPARα in leukocytes, and consequently, its reduction can be involved in the observed altered lipid profile and reduced insulin sensitivity.

We observed a significant increase in TG and a reduction in HDL levels in obese children and adolescents in comparison with the control group. Both parameters overcome the reference values for pediatric individuals. Insulin sensitivity was also affected in this group. We used the HOMA index to evaluate the IR status, which is the most used method for its diagnosis in the pediatric population. We observed that obese subjects displayed a mean value of 4,28, significantly higher than lean subjects, which showed a 1,50 score, predicting IR for the obese group.

As a complementary measure to confirm the prevalence of IR, we calculated the TG/HDL ratio, which closely correlated with this parameter in adults at a value ≥ 3 [47]. This ratio is also considered as a predictor of cardiometabolic risk and reflects an atherogenic lipid profile [48]. In the pediatric population, a high TG/HDL ratio is associated with lower insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular risk [49]. We found a significantly increased TG/HDL ratio for the obese group (3,02 p < 0,0001) in comparison with the lean group (1,60). These results confirm a prevalent condition of IR and cardiovascular risk in obese participants that could be associated with their downregulation of PPARα. Regarding this, PPARα has been reported to improve insulin sensitivity and give a protective property against the development of IR [44, 50].

Besides, PPARα is recognized by its anti-inflammatory role. In this study, we observed a proinflammatory profile in obese pediatric subjects with an increase in the serum levels of adipsin, MCP-1, IL-8, IL-6, IFN-γ, and TNF-α, and a decreased levels of the anti-inflammatory adipokine adiponectin. Hence, PPARα downregulation in leukocytes from obese children suggests an association with their proinflammatory profile. Indeed, PPARα displayed a significant negative correlation with TNF-α levels and the abdominal skinfold. TNF-α promotes IR, decreases the uptake of fatty acids by adipocytes, increasing them in the circulation while stimulating lipolysis [51, 52].

Furthermore, TNF-α increases the production of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and suppresses the production of adiponectin [52]. TNF-α altogether with IFN-γ and IL-6 leads to an infiltration of immune cells in adipose tissue and dysfunction of inflammatory immune cells [53]. In this work, it was found that the concentration of TNF-α was significantly higher in obese patients than in the control group. These findings are consistent with the high HOMA index, IL-8 and IL-6 levels, and the decreased adiponectin concentration in obese children and adolescents.

The consequences of obesity on the development of IR and activation of a chronic inflammatory response has allowed establishing a relationship between GLP-1 and PPARs. GLP-1 is a hormonal factor that improves insulin synthesis and secretion on the pancreatic β-cells. GLP-1 signaling through GLP-1R is recognized for its cytoprotective role in those cells [16, 18]. Increased GLP-1R expression and improved GLP-1 sensitivity into pancreatic islets may be favored by the activation of PPARα [54]. Interestingly, GLP-1R is expressed in some lineages of immune cells that have an immunomodulatory role in the migration and differentiation of T and B lymphocytes [16, 55, 56]. GLP-1R also displays anti-atherogenic effects during obesity by reducing monocyte/macrophage migration and inflammatory cytokine production [57, 58]. In this study, we observed a reduced expression of GLP-1R in obese children and adolescents. Although its expression did not show a significant association with inflammatory parameters, GLP-1R and PPARα expression exhibited a negative correlation with abdominal skinfold. These findings suggest a role of GLP-1R and PPARα in the lipid distribution that could indirectly affect the role of different immune cells and the secreted cytokines. Previous studies show that GLP-1R induce downregulation of proinflammatory cytokines mediated through PPARγ activation and NF-kB inhibition [19], indicating that it is possible that both receptors present crosstalk in leukocytes from obese pediatric population. This association is highly needed to be explored in the future.

In summary, adipose tissue accumulation in obesity is associated with disturbances in the homeostasis of several tissues, disruption of the mechanisms controlling lipid and glucose metabolism, and dysregulation at the secretion profile for proinflammatory cytokines and adipokines [53]. Accordingly, it was possible to establish a relationship between anthropometric alterations and body fat distribution observed in obesity with associated comorbidities, such as IR, chronic inflammatory profile, and risk for the development of cardiovascular diseases. Thus, PPARα and GLP-1R are potential gene targets to explore its role in fat distribution and inflammatory profile as essential aspects in pediatric obesity.

We have shown that PPARα and PPARβ/δ expression are negatively associated with the proinflammatory markers TNF-α and IL-8, respectively, suggesting participation in the regulation of inflammation observed in pediatric obesity. Furthermore, PPARα and GLP-1R are downregulated in leukocytes from obese children and adolescents, and both receptors are associated with the abdominal skinfold suggesting a role in fat distribution that could indirectly affect the function of different immune cells and the secreted cytokines. Thereby, these findings may impact the understanding and implementation of PPARα or GLP-1R agonists in the clinic.

Participants

This is a cross-sectional study with primary data collection performed in children and adolescents from February of 2017 to June of 2018 in Bogota-Colombia. Children and adolescents aged 7 to 17 years old from seven public schools were invited to participate voluntarily with parental authorization. The study population included participants from low- to middle-income, which represent most of the city population. Finally, 37 participants (female, n = 18, and male, n = 19), which fulfilled the inclusion criteria, agreed to participate in this study. The inclusion criteria included female and male participants aged 7–17, with a healthy weight (lean control group) and obesity (defined as BMI, ≥ 85th, and ≥ 95th percentile) [2]. Exclusion criteria included: children and adolescents with diabetes mellitus (both type I and II), secondary causes of obesity, psychiatric illness, mental disorders, with weight equal to or greater than 100 kilograms, as well as those who were receiving medications which promoted weight loss or gain or altered in a way the metabolic profile including glycemia.

The Institutional Review Board of the Antonio Nariño University and the Medical Ethics Committee at DEXA DIAB (CE-CC-00721) approved the study protocol. Written informed parental consent and child assent from participants were obtained before any research procedures. This study was carried out following the ethics committee code of the American Medical Association endorsed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [59].

Anthropometric assessment

Anthropometric measures were obtained using standard methods [60]. Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg on a calibrated digital scale without shoes and wearing light clothing. Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm on a stadiometer. To evaluate the nutritional status of children and adolescents, the BMI Z-score was used, according to the criteria proposed by the World Health Organization [2]. Waist circumference (WC) was measured via flexible measuring tape with an accuracy of 1 mm. The measurement was made with the subject standing, taken at the midpoint between the right lower costal ridge and the iliac crest, without skin compression from the measuring tape, and at the end of a normal expiration. BMI and waist-height were calculated as ratios. Skinfold thicknesses were assessed using a Harpenden Skinfold Calliper, according to a previous protocol [60]. The measurements were performed in triplicate at the non-dominant side on biceps, triceps, subscapular, and suprailiac to the nearest 0.1 mm, and the mean values were calculated [60].

The pubertal stage was assessed according to Tanner criteria [61]. Briefly, the participants were classified as pre-pubertal when they reached a pubertal state between 2–4 and post-pubertal in state 5.

Measurement of body composition by Dual X-ray Absorptiometry

Measurements of total and regional body composition were acquired using a Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan (GE Lunar Prodigy advance, GE Healthcare) by a trained technician. Before each acquisition, the scanner was calibrated according to the manufacturer's instructions. The total effective radiation dose during each examination was < 0.05 micro Sievert for a three-minute scan. For analysis, reference data for standard deviation scores were provided from GE Lunar Body composition software (enCORE 2010; version 11.3; GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA)

Biochemical analyses

Blood samples for laboratory analysis were collected by venipuncture from all participants after an overnight fast (10–12 hours). Participants underwent a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (1.75 g/kg, maximum 75 g) according to the American Diabetes Association criteria [62]. Fasting blood samples were obtained for fasting plasma glucose (FPG) insulin levels, total cholesterol, High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) VLDL-cholesterol (VLDL-c) and triglycerides (TG). IR was scored using the HOMA-IR index by calculating the product of fasting plasma insulin (U/mL) and fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) divided by 22.5. TG/HDL ratio was calculated as TG (mg/dL)/HDL (mg/dL) and android-gynoid percent fat ratio was calculated as android fat (%)/gynoid fat (%) (A/G %).

Gene expression analysis

Leukocyte total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA was quantified with a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies), and cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg ARN with the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat. # 4368814). Real-time PCR was performed in duplicate using CFX96 equipment (BioRad) and SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix, according to the manufacturer's protocol. PPAR-α, PPAR-β, PPAR-γ, incretins receptor genes GLP-1R and GIPR, and reference genes PGK1 and YWHAZ were quantitated using the gene-specific primers (Supplementary Table 1). cDNAs were amplified for 40 cycles consisting of 10 s of denaturation at 95 °C, 15 s of annealing temperature for each primer (Supplementary Table 1), and 10 s of extension at 72 °C. Standard curves for all genes were generated using serial dilutions of pooled cDNAs from all samples. Relative mRNA expression was calculated with the method ΔΔCt. Data are shown as normalized ratios between target gene expression and geometric media of the two reference genes [63]. All expression assays were performed following the MIQE guidelines [64].

Hormone and cytokine levels

Preprandial GIP and GLP1 levels were measured in serum using a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Elabscience, Cat. #E-EL-H2061 and E-EL-H6025) according to the procedures provided by the manufacturer. Levels were expressed in ng/mL and pg/mL. The presence of adiponectin, adipsin, RBP4, MCP-1, IL-1β, IP-10, IL-10, IL-8, leptin, IL-6, IFN-γ, resistin, and TNF-α in serum samples was analyzed using a multiplex immunoassay based on fluorescence-encoded beads according to the manufacturer's instructions (No. 40196, BioLegend). The acquisition was performed in an Accuri C6 flow cytometer. Off-line analysis was performed with LEGENDplex™ data analysis software (version 8.0), and the data were expressed as the mean reporter fluorescence intensity PE (MFI) as a function of concentration (pg/mL). Each assay was performed with two technical replicates.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 6. Descriptive statistics were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) whenever applicable, and variables were tested for normality by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Non-parametric tests were used whenever data were not normally distributed or Student t-test when data were normally distributed. We used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to assess the significance of inter-group differences. The correlation of target genes and evaluated parameters were determined using the Spearman rank test. For all analyses, statistical significance was considered as p < 0.05.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Antonio Nariño University and the Medical Ethics Committee at DEXA DIAB (CE-CC-00721). Written informed parental consent, and child assent from participants were obtained before any research procedures were conducted. This study was carried out in accordance with the ethics committee code of the American Medical Association endorsed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Funding

This study was supported by the Vicerrectoria de investigación (VCTI) from the Universidad Antonio Nariño grant No. 2017208 and 2018207.

Authors' contributions

KVS, JG, and MLB. conceived and designed the research; MLB, KVS, ABR, LV, YU, IB, HYL, and JG performed experiments; KVS, LV, YU, IB, and MLB, prepared figures and wrote the manuscript; MLB, and KVS analyzed data; MLB, and KVS edited, and all authors revised and approved the final manuscript version.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Rodrigo González for their comments of the manuscript and DEXA DIAB for the body composition analysis and facilities. This study was supported by the Vicerrectoría de investigación (VCTI) from the Universidad Antonio Nariño grant No. 2017208 and 2018207.

Arellano-Ruiz P, Garcia-Hermoso A, Cavero-Redondo I, Pozuelo-Carrascosa D, Martinez-Vizcaino V, Solera-Martinez M. Homeostasis Model Assessment cut-off points related to metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European journal of pediatrics. 2019.
World Health Organization. The WHO child growth standards: World Health Organization; 2012 [cited 2019 01-06-2019]. Available from: http://www.who.int/childgrowth/en.
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. Adolescent Health Services: Missing Opportunities.. Washington, DC: 2009.
NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128.9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2017;390(10113):2627–42.
Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar - ICBF MdSyPS-M. Instituto Nacional de Salud - INS, Departamento Administrativo para la Prosperidad Social Encuesta nacional de la situación nutricional ENSIN 2015. 2015.
Zimmet P, Alberti G, Kaufman F, Tajima N, Silink M, Arslanian S, et al. The metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. Lancet. 2007;369(9579):2059–61.
Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Kaufman F, Tajima N, Silink M, Arslanian S, et al. The metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents - an IDF consensus report. Pediatr Diabetes. 2007;8(5):299–306.
Perez-Martinez P, Alcala-Diaz JF, Delgado-Lista J, Garcia-Rios A, Gomez-Delgado F, Marin-Hinojosa C, et al. Metabolic phenotypes of obesity influence triglyceride and inflammation homoeostasis. Eur J Clin Invest. 2014;44(11):1053–64.
Langsted A, Freiberg JJ, Nordestgaard BG. Fasting and nonfasting lipid levels: influence of normal food intake on lipids, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins, and cardiovascular risk prediction. Circulation. 2008;118(20):2047–56.
Kersten S. Regulation of nutrient metabolism and inflammation. Result Probl Cell Differ. 2010;52:13–25.
Wahli W, Michalik L. PPARs at the crossroads of lipid signaling and inflammation. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2012;23(7):351–63.
Li TT, Tan TB, Hou HQ, Zhao XY. Changes in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha target gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Lipids Health Dis. 2018;17(1):256.
Bishop-Bailey D, Bystrom J. Emerging roles of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-beta/delta in inflammation. Pharmacol Ther. 2009;124(2):141–50.
Varga T, Czimmerer Z, Nagy L. PPARs are a unique set of fatty acid regulated transcription factors controlling both lipid metabolism and inflammation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1812(8):1007–22.
Monsalve FA, Pyarasani RD, Delgado-Lopez F, Moore-Carrasco R. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor targets for the treatment of metabolic diseases. Mediat Inflamm. 2013;2013:549627.
Hogan AE, Tobin AM, Ahern T, Corrigan MA, Gaoatswe G, Jackson R, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and the regulation of human invariant natural killer T cells: lessons from obesity, diabetes and psoriasis. Diabetologia. 2011;54(11):2745–54.
Holst JJ. The physiology of glucagon-like peptide 1. Physiological reviews. 2007;87(4):1409–39.
Suarez-Pinzon WL, Power RF, Yan Y, Wasserfall C, Atkinson M, Rabinovitch A. Combination therapy with glucagon-like peptide-1 and gastrin restores normoglycemia in diabetic NOD mice. Diabetes. 2008;57(12):3281–8.
Onuma H, Inukai K, Kitahara A, Moriya R, Nishida S, Tanaka T, et al. The glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist enhances intrinsic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activity in endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;451(2):339–44.
Institute NHLaB. Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents. National Institutes of Health 2012(12-7486A).
Garcia Cuartero B, Garcia Lacalle C, Jimenez Lobo C, Gonzalez Vergaz A, Calvo Rey C, Alcazar Villar MJ, et al. [The HOMA and QUICKI indexes, and insulin and C-peptide levels in healthy children. Cut off points to identify metabolic syndrome in healthy children]. Anales de pediatria. 2007;66(5):481–90.
Crujeiras AB, Parra D, Milagro FI, Goyenechea E, Larrarte E, Margareto J, et al. Differential expression of oxidative stress and inflammation related genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in response to a low-calorie diet: a nutrigenomics study. Omics: a journal of integrative biology. 2008;12(4):251–61.
Luquet S, Lopez-Soriano J, Holst D, Fredenrich A, Melki J, Rassoulzadegan M, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta controls muscle development and oxidative capability. FASEB journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2003;17(15):2299–301.
Neels JG, Grimaldi PA. Physiological functions of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta. Physiological reviews. 2014;94(3):795–858.
Wang YX, Lee CH, Tiep S, Yu RT, Ham J, Kang H, et al. Peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor delta activates fat metabolism to prevent obesity. Cell. 2003;113(2):159–70.
Riserus U, Sprecher D, Johnson T, Olson E, Hirschberg S, Liu A, et al. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)delta promotes reversal of multiple metabolic abnormalities, reduces oxidative stress, and increases fatty acid oxidation in moderately obese men. Diabetes. 2008;57(2):332–9.
Le Garf S, Murdaca J, Mothe-Satney I, Sibille B, Le Menn G, Chinetti G, et al. Complementary Immunometabolic Effects of Exercise and PPARbeta/delta Agonist in the Context of Diet-Induced Weight Loss in Obese Female Mice. International journal of molecular sciences. 2019;20(20).
Mothe-Satney I, Murdaca J, Sibille B, Rousseau AS, Squillace R, Le Menn G, et al. A role for Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Beta in T cell development. Scientific reports. 2016;6:34317.
Howie D, Ten Bokum A, Necula AS, Cobbold SP, Waldmann H. The Role of Lipid Metabolism in T Lymphocyte Differentiation and Survival. Frontiers in immunology. 2017;8:1949.
Hoch M, Eberle AN, Peterli R, Peters T, Seboek D, Keller U, et al. LPS induces interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 but not tumor necrosis factor-alpha in human adipocytes. Cytokine. 2008;41(1):29–37.
Kim CS, Park HS, Kawada T, Kim JH, Lim D, Hubbard NE, et al. Circulating levels of MCP-1 and IL-8 are elevated in human obese subjects and associated with obesity-related parameters. Int J Obes. 2006;30(9):1347–55.
Long X, Ye Y, Zhang L, Liu P, Yu W, Wei F, et al. IL-8, a novel messenger to cross-link inflammation and tumor EMT via autocrine and paracrine pathways (Review). Int J Oncol. 2016;48(1):5–12.
Kunicka Z, Kurzynska A, Szydlowska A, Kaczynska B, Bogacka I. PPARbeta/delta ligands regulate the expression of immune response mediators in the porcine endometrium - An in vitro study. Theriogenology. 2019;134:112–20.
Meissner M, Hrgovic I, Doll M, Naidenow J, Reichenbach G, Hailemariam-Jahn T, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {delta} activators induce IL-8 expression in nonstimulated endothelial cells in a transcriptional and posttranscriptional manner. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(44):33797–804.
Naidenow J, Hrgovic I, Doll M, Hailemariam-Jahn T, Lang V, Kleemann J, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha and delta activators induce ICAM-1 expression in quiescent non stimulated endothelial cells. Journal of inflammation. 2016;13:27.
Odegaard JI, Ricardo-Gonzalez RR, Red Eagle A, Vats D, Morel CR, Goforth MH, et al. Alternative M2 activation of Kupffer cells by PPARdelta ameliorates obesity-induced insulin resistance. Cell Metabol. 2008;7(6):496–507.
Lichtenstein L, Mattijssen F, de Wit NJ, Georgiadi A, Hooiveld GJ, van der Meer R, et al. Angptl4 protects against severe proinflammatory effects of saturated fat by inhibiting fatty acid uptake into mesenteric lymph node macrophages. Cell Metabol. 2010;12(6):580–92.
Grygiel-Gorniak B. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and their ligands: nutritional and clinical implications–a review. Nutrition journal. 2014;13:17.
Rakhshandehroo M, Hooiveld G, Muller M, Kersten S. Comparative analysis of gene regulation by the transcription factor PPARalpha between mouse and human. PloS one. 2009;4(8):e6796.
Cariou B, Hanf R, Lambert-Porcheron S, Zair Y, Sauvinet V, Noel B, et al. Dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha/delta agonist GFT505 improves hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity in abdominally obese subjects. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(10):2923–30.
Fruchart JC. Selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulators (SPPARMalpha): the next generation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha-agonists. Cardiovascular diabetology. 2013;12:82.
Marx N, Kehrle B, Kohlhammer K, Grub M, Koenig W, Hombach V, et al. PPAR activators as antiinflammatory mediators in human T lymphocytes: implications for atherosclerosis and transplantation-associated arteriosclerosis. Circulation research. 2002;90(6):703–10.
Robinson E, Grieve DJ. Significance of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in the cardiovascular system in health and disease. Pharmacol Ther. 2009;122(3):246–63.
Marx N, Duez H, Fruchart JC, Staels B. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and atherogenesis: regulators of gene expression in vascular cells. Circulation research. 2004;94(9):1168–78.
Magliano DC, Bargut TC, de Carvalho SN, Aguila MB, Mandarim-de-Lacerda CA, Souza-Mello V. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-alpha and gamma are targets to treat offspring from maternal diet-induced obesity in mice. PloS one. 2013;8(5):e64258.
Sadeghabadi ZA, Nourbakhsh M, Alaee M, Larijani B, Razzaghy-Azar M. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and angiopoietin-like protein 4 levels in obese children and adolescents. J Endocrinol Investig. 2018;41(2):241–7.
McLaughlin T, Abbasi F, Cheal K, Chu J, Lamendola C, Reaven G. Use of metabolic markers to identify overweight individuals who are insulin resistant. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(10):802–9.
Giannini C, Santoro N, Caprio S, Kim G, Lartaud D, Shaw M, et al. The triglyceride-to-HDL cholesterol ratio: association with insulin resistance in obese youths of different ethnic backgrounds. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(8):1869–74.
Behiry EG, El Nady NM, AbdEl Haie OM, Mattar MK, Magdy A. Evaluation of TG-HDL Ratio Instead of HOMA Ratio as Insulin Resistance Marker in Overweight and Children with Obesity. Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets. 2019;19(5):676–82.
Fruchart JC. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARalpha): at the crossroads of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 2009;205(1):1–8.
Guilherme A, Virbasius JV, Puri V, Czech MP. Adipocyte dysfunctions linking obesity to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2008;9(5):367–77.
Rodriguez-Hernandez H, Simental-Mendia LE, Rodriguez-Ramirez G, Reyes-Romero MA. Obesity and inflammation: epidemiology, risk factors, and markers of inflammation. International journal of endocrinology. 2013;2013:678159.
Francisco V, Pino J, Campos-Cabaleiro V, Ruiz-Fernandez C, Mera A, Gonzalez-Gay MA, et al. Obesity, Fat Mass and Immune System: Role for Leptin. Frontiers in physiology. 2018;9:640.
Oh TJ, Shin JY, Kang GH, Park KS, Cho YM. Effect of the combination of metformin and fenofibrate on glucose homeostasis in diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats. Exp Mol Med. 2013;45:e30.
Hadjiyanni I, Siminovitch KA, Danska JS, Drucker DJ. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor signalling selectively regulates murine lymphocyte proliferation and maintenance of peripheral regulatory T cells. Diabetologia. 2010;53(4):730–40.
Marx N, Burgmaier M, Heinz P, Ostertag M, Hausauer A, Bach H, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1(1–37) inhibits chemokine-induced migration of human CD4-positive lymphocytes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010;67(20):3549–55.
Arakawa M, Mita T, Azuma K, Ebato C, Goto H, Nomiyama T, et al. Inhibition of monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells and attenuation of atherosclerotic lesion by a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, exendin-4. Diabetes. 2010;59(4):1030–7.
Tanaka M, Matsuo Y, Yamakage H, Masuda S, Terada Y, Muranaka K, et al. Differential effects of GLP-1 receptor agonist on foam cell formation in monocytes between non-obese and obese subjects. Metab Clin Exp. 2016;65(2):1–11.
Riddick FA. Jr. The code of medical ethics of the american medical association. The Ochsner journal. 2003;5(2):6–10.
Lohman TGRA, Martorell R. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual1988.
Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH. Clinical longitudinal standards for height, weight, height velocity, weight velocity, and stages of puberty. Arch Dis Child. 1976;51(3):170–9.
American Diabetes A. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2014. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(Suppl 1):14–80.
Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, et al. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clinical chemistry. 2009;55(4):611–22.
Willems E, Leyns L, Vandesompele J. Standardization of real-time PCR gene expression data from independent biological replicates. Anal Biochem. 2008;379(1):127–9.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 31 Oct, 2020

Read the published version in Journal of Inflammation →

Review #2 received at journal
07 Sep, 2020
Editorial decision: Major revision
07 Sep, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
27 Aug, 2020
Review #1 received at journal
27 Aug, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
20 Aug, 2020
Reviewers invited by journal
18 Aug, 2020
Editor assigned by journal
23 Jul, 2020
First submitted to journal
22 Jul, 2020
Submission checks completed at journal
22 Jul, 2020
Editor invited by journal
22 Jul, 2020

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

PPARα and PPARβ/δ Expression is Associated with Proinflammatory Markers in an Obese Pediatric Population

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Background

Results

Conclusions

Figures

Background

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Materials And Methods

Participants

Anthropometric assessment

Measurement of body composition by Dual X-ray Absorptiometry

Biochemical analyses

Gene expression analysis

Hormone and cytokine levels

Statistical analysis

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Funding

Authors' contributions

Acknowledgments

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1